Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This review tracks 234 published records filed against unbonded flexible pipe, flexible pipe carcass, and flexible riser layer terminology, cross-referenced against annulus venting, helical wire winding, wire layer fatigue, end fitting swaging, polymer barrier layer, and crush collapse resistance concepts. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, capturing both the design of the layered pipe body and the instrumentation used to test and monitor it in service.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend chart understate actual filing activity rather than reflecting a genuine slowdown.
Two views of the same 234-record corpus: filings by year, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry.
Filings rose to a peak of 11 in 2017 and have run lower since; the final year shown is partial because of publication lag, so it should not be read as a drop in activity.
F16L (pipes and pipe fittings) appears in 62.4% of the 234 records, with G01M testing structures at 30.3% and G01N material analysis at 22.6%. Because a record can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the record total.
Shares are the percentage of the 234 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about flexible pipe and riser layer design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaAn elongate tape element, a flexible pipe body and method of producing a flexible pipe body are disclosed. The tape element has a cross-sectional profile comprising a body portion for being positioned between collapse resistant tape windings such that each body portion lies at least partially in a gap between adjacent collapse resistant tape windings; and at least one wing portion extending from an end region of the body portion, the at least one wing portion configured to span the gap and respectively abut with a radially inner surface of an adjacent collapse resistant tape winding.Filed by Baker Hughes Energy Technology UK Limited, published 2018-07-10.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20110153225A1 | In-line composition and volumetric analysis of vent gases and flooding of the annular space of flexible pipe | 60 |
| 2 | WO2014167346A1 | Elongate tape element and method | 23 |
| 3 | US20140069542A1 | Detection apparatus and method | 20 |
| 4 | EP2706338A1 | Detection apparatus and method | 15 |
| 5 | EP2653288A1 | Method of producing a flexible pipe body, and flexible pipe body so produced | 14 |
| 6 | US20130276931A1 | Flexible pipe body and method of producing same | 13 |
| 7 | US20170023435A1 | In-Line Composition and Volumetric Analysis of Vent Gases and Flooding of the Annular Space of Flexible Pipe | 12 |
| 8 | US9574690B2 | Sleeve member, end fitting assembly and method of assembly of flexible pipe | 12 |
| 9 | WO2014001236A1 | Intermediate sealing for ultradeep water applications | 11 |
| 10 | WO2014001237A1 | Assembly and seal test | 11 |
Ranked by citation count within this corpus; older records accumulate citations for longer, so treat this as a signal of influence rather than current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the trend, composition and citation data.
The leading assignee's 142 records against a fifth-place figure of 4 means the layer-design core of this field is effectively owned by a single filer, with the rest of the ranked leaders holding a long tail. A new entrant should assume any core carcass or armor-layer claim overlaps this filer's estate before assuming open ground.
F16L's 62.4% share and G01M's 30.3% share show that both the physical pipe structure and the test/monitoring apparatus around it are heavily claimed. B21D sheet-metal working at 9.0% and B21C metal extrusion at 6.4% are comparatively thin, suggesting the manufacturing-process side of layer fabrication carries less claim pressure than the structural design side.
None of the tracked assignees show filings in the latest year, and the 2017 peak of 11 has not been repeated since. Combined with the publication lag on recent years, this points to a mature, consolidated claim landscape rather than an actively expanding one.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to flexible pipe and riser layer design, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders are dominated by one group of related entities, with co-filing patterns pointing to joint development work rather than open competition.
At 142 records against a fifth-place count of 4, this filer's estate is the first place to check freedom-to-operate for any carcass, armor-layer or barrier-layer design. Its strongest co-assignee pairing, at 9 shared filings, points to a long-running joint filing relationship rather than a one-off collaboration.
From fifth place at 4 records down to tenth at 1, the remaining ranked assignees each hold a narrow slice of the field. This is consistent with a market where a handful of oilfield-services majors dominate core layer-design IP while smaller filers patent specific fittings or test methods.
Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest pairing by far involves the two leading related entities. This suggests most filings are single-assignee efforts, with joint filings reserved for closely affiliated corporate structures rather than arm's-length partnerships.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| General Electric Oil & Gas UK Limited | 0 | — |
| Wellstream International Limited | 0 | — |
| Baker Hughes Energy Technology UK Limited | 0 | — |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation | 0 | — |
| POLYFLOW LLC | 0 | — |
| Schlumberger Holdings Limited | 0 | — |
| GRAHAM GEOFFREY STEPHEN | 0 | — |
| Prad Research and Development Limited | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a consolidated core with narrow open branches around manufacturing process claims.
With 142 of 234 records held by one assignee, any new carcass, armor-layer or venting design should be checked claim-by-claim against that estate before development spend commits to a layer geometry.
Explore the leading assignee's portfolio in EurekaSheet-metal carcass forming and extrusion-based barrier layer fabrication carry lighter IPC coverage than the structural pipe-body classes, and may offer more room for a defensible first claim.
Run a white-space search in EurekaOne assignee dominates this field, holding 142 of the 234 records in scope, compared with just 4 for the fifth-ranked filer and 1 for the tenth. That gap means the core layer-architecture claim space — carcass, armor layer, and barrier layer design — is concentrated in a single corporate group rather than spread across competitors. Any competitive analysis should treat this filer's estate as the reference point for freedom-to-operate checks, not just one entry among many.
Filing peaked at 11 records in 2017 and has not returned to that level since, with the most recent tracked year showing no filings from the major assignees. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one or two years in any dataset understate real activity, so this should not be read as the field going dormant. It does suggest the core structural claims were largely staked out by the mid-2010s, with newer work concentrating on narrower refinements.
US10018289B2, filed by Baker Hughes Energy Technology UK Limited and published 2018-07-10, claims an elongate tape element with a specific cross-sectional profile: a body portion sitting in the gap between adjacent collapse-resistant tape windings, plus a wing portion that spans that gap and abuts the inner surface of the neighbouring winding. It blocks tape-element designs that use this gap-spanning wing geometry to reinforce collapse-resistant windings, which is a specific mechanical solution rather than a claim over collapse-resistant tape winding as a general concept. Designers using a different gap-bridging geometry, or a different fixation method between windings, would sit outside this specific claim.
F16L, covering pipes and pipe fittings, appears in 62.4% of the 234 records in scope, making it the single densest class. G01M testing-structure classes follow at 30.3%, and G01N material analysis and testing at 22.6%, reflecting how much of this field's patenting covers not just the pipe body but the apparatus used to test and monitor it. Manufacturing-process classes such as B21D sheet-metal working (9.0%) and B21C metal extrusion (6.4%) carry noticeably lighter coverage, which is where new process-side claims may have more room.
The thinnest coverage relative to the core structural classes sits in manufacturing-process areas: sheet-metal carcass forming (B21D at 9.0% of records), metal extrusion and drawing (B21C at 6.4%), and polymer processing for barrier layers (C08J at 6.4%). These are process-side claims rather than structural-layer claims, and a first claim there would likely need to specify a distinct forming or extrusion sequence rather than a new layer geometry, since the geometry space is already densely claimed by the leading assignee.
Go past this page: query the whole flexible pipe and riser layer design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.