Book a demo

Floating Wind Turbine for Desalination Plants Patent Landscape

Floating Wind Turbine for Desalination Plants Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Floating Wind Turbine for Desalination Plants Patent Landscape in 2026

A small set of specialist firms and one major OEM dominate a 136-family corpus that reached peak annual volume in 2022 and has since plateaued. Lone Gull Holdings and Siemens Gamesa together account for roughly two-fifths of the top-hundred filers’ combined output, signalling high concentration in a field that is still expanding on a multi-year basis even as recent annual intake has eased from its 2022 peak.

136
Patent families in scope
75%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+17%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Lone Gull Holdings and Siemens Gamesa lead a highly concentrated field

Lone Gull Holdings Ltd ranks first with 30 patent families, separated by only one family from Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS at 29. Innovator Energy LLC holds third place at 21, followed by the University of Malta at 13 and Floating Windfarms Corp at 11.

The top five filers collectively hold 75% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, a concentration level unusual even for an emerging technology niche. The tier gap between the top five and the next five — Zero E Technologies LLC, Frew Hldg BV, Sailwint GmbH, Costas Dan Nicolaus, and University of Virginia. Patent Foundation, each with two to five families — is wide enough to limit near-term challenges to the leaders’ positions.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Lone Gull Holdings Ltd30
2Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS29
3Innovator Energy LLC21
4University of Malta13
5Floating Windfarms Corp11
6Zero E Technologies LLC5
7Frew Hldg BV3
8Sailwint GmbH3
9Costas Dan Nicolaus3
10University of Virginia Patent Foundation3
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Dehlsen Associates of the Pacific Ltd2
12Arup IP Management Ltd2
13Equinor Energy AS2
14Robert Miller Maguire2
15Pao Yih Ho Michael2
16National Institute of Technology Manipur1
17Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences1
18Barnickel Ing. Nils Juri1
19University of Massachusetts1
20Baird James Russell1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of purpose-built specialists (Lone Gull, Innovator Energy, Floating Windfarms, Zero E Technologies) alongside a large OEM (Siemens Gamesa) and an academic institution (University of Malta) reflects a field where independent inventors and small companies have so far set the IP agenda, and major energy corporations have only recently entered.

Patent publication typically lags filing by 18–24 months, so the 20242025 data are likely undercounted; the corpus scope is global with the. United States as the leading filing office. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2022 peak followed by a plateau, anchored by wind-turbine and marine technology

Two charts together describe the field’s pace and technical scope: the annual filing trend reveals the growth arc and its recent easing, while the technology composition shows how broadly inventors are combining wind, marine, water-treatment, and power disciplines.

Annual filing trend

Annual family filings climbed from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 45 in 2022, then receded sharply to 8 in 2023 before a partial recovery to 15 in 2024. The 2023–2025 bars are subject to publication lag and should be read as floors rather than final counts. The multi-year window still shows positive growth of 17% relative to the prior period, consistent with a field that has plateaued near its peak rather than entered structural decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 45 in 2022.220170201852019222020312021452022820231520248202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

F03D (wind motors) is the anchor class, appearing in 100 records. F03B (hydraulic machines) at 69 and B63B (ships and marine vessels) at 57 reflect the floating-platform engineering layer. C02F (water and wastewater treatment) and C25B (electrolytic production, covering hydrogen and brine electrolysis) each appear in 19 records, confirming that desalination and energy-conversion chemistry are present but remain secondary to the mechanical and marine engineering core. H02J (power supply and grid systems) at 15 rounds out the main technical axes.

Technology compositionF03D · Wind motors (wind turbines) leads with 100; F03B · Hydraulic machines & engines 69.F03D · Wind motors (wind…100F03B · Hydraulic machine…69B63B · Ships & marine ve…57C02F · Water & wastewate…19C25B · Electrolytic prod…19H02J · Power supply & gr…15B63G · Naval vessels & o…13B67D · Dispensing liquids13↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20220332395A1Published 2022-10-20

A floating metal platform

Clovers As

A floating metal platform for supporting an offshore installation includes three elongated elements. Each elongated element includes a first elongated member; a second elongated member parallel to the first elongated member; and at least a first buoyancy element connected to the first elongated member and the second elongated member. Each elongated element… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

A floating metal platform — patent drawingA floating metal platform — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Offshore wind turbine and associated systems and m…54
2Offshore Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine and Associated…53
3Hydrogen production and conveyance system45
4Offshore vertical-axis wind turbine and associated…37
5Wind and wave desalination vessel28
6Hydro-pneumatic engery storage system28
7Aparatus for converting wave energy23
8Hydro-pneumatic energy storage system22

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, plateauing annual volume, no recorded co-filing activity, and a US-dominant filing footprint shapes where incremental R&D spend is likely to generate differentiated IP.

Maturity

Field at plateau — annual volume eased from its 2022 peak

The lifecycle evidence places this field at the Maturity stage: annual filings plateaued near their 2022 peak of 45 families and have since eased. The multi-year growth rate remains positive at 17%, indicating the total corpus is still expanding, but the rapid ramp of 2019–2022 has not been sustained. New entrants face an increasingly charted IP landscape, making differentiation harder in the core F03D and B63B classes.

Lifecycle: Maturity
Concentration

Top five hold 75% of the leading-hundred filers’ output

With the top five filers — Lone Gull Holdings, Siemens Gamesa, Innovator Energy, University of Malta, and Floating Windfarms — holding 75% of the top-hundred combined total, the field is effectively oligopolistic. The gap to the second tier (two to five families each) is large. Challengers seeking to enter must either develop genuinely novel architectures or target the under-served adjacent branches where incumbent density is lower.

