Floating Wind Turbine for Mining Operations Patent Landscape
Floating Wind Turbine for Mining Operations Patent Landscape in 2026
The floating wind turbine for mining operations patent space is highly concentrated, with a small cohort of specialist filers — led by Innovator Energy LLC — holding the majority of the top-100 filers’ combined output. Activity peaked in 2020 and has plateaued at a mature level, with several new entrants signalling continued but selective investment.
A concentrated niche led by Innovator Energy LLC and Lone Gull Holdings
Innovator Energy LLC leads. These three alone define the top tier of this niche field.
The top five filers account for 62% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating a highly concentrated competitive structure with a pronounced gap between the leading cluster and the remainder of the field.
| # | Applicant | Patent families | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Innovator Energy LLC | 17 | |
| 2 | Lone Gull Holdings Ltd | 14 | |
| 3 | Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS | 10 | |
| 4 | MAGELLAN & BARENTS SL | 9 | |
| 5 | Mark Stewart Dimmock | 5 | |
| 6 | Stephen Christopher Colin | 5 | |
| 7 | Cabin Air Group | 4 | |
| 8 | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd | 3 | |
| 9 | Lone Gull Holdings Ltd | 3 | |
| 10 | Garth Alexander Sheldon Coulson | 3 |
| # | Applicant | Patent families | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Seapower Systems | 2 | |
| 12 | Arup IP Management Ltd | 2 | |
| 13 | Stephen Christopher Colin | 2 | |
| 14 | Sia Yik Hei | 2 | |
| 15 | Equinor Energy AS | 2 | |
| 16 | Mark Stewart Dimmock | 2 | |
| 17 | Clifford A. Goudy | 1 | |
| 18 | Tyler N. Doyle | 1 | |
| 19 | Westgen Energy LLC | 1 | |
| 20 | Robert C. Houvener | 1 |
The dominance of two specialist independent entities — Innovator Energy LLC and Lone Gull Holdings — alongside one established turbine OEM (Siemens Gamesa) suggests the landscape is being shaped more by focused innovators than by diversified industrials, leaving the competitive dynamic relatively fluid for new entrants with differentiated technical approaches.
Filing counts for 2024–2025 are subject to publication lag and are likely under-represented; the apparent softening in those years should not be read as a structural decline. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
A 2020 filing surge that has since plateaued, anchored by marine and wind-motor IP
The annual filing trend reveals a sharp 2020 peak followed by moderated but sustained activity, while the technology composition confirms that marine vessel design and wind motor engineering are the dominant technical axes of this space.
Annual filing trend
Filings spiked sharply in 2020 (31 families) before retreating; 2022 saw a secondary rise (22 families), and the 2023–2025 period shows moderation consistent with a maturing field. Data for 2024 and 2025 are under-counted due to publication lag and should not be interpreted as a sustained decline.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
B63B (Ships and marine vessels) and F03D (Wind motors) are the two dominant IPC classes, reflecting the dual engineering challenge of offshore structural design and turbine performance. F03B (Hydraulic machines and engines) is a significant third branch, pointing to wave and tidal energy hybridisation as a recurring theme. Lower-share branches — including H02J (Power supply and grid systems), F21S (Lighting devices), and C02F (Water and wastewater treatment) — represent adjacent application areas with comparatively sparse coverage.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Control system for stabilizing a floating wind tur…
It is described a control system (170, 270) for stabilizing a floating wind turbine (100, 200, 300, 400, 600). The control system (170, 270) comprises a measuring device (371, 471) configured for measuring a wind field (111, 211, 311, 411, 611) and a wave field (418, 618), a determining device (373, 473), wherein the determining device (373, 473) is… (excerpt from the patent abstract)
| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gravity-based energy-storage system and method | 50 |
| 2 | Power generating windbags and waterbags | 28 |
| 3 | Gravity-based energy-storage and method | 27 |
| 4 | Mechanical energy storage | 25 |
| 5 | Mooring system for drifting energy converters | 17 |
| 6 | Offshore wind turbine | 11 |
| 7 | Brine power | 10 |
| 8 | A floating metal platform | 7 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions
The combination of high concentration, a plateau lifecycle, and a narrow but technically diverse applicant base creates a specific set of considerations for teams evaluating entry or expansion in this space.
Field has plateaued near its 2020 peak
The lifecycle stage is Maturity: annual filings have plateaued near the 2020 peak of 31 families, and activity has eased since then. On a multi-year basis the field still shows positive growth (21% recent-window growth), but the era of rapid expansion appears to have passed. New entrants face an established prior-art base, making differentiation — particularly in system integration and hybrid energy configurations — more important than volume filing.
Lifecycle: MatureTop five filers control 62% of the leading-100 filers’ output
The top five applicants — Innovator Energy LLC, Lone Gull Holdings Ltd, Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS, Magellan & Barents SL, and the individual filer Dimmock Mark Stewart — account for 62% of the top-100 filers’ combined output. This degree of concentration is typical of a niche market where two or three actors have built defensive positions, but the presence of individual inventors in the top ten signals that broad coverage is not yet locked in by large corporations.
High concentrationMinimal co-filing activity; Lone Gull Holdings is the main collaboration hub
Co-applicant activity is sparse: the only recorded co-filing pairs involve Lone Gull Holdings collaborating once each with Garth Alexander Sheldon Coulson and with Brian Moffat. This thin collaboration network suggests that most IP development is proprietary and siloed, which may create partnership opportunities for organisations seeking to pool offshore engineering and renewable energy expertise.
