Book a demo

Forklift Electrification Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Forklift Electrification Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/forklift-electrification-and-battery-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Forklifts & Warehouse Trucks
Forklift Electrification and Battery Systems Patents
  • One filer holds 103 of 317 records in scope — more than three times the fifth-place assignee's count of 12, a concentration rarely seen in industrial equipment patenting.
  • Filing growth has flattened, not fallen 2021 to 2024 moved from 23 to 22 filings, a -4% span over the only years the dataset treats as complete.
  • Measurement and grid classes rival propulsion itself G01R measurement claims (36.6% of records) and H02J power-supply claims (26.5%) sit nearly as dense as B60L propulsion (39.1%).
Get a prior-art report on your approach
317
Published Records
55%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-4%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (23 records) with 2024 (22) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 317 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers 317 published records matching electric forklift, lithium forklift battery, and forklift battery charging language, cross-referenced against battery swap, charge acceptance, state-of-charge, counterweight integration, thermal management, and fast-charging claims. The scope runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, though publication lag means the most recent filing years are still filling in. The set spans battery chemistry and pack design, propulsion control, state-of-charge and thermal management electronics, and the power-supply infrastructure that charges and swaps these packs.

Coverage is dominated by battery and propulsion-adjacent IPC classes rather than lift-mechanism classes, which signals that the active patenting fight in this field is inside the power system, not the forklift chassis. Receiving-office data shows the United States and Europe carrying the largest share of filings, with WIPO PCT filings indicating a meaningful cohort seeking multi-jurisdiction protection.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1NORTHSTAR BATTERY CO LLC103
  2. 2ETHIUM LLC26
  3. 3FERMATA ENERGY II LLC18
  4. 4TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORP15
  5. 5ECONTROLS LLC12
  6. 6JSYOUNGTECH12
  7. 7GENERAL ELECTRIC CO9
  8. 8INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION8
  9. 9PARKER HANNIFIN EMEA SARL8
  10. 10ENEL X SRL8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Forklift Electrification and Battery Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 317-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 1 in 2017 to a peak of 123 in 2018, then settled into a lower, comparatively stable band; 2021's 23 filings moved to 22 by 2024, a -4% span over the last years the dataset treats as complete. 2025 and 2026 figures are shown for completeness but will rise as publication catches up.

Filing trend, 2017–202603875113150120171232018201920202021202220232024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) leads at 41.6% of the 317 records in scope, followed closely by B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) at 39.1% and G01R (electric & magnetic measurement) at 36.6%. H02J (power supply & grid systems) claims a further 26.5%, while B66F (jacks & lifting devices) — the classic forklift mechanism class — appears in only 8.5% of records, underscoring that this landscape is a power-electronics fight layered onto a mechanical platform, not the reverse. Records can carry multiple classes, so these shares sum to more than 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells13241.6%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion12439.1%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement11636.6%H02J · Power supply & grid systems8426.5%B66F · Jacks & lifting devices278.5%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…237.3%G08B · Signalling & alarm systems175.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…134.1%Other15649.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 317 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Forklift Electrification and Battery Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Forklift Electrification and Battery Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about forklift electrification and battery systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Record
US20250042218A12025-02-06

Thermal management system for electric forklift (US20250042218A1)

ENEROC NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

A thermal management system for an electric forklift combining a battery cooling circulation loop, a battery heating circulation loop, a cab cooling circulation loop, and a cab heating circulation loop under a single turn-on control unit and thermal management control module. The battery cooling loop and a refrigerant sub-loop are arranged in parallel and share an electric compressor and condenser; the cab heating loop and battery heating loop share a heater and second power unit.Filed by Eneroc New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., published 2025-02-06 — illustrates how thermal loops for cab comfort and battery conditioning are increasingly claimed as a single shared-hardware system rather than separate subsystems.

