Flux-Switching Machine Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2019. The peak year so far is 2019 at 5 records, and the 2022 midpoint sits at just 2 — a flat-to-declining trend, not a growing one.
- Four filers already hold over half the field. The top 5 assignees combined account for 14 of the 26 records in scope (53.8%), with a long tail of single- and double-filing entrants below them.
- Almost everything sits in one IPC subclass. H02K (electric motors & generators) covers 88.5% of the 26 records, leaving lifts/escalators and electron-tube applications as marginal, single-record footnotes.
Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 26 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Flux-switching permanent magnet machines and amorphous or soft magnetic composite (SMC) stator designs sit at the intersection of two manufacturing problems: how to keep magnets and windings on the stator for fault tolerance and thermal reasons, and how to build a core from a material that resists eddy-current loss without becoming too brittle to laminate or press. This dataset pulls 26 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine those design claims with language about core loss, brittleness, lamination handling, torque density, manufacturing process or thermal conductivity.
The scope is deliberately narrow: it is not general PM motor design, but the specific overlap between flux-switching or amorphous/SMC core topologies and the practical constraints of building them. That makes the 26-record set small enough that a handful of academic groups and one or two corporates account for most of the activity, and it means a single well-cited filing can shift the picture for a whole sub-branch.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology mix
Two views of the same 26-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the records actually sit in. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year shown is always an undercount.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Activity rose to a peak of 5 records in 2019, then eased back; the 2022 midpoint of 2 records confirms a flat-to-declining pattern rather than renewed growth. The 2026 figure of 0 reflects the partial year and cut-off, not a stop in filing.
IPC subclass composition
H02K (electric motors & generators) dominates at 23 of 26 records (88.5%); B66B (lifts & escalators) and H01J (electron & discharge tubes) each contribute a single record (3.8%), marking incidental rather than core application areas. Records can carry more than one class, so these shares sum to over 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 26 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about flux-switching and amorphous core machines and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in the set
Fault tolerant flux switching machine (GB201003954D0)
Filed by the University of Nottingham in 2010, this record predates the dataset's main filing window but anchors the fault-tolerant flux-switching machine concept that later Chinese academic filings build on and around.Priority date shown separately in the record card.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN109660097A | 一种新型调磁轴向磁通切换Halbach电机 | 31 |
| 2 | CN109842265A | 一种新型磁通切换永磁直线电机 | 7 |
| 3 | CN117559679A | 一种具有定子槽口永磁体的磁通切换永磁电机和调速系统 | 6 |
| 4 | WO2011110857A2 | Fault tolerant flux switching machine | 5 |
| 5 | CN109842220A | 一种外转子磁通切换永磁电机 | 4 |
| 6 | CN117498587A | 一种定子励磁磁场高次谐波增强型磁通切换永磁电机 | 3 |
| 7 | KR1020170073240A | Flux Switching Permanent Magnet Motor | 3 |
| 8 | CN116566079A | 一种三相新型多齿容错型外转子磁通切换永磁电机 | 2 |
| 9 | KR1020170108490A | Method For Manufacturing Flux Switching Permanent Magnet Motor | 2 |
| 10 | GB2480229A | Stator for a flux switching inductor machine | 2 |
Ranked by citation count within this searched corpus; older records accumulate citations simply by being available longer, so treat this as a signal of influence, not of current importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are set against each other: where claim density already sits, what geography the activity funnels through, and how thin the collaboration network actually is.
Half the field sits with five filers
The top 5 assignees combined hold 14 of the 26 records in scope (53.8%), and the top 10 hold 22 (84.6%). That leaves a genuinely thin tail below rank ten — most of the remaining nine ranked companies appear on a single record.
Filing funnels through China
China accounts for 17 of the 26 records, with South Korea and WIPO (PCT) each contributing 3, and the UK and India trailing at 2 and 1. A filing strategy built only around Western offices will miss most of the activity in this space.
Co-filing is rare and clustered
Only three co-assignee pairs appear across the whole set, and all three link the same three parties around the Nottingham fault-tolerant machine work. Outside that cluster, filings are single-assignee.
