Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (22 records) with 2024 (20) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 278 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Metallic bipolar plates sit at the intersection of electrochemistry and sheet-metal manufacturing: a single plate must resist corrosion in acidic environments, hold interfacial contact resistance low over the stack's life, and still be stamped economically at volume. This landscape tracks 278 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that claim a metallic bipolar plate, a fuel-cell plate coating, or the flow-field and stamping processes used to make one.
The search combines fuel-cell and plate-specific terms with IPC classes spanning battery and fuel-cell structures (H01M8), physical vapour coating (C23C14) and sheet-metal forming (B21D22), so it captures both the electrochemical claims and the manufacturing-process claims that sit around them.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views matter here: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings rose from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2019, held near that level through the 2022 midpoint of 17, and have since fallen to 3 in the most recent, still-partial year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be — but even allowing for that lag, the multi-year plateau after 2019 points to a maturing filing cycle rather than a market still opening up.
H01M classifications appear in 269 of 278 records, confirming that nearly every filing in this set is anchored to a fuel-cell or battery structure claim. Coating (C23C, 42), alloy (C22C, 17) and stamping (B21D, 16) classes appear far less often, and electrolytic production (C25B, 10), electroplating (C25D, 7) and heat-exchanger detail (F28F, 5) classes are thinner still — these smaller classes are where process-level claims have the most room left.
Shares are the percentage of the 278 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fuel cell bipolar plates and coatings and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA metallic bipolar plate built on a passivatable metal substrate, with a noble-metal layer applied only where needed on both faces, and a concave-convex flow-field pattern formed at least in the region facing the membrane electrode assembly. The plate distinguishes a contact surface against the electrode from a non-contact surface, targeting corrosion resistance and low contact resistance without coating the entire plate.Filed by Daido Tokushuko; published 2008-02-13.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20040209150A1 | Stamped fuel cell bipolar plate | 141 |
| 2 | US6942941B2 | Adhesive bonds for metalic bipolar plates | 88 |
| 3 | US5733682A | Metallic bipolar plate for high-temperature fuel cells and method of making same | 88 |
| 4 | US20050244703A1 | Membrane based electrochemical cell stacks | 70 |
| 5 | US20050031933A1 | Adhesive bonds for metalic bipolar plates | 59 |
| 6 | US20080090129A1 | Bipolar plate for fuel cell | 56 |
| 7 | US6887610B2 | Joining of bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks | 56 |
| 8 | US20060099481A1 | Electroconductive polymer coating on electroconductive elements in a fuel cell | 53 |
| 9 | US7459227B2 | Stamped fuel cell bipolar plate | 52 |
| 10 | US20040072053A1 | Method of fabricating a bipolar plate assembly | 51 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are a signal of foundational status, not of current commercial weight.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns in this dataset are worth acting on rather than just noting.
Filing peaked in 2019 and has not recovered; the 2022 midpoint of 17 shows the decline was gradual, not a single-year drop. Combined with the 18-month publication lag, this looks like a technology that went through its main claim-staking phase and is now in a consolidation period rather than active expansion.
With H01M present in 97% of records, the differentiated ground is in the secondary classifications — coating, alloy composition and forming process — that appear alongside it. A plate claim without a distinct coating, alloy or forming element is filing into the densest part of the art.
The United States carries the largest single share of receiving-office filings, but China, PCT and EPO filings together outnumber it, and India's 27 filings signal an emerging manufacturing base building its own position rather than only defending against imports.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fuel cell bipolar plates and coatings, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity clusters around a small group of automotive and specialist plate manufacturers, with collaboration pairs suggesting joint development rather than pure competition.
Every named assignee in the recent-momentum data, including major automakers and specialist plate makers, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is a field-wide pause rather than one company stepping back, and it opens a window for a new entrant to file cleanly against older, foundational art instead of against fresh competitor claims.
The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset recurs at a materially higher count than the next pairs, consistent with a plate or coating supplier filing jointly with an OEM partner rather than two independent competitors filing by coincidence.
The most-cited record in this corpus is a stamped bipolar plate filing, and several of the next most-cited records also concern adhesive bonding and stamped or membrane-stack construction. New filings in stamping and forming should expect this older art to sit directly in their path.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| General Motors LLC | 0 | — |
| Plug Power / Protonex Technology Corporation | 0 | — |
| Amphenol Corporation | 0 | — |
| Robert Bosch GmbH (Germany) | 0 | — |
| Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Hyundai HYSCO Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Volkswagen AG | 0 | — |
| POSCO | 0 | — |
The landscape points to specific questions rather than a single answer; the next step depends on which one applies to your work.
If a new plate or coating design touches stamping, adhesive bonding or membrane-stack construction, the most-cited records in this corpus are the first prior art to clear against, not the newest filings.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaCoating deposition, alloy formulation and stamping process classes each carry far fewer filings than the core fuel-cell structure class, which is where a first claim has the most room to stand on its own.
Explore white space in EurekaWith every tracked assignee at zero filings in the latest year, the field is positioned for a restart rather than continued decline; tracking early filings from any one of these assignees will flag the turn before it shows up in aggregate counts.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaThe dataset shows filing concentrated among a handful of automotive OEMs and specialist plate manufacturers, alongside individual inventors and coating-technology firms. No single assignee dominates outright; instead, the strongest positions come from a cluster of companies with sustained filing histories plus a long tail of smaller or one-off filers. The most-cited prior art in the field, including the stamped bipolar plate patent with 141 citations, predates the current wave of active assignees, which matters more for freedom-to-operate work than raw filing counts do.
Filing peaked at 22 families in 2019, held near that level through 2022, and has fallen sharply since, with only 3 filed in the most recent, still-incomplete year. Part of that drop is a data artefact: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years always understate true activity. But the multi-year plateau before the drop suggests the core plate and coating claim space was largely staked out by the early 2020s, with the field now consolidating rather than expanding.
Interfacial contact resistance is the electrical resistance at the boundary between the bipolar plate and the adjacent gas diffusion layer or electrode; high resistance wastes stack power as heat rather than delivering it as current. It is one of the two core performance constraints, alongside corrosion resistance in acidic environments, that nearly every claim in this dataset is written to address. Patents that combine a coating or surface treatment with a specific contact-resistance target, rather than claiming the coating alone, tend to be the more defensible filings in this space.
This dataset is scoped specifically to metallic bipolar plates and their coatings, sheet-metal forming and corrosion-resistant treatments, so it does not directly compare metallic to graphite plate filing volumes. Within the metallic-plate space, the search terms and IPC classes used here, spanning fuel-cell structures, coating deposition and stamping, indicate that weight reduction and stamping-forming claims are treated as core differentiators, consistent with metallic plates being pursued for their thinner, lighter, more stampable form factor versus graphite alternatives.
The clearest gaps sit in the IPC classes with the thinnest coverage relative to the dominant H01M fuel-cell class: electroplating and electroforming methods, heat-exchanger integration at the plate level, and alloy-specific corrosion formulations each appear in well under a fifth of the records that H01M does. A first claim that pairs a specific alloy composition or electrolytic deposition method with a measurable corrosion or contact-resistance outcome is more likely to clear a novelty search than a generic coated-plate claim, given how densely the core structure class is already occupied.
Go past this page: query the whole fuel cell bipolar plates and coatings corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.