Floating Wind Turbine for Marine Power Patent Landscape
Floating Wind Turbine for Marine Power Patent Landscape in 2026
This niche field is tightly concentrated, with the top five filers holding 93% of activity among the hundred largest filers, and Marine Power Systems commanding the single largest position. Annual filing volume peaked in 2020 and has since eased substantially, signalling a field in decline phase, though a small cohort of new entrants has appeared in the most recent window.
Marine Power Systems leads a heavily concentrated field
Marine Power Systems holds the top-ranked position with 14 patent families, nearly double the second-ranked Orbital Marine Power Ltd at 6 patent families — a gap that underscores how dominant a single organization has become in this niche.
The top five filers account for 93% of combined activity among the hundred largest filers, a concentration level that leaves little room for mid-tier challengers and effectively structures the field as a two-tier contest between one dominant player and a cluster of smaller specialists.
| # | Applicant | Patent families | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marine Power Systems | 14 | |
| 2 | Orbital Marine Power Ltd | 6 | |
| 3 | Alen Co Ltd | 3 | |
| 4 | Dehlsen Associates of the Pacific Ltd | 2 | |
| 5 | RWE Renewables GmbH | 2 | |
| 6 | Orbital Marine Power Ltd (Kirkwall) | 1 | |
| 7 | PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Ltd | 1 |
This concentration implies that any entrant seeking freedom to operate must carefully navigate Marine Power Systems’ portfolio first, and that partnerships or licensing from Orbital Marine Power Ltd — the only other entity with a meaningful cluster — may be a faster route to capability than independent development.
Filing data for the most recent 18 to 24 months is subject to publication lag and may understate true recent activity; conclusions about very recent trends should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
Activity peaked in 2020 and has eased; wind turbine mechanics dominate the technology mix
The filing trend and technology composition together reveal a field that mobilised rapidly around 2018–2020 and has since contracted, while the IPC mix shows that marine vessel engineering is nearly as prominent as wind motor technology — reflecting the hybrid nature of floating offshore systems.
Annual filing trend
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 13 families in 2020, then dropped sharply; the zero counts for 2023–2026 reflect publication lag rather than a confirmed cessation of activity and should not be interpreted as a complete halt.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
F03D (wind motors) leads the branch mix, followed closely by B63B (ships and marine vessels) and F03B (hydraulic machines and engines) — a pattern consistent with multi-energy conversion designs that couple wind capture with wave or tidal energy; lower-share branches such as H02G (power cable installation) and C02F (water treatment) indicate secondary functional layers present in some designs.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Combined structure of a fishing net cage and float…
Disclosed is a combined structure of a fishing net cage and floating wind turbine foundation. The combined structure includes a wind turbine and a polygonal deep-sea fishing net cage floating body. The polygonal deep-sea fishing net cage floating body comprises an upper polygonal floating body frame, a bottom ring beam, and a middle truss structure, and a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)
| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Combined structure of a fishing net cage and float… | 34 |
| 2 | Wind and wave desalination vessel | 28 |
| 3 | Renewable energy conversion apparatus | 13 |
| 4 | Renewable energy conversion apparatus | 11 |
| 5 | Renewable energy conversion apparatus | 8 |
| 6 | Wind and wave desalination vessel | 6 |
| 7 | Power cable arrangement for offshore wind farms | 4 |
| 8 | Mooring line connector apparatus and method | 2 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the field structure means for R&D investment decisions
Three structural features — a declining filing rate, extreme applicant concentration, and a multi-technology IPC footprint — combine to shape a specific set of R&D risks and entry options for new investors.
Decline phase following a 2020 peak
Annual filings peaked at 13 families in 2020 and have eased substantially since, placing this field in a decline stage per the lifecycle assessment. New entrants appearing in the most recent window suggest that opportunistic inventors see residual whitespace, but the overall trajectory warrants caution before committing large R&D budgets to incremental improvements on crowded core claims.
Lifecycle: DeclineOne dominant applicant, thin mid-tier
With Marine Power Systems holding 14 patent families and the top five filers controlling 93% of the hundred largest filers’ combined activity, the competitive barrier is high and asymmetric. Second-ranked Orbital Marine Power Ltd (6 families) is the only realistic licensing or partnership target outside the leader. Entrants without a differentiated technology position risk being locked out of core claims.
HHI: Very HighNo co-applicant relationships identified in this corpus
The collaboration evidence shows no co-filed patent families within scope, meaning that the field has developed through independent proprietary filings rather than consortium or joint-development arrangements. This absence of visible IP-level collaboration may reflect competitive sensitivity or alternatively that any collaborative R&D is not yet captured in published patent data.
