Book a demo

FTIR Spectrometer Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

FTIR Spectrometer Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/fourier-transform-infrared-spectrometers-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Spectroscopy Instruments
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer Patents: Who Holds the Ground and Where It's Open
  • No single filer dominates. the top 5 assignees together hold only 4.6% of all 17,095 records in scope, and the top 10 just 7.8% — this is a fragmented field, not a walled garden.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2019 peak. 1,035 records that year, versus a confirmed -29% decline from 980 filings in 2021 to 696 in 2024, the last year with complete data.
  • The core claim territory sits outside classic optics. A61K medicinal preparations account for 28.1% of records and G01N material analysis for 17.1%, showing FTIR's biggest patent activity is in how it's applied, not the interferometer itself.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
17.1K
Published Records
5%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-29%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (980 records) with 2024 (696) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 17,095 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy patenting spans far more than instrument design. This dataset draws on 17,095 patent records published between 2015 and mid-2026, captured through claims and descriptions referencing interferometer alignment, attenuated total reflectance, purge requirements, water vapour interference, spectral libraries and signal averaging. The result is a corpus dominated by applications of FTIR — pharmaceutical formulation, material testing, polymer characterisation — rather than by the spectrometer hardware alone.

Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than the underlying filing activity actually was. Treat 2024 as the last complete year for growth comparisons, and read 2025–2026 as a partial, rising baseline rather than a real decline.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA216
  2. 2DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC169
  3. 3SALIX PHARMA INC157
  4. 4WILLIAM MARCH RICE UNIVERSITY131
  5. 5GILEAD PHARMASSET LLC120
  6. 6REBELLION PHOTONICS116
  7. 7BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO114
  8. 8ACERTA PHARMA BV106
  9. 93M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO105
  10. 10PROCTER & GAMBLE CO99
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data & Trends

Filing trends and technology composition

The two views below cover the same 17,095 records: one traces filing activity over time, the other breaks the corpus down by IPC subclass to show where claim density concentrates.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings ran near 890 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 1,035 in 2019, and by the last complete year (2024) had fallen to 696 — a confirmed -29% change from 980 filings in 2021. Years after 2024 are still filling in under publication lag and should not be read as a continued drop.

Filing trend, 2017–202603006009001,200890201720181,0352019202020212022202320242025982026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

A61K (medicinal preparations) leads at 28.1% of the 17,095 records in scope, followed by G01N (material analysis & testing) at 17.1% and C07D (heterocyclic compounds) at 14.8%. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to well over 100% — they describe overlap in claim territory, not a partition of the dataset.

IPC subclass compositionA61K · Medicinal preparations4,80328.1%G01N · Material analysis & testing2,92817.1%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds2,53414.8%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…2,35813.8%C08G · Condensation polymers1,2127.1%C08L · Polymer compositions1,1836.9%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting1,1036.5%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions1,0996.4%Other18,796110.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 17,095 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometers with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fourier transform infrared spectrometers and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited prior art and a representative filing

Representative Record
US20010033947A12001-10-25

US20010033947A1 — Magnetic recording medium

SONY CORPORATION

The filing defines a lubricant-evaluation method using attenuated total reflectance FTIR measurement of a magnetic layer surface, comparing absorption spectrum areas in the 2940-2800 cm-1 band with and without a lubricant layer, and claiming a specific area-difference range (0.01 to 0.30) as the basis for accurately assessing lubricant amount.Filed by Sony Corporation; illustrates how ATR-FTIR measurement protocols get locked into claims for a specific industrial application rather than the spectrometer itself.

