Book a demo

Flux-Switching Machine Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Flux-Switching Machine Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/flux-switching-and-amorphous-core-machines-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Electric Machines & Drives
Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machine Patents
  • Filing has cooled since 2019. The peak year so far is 2019 at 5 records, and the 2022 midpoint sits at just 2 — a flat-to-declining trend, not a growing one.
  • Four filers already hold over half the field. The top 5 assignees combined account for 14 of the 26 records in scope (53.8%), with a long tail of single- and double-filing entrants below them.
  • Almost everything sits in one IPC subclass. H02K (electric motors & generators) covers 88.5% of the 26 records, leaving lifts/escalators and electron-tube applications as marginal, single-record footnotes.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
26
Published Records
54%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 26 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Flux-switching permanent magnet machines and amorphous or soft magnetic composite (SMC) stator designs sit at the intersection of two manufacturing problems: how to keep magnets and windings on the stator for fault tolerance and thermal reasons, and how to build a core from a material that resists eddy-current loss without becoming too brittle to laminate or press. This dataset pulls 26 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine those design claims with language about core loss, brittleness, lamination handling, torque density, manufacturing process or thermal conductivity.

The scope is deliberately narrow: it is not general PM motor design, but the specific overlap between flux-switching or amorphous/SMC core topologies and the practical constraints of building them. That makes the 26-record set small enough that a handful of academic groups and one or two corporates account for most of the activity, and it means a single well-cited filing can shift the picture for a whole sub-branch.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM4
  2. 2JOUNG IL IND3
  3. 3NANJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY3
  4. 4HARBIN INST OF TECH2
  5. 5GERADA CHRIS2
  6. 6HUAZHONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH2
  7. 7RAMINOSA TSARAFIDY2
  8. 8Chuangneng Future (Yangzhou) New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.2
  9. 9RENAULT SA1
  10. 10RES & DEV INST OF NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIV IN SHENZHEN1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 26-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the records actually sit in. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year shown is always an undercount.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Activity rose to a peak of 5 records in 2019, then eased back; the 2022 midpoint of 2 records confirms a flat-to-declining pattern rather than renewed growth. The 2026 figure of 0 reflects the partial year and cut-off, not a stop in filing.

Filing trend, 2017–20260134522017201852019202020212022520232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H02K (electric motors & generators) dominates at 23 of 26 records (88.5%); B66B (lifts & escalators) and H01J (electron & discharge tubes) each contribute a single record (3.8%), marking incidental rather than core application areas. Records can carry more than one class, so these shares sum to over 100%.

IPC subclass compositionH02K · Electric motors & generators2388.5%B66B · Lifts & escalators13.8%H01J · Electron & discharge tubes13.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 26 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about flux-switching and amorphous core machines and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records in the set

Representative filing
GB201003954D02010-04-21

Fault tolerant flux switching machine (GB201003954D0)

THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM

Filed by the University of Nottingham in 2010, this record predates the dataset's main filing window but anchors the fault-tolerant flux-switching machine concept that later Chinese academic filings build on and around.Priority date shown separately in the record card.

View full record
Citation leaders
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN109660097A一种新型调磁轴向磁通切换Halbach电机31
2CN109842265A一种新型磁通切换永磁直线电机7
3CN117559679A一种具有定子槽口永磁体的磁通切换永磁电机和调速系统6
4WO2011110857A2Fault tolerant flux switching machine5
5CN109842220A一种外转子磁通切换永磁电机4
6CN117498587A一种定子励磁磁场高次谐波增强型磁通切换永磁电机3
7KR1020170073240AFlux Switching Permanent Magnet Motor3
8CN116566079A一种三相新型多齿容错型外转子磁通切换永磁电机2
9KR1020170108490AMethod For Manufacturing Flux Switching Permanent Magnet Motor2
10GB2480229AStator for a flux switching inductor machine2

Ranked by citation count within this searched corpus; older records accumulate citations simply by being available longer, so treat this as a signal of influence, not of current importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are set against each other: where claim density already sits, what geography the activity funnels through, and how thin the collaboration network actually is.

Concentration
53.8% / 84.6%
share of 26 records

Half the field sits with five filers

The top 5 assignees combined hold 14 of the 26 records in scope (53.8%), and the top 10 hold 22 (84.6%). That leaves a genuinely thin tail below rank ten — most of the remaining nine ranked companies appear on a single record.

Assignee ranking, 19 companies
Geography
17 of 26
China receiving office filings

Filing funnels through China

China accounts for 17 of the 26 records, with South Korea and WIPO (PCT) each contributing 3, and the UK and India trailing at 2 and 1. A filing strategy built only around Western offices will miss most of the activity in this space.

Receiving office breakdown
Collaboration
3 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is rare and clustered

Only three co-assignee pairs appear across the whole set, and all three link the same three parties around the Nottingham fault-tolerant machine work. Outside that cluster, filings are single-assignee.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Momentum
0 latest year
for every tracked assignee

No assignee shows recent-year momentum

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including the leading academic groups, shows zero filings in the latest year. Combined with the flat 2022 midpoint, this reads as a maturing niche rather than an accelerating one.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to flux-switching and amorphous core machines, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the gate sits

The ranked leaders come almost entirely from university engineering departments and a handful of individual inventors; there is no dominant automotive or industrial-motor OEM in the top ranks of this specific 26-record set, though a major automaker appears further down the list.

Leader
4 records
top-ranked assignee

A single academic group leads on volume

The top assignee holds 4 of the 26 records, roughly matched further down by fifth and tenth place at 2 and 1 respectively — a gentle rather than steep drop-off through the ranked leaders.

Assignee ranking
Cluster
3 co-filed pairs
all linked to one project

One collaboration network, not several

The only repeated co-assignee relationships in the dataset connect the same fault-tolerant flux-switching machine work; no other cross-institution or corporate-academic pairing recurs.

Co-assignee pairs
Corporate entrant
1 automaker
named in the ranking

Automotive interest is present but thin

A major automaker appears in the ranked list, but well below the leading academic filers by record count, suggesting exploratory rather than core-platform patenting activity in this specific claim space.

Assignee ranking, position 10 and below
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches where the current 26-record set shows thin or no coverage relative to the core flux-switching and SMC-stator claims
Amorphous alloy lamination stress reliefSMC stator thermal conductivity pathsFault-tolerant winding isolation in flux-switching topologiesHalbach-array flux-switching rotor variantsCore-loss modelling for high-speed SMC stators
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
University of Nottingham0
Nanjing Normal University0
JOUNG IL IND0
Harbin Institute of Technology0
Nantong University0
Huazhong University of Science and Technology0
RAMINOSA TSARAFIDY0
GERADA CHRIS0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this from here

The dataset points to a niche that is technically active but has stopped growing in filing volume, concentrated among a small set of academic groups with light corporate participation.

Check freedom to operate around the Nottingham cluster

The strongest co-assignee network in this set centres on fault-tolerant flux-switching machine claims; any new filing touching fault tolerance in this topology should be checked against that cluster first.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Watch for automotive re-entry

Automotive interest is present but thin relative to the academic leaders; a shift in that balance would be an early signal of commercialisation intent worth tracking.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Explore the under-claimed branches directly

Thermal-path and lamination-stress claims around SMC and amorphous stators show little current coverage in this set, which is where a well-drafted first claim has the most room.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole flux-switching and amorphous core machines corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.