Low collaborationUS-centric filings with meaningful EPO and PCT reach
The United States leads jurisdictional coverage, followed by Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT). Australia appears as a notable fourth jurisdiction, likely reflecting that country’s remote mining sector as a target market. Chile, New Zealand, and South Africa also appear, consistent with mining-intensive economies. The relatively thin presence in Asian jurisdictions — despite the scale of mining activity in those regions — represents a geographic coverage gap worth monitoring.
US-led, mining marketsGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
| Applicant | Collaborator | Co-filings |
|---|---|---|
| Garth Alexander Sheldon Coulson | Lone Gull Holdings Ltd | 1 |
| MOFFAT BRIAN | Lone Gull Holdings Ltd | 1 |
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
Innovator Energy LLC and Lone Gull Holdings lead by volume; Siemens Gamesa provides OEM depth
The top two filers are specialist entities with distinct technical emphases: Innovator Energy LLC focuses on hydraulic, water treatment, and grid systems integration, while Lone Gull Holdings concentrates on hydraulic machines and offshore lighting. Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS represents the only major turbine OEM in the top three.
Innovator Energy LLC
Holds 17 patent families, the largest position in the ranking. Its technical focus spans hydraulic machines and engines (F03B 13), water and wastewater treatment (C02F 1), and power supply and grid systems (H02J 15) — a profile consistent with integrated offshore energy and process systems for remote mining sites. Momentum is classified as a new entrant in the recent period, suggesting its filing activity is concentrated in the most recent filing window.
families: 17Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS
Holds 10 patent families and is the largest established turbine OEM in the ranking. Its focus is squarely on wind motor technology (F03D 7, F03D 13) and marine vessel structures (B63B 39), reflecting core floating offshore wind engineering rather than mining-specific integration. Momentum is classified as a new entrant in the recent period. Its entry signals that mainstream offshore wind OEMs are beginning to engage with the mining application segment.
families: 10| Applicant | Recent (3 yrs) | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Innovator Energy LLC | 15 | ▲ new entrant |
| Lone Gull Holdings Ltd | 2 | ▲ new entrant |
| Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS | 3 | ▲ new entrant |
| MAGELLAN & BARENTS SL | 7 | ▲ new entrant |
| Stephen Christopher Colin | 2 | ▲ new entrant |
| Mark Stewart Dimmock | 2 | ▲ new entrant |
| Cabin Air Group Pty Ltd | 4 | ▲ new entrant |
Under-served technical branches adjacent to the core floating wind space
Several IPC branches appear at the periphery of the dominant B63B/F03D core with relatively low patent-record counts. These represent areas of comparative sparsity; two in particular have plausible technical relevance to mining-site deployment and realistic entry paths.
H02J · Power supply and grid systems
This branch covers microgrid architecture, energy storage interconnection, and remote power supply — all directly relevant to powering isolated mining operations from floating wind assets. With only 15 patent records, coverage is thin relative to the engineering complexity involved. Teams with expertise in islanded microgrid control or battery-coupled offshore power systems could find this a viable differentiation vector, particularly given that grid integration is a key barrier to adoption at remote mine sites.
Search this in Eureka →C02F · Water and wastewater treatment
With 10 patent records, this branch is sparsely covered despite water being a critical constraint for many mining operations. Coupling floating wind generation with desalination or process-water treatment — an application area already touched on by Innovator Energy LLC’s portfolio — remains largely open territory. Entrants with process-engineering capability in water treatment could build a defensible position at the intersection of offshore power and mine-site water supply.
Search this in Eureka →How leading applicants differ across technology routes
Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.
| Player | F03D 13 · Wind motors (wind turbines) | B63B 35 · Ships & marine vessels | F03B 13 · Hydraulic machines & engines | B63B 1 · Ships & marine vessels | B63B 21 · Ships & marine vessels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magellan & Barents SL | Strong · 6 | Moderate · 2 | Absent | Strong · 6 | Strong · 6 |
| Lone Gull Holdings Ltd | Moderate · 3 | Moderate · 3 | Strong · 9 | Absent | Moderate · 4 |
| Innovator Energy LLC | Absent | Absent | Strong · 15 | Absent | Absent |
| Garth Alexander Sheldon Coulson | Absent | Absent | Strong · 7 | Absent | Moderate · 2 |
| Mark Stewart Dimmock | Strong · 3 | Strong · 2 | Absent | Absent | Strong · 3 |
| Stephen Christopher Colin | Strong · 3 | Strong · 2 | Absent | Absent | Strong · 3 |
Frequently asked questions
The evidence covers 100 patent families in scope for this technology topic.
Innovator Energy LLC leads with 17 patent families, followed by Lone Gull Holdings Ltd with 14 and Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS with 10.
The field is assessed as Mature: annual filings have plateaued near their 2020 peak and have eased since. Multi-year growth remains positive at 21%, but the rapid-expansion phase appears to have passed.
The United States leads with 32 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) with 15 and WIPO (PCT) with 13. Australia is a notable fourth market, reflecting its mining sector relevance.
B63B (Ships and marine vessels) and F03D (Wind motors) are the two largest IPC branches, reflecting the dual challenge of offshore structural engineering and turbine design. F03B (Hydraulic machines and engines) is a significant third branch.
Co-filing activity is minimal. The only recorded co-applicant pairs involve Lone Gull Holdings collaborating once each with Garth Alexander Sheldon Coulson and with Brian Moffat. Most filings are single-applicant, suggesting predominantly proprietary IP development.
Map the floating wind turbine patent landscape for your own technology focus
Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.