US20010033947A1 — patent drawing 1US20010033947A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5582184AInterstitial fluid collection and constituent measurement1,580
2US6019968ADispersible antibody compositions and methods for their preparation and use1,512
3US6505059B1Non-invasive tissue glucose level monitoring1,468
4US6721582B2Non-invasive tissue glucose level monitoring1,340
5US6728560B2Non-invasive tissue glucose level monitoring1,226
6US4975581AMethod of and apparatus for determining the similarity of a biological analyte from a model constructed from …835
7US6115673AMethod and apparatus for generating basis sets for use in spectroscopic analysis783
8US5746217AInterstitial fluid collection and constituent measurement781
9US7899518B2Non-invasive tissue glucose level monitoring744
10US5553616ADetermination of concentrations of biological substances using raman spectroscopy and artificial neural netwo…725

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus — treat them as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns matter more than any single ranking: how concentrated ownership is, where filing activity actually sits, and which jurisdictions carry the bulk of the activity.

Concentration
4.6%
share held by top 5 assignees

Ownership is fragmented, not cornered

The top 5 assignees combined hold just 4.6% of the 17,095 records in scope, and the top 10 only reach 7.8%. No single company has built a defensible wall around FTIR claim space — the field is a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants rather than a battleground between a handful of majors.

Ranked leaders, 100 companies
Momentum
-29%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Activity has pulled back from its 2019 high

Filings peaked at 1,035 in 2019 and confirmed filings fell from 980 in 2021 to 696 in 2024, a -29% change over that span. That is a real cooling in complete-year data, though 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete under normal publication lag and should not be read as a further drop yet.

Peak year: 2019
Geography
5,500
US-filed records

The US anchors filing, PCT and EPO follow

The United States receives the largest share of filings at 5,500 records, ahead of the EPO at 2,590 and WIPO/PCT at 2,476. Australia, Canada and India each sit in the 800-900 range, indicating a filing strategy built around US priority with selective international extension rather than broad simultaneous global filing.

Six receiving offices tracked
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fourier transform infrared spectrometers, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players & White Space

Who is filing, and where the gaps are

With no dominant assignee, the more useful question is not who leads but which sub-areas remain thinly claimed relative to the size of the overall corpus.

Leader
216
records, top-ranked assignee

The leader is well ahead of fifth place

The top-ranked assignee holds 216 records against 120 for the fifth-placed filer and 99 for tenth — a real gap at the very top, but one that still leaves the leader controlling only a small fraction of the full 17,095-record dataset.

Fifth place: 120 records
Momentum
-83%
YoY, leading academic filer

Even active filers are slowing

Recent-year momentum data shows the leading academic assignee dropping to just 1 filing in the latest year, an 83% year-on-year decline, while several pharmaceutical and industrial assignees in the tracked group show zero filings in the latest year. This is consistent with the broader post-2021 pullback rather than isolated to one filer.

Six assignees tracked for momentum
Collaboration
37
strongest co-assignee pair count

Co-filing is rare and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset at all, and the strongest pair reaches just 37 joint records. Most patenting activity in this field happens under single ownership rather than through formal co-development arrangements.

10 co-assignee pairs total
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches sit adjacent to the dense IPC classes but show comparatively thin claim density in this corpus — a plausible entry point for a narrowly drafted first claim.
water vapour compensation methodspurge-gas-free interferometer sealingin-line ATR crystal degradation monitoringautomated spectral library matching for mixed analytessignal-averaging protocols for low-concentration analytes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Regents of the University of California1-83%
Dow Global Technologies LLC0-100%
Gilead Pharmasset LLC0
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.0
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company0-100%
William Marsh Rice University0-100%
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company0
Rebellion Photonics, Inc.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field that rewards narrow, application-specific claims over broad instrument patents. Two directions follow naturally from that.

Map a freedom-to-operate position

With ownership this fragmented, a freedom-to-operate check needs to look past the top-ranked assignees to the long tail of single-filing entrants working in the same application space.

Run an FTO scan in Eureka

Track the post-2021 pullback by application

The -29% filing decline from 2021 to 2024 is aggregate; breaking it out by IPC subclass would show whether the pullback is concentrated in pharmaceutical applications or spread across material testing and polymer uses too.

Build a custom trend view in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about FTIR spectrometer patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometers in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole fourier transform infrared spectrometers corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.