Book a demo

Float Glass Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Float Glass Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/float-glass-manufacturing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Glass Processing
Float Glass Manufacturing Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
  • Filings have cooled since a 2019 peak of 74, with the most recent full year sitting well below that mark — a maturing claim space rather than a growing one.
  • China dominates the filing map with 571 records, more than double the United States' 243, putting most of the newest tin-bath and defect-detection art on Chinese registers first.
  • A single glassmaking group anchors ten of the ten tracked co-assignee pairs, showing manufacturing-network filing rather than cross-company joint development.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,177
Published Records
23%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+29%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (42 records) with 2024 (54) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,177 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the float glass patent record actually shows

Float glass manufacturing patenting concentrates on three linked problems: keeping the tin bath stable enough to hold thickness uniformity, cutting the melting energy a furnace consumes per tonne of glass, and catching defect inclusions before a sheet leaves the annealing lehr. The search set spans 2015 through mid-2026 and returns 1,177 patent families once continuation and multi-jurisdiction duplicates are collapsed to the family level. That family count is the fairer measure of real invention activity than raw document counts, since it strips out the filing noise that comes from chasing the same idea through multiple patent offices.

Filing activity rose through the back half of the 2010s, peaked in 2019, and has since drifted down toward single digits in the most recent partial year — though any read of the last 18 months understates true filing volume, since publication lags filing by roughly that long.

Annual filings, 2017–2026
  1. 1AGC INC59
  2. 2LG CHEM LTD57
  3. 3PPG IND INC55
  4. 4PILKINGTON GRP LTD50
  5. 5AGC GLASS EUROPE SA50
  6. 6CSG HOLDING CO LTD46
  7. 7CHINA TRIUMPH INT ENG CO LTD41
  8. 8GUARDIAN GLASS LLC41
  9. 9PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC37
  10. 10BENGBU CHINA OPTOELECTRONIC TECH CO LTD31
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Float Glass Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,177-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the bulk of the claim language.

A 2019 peak followed by a steady decline

Filings ran from 44 in 2017 to a peak of 74 in 2019, sat at 57 by the 2022 midpoint, and have fallen since — a pattern consistent with a technology whose core mechanical and chemical claims are largely staked out rather than one still opening new ground.

A 2019 peak followed by a steady decline020406080442017201874201920202021202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

C03B carries the case; C03C and adjacent classes trail

C03B (glass manufacture and shaping) covers 1,115 of the 1,177 records, effectively the whole set, with C03C (glass and enamel compositions) a distant second at 268. Smaller counts in B32B laminates, C23C coatings, B01J catalytic processes and G01N testing mark where float glass claims spill into adjacent processing and quality-control disciplines.

C03B carries the case; C03C and adjacent classes trailC03B · Glass manufacture & shaping1,11594.7%C03C · Glass & enamel compositions26822.8%B32B · Layered products & laminates443.7%C23C · Coating & surface deposition403.4%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …342.9%G01N · Material analysis & testing232.0%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories151.3%H01L · Semiconductor devices121.0%Other19116.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,177 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Float Glass Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Float Glass Manufacturing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about float glass manufacturing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents other filings build on

Representative Filing
US10753883B22020-08-25

Method and system for detecting inclusions in float glass (US10753883B2)

GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC

The patent describes detecting nickel-sulfide and similar inclusions in soda-lime-silica float glass during or after the float process, using an intense visible-light source and thermal imaging to spot the temperature difference between an inclusion and the surrounding glass as the sheet cools through the annealing lehr.Assignee: Guardian Glass, LLC. Filed process covers detection after tin-bath forming and through lehr cooling.

US10753883B2 — patent drawing 1US10753883B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4746347APatterned float glass method398
2US6027766APhotocatalytically-activated self-cleaning article and method of making same287
3US6846760B2Flat float glass197
4US3660061ACoated glass sheet and method for making the same158
5US20020023463A1Flat float glass142
6US4859636AChemically strengthened glass article formed of float glass116
7US6413581B1Photocatalytically-activated self-cleaning article and method of making same107
8US20090217978A1Low iron transmission float glass for solar cell applications and method of making same103
9US20030037569A1Method and apparatus for forming patterned and/or textured glass and glass articles formed thereby99
10US3467508AFloat glass surface modification process85

Citation counts inside a searched corpus reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later art, not as a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Float Glass Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the families are broken down by geography, class and citation weight.

