Book a demo

Floating Wind Turbine for Renewable Hydrogen Patent Landscape

Floating Wind Turbine for Renewable Hydrogen Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Floating Wind Turbine for Renewable Hydrogen Patent Landscape in 2026

The floating wind-to-hydrogen field is sharply concentrated: the top five filers among the hundred largest applicants hold 72% of that group’s combined total, with Lone Gull Holdings and Innovator Energy accounting for nearly half the corpus alone. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2022 peak and the most recent filing years remain understated by publication lag.

111
Patent families in scope
72%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+61%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

A tightly held niche dominated by two specialist firms

Lone Gull Holdings Ltd leads all applicants with 30 patent families, followed by Innovator Energy LLC with 21 and Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS with 13.

The top five filers account for 72% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total — an unusually high concentration for an emerging energy technology, indicating that a small cluster of specialist and early-mover entities has established a structurally dominant position before mainstream industrial adoption.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Lone Gull Holdings Ltd30
2Innovator Energy LLC21
3Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS13
4Single Buoy Moorings Inc8
5Subsea 7 Ltd8
6Cabin Air Group4
7FREW HLDG BV3
8Hitachi Ltd3
9Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLC3
10University of Maine3
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Dehlsen Associates of the Pacific Ltd2
12KOREA INSTITUTE OF OCEAN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY2
13SIA YIK HEI2
14Huygens Beheer BV1
15Korea Marine Equipment Research Institute1
16National Institute of Technology Manipur1
17Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences1
18University of Massachusetts1
19Odfjell Oceanwind AS1
20Edison Technology Co Ltd1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Lone Gull’s lead, built on hydraulic machinery and marine vessel classes, suggests a platform-level approach; Siemens Gamesa’s entry signals that a major turbine OEM has begun staking IP positions, which typically foreshadows broader industrial competition.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 are understated due to standard patent publication delays of 18–24 months; the apparent slowdown in those years should not be read as a real decline in inventive activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity surged from 2021 onward; hydraulic and marine classes dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend and the IPC technology composition together reveal both the pace at which the field has matured and the breadth of engineering disciplines it spans.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible before 2019, then accelerated sharply through 2021 and peaked in 2022. The three-year window ending in 2024 sits well above the prior three-year window, confirming multi-year growth, but annual volume has eased from the 2022 peak. Years 2024 and 2025 are materially understated by publication lag and should not be interpreted as a real slowdown.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 33 in 2022.020170201872019620202820213320222020231320244202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Hydraulic machines and engines (F03B) and ships and marine vessels (B63B) are the two most represented IPC classes, reflecting the offshore platform engineering at the core of these inventions. Wind motors (F03D) and electrolytic production of compounds (C25B, which covers electrolysis-based hydrogen generation) follow, confirming that the corpus spans both the energy-capture and the hydrogen-production subsystems. Several adjacent classes — water treatment (C02F), power grid integration (H02J), and liquid dispensing (B67D) — appear at lower densities, indicating that balance-of-plant and offtake engineering is less developed in the patent record.

Technology compositionF03B · Hydraulic machines & engines leads with 52; B63B · Ships & marine vessels 43.F03B · Hydraulic machine…52B63B · Ships & marine ve…43F03D · Wind motors (wind…37C25B · Electrolytic prod…29C02F · Water & wastewate…18B63G · Naval vessels & o…16H02J · Power supply & gr…15B67D · Dispensing liquids13↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
EP4733186A1Published 2026-04-29

EINE NICHT VERANKERTE, FREI SCHWIMMENDE WINDKRAFTA…

Huygens Beheer B.V.

This disclosure relates to an unmoored floating wind turbine system comprising a connecting structure that bears one or more wind turbines, and at least three hulls or topological concentrations of buoyancy-force, wherein the connecting structure is configured to transmit moments and forces between the at least three hulls and the one or more wind turbines… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

EINE NICHT VERANKERTE, FREI SCHWIMMENDE WINDKRAFTA… — patent drawingEINE NICHT VERANKERTE, FREI SCHWIMMENDE WINDKRAFTA… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Hydrogen production and conveyance system45
2Power generating windbags and waterbags28
3Wind and wave desalination vessel28
4Offshore renewable energy power station16
5Hydrogen production and conveyance system11
6Mobile floating offshore wind energy system10
7Brine power10
8一种浮式海上风机与制氢一体化系统及其应用8

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, a clearly identifiable growth inflection, limited academic-industrial collaboration, and US-centric filing geography shapes both the risk and opportunity profile for new entrants.

Growth

Growth stage, but past its 2022 filing peak

The field carries a Growth lifecycle designation: the recent three-year filing window sits well above the prior three-year window, confirming the field is still expanding on a multi-year basis. However, annual volume has eased from the 2022 peak, suggesting the initial land-grab phase is transitioning toward more selective, higher-quality filings. New entrants can still establish credible positions, but the window of easy differentiation is narrowing.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Two specialists hold structural dominance

Lone Gull Holdings and Innovator Energy together account for 51 of the top-ranked patent families, giving them a blocking position across core hydraulic-marine system architectures. Siemens Gamesa’s entry with 13 patent families introduces an OEM-scale competitor whose supply-chain leverage could accelerate commercialization. Any new entrant must either design around the dominant clusters or target the adjacent, less-covered branches.

