Float Glass Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Filings have cooled since a 2019 peak of 74, with the most recent full year sitting well below that mark — a maturing claim space rather than a growing one.
- China dominates the filing map with 571 records, more than double the United States' 243, putting most of the newest tin-bath and defect-detection art on Chinese registers first.
- A single glassmaking group anchors ten of the ten tracked co-assignee pairs, showing manufacturing-network filing rather than cross-company joint development.
Filing growth compares 2021 (42 records) with 2024 (54) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,177 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the float glass patent record actually shows
Float glass manufacturing patenting concentrates on three linked problems: keeping the tin bath stable enough to hold thickness uniformity, cutting the melting energy a furnace consumes per tonne of glass, and catching defect inclusions before a sheet leaves the annealing lehr. The search set spans 2015 through mid-2026 and returns 1,177 patent families once continuation and multi-jurisdiction duplicates are collapsed to the family level. That family count is the fairer measure of real invention activity than raw document counts, since it strips out the filing noise that comes from chasing the same idea through multiple patent offices.
Filing activity rose through the back half of the 2010s, peaked in 2019, and has since drifted down toward single digits in the most recent partial year — though any read of the last 18 months understates true filing volume, since publication lags filing by roughly that long.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,177-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the bulk of the claim language.
A 2019 peak followed by a steady decline
Filings ran from 44 in 2017 to a peak of 74 in 2019, sat at 57 by the 2022 midpoint, and have fallen since — a pattern consistent with a technology whose core mechanical and chemical claims are largely staked out rather than one still opening new ground.
C03B carries the case; C03C and adjacent classes trail
C03B (glass manufacture and shaping) covers 1,115 of the 1,177 records, effectively the whole set, with C03C (glass and enamel compositions) a distant second at 268. Smaller counts in B32B laminates, C23C coatings, B01J catalytic processes and G01N testing mark where float glass claims spill into adjacent processing and quality-control disciplines.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,177 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Float Glass Manufacturing with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about float glass manufacturing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe documents other filings build on
Method and system for detecting inclusions in float glass (US10753883B2)
The patent describes detecting nickel-sulfide and similar inclusions in soda-lime-silica float glass during or after the float process, using an intense visible-light source and thermal imaging to spot the temperature difference between an inclusion and the surrounding glass as the sheet cools through the annealing lehr.Assignee: Guardian Glass, LLC. Filed process covers detection after tin-bath forming and through lehr cooling.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4746347A | Patterned float glass method | 398 |
| 2 | US6027766A | Photocatalytically-activated self-cleaning article and method of making same | 287 |
| 3 | US6846760B2 | Flat float glass | 197 |
| 4 | US3660061A | Coated glass sheet and method for making the same | 158 |
| 5 | US20020023463A1 | Flat float glass | 142 |
| 6 | US4859636A | Chemically strengthened glass article formed of float glass | 116 |
| 7 | US6413581B1 | Photocatalytically-activated self-cleaning article and method of making same | 107 |
| 8 | US20090217978A1 | Low iron transmission float glass for solar cell applications and method of making same | 103 |
| 9 | US20030037569A1 | Method and apparatus for forming patterned and/or textured glass and glass articles formed thereby | 99 |
| 10 | US3467508A | Float glass surface modification process | 85 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later art, not as a ranking of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once the families are broken down by geography, class and citation weight.
China is the primary filing venue by a wide margin
China's 571 filings are more than double the United States' 243, and well ahead of Europe (75), the United Kingdom (60) and Japan (44). New tin-bath control and inclusion-detection art is increasingly disclosed on Chinese registers before it appears elsewhere, making Chinese-language monitoring a practical necessity for freedom-to-operate work.
Core forming and shaping claims are almost fully occupied
Nearly every record in the dataset touches C03B, the subclass covering glass manufacture and shaping itself. That density means the tin-bath, forming and annealing mechanics are heavily claimed territory; differentiation is more likely to come from the thinner adjacent classes — coatings, testing, layered products — than from the core forming process.
The filing curve has turned down, not up
Volume climbed to a 2019 peak of 74 filings, held near 57 by 2022, and has fallen sharply since. Combined with -75% YoY momentum at the two most active Chinese assignees in the latest tracked year, the signal is a market consolidating around existing claims rather than one attracting fresh entrants.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to float glass manufacturing, with the prior art for and against each one.
