https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/flexible-foam-and-comfort-applications-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Flexible Foam & Comfort Applications
Flexible polyurethane foam patents: who holds the ground and where it is still open
  • 37.8% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees together account for 650 of the 1,719 records in scope — a field with a defined core group, not a fragmented one.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2019 peak. Activity ran from 43 records in 2017 to a peak of 54 in 2019, then fell from 36 in 2021 to 12 in 2024 — a 67% drop over that three-year span.
  • Condensation-polymer chemistry dominates the claims. C08G appears in 85.2% of all records, meaning most protection sits on core polyol/isocyanate chemistry rather than downstream shaping or additive work.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,719
Published Records
38%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-67%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (36 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,719 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape covers flexible polyurethane foam and moulded foam patents that touch on comfort-critical performance properties: hardness, hysteresis, cell opening, emission of volatiles, demould time, density reduction and fatigue durability. These are the properties that separate a foam grade fit for automotive seating or bedding from one that is not, and they show up repeatedly in claim language across the corpus.

The 1,719 records in scope span filings from 2015 through the current data cut-off, with publication activity concentrated in the mid-2010s through early 2020s. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart understate real filing activity and should be read with that in mind.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1AGC INC210
  2. 2HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL LLC182
  3. 3DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC125
  4. 4BASF SE75
  5. 5RECTICEL NV SA58
  6. 6THE DOW CHEM CO56
  7. 7TOSOH CORP52
  8. 8AIR PROD & CHEM INC51
  9. 9HUNTSMAN ICI CHEM LLC50
  10. 10MITSUI CHEMICALS INC47
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Foam and Comfort Applications covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,719 records: how filing activity has moved year on year, and how it distributes across IPC subclasses. Both use the full record set as their denominator.

Filing trend: a 2019 peak followed by a real pullback

Records rose from 43 in 2017 to a peak of 54 in 2019, then declined to 36 by 2021 and to 12 by 2024 — a 67% fall over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in under the publication lag and should not be read as a continuation of that decline on their own.

Filing trend: a 2019 peak followed by a real pullback015304560432017201854201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition: chemistry-heavy, shaping and additives secondary

C08G (condensation polymers) touches 85.2% of records, with C08J (polymer processing) at 34.1% and C08L (polymer compositions) at 15.0% well behind. Shaping (B29C, 9.1%) and additive use (C08K, 7.8%) are present but comparatively thin, and seating-specific art (A47C, 3.7%) is a small fraction of the whole — each record can carry more than one class, so these shares add up past 100%.

IPC composition: chemistry-heavy, shaping and additives secondaryC08G · Condensation polymers1,46485.2%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions58634.1%C08L · Polymer compositions25715.0%B29C · Shaping of plastics1569.1%C08K · Use of additives in polymers1347.8%A47C · Chairs, sofas & beds633.7%B29K · Plastics moulding materials (i…412.4%B32B · Layered products & laminates412.4%Other43725.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,719 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Foam and Comfort Applications covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Flexible Foam and Comfort Applications with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about flexible foam and comfort applications and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
US20190185667A12019-06-20

US20190185667A1 — Polyol composition for molding flexible polyurethane foam, and flexible polyurethane foam

TOSOH CORPORATION

The application addresses a specific formulation problem: keeping a polyol composition stable over time even when a large amount of water is blended in, while still producing a low-density, fatigue-durable flexible foam. The route claimed combines a polyol component, catalyst, foam stabiliser, foaming agent and a compatibilizing agent — specifically an anionic surfactant carrying an alkali-metal-salt hydrophilic portion paired with an aromatic or otherwise structured hydrophobic portion.Filed by Tosoh Corporation, published 2019-06-20.