Top-5 share: 72%
Collaboration

One active co-filing pair identified: University of Maine and Alliance for Sustainable Energy

The University of Maine and the Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLC share 3 co-filed patent families, the only collaboration pair evidenced in the data. Both organizations focus on floating platform vessel architecture (B63B). The near-absence of broader academic-industrial co-filing suggests that the dominant private players are developing technology internally rather than through open-innovation partnerships, which may create licensing or partnership entry points for research institutions.

Co-filers: 1 pair
Geography

US-led filing with limited Asian and European coverage

The United States is the leading filing jurisdiction, followed by the EPO regional route and WIPO PCT filings. Australia, the United Kingdom, and Vietnam also appear in the record, suggesting some applicants are pursuing Asia-Pacific market access. China and South Korea each carry only a small number of patent records despite both countries’ active offshore wind programs, indicating a potential gap between commercial ambition and filed IP in those markets.

Lead office: US
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
University of MaineAlliance for Sustainable Energy LLC3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Lifecycle and collaboration data sourced from PatSnap Eureka filing analytics.Explore insights →
Leaders

Lone Gull leads on volume; Innovator Energy and Siemens Gamesa are the fastest-moving challengers

The leader set divides into an established volume leader (Lone Gull) and a cohort of new entrants that entered the recent three-year window at scale, with Innovator Energy and Siemens Gamesa being the most consequential.

Leader · Lone Gull Holdings Ltd

Lone Gull Holdings Ltd

Lone Gull Holdings holds 30 patent families, the largest portfolio in the corpus. Its technology emphasis is concentrated in hydraulic machines and engines (F03B) and marine vessel architecture (B63B), indicating a platform-level, systems-integration approach to the offshore hydrogen value chain. Recent momentum shows a 60% decline from prior levels, suggesting the initial filing campaign has concluded and the portfolio is now in a consolidation or prosecution phase rather than active expansion.

families: 30
Challenger · Innovator Energy LLC

Innovator Energy LLC

Innovator Energy LLC holds 21 patent families and entered the recent filing window as a new entrant, with 18 of those families filed in the recent period. Its technology focus spans hydraulic machinery (F03B), water and wastewater treatment (C02F), and power grid systems (H02J), which is a notably broader systems scope than Lone Gull’s and covers the electrolysis balance-of-plant chain more explicitly. This trajectory makes Innovator Energy the most active current filer and a potential challenger for portfolio leadership in the next cycle.

families: 21
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, technology focus maps, and momentum scores for all top applicants in the floating wind-to-hydrogen corpus.
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy ASSingle Buoy Moorings Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Lone Gull Holdings Ltd8▼ -60%
Innovator Energy LLC18▲ new entrant
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS11▲ new entrant
Subsea 7 Ltd8▲ new entrant
Cabin Air Group4▲ new entrant
University of Maine3▲ new entrant
Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLC3▲ new entrant
FREW HLDG BV3▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent family counts are drawn from PatSnap Eureka applicant rankings.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in power integration, liquid handling, and vessel auxiliaries

Several IPC branches appear at materially lower patent-record densities relative to the dominant hydraulic and marine classes, suggesting that certain engineering subsystems have received less systematic IP coverage and may be accessible to focused entrants.

H02J · Power supply and grid systems integration

With 15 patent records against 37 in the core wind motor class (F03D), grid and power management represents an under-served adjacent branch. Offshore hydrogen systems require dynamic power routing between the turbine, electrolyzer, and potential grid export — a technically complex problem that existing filings address only partially. Innovator Energy is the primary filer in this space (H02J 15), but coverage is thin. An entrant with expertise in power electronics or microgrid control could file in this branch without directly conflicting with the dominant hydraulic-marine portfolios.

Search this in Eureka →

B67D · Dispensing and transfer of liquids (hydrogen offtake)

B67D covers liquid dispensing and transfer, which in this context maps to compressed or liquefied hydrogen offtake, storage transfer, and bunkering — a critical but currently sparse branch with 13 patent records. Safe and efficient hydrogen transfer from an offshore floating platform to a carrier vessel or pipeline is a recognized commercialization bottleneck. No single dominant filer is evident in this branch, and the technical problem is distinct from the upstream generation and platform engineering covered by the leading portfolios, offering a realistic entry path for marine logistics or gas-handling specialists.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See patent-density scores, filing velocity, and applicant coverage for all adjacent branches across the floating wind-to-hydrogen landscape.
B63J · Ship auxiliariesB01D · Separation processes (filtration, gas purification)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. White-space branches are identified by low patent-record share relative to dominant IPC classes in the corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How the leading applicants differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerF03B 13 · Hydraulic machines & enginesC25B 1 · Electrolytic production of compoundsB63B 35 · Ships & marine vesselsF03D 13 · Wind motors (wind turbines)F03D 9 · Wind motors (wind turbines)
Lone Gull Holdings LtdStrong · 27Moderate · 12AbsentAbsentAbsent
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy ASAbsentModerate · 5AbsentModerate · 6Strong · 13
Innovator Energy LLCStrong · 19AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Single Buoy Moorings IncAbsentStrong · 6Strong · 8AbsentAbsent
Subsea 7 LtdAbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 8Absent
FREW HLDG BVAbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 3Strong · 3
Korea Institute of Ocean Science and TechnologyAbsentStrong · 2Strong · 2Strong · 2Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map the floating wind hydrogen landscape for your own R&D portfolio?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.