Book a demo

Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/fluorinated-etch-gas-alternatives-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Electronic Chemicals
Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives Patents: Who Holds the Ground
  • Top 5 filers hold 50.3% of the field. 541 of 1,075 records in scope sit with just five assignees — this is a concentrated landscape, not a fragmented one.
  • Filing rose 22% from 2021 to 2024. 32 records in 2021 grew to 39 in 2024, the last year with a complete publication picture.
  • C09K materials claims cover over half the field. 563 of 1,075 records touch this subclass alone, with refrigeration (F25B) and lubricants (C10M, C10N) close behind.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,075
Published Records
50%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+22%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (32 records) with 2024 (39) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,075 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Fluorinated etch gas alternatives sit at the intersection of semiconductor process chemistry and refrigerant/lubricant science, because many of the low-global warming potential (GWP) fluorocarbon compositions developed for cooling and cleaning applications share the same molecular backbones as those explored for plasma etch. This dataset spans 1,075 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from claims and descriptions referencing global warming potential, etch rate parity, byproduct formation, abatement efficiency, chamber compatibility and supply availability.

The picture that emerges is not a niche etch-gas story on its own — it is a broader low-GWP fluorochemical landscape where refrigeration and lubricant claims outnumber pure etch-process claims, and where a small number of chemical majors hold a majority of the filings.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1AGC INC196
  2. 2HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC138
  3. 3IDEMITSU KOSAN CO LTD98
  4. 4THE CHEMOURS CO FC LLC60
  5. 5OWENS CORNING INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL LLC49
  6. 6DAIKIN INDUSTRIES LTD44
  7. 7RPL HLDG LTD36
  8. 8THE LUBRIZOL CORP30
  9. 9SOLSTICE ADVANCED MATERIALS US INC25
  10. 10JAPAN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION CO LTD22
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,075 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 56 in 2017 to a peak of 75 in 2019, before settling into a mid-30s range through the early 2020s. From 2021 (32) to 2024 (39) — the last year with a largely complete publication record — filings grew 22%. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the apparent tail should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017–2026020406080562017201875201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications) appears in 52.4% of the 1,075 records, the single largest subclass. F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps) follows at 30.3%, and lubricant-related classes C10M and C10N cover 22.8% and 13.2% respectively. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to well over 100% — they show where claim density sits, not a partition of the field.

Technology composition by IPC subclassC09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…56352.4%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps32630.3%C10M · Lubricants24522.8%C10N · Lubricant properties (index)14213.2%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds14013.0%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions12111.3%C11D · Detergents & cleaning composit…474.4%A01N · Biocides / agrochemicals423.9%Other56452.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,075 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fluorinated etch gas alternatives and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in the field

Representative Filing
US20210010478A12021-01-14

Centrifugal compressor for use with low global warming potential (GWP) refrigerant

DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD.

A centrifugal compressor configured for low-GWP refrigerant, with an impeller whose blades carry a fully nonlinear, quasi-orthogonal cross-section. The hub-side blade angle varies along the streamwise direction so it is largest nearer the leading edge than the trailing edge, and the casing is shaped to work with the low-GWP refrigerant's flow characteristics.Filed by Daikin Industries, this record illustrates how low-GWP chemistry claims extend into mechanical hardware — compressor and casing geometry tuned to a specific refrigerant class, not just the chemical composition itself.

US20210010478A1 — patent drawing 1US20210010478A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5759430AClean, tropodegradable agents with low ozone depletion and global warming potentials to protect against fires…208
2WO2009015317A1Improved method for producing 2-chloro-3,3,3,-trifluoropropene (HCFC-1233xf)202
3WO2015186670A1Composition for heat cycle system and heat cycle system185
4US6300378B1Tropodegradable bromine-containing halocarbon additives to decrease flammability of refrigerants foam blowing…169
5US5900185ATropodegradable bromine-containing halocarbon additives to decrease flammability of refrigerants, foam blowin…168
6WO2008027555A2Method for circulating selected heat transfer fluids through a closed loop cycle156
7US6024889AChemically active fire suppression composition132
8US20090030244A1METHOD FOR PRODUCING 2-CHLORO-3,3,3-TRIFLUOROPROPENE (HCFC-1233xf)125
9WO2015125885A1Composition for heat cycle systems, and heat cycle system94
10US7795480B2Method for producing 2-chloro-3,3,3,-trifluoropropene (HCFC-1233xf)90

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings, since they have had more time to accumulate citations — read this table as a map of influential prior art, not a ranking of current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the records are aggregated by assignee, year and IPC class.