High concentration
Collaboration

No co-filing activity recorded — an ecosystem yet to form

Evidence pending: no co-applicant filing pairs are recorded in scope. The absence of co-filing links suggests the field has not yet developed the university-industry or cross-company research consortia common in more mature offshore-energy sectors. This may reflect the early specialist character of the dominant filers, or simply that collaboration is occurring informally. Either way, an entrant offering consortium IP structures could find receptive partners.

No co-filing detected
Geography

US-dominant filing with meaningful EPO and PCT coverage

The United States is the leading jurisdiction with 53 records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 24 and WIPO (PCT) at 23. Australia at 12 and Vietnam at 8 reflect coverage in regions with high desalination demand. Canada, Chile, Germany, Israel, and India each hold four records. China appears at only 2 records, a notable gap given Chinese activity in both offshore wind and desalination domestically. Filing in water-stressed markets such as the Middle East and North Africa is not visibly represented in the evidence.

US-led, global gaps
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights drawn from lifecycle, concentration, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Lone Gull Holdings and Siemens Gamesa lead with distinct technology emphases

The two leading filers diverge sharply in technical focus: Lone Gull Holdings anchors in hydraulic-machine and marine-vessel engineering, while Siemens Gamesa concentrates on wind-turbine systems with a secondary reach into water treatment. Both entered or surged in recent years from very different starting points.

Leader · Lone Gull Holdings Ltd

Lone Gull Holdings Ltd

Lone Gull Holdings leads the corpus with 30 patent families, concentrated in F03B 13 (hydraulic machines, 27 records), B63B 25, and B63B 27 (marine vessel configurations, 13 records each). This profile reflects a floating-platform-first approach where wave and hydraulic energy conversion is central. Recent momentum shows a 60% decline in the latest period versus the prior window, suggesting the initial filing campaign has slowed and the portfolio is now in consolidation.

families: 30
Challenger · Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS

Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS

Siemens Gamesa holds 29 patent families and is classified as a new entrant in the recent period, meaning all or nearly all of its families were filed in the most recent filing window with little to no prior-period base. Its technical focus is F03D 9 (wind turbines integrated with other energy systems, 23 records) and F03D 13 (offshore wind turbines, 18 records), with a secondary reach into C02F 1 (water treatment, 6 records) — the most direct desalination linkage among the top filers. Its rapid emergence as co-leader makes it the most significant new force in the field.

families: 29
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 20 applicants, including Innovator Energy LLC, University of Malta, and Floating Windfarms Corp.
Innovator Energy LLCUniversity of Malta+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Lone Gull Holdings Ltd8▼ -60%
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS21▲ new entrant
Innovator Energy LLC18▲ new entrant
University of Virginia Patent Foundation3▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles combine applicant ranking, technology focus, and recent filing momentum.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant wind and marine classes

Several IPC classes appear in fewer than 20 records despite having direct technical relevance to floating wind-powered desalination; these represent relatively sparse areas compared with the dominant F03D and B63B classes, though they are observations of current filing density rather than confirmed commercial opportunities.

C02F · Water & wastewater treatment — desalination process IP

C02F appears in only 19 records, representing roughly 5% of the IPC record base, despite being the most directly relevant class to the desalination output side of these systems. The top-cited patents reference ‘Wind and wave desalination vessel’ and water treatment (C02F 1 is present in Siemens Gamesa’s and Innovator Energy’s portfolios), yet the class remains sparse relative to wind-turbine and marine-vessel classes. An entrant with process chemistry or membrane engineering expertise could file in C02F with relatively low incumbent density. Search string: ‘floating offshore wind reverse osmosis desalination membrane’.

Search this in Eureka →

H02J · Power supply & grid systems — offshore islanded power architecture

H02J appears in 15 records, representing roughly 4% of the IPC record base, covering power management for offshore or islanded desalination microgrids. As floating wind-desalination systems move toward commercial scale, power conditioning, energy storage dispatch, and grid-interconnect IP become critical. Innovator Energy holds H02J 15 filings, but the class overall remains thinly occupied. Engineers working on control systems, battery-hybrid architectures, or hydrogen buffer storage have a plausible entry path here. Search string: ‘floating wind desalination offshore microgrid power management H02J’.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See filing density, citation velocity, and entry-path analysis for all adjacent IPC branches including C25B, B67D, and E02B.
C25B · Electrolytic production (brine/hydrogen)B67D · Dispensing and distributing liquids+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; a family filing across multiple jurisdictions or classes can contribute to multiple branch totals.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerF03B 13 · Hydraulic machines & enginesF03D 13 · Wind motors (wind turbines)F03D 9 · Wind motors (wind turbines)B63B 35 · Ships & marine vesselsB63B 1 · Ships & marine vessels
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy ASAbsentStrong · 18Strong · 23Emerging · 3Absent
Lone Gull Holdings LtdStrong · 27AbsentAbsentEmerging · 1Absent
University of MaltaStrong · 13Emerging · 2Strong · 8AbsentAbsent
Innovator Energy LLCStrong · 19AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Sailwint GmbHAbsentStrong · 3AbsentStrong · 2Strong · 3
Frew Hldg BVAbsentStrong · 3Strong · 3AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own floating wind and water technology landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.