Floating Wind Turbine for Microgrids Patent Landscape 2026
Floating Wind Turbine for Microgrids Patent Landscape in 2026
This is a nascent, highly concentrated field with only 7 patent families in scope, dominated by a small cluster of individual inventors filing primarily in Australia. Annual volume peaked in 2020 and has since eased, signalling a field in decline that presents both risk and potential entry opportunity for well-resourced R&D teams.
A handful of inventors hold the entire field
The top-ranked filer, Mark Stewart Dimmock (appearing under multiple name variants), accounts for the largest share of patent records, with the top five filers collectively representing 100% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total — a level of concentration rarely seen and a direct consequence of the field’s small absolute size.
There is effectively no tier gap in terms of breadth: all active applicants are individual inventors or a single corporate entity (Petroliam Nasional Bhd, the Malaysian national oil company), and no established wind-energy OEM or microgrid integrator appears in the ranking.
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mark Stewart Dimmock | 5 | |
| 2 | Stephen Christopher Colin | 5 | |
| 3 | Christopher Colin Stephen | 2 | |
| 4 | Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) | 2 | |
| 5 | Mark Stewart Dimmock | 2 |
The absence of large industrial incumbents suggests the field has not yet attracted mainstream commercial attention, leaving prior-art density low and claim space relatively open — but also raising questions about whether issued patents reflect commercially viable architectures.
Note that filings from the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and may be under-represented in this dataset. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
Activity peaked in 2020 and the technology mix spans wind, marine, and grid classes
The filing trend chart and the IPC technology composition together show a brief burst of activity around 2020–2022 and a cross-disciplinary technical scope that links offshore structures to power-grid systems.
Annual filing trend
Filing activity opened in 2020 with three records, sustained two records per year in 2021 and 2022, then fell to zero in subsequent years. Given publication lag, the apparent silence in 2023–2026 should be treated with caution, but the field’s peak clearly sits at 2020. This pattern is consistent with the lifecycle assessment of decline from that peak.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
F03D (wind motors) dominates with seven records, closely followed by H02J (power supply and grid systems) with six, confirming the dual wind-plus-grid focus. B28B (shaping clay and cement products) and B63B (ships and marine vessels) each appear in five records, reflecting the structural and marine-engineering dimensions of floating platform design. F03G (spring, weight, and miscellaneous motors) and H02K (electric motors and generators) round out the mix, while C04B (ceramics, cement, and refractories) appears in three records and points to novel construction materials for floating foundations.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
An improved energy management system and microgrid
A method of controlling operation of a microgrid using an EMS, the microgrid comprising a plurality of distributed energy resources including at least one controllable distributed hydrocarbon fuelled generator and electrical energy storage devices, the method comprising: the EMS measuring a cumulative availability status of each distributed energy resource… (excerpt from the patent abstract)
| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mechanical energy storage | 25 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the competitive structure means for R&D investment
The field’s small size, individual-inventor dominance, and post-peak trajectory create a distinctive risk-reward profile for any R&D team evaluating entry.
Field in decline from a 2020 peak
The lifecycle stage is assessed as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2020 peak and no recorded activity in 2023–2026 (subject to publication lag). This could reflect either genuine loss of inventor interest or a pause before a second wave driven by offshore microgrid commercialisation. An R&D team entering now faces minimal blocking prior art but also limited proof of commercial traction from existing filers.
Lifecycle: Decline100% of top-100 filers’ volume held by five names
The top five filers account for the entirety of the top hundred filers’ combined patent records, an extreme concentration driven by the corpus’s small absolute scale of 7 patent families. No established offshore wind OEM, energy-storage company, or microgrid integrator appears in the ranking, which means any large player entering would immediately become the dominant corporate filer.
Extreme concentrationNo co-applicant activity detected
Evidence pending: the collaboration dataset for this corpus is empty, indicating that all filings to date have been made by sole applicants or single entities without recorded co-assignment. This absence of consortium or university-industry co-filing is consistent with the early, inventor-driven character of the field and suggests no established research alliance has yet formed around floating wind for microgrids.
No co-filing detectedAustralia leads; US and PCT provide limited international reach
Australia is the lead jurisdiction with three patent records, followed by the United States with two, and single records in Tunisia (TN) and via WIPO PCT. The PCT filing signals at least one inventor sought broader geographic protection, but the overall footprint remains narrow. Markets such as Japan, Europe, and Southeast Asia — all relevant to offshore microgrid deployment — show no recorded filings, representing an open jurisdictional landscape for a competitor seeking exclusivity in those regions.
Australia-ledGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
Individual inventors dominate; one corporate entity provides the only institutional presence
The ranking is led by individual inventors filing under multiple name variants, with Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) as the sole corporate filer. All tracked filers show a new-entrant momentum profile within the observation window.
