https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/frac-pumping-equipment-and-pressure-pumping-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Hydraulic Fracturing Equipment
Frac pumping equipment patents: who holds the fluid end, and where filing has slowed
  • 78.5% concentration. The top 5 of 52 ranked assignees hold 520 of 662 records in scope — filing here is dominated by a small group, not a fragmented field.
  • Filings fell 63% from the 2021 peak. 144 records in 2021 dropped to 54 by 2024, the last complete filing year — a real pullback, not a data artefact.
  • E21B and F04B dominate, but turbine and motor-control classes are thin. F02C, F01D and H02P each sit under 12% of records, leaving electric-drive and turbine-integration claims comparatively open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
662
Published Records
79%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-63%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (144 records) with 2024 (54) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 662 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 662 published records matching hydraulic fracturing pumps, pressure pumping units and electric fracturing fleets, cross-referenced against plunger packing, fluid end assemblies, hydration units, frac manifolds, turbine-driven pumps and discharge pressure control. The scope runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, though the most recent one to two years understate true filing activity because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

The field splits along a clear line: mechanical pump architecture (fluid ends, plunger packing, manifolds) sits inside E21B and F04B and carries the bulk of filings, while the newer electric-drive and turbine-integration approaches sit in F02C, F01D and H02P at much lower density. That split is the first thing to check before scoping a freedom-to-operate review or a first-filing strategy.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1BJ ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC235
  2. 2US WELL SERVICES LLC148
  3. 3SPM OIL & GAS INC60
  4. 4KERR MACHINE CO48
  5. 5CATERPILLAR INC29
  6. 6STEWART & STEVENSON LLC22
  7. 7HAVEN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC20
  8. 8CW HOLDINGS LTD17
  9. 9VULCAN IND HOLDINGS LLC12
  10. 10FMC TECHNOLOGIES INC8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Frac Pumping Equipment and Pressure Pumping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 662-record dataset: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend: a sharp peak, then a pullback

Filings rose from 20 in 2017 to a peak of 144 in 2021, then fell to 54 by 2024 — a 63% decline over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline until later data confirms it.

Filing trend: a sharp peak, then a pullback038751131502020172018201920201442021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition: mechanical pumping dominates

E21B (earth and rock drilling, wells) covers 77.8% of the 662 records and F04B (positive-displacement pumps) covers 55.4%. Turbine and electric-drive-adjacent classes — F02C at 11.0%, F01D at 9.5%, H02P at 4.5% — are present but far less crowded, and a record can carry more than one class.

IPC composition: mechanical pumping dominatesE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)51577.8%F04B · Positive-displacement pumps36755.4%F02C · Gas-turbine plants7311.0%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines639.5%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…365.4%H02P · Control of motors & generators304.5%F16L · Pipes & pipe fittings274.1%F16H · Gearing & transmissions243.6%Other31447.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 662 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Frac Pumping Equipment and Pressure Pumping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Frac Pumping Equipment and Pressure Pumping with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about frac pumping equipment and pressure pumping and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
US20210404308A12021-12-30

Systems and methods to monitor, detect, and/or intervene relative to cavitation and pulsation events during a hydraulic fracturing operation

BJ ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC

Filed by BJ Energy Solutions, this application describes a supervisory controller that reads pump discharge pressure, suction pressure, pump speed and vibration signals, together with blender flow rate and discharge pressure, to detect cavitation and pulsation events during a fracturing operation and intervene in response.Abstract condensed from the published filing for readability.

US20210404308A1 — patent drawing 1US20210404308A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160258267A1Well fracturing systems with electrical motors and methods of use341
2US9611728B2Cold weather package for oil field hydraulics301
3US20160290114A1Modular remote power generation and transmission for hydraulic fracturing system285
4US9650871B2Safety indicator lights for hydraulic fracturing pumps274
5US20160319650A1Suction and Discharge Lines for a Dual Hydraulic Fracturing Unit263
6US9840901B2Remote monitoring for hydraulic fracturing equipment252
7US10119381B2System for reducing vibrations in a pressure pumping fleet249
8US10246984B2Well fracturing systems with electrical motors and methods of use241
9US20190211661A1Electric hydraulic fracturing system240
10US20190316447A1Hybrid hydraulic fracturing fleet239

Citation counts favour older filings inside this searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Frac Pumping Equipment and Pressure Pumping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the concentration, trend and citation data that matter for scoping new work in this space.

