Book a demo

Forward Osmosis Heavy-Metal Rejection Patent Snapshot

Forward Osmosis Heavy-Metal Rejection Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Forward Osmosis Heavy-Metal Rejection Patent Snapshot in 2026

The patent corpus for forward osmosis applied specifically to heavy-metal rejection is nascent, with activity concentrated almost entirely at Nanyang Technological University. The field sits at an early, pre-competitive stage where a small number of academic filers dominate and significant white space remains across adjacent IPC branches.

1
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Nanyang Tech leads a highly concentrated, academic-dominated field

Nanyang Technological University holds the top position in this space, accounting for the largest share of patent records among ranked applicants. Khalifa University of Science and Technology is the only other identified filer, making this a two-player evidence snapshot at present.

The top five filers collectively account for 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total — an extreme concentration figure that reflects the nascent state of the field rather than a mature competitive lock-in. The gap between the leading applicant and the second-ranked filer is substantial.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Nanyang Technological University4
2KHALIFA UNIV OF SCI & TECH1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Nanyang Tech’s lead position, grounded in separation processes and water treatment IPC classes, suggests it holds the foundational IP framework. Any new entrant would need to design around or license from this base, or target adjacent technical routes not yet covered.

Patent publication typically lags filing by 18–24 months, so the most recent activity may not yet be fully visible in this corpus. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A single recent filing pulse and a wastewater-treatment-dominant IPC mix

The annual filing trend and technology composition together reveal a field that has seen minimal activity across most of the past decade, with IPC coverage concentrated in water treatment and separation processes.

Annual filing trend

Filing activity across the 2017–2024 window was flat, with a single recorded data point appearing in 2025. Given the standard 18–24 month publication lag, the 2025 figure may undercount actual recent filings, and the 2026 count should be treated as incomplete. The overall picture is one of sparse, episodic activity rather than a sustained growth trend.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1 in 2025.02017020180201902020020210202202023020241202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) is the visible IPC branch, followed by B01D (separation processes including filtration). Three lower-frequency branches — A01C (planting and sowing), B01J (chemical and physical processes and catalysis), and C08L (polymer compositions) — each appear at single-record counts, signalling adjacency rather than established coverage.

Technology compositionC02F · Water & wastewater treatment leads with 5; B01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) 4.C02F · Water & wastewate…5B01D · Separation proces…4A01C · Planting & sowing1B01J · Chemical/physical…1C08L · Polymer compositi…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20160082391A1Published 2016-03-24

A draw solute and an improved forward osmosis method

Nanyang Technological University

A draw solute for forward osmosis comprising a semi-interpenetrating (semi-IPN) hydrogel which comprises a thermally responsive polymer and a hydrophilic polymer, such that the semi-IPN hydrogel is capable of switching between a hydrophilic and hydrophobic state in response to changes in temperature is provided. Also provided is a draw solute comprising a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

A draw solute and an improved forward osmosis method — patent drawingA draw solute and an improved forward osmosis method — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1A draw solute and an improved forward osmosis method19
2A draw solute and an improved forward osmosis method10

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Nanyang Technological University

Nanyang Technological University

Nanyang Tech leads with 4 patent records, concentrated in B01D 61 (separation processes) and C02F 1 (water and wastewater treatment). This dual-class focus suggests a membrane-system approach spanning both the physical separation mechanism and the water-treatment application context. Applicant momentum data is not available in the current evidence set, so trajectory direction cannot be confirmed from filing counts alone.

patent records: 4
Challenger · Khalifa University of Science and Technology

Khalifa University of Science and Technology

Khalifa University holds 1 patent record with IPC coverage spanning A01C 23 (planting and sowing), B01J 13 (chemical and physical processes and catalysis), and C02F 1 (water treatment). The spread across three classes from a single record suggests a draw-solute or hybrid-process approach with potential agricultural reuse applications. Momentum data is not available for this applicant.

patent records: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Nanyang Technological UniversityKhalifa University of Science and Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own forward osmosis Snapshot?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.