No assignee shows recent-year momentum
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including the leading academic groups, shows zero filings in the latest year. Combined with the flat 2022 midpoint, this reads as a maturing niche rather than an accelerating one.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to flux-switching and amorphous core machines, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is active, and where the gate sits
The ranked leaders come almost entirely from university engineering departments and a handful of individual inventors; there is no dominant automotive or industrial-motor OEM in the top ranks of this specific 26-record set, though a major automaker appears further down the list.
A single academic group leads on volume
The top assignee holds 4 of the 26 records, roughly matched further down by fifth and tenth place at 2 and 1 respectively — a gentle rather than steep drop-off through the ranked leaders.
One collaboration network, not several
The only repeated co-assignee relationships in the dataset connect the same fault-tolerant flux-switching machine work; no other cross-institution or corporate-academic pairing recurs.
Automotive interest is present but thin
A major automaker appears in the ranked list, but well below the leading academic filers by record count, suggesting exploratory rather than core-platform patenting activity in this specific claim space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| University of Nottingham | 0 | — |
| Nanjing Normal University | 0 | — |
| JOUNG IL IND | 0 | — |
| Harbin Institute of Technology | 0 | — |
| Nantong University | 0 | — |
| Huazhong University of Science and Technology | 0 | — |
| RAMINOSA TSARAFIDY | 0 | — |
| GERADA CHRIS | 0 | — |
Where to take this from here
The dataset points to a niche that is technically active but has stopped growing in filing volume, concentrated among a small set of academic groups with light corporate participation.
Check freedom to operate around the Nottingham cluster
The strongest co-assignee network in this set centres on fault-tolerant flux-switching machine claims; any new filing touching fault tolerance in this topology should be checked against that cluster first.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaWatch for automotive re-entry
Automotive interest is present but thin relative to the academic leaders; a shift in that balance would be an early signal of commercialisation intent worth tracking.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaExplore the under-claimed branches directly
Thermal-path and lamination-stress claims around SMC and amorphous stators show little current coverage in this set, which is where a well-drafted first claim has the most room.
Explore white space in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
A flux-switching permanent magnet machine keeps both the magnets and the windings on the stator, with the rotor built from simple laminated steel and no magnets or windings. This makes the rotor mechanically robust and easier to cool, which is why fault-tolerant and high-temperature applications drive much of the patenting interest. Because the core claims involve stator geometry, magnet placement and winding configuration together, filings in this space tend to combine mechanical, magnetic and thermal claim language rather than isolating one discipline.
Amorphous alloys reduce core loss significantly compared with conventional silicon steel, but the same atomic structure that suppresses eddy currents also makes the material brittle and difficult to stamp or laminate at scale. SMC materials avoid lamination altogether by using bonded powder cores, which shifts the challenge to thermal conductivity and mechanical strength instead. Patent claims in this dataset frequently address one of these two manufacturing trade-offs directly, which is why search terms like brittleness and lamination handling surface alongside the core material claims.
The ranked leaders in this 26-record dataset are dominated by university engineering departments, with the top-ranked assignee holding 4 records and the ranking dropping off gently rather than sharply through the remaining ranked companies. A major automaker appears further down the ranked list, but well behind the leading academic filers by volume. There is no single corporate assignee that dominates this specific claim combination the way OEMs often dominate broader PM motor categories.
Filing activity peaked in 2019 at 5 records and has not returned to that level since; the 2022 midpoint of 2 records, together with zero recent-year filings across every tracked assignee, points to a flat or declining trend rather than growth. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year in any such trend is always understated, but the multi-year pattern here is consistent enough to read as a genuine slowdown rather than a reporting artefact. This suggests a technology area where the core claim space has already been substantially staked out.
The technology composition is heavily concentrated in H02K electric motor and generator claims, at 88.5% of the 26 records, with only incidental coverage of adjacent applications like lifts, escalators and electron tubes. Within the core topology, sub-areas such as amorphous alloy lamination stress relief, SMC stator thermal conductivity paths and Halbach-array flux-switching rotor variants show thin direct coverage relative to the core fault-tolerance and torque-density claims. These are reasonable areas to investigate for a first claim, though a formal freedom-to-operate search against the existing cluster is still necessary before drafting.
Research Flux-Switching and Amorphous Core Machines in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole flux-switching and amorphous core machines corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.