A network of related entities, not a wide field of independents
The strongest co-assignee relationships in the dataset all sit inside one Chinese glassmaking group's subsidiary network, filing jointly across its regional manufacturing units rather than with outside partners.
One group's subsidiaries file together repeatedly
The single strongest co-assignee link pairs a national glassmaking group with one of its regional glass subsidiaries at 10 shared filings, with two further subsidiary pairings each at 7. This is intra-group filing coordination across plants, not cross-company joint R&D — useful context when assessing how consolidated the true decision-making footprint is.
Even the most active filers are slowing
The two assignees with any activity in the latest tracked year each filed just once, down 75% year over year. Several long-established Western and Japanese glassmakers show zero filings in the latest year in this dataset, consistent with a technology area where the active claim-building has shifted toward Chinese manufacturing groups.
Filing behaviour splits along geographic lines
Chinese entities file predominantly through the Chinese office, while historically dominant glassmakers with US, European and Japanese roots show up mostly through their home offices at lower volumes. That split matters for freedom-to-operate screening — a US-only search will miss the majority of current filing activity in this space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| China Southern Glass (CSG) Holding Co., Ltd. | 1 | -75% |
| China Triumph International Engineering Co., Ltd. (CTIEC) | 1 | -75% |
| PPG Industries, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. (AGC) | 0 | — |
| PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Pilkington Group Limited | 0 | — |
| AGC Glass Europe | 0 | -100% |
| LG Chem, Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature, geographically concentrated claim space with specific thin spots. These are the practical next steps for turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.
Map claims against your own process flow
Overlay your tin-bath, forming and lehr process steps against the C03B claim density found here to see exactly where existing patents sit relative to your own equipment and process parameters.
Explore in EurekaWatch the Chinese subsidiary network
Track the group filing across its regional subsidiaries for signs of where its R&D investment is concentrating next, since its filing pattern leads the rest of the dataset.
Set up monitoring in EurekaTest white space claims for novelty
Before drafting in inclusion imaging, energy recovery or coating white space, run a focused novelty search against the thinner adjacent IPC classes identified here.
Run a novelty check in EurekaCommon questions on float glass manufacturing patents
Filing activity in this dataset concentrates around a Chinese national glassmaking group and its regional subsidiaries, which together account for the strongest co-assignee relationships in the data. Established Western and Japanese glassmakers such as those historically active in tin-bath and float process patents remain present in the record but show markedly lower recent-year filing activity. Anyone assessing freedom-to-operate should treat the Chinese subsidiary network as the most active current filer rather than assuming legacy Western players still lead.
Filings peaked at 74 in 2019 and have fallen since, down to single digits in the most recent partial year, which lags due to normal 18-month publication delay. This pattern is more consistent with a maturing claim space — where core tin-bath, forming and annealing mechanics are already heavily patented — than with a market losing commercial interest in float glass. Filing decline in a densely claimed area typically signals that new entrants face a crowded prior-art landscape, not that the underlying manufacturing process is being abandoned.
C03B, the IPC subclass covering glass manufacture and shaping, appears in 1,115 of the 1,177 records in this dataset — essentially the entire corpus. C03C, glass and enamel compositions, is a distant second at 268 records. Adjacent areas like layered products, coatings, catalytic processes and material testing carry far fewer filings, marking them as comparatively open ground relative to the core forming and shaping claims.
US10753883B2, assigned to Guardian Glass, LLC, covers detecting inclusions such as nickel-sulfide defects in float glass by directing intense visible light at the glass and using thermal imaging to spot temperature differences between an inclusion and the surrounding material, specifically during or after the tin-bath forming and annealing lehr cooling stages. It does not block inclusion detection generally — it is specific to this optical/thermal detection method at this stage of the process. Alternative detection approaches, such as different imaging wavelengths or detection timed to a different process stage, would sit outside its literal claim scope but should be checked individually against the full claim set.
The thinner IPC classes relative to the dominant C03B forming and shaping claims — including B32B laminates, C23C coatings, B01J catalytic processes and G01N testing — carry noticeably fewer filings and represent comparatively under-claimed ground. Specific candidates include real-time nickel-sulfide inclusion imaging methods, melting energy recovery from furnace exhaust, photocatalytic self-cleaning coatings, and thickness uniformity control for thin or ultra-thin float glass. These areas sit adjacent to the heavily claimed core process rather than inside it, making them more viable starting points for new filings.
Research Float Glass Manufacturing in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole float glass manufacturing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.