https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/flexible-pipe-and-riser-layer-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Downhole Materials & Nonmetallic Pipe
Flexible pipe and riser layer design patents: who holds the layer architecture
  • One filer dominates. The leading assignee accounts for 142 of the 234 records in scope, far ahead of the fifth-ranked filer at 4.
  • Filing has cooled since 2017. The peak year on record is 2017 at 11 filings, with the latest complete years running lower — publication lag means the most recent year always understates true activity.
  • Claim density sits in pipe fittings and testing. F16L covers 62.4% of the 234 records and G01M testing structures cover 30.3%, showing where prior art is thickest.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
234
Published Records
EP
Leading Jurisdiction
10
Active Filers Ranked
2017
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review tracks 234 published records filed against unbonded flexible pipe, flexible pipe carcass, and flexible riser layer terminology, cross-referenced against annulus venting, helical wire winding, wire layer fatigue, end fitting swaging, polymer barrier layer, and crush collapse resistance concepts. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, capturing both the design of the layered pipe body and the instrumentation used to test and monitor it in service.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend chart understate actual filing activity rather than reflecting a genuine slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1General Electric Oil & Gas UK Limited142
  2. 2Wellstream International Limited64
  3. 3Baker Hughes Energy Technology UK Limited24
  4. 4Schlumberger Technology Corporation4
  5. 5POLYFLOW LLC4
  6. 6Schlumberger Holdings Limited3
  7. 7GRAHAM GEOFFREY STEPHEN3
  8. 8Prad Research and Development Limited1
  9. 9Schlumberger Canada Limited1
  10. 10Schlumberger Limited1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Pipe and Riser Layer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 234-record corpus: filings by year, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry.

Filing trend

Filings rose to a peak of 11 in 2017 and have run lower since; the final year shown is partial because of publication lag, so it should not be read as a drop in activity.

Filing trend0369121120172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition

F16L (pipes and pipe fittings) appears in 62.4% of the 234 records, with G01M testing structures at 30.3% and G01N material analysis at 22.6%. Because a record can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the record total.

IPC compositionF16L · Pipes & pipe fittings14662.4%G01M · Testing machine & structure ba…7130.3%G01N · Material analysis & testing5322.6%B29C · Shaping of plastics4017.1%B21D · Sheet-metal working219.0%B32B · Layered products & laminates187.7%B21C · Metal extrusion & drawing156.4%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions156.4%Other5322.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 234 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Pipe and Riser Layer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Flexible Pipe and Riser Layer Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about flexible pipe and riser layer design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing

Representative Record
US10018289B22018-07-10

Elongate tape element and method (US10018289B2)

BAKER HUGHES ENERGY TECHNOLOGY UK LIMITED

An elongate tape element, a flexible pipe body and method of producing a flexible pipe body are disclosed. The tape element has a cross-sectional profile comprising a body portion for being positioned between collapse resistant tape windings such that each body portion lies at least partially in a gap between adjacent collapse resistant tape windings; and at least one wing portion extending from an end region of the body portion, the at least one wing portion configured to span the gap and respectively abut with a radially inner surface of an adjacent collapse resistant tape winding.Filed by Baker Hughes Energy Technology UK Limited, published 2018-07-10.

US10018289B2 — patent drawing 1US10018289B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20110153225A1In-line composition and volumetric analysis of vent gases and flooding of the annular space of flexible pipe60
2WO2014167346A1Elongate tape element and method23
3US20140069542A1Detection apparatus and method20
4EP2706338A1Detection apparatus and method15
5EP2653288A1Method of producing a flexible pipe body, and flexible pipe body so produced14
6US20130276931A1Flexible pipe body and method of producing same13
7US20170023435A1In-Line Composition and Volumetric Analysis of Vent Gases and Flooding of the Annular Space of Flexible Pipe12
8US9574690B2Sleeve member, end fitting assembly and method of assembly of flexible pipe12
9WO2014001236A1Intermediate sealing for ultradeep water applications11
10WO2014001237A1Assembly and seal test11

Ranked by citation count within this corpus; older records accumulate citations for longer, so treat this as a signal of influence rather than current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Pipe and Riser Layer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, composition and citation data.

Concentration
142 of 234 records
leading assignee's share of records

One filer holds the architecture, not just a share of it

The leading assignee's 142 records against a fifth-place figure of 4 means the layer-design core of this field is effectively owned by a single filer, with the rest of the ranked leaders holding a long tail. A new entrant should assume any core carcass or armor-layer claim overlaps this filer's estate before assuming open ground.

Assignee ranking, 10 companies
Claim density
62.4% F16L
of 234 records

Pipe fittings claims are the densest prior art

F16L's 62.4% share and G01M's 30.3% share show that both the physical pipe structure and the test/monitoring apparatus around it are heavily claimed. B21D sheet-metal working at 9.0% and B21C metal extrusion at 6.4% are comparatively thin, suggesting the manufacturing-process side of layer fabrication carries less claim pressure than the structural design side.

IPC composition, 234 records
Momentum
Peak 11 in 2017
filings in the peak year

Activity has not returned to its 2017 peak

None of the tracked assignees show filings in the latest year, and the 2017 peak of 11 has not been repeated since. Combined with the publication lag on recent years, this points to a mature, consolidated claim landscape rather than an actively expanding one.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to flexible pipe and riser layer design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Pipe and Riser Layer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where they overlap

The ranked leaders are dominated by one group of related entities, with co-filing patterns pointing to joint development work rather than open competition.

Leader
142 records
of 234 in scope

The dominant filer sets the boundary for new claims

At 142 records against a fifth-place count of 4, this filer's estate is the first place to check freedom-to-operate for any carcass, armor-layer or barrier-layer design. Its strongest co-assignee pairing, at 9 shared filings, points to a long-running joint filing relationship rather than a one-off collaboration.

Assignee ranking
Long tail
4 to 1 records
fifth through tenth place

The rest of the ranking is thin

From fifth place at 4 records down to tenth at 1, the remaining ranked assignees each hold a narrow slice of the field. This is consistent with a market where a handful of oilfield-services majors dominate core layer-design IP while smaller filers patent specific fittings or test methods.

Assignee ranking, 10 companies
Co-filing
8 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-assignee activity is limited and concentrated

Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest pairing by far involves the two leading related entities. This suggests most filings are single-assignee efforts, with joint filings reserved for closely affiliated corporate structures rather than arm's-length partnerships.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches carry comparatively thin IPC coverage relative to the core pipe-body and testing classes.
sheet-metal carcass forming methodsextrusion-based barrier layer fabricationpolymer processing for barrier layerslayered laminate bonding at end fittings
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
General Electric Oil & Gas UK Limited0
Wellstream International Limited0
Baker Hughes Energy Technology UK Limited0
Schlumberger Technology Corporation0
POLYFLOW LLC0
Schlumberger Holdings Limited0
GRAHAM GEOFFREY STEPHEN0
Prad Research and Development Limited0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Pipe and Riser Layer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a consolidated core with narrow open branches around manufacturing process claims.

Map freedom-to-operate against the leading filer

With 142 of 234 records held by one assignee, any new carcass, armor-layer or venting design should be checked claim-by-claim against that estate before development spend commits to a layer geometry.

Explore the leading assignee's portfolio in Eureka

Test the under-claimed manufacturing branches

Sheet-metal carcass forming and extrusion-based barrier layer fabrication carry lighter IPC coverage than the structural pipe-body classes, and may offer more room for a defensible first claim.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Pipe and Riser Layer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on flexible pipe and riser layer patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flexible Pipe and Riser Layer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Flexible Pipe and Riser Layer Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole flexible pipe and riser layer design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.