US20250042218A1 — patent drawing 1
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20010052433A1Hybrid power supply module157
2US20190103639A1Modular lithium-ion battery system for fork lifts77
3US20060162973A1Hybrid power supply module76
4US20190036178A1Systems and methods for detecting thermal runaway of a battery68
5US20190033385A1Systems and methods for determining a state of charge of a disconnected battery64
6WO2001079012A2Hybrid power supply module with internal combustion engine or fuel cell59
7US20190033395A1Systems and methods for monitoring and presenting battery information56
8US20190033393A1Energy storage device, systems and methods for monitoring and performing diagnostics on batteries49
9US20190033384A1Operating conditions information system for an energy storage device47
10US20190033377A1Systems and methods for utilizing battery operating data and exogenous data41

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of prior-art density, not current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Forklift Electrification and Battery Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the records are grouped by assignee, class, and year.

Concentration
54.9%
of 317 records held by the top 5 assignees

One filer sets the ceiling

The leading assignee alone accounts for 103 of the 317 records in scope, more than eight times the tenth-place count of 8. A concentration this steep in the top 5 (54.9% of all records) means a new entrant is not competing against a flat field but against one dominant claim set plus a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.

Top 10 combined reach 69.1% of all records.
Technology mix
41.6% / 39.1%
H01M vs. B60L share of records

Battery claims edge out propulsion claims

H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) narrowly leads B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) as the densest class, with G01R measurement claims close behind at 36.6%. The gap between these three and B66F lifting-mechanism claims at 8.5% shows where the claim pressure actually sits: in cell and pack design, propulsion control, and the sensing layer around state of charge — not in the mechanical lift.

Records may carry multiple IPC classes; shares sum above 100%.
Filing momentum
-4%
change, 2021 (23) to 2024 (22)

A plateau, not a decline

Annual filings moved from 23 in 2021 to 22 in 2024, a -4% span across the only recent years the dataset treats as complete. That is a plateau after the 2018 peak of 123, not a retreat — and because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures will revise upward as later filings surface.

2018 remains the single peak year at 123 filings.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to forklift electrification and battery systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Forklift Electrification and Battery Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape

The ranked list covers 60 companies across 317 records — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the full set the data endpoint returns. Momentum figures below show recent-year activity is thin across even the most active names, consistent with a field where a handful of large filings from years past still dominate cumulative counts.

Leader
103
records held

A single dominant filer

The top-ranked assignee holds 103 of the 317 records in scope — more than triple the fifth-place count of 12 — establishing a claim position that any new entrant in battery pack design or charging control will likely cross.

Fifth place holds 12 records; tenth place holds 8.
Mid-field
12 → 8
records, 5th to 10th place

A thin but real second tier

Between fifth and tenth place, record counts fall from 12 to 8 — a much shallower drop than the gap from first to fifth. This mid-field is where most active, filing competitors sit, rather than the single-filing tail below them.

Top 10 combined hold 69.1% of all 317 records.
Recent activity
-67% YoY
Ethium LLC, latest year

Even active filers are slowing

Recent-year momentum data shows even filers with multiple co-assignee ties, such as Ethium LLC, dropping to a single filing in the latest year with a -67% year-on-year change. Several other tracked assignees, including Toyota Industries, show zero filings in the latest year — again a lag effect as much as a retreat.

Publication lag means the latest year is always understated.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with comparatively thin claim density relative to the core battery and propulsion classes
Battery swap mechanism standardisationCounterweight-integrated pack structural claimsCharge-acceptance algorithms for cold environmentsFleet-level state-of-charge data processing (G06Q overlap)Alarm/signalling integration for thermal runaway (G08B overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
ETHIUM LLC1-67%
Northstar Battery Co LLC0
Ethium LLC0
FERMATA LLC0
Toyota Industries Corp0-100%
JSYoungTech0
FERMATA ENERGY LLC0
General Electric Co0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Forklift Electrification and Battery Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to a field with a dominant filer, a plateaued filing rate, and claim density concentrated in battery and propulsion classes rather than the lift mechanism itself.

Map freedom-to-operate against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 103 of 317 records, any new battery pack, charging control, or thermal management design should be checked against that portfolio specifically, not just the field average.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Watch the under-claimed branches before they fill in

Battery swap standardisation and cold-environment charge acceptance show thinner claim density than core H01M and B60L classes — a filing window that narrows as filings from 2025–2026 continue to publish.

Track white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Forklift Electrification and Battery Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Forklift Electrification and Battery Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Forklift Electrification and Battery Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole forklift electrification and battery systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.