Geography
571 China vs 243 US
receiving office filings

China is the primary filing venue by a wide margin

China's 571 filings are more than double the United States' 243, and well ahead of Europe (75), the United Kingdom (60) and Japan (44). New tin-bath control and inclusion-detection art is increasingly disclosed on Chinese registers before it appears elsewhere, making Chinese-language monitoring a practical necessity for freedom-to-operate work.

Receiving office split, all years
Technology depth
1,115 of 1,177 in C03B
glass manufacture & shaping

Core forming and shaping claims are almost fully occupied

Nearly every record in the dataset touches C03B, the subclass covering glass manufacture and shaping itself. That density means the tin-bath, forming and annealing mechanics are heavily claimed territory; differentiation is more likely to come from the thinner adjacent classes — coatings, testing, layered products — than from the core forming process.

IPC subclass distribution
Filing momentum
74 (2019) to 4 (partial 2026)
annual filings, peak to latest

The filing curve has turned down, not up

Volume climbed to a 2019 peak of 74 filings, held near 57 by 2022, and has fallen sharply since. Combined with -75% YoY momentum at the two most active Chinese assignees in the latest tracked year, the signal is a market consolidating around existing claims rather than one attracting fresh entrants.

Annual filing count, 2017–2026
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to float glass manufacturing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Float Glass Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

A network of related entities, not a wide field of independents

The strongest co-assignee relationships in the dataset all sit inside one Chinese glassmaking group's subsidiary network, filing jointly across its regional manufacturing units rather than with outside partners.

Filing network
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 10 shared filings

One group's subsidiaries file together repeatedly

The single strongest co-assignee link pairs a national glassmaking group with one of its regional glass subsidiaries at 10 shared filings, with two further subsidiary pairings each at 7. This is intra-group filing coordination across plants, not cross-company joint R&D — useful context when assessing how consolidated the true decision-making footprint is.

Co-assignee pair strength
Momentum
-75% YoY
at the two most active recent filers

Even the most active filers are slowing

The two assignees with any activity in the latest tracked year each filed just once, down 75% year over year. Several long-established Western and Japanese glassmakers show zero filings in the latest year in this dataset, consistent with a technology area where the active claim-building has shifted toward Chinese manufacturing groups.

Recent-year filing change
Geographic base
571 filings via China
vs. 243 via the US

Filing behaviour splits along geographic lines

Chinese entities file predominantly through the Chinese office, while historically dominant glassmakers with US, European and Japanese roots show up mostly through their home offices at lower volumes. That split matters for freedom-to-operate screening — a US-only search will miss the majority of current filing activity in this space.

Receiving office by filer origin
🔍
Under-claimed ground worth checking before you file
Sub-areas where filing density is visibly thinner than the core tin-bath and forming claims.
Real-time nickel-sulfide inclusion imagingMelting energy recovery from furnace exhaustPhotocatalytic self-cleaning coatings on float glassAnnealing lehr thermal gradient controlThin/ultra-thin float glass thickness uniformity
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
China Southern Glass (CSG) Holding Co., Ltd.1-75%
China Triumph International Engineering Co., Ltd. (CTIEC)1-75%
PPG Industries, Inc.0
Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. (AGC)0
PPG Industries Ohio, Inc.0
Pilkington Group Limited0
AGC Glass Europe0-100%
LG Chem, Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Float Glass Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, geographically concentrated claim space with specific thin spots. These are the practical next steps for turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.

Map claims against your own process flow

Overlay your tin-bath, forming and lehr process steps against the C03B claim density found here to see exactly where existing patents sit relative to your own equipment and process parameters.

Explore in Eureka

Watch the Chinese subsidiary network

Track the group filing across its regional subsidiaries for signs of where its R&D investment is concentrating next, since its filing pattern leads the rest of the dataset.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Test white space claims for novelty

Before drafting in inclusion imaging, energy recovery or coating white space, run a focused novelty search against the thinner adjacent IPC classes identified here.

Run a novelty check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Float Glass Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on float glass manufacturing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Float Glass Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Float Glass Manufacturing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole float glass manufacturing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.