Concentration
78.5%
of 662 records held by top 5 of 52 assignees

A small group controls the mechanical core

With 520 of 662 records held by the five leading assignees, most fluid-end, plunger-packing and manifold claim space is already occupied. New entrants filing in this exact core are filing into dense prior art rather than open ground.

Top 5 combined, 662-record scope
Momentum
-63%
2021 peak (144) to 2024 (54)

The 2021 surge has not repeated

Filing volume fell sharply after 2021 across nearly every tracked assignee, several showing -82% to -100% year-over-year in the latest complete year. That pullback likely reflects the fleet-electrification wave working through prosecution rather than a shrinking field.

2021 to 2024, last complete filing year
Technology mix
11.0%
of records in F02C, gas-turbine plants

Turbine-driven pump claims are a minority position

F02C and F01D together sit under a fifth of records, well behind E21B and F04B. Electric and turbine drivetrain integration is claimed far less densely than the mechanical pump end, which is where new filings are more likely to find open space.

F02C 11.0%, F01D 9.5% of 662 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to frac pumping equipment and pressure pumping, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Frac Pumping Equipment and Pressure Pumping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and what is left uncontested

The ranked leaders account for the great majority of filings, but momentum has cooled across nearly all of them in the latest complete year — a sign the core architecture is settled even as newer sub-areas remain open.

Leader
235
records held by the top-ranked assignee

One assignee holds more than a third of the field

The leading assignee's 235 records dwarf the rest of the ranking; fifth place holds 29 and tenth place holds 8, a steep drop-off that marks this as a concentrated field rather than a fragmented one.

Leader 235 of 662 records
Momentum
-82% to -100%
YoY change among tracked leaders, latest year

Even the leaders have pulled back

Recent-year filing counts among the top assignees have dropped sharply, several to zero in the latest year. This is consistent with the broader post-2021 decline and does not necessarily signal exit from the field, given publication lag on the newest filings.

Latest tracked year vs prior year
Long tail
42
assignees below the top 10, out of 52 ranked

A long tail of single- and few-filing entrants

Beyond the top 10, which together hold 90.5% of the 662 records, the remaining ranked assignees each hold small counts. That tail is where component-level and control-system specialists tend to sit rather than full pumping-unit integrators.

Top 10 combined 90.5% of 662 records
🔍
Sub-areas still open to claim
Where filing density is lightest relative to the mechanical pump core
Electric motor drivetrain integrationTurbine-to-pump power transmission controlCavitation/pulsation sensing and supervisory controlModular hydration unit skidsDischarge manifold pressure isolationMotor/generator control for electric fleets
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
KERR MACHINE CO2-82%
BJ Energy Solutions, LLC0-100%
US WELL SERVICES LLC0-100%
SPM Oil & Gas Inc0-100%
Caterpillar Inc0-100%
Stewart & Stevenson LLC0
Haven Technology Solutions LLC0
SPM Flow Control Inc0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Frac Pumping Equipment and Pressure Pumping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to two practical follow-ups: checking freedom-to-operate against the concentrated top 5, and scoping first claims in the thinner electric-drive and control classes.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the mechanical core

Before filing on fluid ends, plunger packing or discharge manifolds, screen against the top 5 assignees who together hold 78.5% of the 662 records in scope.

Screen assignees in Eureka

Scope first claims in electric-drive and control classes

F02C, F01D and H02P each sit under 12% of records — map the specific sub-claims already filed there before drafting into what looks like open space.

Explore IPC classes in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Frac Pumping Equipment and Pressure Pumping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on frac pumping patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Frac Pumping Equipment and Pressure Pumping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Frac Pumping Equipment and Pressure Pumping in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole frac pumping equipment and pressure pumping corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.