Concentration
50.3%
of 1,075 records held by top 5 assignees

The top tier is narrow

Five assignees hold just over half of all records in scope, and the top ten extend that to 64.9%. New entrants filing broad compositional claims in this space are filing into occupied ground; the more open routes tend to sit in application-specific hardware or formulation niches rather than core chemistry.

Based on the full 100-company ranking
Momentum
+22%
growth in filings, 2021 to 2024

Activity is building, not fading

Filings climbed from 32 in 2021 to 39 in 2024, the last year with a mostly complete publication record. The dip visible in 2025–2026 reflects publication lag rather than a real drop in filing activity, since publication typically trails filing by around 18 months.

2024 is the most recent complete year
Composition
52.4%
of records touch C09K materials claims

Refrigerant and lubricant chemistry dominates

C09K, F25B, C10M and C10N together account for the bulk of claim density, meaning most of this landscape's activity is about refrigerant and lubricant compositions rather than semiconductor process integration specifically. Etch-adjacent claims exist but sit inside a much larger low-GWP fluorochemical corpus.

Classes overlap; a record may carry several
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fluorinated etch gas alternatives, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-assignee activity
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.Showa Tansan Co., Ltd.21
Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.Toyota Tsusho Corporation16
Honeywell International Inc.Earth Chemical Co., Ltd.12
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.Denso Corporation10
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.Toyota Industries Corporation9
AGC Inc.Sony Group Corporation5
AGC Inc.ULVAC, Inc.5
AGC Inc.Panasonic Corporation (Japan)5

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairing linked to joint filings between a petroleum resource development company and a carbonic acid gas producer — a pattern consistent with feedstock or gas-supply partnerships rather than pure R&D collaboration.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the openings sit

The ranked leaders span chemical majors with refrigerant and lubricant portfolios; recent-year momentum for several of the largest filers has slowed to zero or near-zero, which is consistent with publication lag rather than withdrawal from the field.

Leader
196
records

A single filer well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee holds 196 records, more than double the fifth-place filer's 49. That gap signals a company that has built a broad compositional and application patent base rather than a narrow defensive position.

Leader vs. fifth place: 196 vs. 49
Mid-tier
22
records at tenth place

A steep drop-off after the top ten

Tenth place holds 22 records, less than half of fifth place's 49. Below the top ten, the ranking spreads across a long tail of the remaining 90 companies, many with single-digit filing counts.

Top 10 combined: 698 records, 64.9% of scope
Momentum
-100%
YoY for several large filers in the latest year

Recent-year counts are thin across the board

Several of the largest historical filers show zero or near-zero activity in the latest year, including year-over-year drops as steep as -100% and -80%. This reflects the ~18-month publication lag more than a genuine pullback, and should not be read as leaders exiting the space.

Latest year is partial in the dataset
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core refrigerant and lubricant chemistry claims
byproduct abatement kineticschamber-material compatibility testingsupply-chain feedstock sourcing claimsetch rate parity measurement methodsbiocide/agrochemical crossover formulations
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Chemours Company FC, LLC1-80%
AGC Inc.0
Honeywell International Inc.0-100%
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.0-100%
Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, LLC0
Daikin Industries, Ltd.0
RPL Holdings Ltd.0
The Lubrizol Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated core and a thinner periphery — the next steps depend on whether you are filing, licensing or freedom-to-operate checking.

Map claim boundaries around the top filers

With 50.3% of records held by five assignees, a freedom-to-operate review should start with their core compositional claims before looking at the long tail.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches

Byproduct abatement, chamber compatibility testing and supply-chain sourcing claims show thinner density than core refrigerant chemistry — worth monitoring for freshly filed white space.

Set up a monitoring search in Eureka

Watch for the 2025–2026 publication catch-up

Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the current partial-year figures will fill in; re-checking this view in a future quarter will sharpen the recent-momentum picture.

Run this landscape again in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Fluorinated Etch Gas Alternatives in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole fluorinated etch gas alternatives corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.