View full filing
Highest-citation records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5348778ASandwich elements in the form of slabs, shells and the like481
2US5145883AMethods for producing polyether ester polyols and polyurethanes264
3EP1678232A2Flexible polyurethane foams prepared using modified vegetable oil-based polyols232
4WO2005033167A2Flexible polyurethane foams prepared using modified vegetable oil-based polyols180
5US20070221890A1Phosphorus Containing Compounds Useful for Making Halogen-Free, Ignition-Resistant Polymer157
6WO2003016372A1Process to manufacture flexible polyurethane foams145
7US20050070620A1Flexible polyurethane foams prepared using modified vegetable oil-based polyols123
8US5194453AMethod for the manufacture of flexible polyurethane foam117
9US6922863B2Adjustable foam mattress107
10US5124369AProcess for preparing soft flexible polyurethane foams and a polyol composition useful in said process96

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within this searched corpus — read them as a measure of influence on subsequent filers, not as a signal of which patents matter most today.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Foam and Comfort Applications covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the data indicates for filing strategy

Three read-outs from the concentration, class and citation figures above, translated into what they mean for someone deciding where to file next.

Concentration
37.8% / top 5
of 1,719 records

A defined core, not a fragmented field

The top five assignees hold 650 of the 1,719 records in scope, and the top ten extend that to 906, or 52.7%. That leaves a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants competing for the remaining claim space outside the core chemistry.

Based on the full 100-company ranking
Chemistry weight
85.2% C08G
of all records

Core polyol/isocyanate chemistry is the densest ground

C08G's presence in 85.2% of records means most active claims sit on condensation-polymer chemistry itself, ahead of processing (C08J, 34.1%) and formulation (C08L, 15.0%). New entrants attempting a chemistry-first claim are filing into the most crowded part of the field.

IPC subclass shares, multi-label records
Filing momentum
-67%
2021 → 2024

Activity has pulled back from its 2019 peak

Filings ran 36 in 2021 down to 12 in 2024, a real decline over a three-year window that is fully published. That is a genuine cooling in a field that peaked at 54 records in 2019, not an artefact of the publication lag — though the very latest years are still filling in.

2021–2024 complete-year comparison
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to flexible foam and comfort applications, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Foam and Comfort Applications covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The ranked leaders sit atop a long tail: 100 companies appear in the assignee ranking, but more than half of all activity concentrates in the top ten. Recent-year momentum among the historically largest filers has slowed to near zero, which changes who to watch going forward.

Leader
210 records
single largest filer

One assignee holds a clear lead

The leading assignee's 210 records sit well above fifth place at 58 and tenth place at 47, marking a steep drop-off rather than a gradual one. That gap is the clearest sign of where defensive filing has been heaviest.

Leader vs. fifth and tenth place
Mid-tier
58 → 47
fifth to tenth place

A tighter cluster below the leader

Positions five through ten sit close together, 58 down to 47 records, suggesting a group of comparably active filers rather than a second dominant player. This is the tier most likely to shift with a few years of renewed filing.

Ranking positions 5–10
Momentum
0 latest year
across historic leaders

Historic leaders show no recent-year filings

Several of the largest historic assignees show zero records in the latest year of this dataset. Given the publication lag, this does not necessarily mean these firms have stopped innovating — it may mean their newest filings have not published yet — but it does mean the visible pipeline from the traditional leaders has gone quiet for now.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with comparatively thin IPC representation relative to the core chemistry classes
Cell-opening control agentsLow-emission volatile-suppression additivesFatigue-durability testing methodsSeating-integrated foam laminatesDensity-reduction foaming agents
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
AGC Inc.0
Huntsman International LLC0
Dow Global Technologies LLC0
BASF SE0
Recticel NV SA0
Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI)0
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.0
The Dow Chemical Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Foam and Comfort Applications covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The figures above describe the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going claim by claim.

Map claims against the core chemistry classes

With 85.2% of records touching C08G, a chemistry-first filing needs a clause-level comparison against the densest prior art, not just a class-level check.

Explore claims in Eureka

Track the quiet leaders

Historic top filers show zero records in the latest year; confirming whether that is a real slowdown or a publication-lag gap needs a pipeline watch, not a snapshot.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Test the white-space chips against your own formulation

Cell-opening control, low-emission additive systems and fatigue-durability testing methods show thinner IPC coverage than the core chemistry — worth a targeted search before assuming the space is open.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Foam and Comfort Applications covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on flexible foam patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Foam and Comfort Applications covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Flexible Foam and Comfort Applications in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole flexible foam and comfort applications corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.