Book a demo

FO Fouling & Flux-Decline Monitoring Patent Snapshot

FO Fouling & Flux-Decline Monitoring Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
FO Fouling / Flux-Decline Monitoring Patent Snapshot in 2026

The patent corpus for forward osmosis fouling and flux-decline monitoring is extremely small, with activity concentrated almost entirely in two academic institutions following a single filing peak in 2019. The field is in a post-peak, low-activity phase, making it an open area for organisations seeking to establish early IP positions in real-time membrane monitoring.

2
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Two academic applicants account for all ranked activity in a nascent, highly concentrated field

The corpus contains 2 patent families in scope. Among ranked applicants, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) leads with 6 patent records, followed by the Research and Business Foundation of Sungkyunkwan University with 2 patent records.

The top five filers account for 100% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query — a level of concentration that is extreme even by emerging-technology standards, and reflects the field’s very early, academically driven origins rather than broad industrial uptake.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1KING ABDULLAH UNIV OF SCI & TECH6
2RES & BUSINESS FOUND SUNGKYUNKWAN UNIV2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

KAUST’s visible position, spanning both membrane separation (B01D) and analytical testing (G01N) branches, indicates it has pursued the broadest technical scope in this space. The absence of major industrial or membrane-manufacturer applicants signals that commercial adoption of in-line monitoring technology has not yet translated into patent filings.

Because the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag, the absence of post-2019 filings should be interpreted cautiously; some recent activity may not yet be visible in the corpus. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A single 2019 activity peak and a split between separation-process and analytical-testing branches define this field

The filing trend and technology composition together reveal a narrow, academically initiated field that has not yet attracted sustained or diversified investment. Both charts point to an early-mover opportunity for any applicant willing to move into under-occupied technical sub-areas.

Annual filing trend

All recorded filings occur in 2019, with zero activity in every surrounding year. The lifecycle is classified as post-peak decline from that single-year burst. Publication lag means filings from 2024–2026 may not yet appear, so the current zero count for those years should not be read as confirmed absence.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2019.02017020182201902020020210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B01D (Separation processes, including filtration) accounts for 8 patent records and G01N (Material analysis and testing) for 6, indicating that applicants have split effort between core membrane-process protection and the analytical/sensing instrumentation layer. No other IPC classes appear in the corpus.

Technology compositionB01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) leads with 8; G01N · Material analysis & testing 6.B01D · Separation proces…8G01N · Material analysis…6↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2016140412A1Published 2016-09-09

Device and method for real-time membrane fouling m…

Research Business Foundation Sungkyunkwan University

The present invention relates to the technical field of water treatment and, more specifically, provides monitoring device and method for detecting real-time the degree of membrane fouling of a forward osmosis membrane vessel in a forward osmosis membrane treatment device. To this end, the present invention comprises an FO treatment simulation unit which… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Device and method for real-time membrane fouling m… — patent drawingDevice and method for real-time membrane fouling m… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1In-line quantification and characterization of mem…15
2In-line quantification and characterization of mem…5
3In-line quantification and characterization of mem…5
4Device and method for real-time membrane fouling m…2
5A assembly and method of real-time fouling monitor…2
6In-line quantification and characterization of mem…1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

KAUST holds 6 patent records and is the sole applicant active across both B01D 61 (membrane separation processes), B01D 65 (membrane maintenance/fouling control), and G01N 17 (material analysis and testing) — the broadest technical scope in the corpus. This three-branch coverage suggests a deliberate strategy to protect both the monitoring instrumentation and the underlying membrane-process methods. Applicant momentum data for recent periods is not available in the evidence.

patent records: 6
Challenger · Research and Business Foundation of Sungkyunkwan University

Research and Business Foundation of Sungkyunkwan University

Sungkyunkwan University’s foundation holds 2 patent records, focused on B01D 61 and B01D 65 — the membrane separation and fouling-control sub-classes — without extending into the G01N analytical-testing branch. This narrower footprint positions it as a separation-process specialist rather than a full-stack monitoring player. Recent-period momentum data is not available in the evidence.

patent records: 2
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
King Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyResearch and Business Foundation of Sungkyunkwan University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.