Mark Stewart Dimmock
Appearing under the name variants DIMMOCK MARK STEWART and MARK STEWART DIMMOCK, this inventor holds 5 patent records at the lead rank and 2 additional records under the second variant, with a technology emphasis spanning F03D 9 (wind turbines), F03G 3 (miscellaneous motors), and H02J 15 (grid systems). Later filings shift toward B28B 3 (cement shaping) and B63B 35 (marine vessels), suggesting an evolution toward floating-platform construction methods. Momentum is tracked as a new entrant within the recent period.
families: 5Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas)
The only corporate applicant in the ranking, Petroliam Nasional Bhd holds 2 patent records focused on F03D 13 and F03D 9 (wind turbines) and H02J 3 (grid systems), reflecting an interest in integrating floating wind into offshore power infrastructure — a natural adjacency to its core upstream operations. As a national oil company with existing offshore engineering capability, Petronas represents the most credible institutional actor currently in this space.
families: 2| Applicant | Recent (3 yrs) | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen Christopher Colin | 2 | ▲ new entrant |
| Mark Stewart Dimmock | 2 | ▲ new entrant |
| Mark Stewart Dimmock | 2 | ▲ new entrant |
| Christopher Colin Stephen | 2 | ▲ new entrant |
Under-served technical branches adjacent to the dominant filing activity
The corpus identifies no validated white-space candidates in the evidence, but the IPC branch distribution points to two areas where filing density is relatively low relative to their technical relevance to floating wind microgrid systems.
C04B · Ceramics, Cement and Refractories for Floating Foundations
C04B appears in only 3 of 7 patent records, the lowest count among the active IPC branches. For floating wind platforms designed for remote microgrid deployment, the choice of construction material — particularly lightweight or marine-grade cement composites — is a critical engineering variable. The sparse filing density here suggests that material formulation for buoyant concrete or refractory-resistant structural components has not been systematically patented in this context. An entrant with materials science capability could file in this adjacent branch with limited blocking art.
Search this in Eureka →H02K · Electric Generators Optimised for Low-Wind Offshore Microgrids
H02K (electric motors and generators) appears in 4 records but remains a secondary branch behind H02J and F03D. Generator design optimised for the variable, low-to-moderate wind speeds typical of microgrid-scale floating installations — including direct-drive permanent-magnet or axial-flux architectures — represents a technically distinct and commercially relevant sub-domain. Filing activity specifically combining H02K with floating-platform and microgrid constraints is sparse, and no dedicated applicant focuses exclusively on this intersection in the current corpus.
Search this in Eureka →How the leading filers differ by technology route
Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.
| Player | F03D 9 · Wind motors (wind turbines) | F03D 13 · Wind motors (wind turbines) | F03G 3 · Spring/weight & misc. motors | H02J 15 · Power supply & grid systems | H02K 7 · Electric motors & generators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Stewart Dimmock | Strong · 4 | Strong · 3 | Strong · 4 | Strong · 4 | Strong · 4 |
| Stephen Christopher Colin | Strong · 4 | Strong · 3 | Strong · 4 | Strong · 4 | Strong · 4 |
| Christopher Colin Stephen | Strong · 2 | Absent | Strong · 2 | Strong · 2 | Strong · 2 |
| Mark Stewart Dimmock | Strong · 2 | Absent | Strong · 2 | Strong · 2 | Strong · 2 |
| Christopher Stephen | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 |
| Mark Dimmock | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 |
| Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) | Strong · 2 | Strong · 2 | Absent | Absent | Absent |
Frequently asked questions
The current corpus contains 7 patent families in scope. This is an exceptionally small corpus, confirming that floating wind turbines specifically targeting microgrid applications remain a niche and early-stage technology area.
The leading filers are individual inventors operating under the name variants Mark Stewart Dimmock and Stephen Christopher Colin, each associated with 5 patent records at the top rank. Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) is the only corporate filer, holding 2 patent records.
Australia leads with 3 patent records, followed by the United States with 2. Tunisia and WIPO (PCT) each account for 1 record. Major wind-energy markets such as Europe, Japan, and Southeast Asia show no recorded filings in this corpus.
The field is assessed as being in Decline, with annual filings having eased back from a peak in 2020. No filing activity is recorded in 2023–2026, though publication lag means very recent filings may not yet appear in the dataset.
No co-applicant or collaborative filing activity is detected in this corpus. All filings to date have been made by individual applicants or single entities, with no recorded university-industry or corporate consortium arrangements.
F03D (wind motors and turbines) covers all 7 patent records and is the dominant class. H02J (power supply and grid systems) appears in 6 records. B28B (shaping clay and cement products) and B63B (ships and marine vessels) each appear in 5 records, reflecting the structural and marine-engineering dimensions of floating platform design.
Ready to map your own technology landscape?
Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.