Collaboration: None detectedUnited States leads, Europe and UK are the secondary venues
The United States is the leading filing jurisdiction, followed by Europe (EPO) and the United Kingdom. Canada, Germany, Chile, WIPO, and South Africa each show modest presence, indicating that primary applicants are seeking protection across anglophone and Northern European energy markets. Emerging offshore wind markets in Asia and South America appear largely unprotected in this corpus, which may represent a geographic gap for competitive entrants.
Lead Office: USGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
Marine Power Systems leads on volume; Orbital Marine Power is the principal challenger
Two organisations account for the majority of documented activity; the remaining filers each hold three or fewer patent families and occupy specialised technical niches.
Marine Power Systems
Marine Power Systems holds 14 patent families, more than twice the next-ranked applicant. Their technology emphasis spans F03B hydraulic machines and engines, F03D wind motors, and B63B marine vessel structures — consistent with an integrated multi-energy floating platform strategy. No momentum trend data from the recent window is attributable to this entity in the evidence, reflecting the field’s post-peak filing environment.
families: 14Orbital Marine Power Ltd
Orbital Marine Power Ltd holds 6 patent families concentrated in B63B 21 (mooring and anchoring of marine vessels), indicating a mooring-system specialisation within the floating platform stack. The combined entity — including the Kirkwall subsidiary — accounts for 7 patent families total. No recent momentum uplift is recorded for this entity in the evidence window.
families: 6| Applicant | Recent (3 yrs) | Trend |
|---|
Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant wind-marine core
Several IPC branches appear at low share within the corpus and sit adjacent to the dominant F03D and B63B core; they are noted as observations of relative sparsity and assessed for plausible technical value and entry path.
H02G · Offshore power cable installation
With only 4 patent records and a 7% share in the corpus, dynamic cable management for floating wind systems is under-represented relative to its operational importance — a floating turbine requires flexible, fatigue-resistant cable solutions that differ fundamentally from fixed-bottom offshore practice. The recent entry of one applicant (Hyseal France) specifically targeting H02G 1 and H02G 9 subclasses confirms technical relevance. An entrant with expertise in subsea cable engineering could address a genuine engineering gap with low risk of immediate crowding.
Search this in Eureka →C02F · Desalination and water treatment integrated with floating platforms
C02F (water and wastewater treatment) appears at only 2 patent records and a 3% share, yet at least one top-cited patent in the corpus is titled ‘Wind and wave desalination vessel’ — indicating that the concept of co-locating renewable energy conversion with desalination has attracted citation interest disproportionate to its filing volume. Dehlsen Associates of the Pacific has also filed in the adjacent B01D separation process branch. This combination suggests a sparse but technically coherent opportunity for floating multi-purpose platforms serving water-stressed coastal markets, with a realistic entry path through integration of existing offshore desalination and floating wind sub-systems.
Search this in Eureka →How leading applicants differ by technology route
Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.
| Player | F03D 9 · Wind motors (wind turbines) | F03B 13 · Hydraulic machines & engines | F03D 13 · Wind motors (wind turbines) | B63B 21 · Ships & marine vessels | B63B 35 · Ships & marine vessels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marine Power Systems | Strong · 11 | Strong · 12 | Emerging · 2 | Absent | Emerging · 2 |
| Alen Co Ltd | Absent | Absent | Strong · 3 | Absent | Strong · 3 |
| Orbital Marine Power Ltd | Absent | Absent | Absent | Strong · 6 | Absent |
| Dehlsen Associates of the Pacific Ltd | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Strong · 1 |
Frequently asked questions
The corpus contains 31 patent families in scope for this technology area.
Marine Power Systems holds the top-ranked position with 14 patent families, accounting for a substantial plurality of the field.
Annual filing activity peaked at 13 patent families in 2020 and has eased significantly since. The lifecycle assessment classifies the field as in decline. Note that very recent years may be under-counted due to publication lag.
The United States is the leading filing jurisdiction, followed by Europe (EPO) and the United Kingdom. Canada, Germany, Chile, WIPO, and South Africa each have a smaller presence in the corpus.
No co-applicant patent families are identified within this corpus, indicating that filers have developed their portfolios independently rather than through visible joint-filing arrangements.
Power cable installation (H02G), water treatment and desalination (C02F), separation processes (B01D), filament handling (B65H), and aquaculture integration (A01K) each appear at low share in the corpus and represent relatively sparse adjacent branches relative to the dominant wind motor and marine vessel classes.
Ready to map your own floating offshore energy landscape?
Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.