Book a demo

Fuel Cell Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Fuel Cell Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/fuel-cells-catalyst-layer-ionomer-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Fuel Cells
Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patents in Fuel Cells
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,202
Published Records
27%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-25%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (68 records) with 2024 (51) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,202 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What the catalyst layer ionomer patent record shows

A catalyst layer ionomer is the proton-conducting polymer binder mixed with catalyst particles inside a fuel cell’s membrane electrode assembly. It governs how efficiently protons, electrons and reactant gases reach the catalyst surface, and it is one of the few components where a formulation change can shift both cost and durability at once. That makes it a persistent filing target across automotive OEMs, materials suppliers and catalyst specialists.

The scope tracked here spans 1,202 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from claims and titles referencing catalyst layer ionomer constructions within the fuel cell classification. Filing peaked in 2018 and has since eased, though recent years understate true activity because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months.

The composition data below breaks the same 1,202 records down by International Patent Classification subclass, receiving office and citation weight, giving a view of where the claim density sits and which offices see the heaviest filing.

Catalyst Layer Ionomer Filing Activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1UMICORE AG & CO KG87
  2. 2TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK81
  3. 3GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC56
  4. 4POCELL TECH LTD53
  5. 5KOLON INDUSTRIES INC52
  6. 6LG CHEM LTD48
  7. 7AUDI AG41
  8. 8HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD38
  9. 9KIA CORPORATION37
  10. 10JOHNSON MATTHEY PLC31
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Cells: Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The figures below cover all 1,202 records in scope. Because a single record can carry more than one IPC classification, the composition shares add to more than 100% — each percentage is measured against the full record count, not against other classes.

A 2018 peak followed by a cooling filing pace

Filings rose to a peak of 83 records in 2018, then eased through the following years. The 2021-to-2024 window, the most recent span that can be read as complete, shows a 25% decline from 68 to 51 records. 2025 and 2026 figures will rise as later publications catch up; they should not yet be read as a continued slide.

A 2018 peak followed by a cooling filing pace0255075100582017832018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01M dominates; C25B and B01J mark the adjacent chemistry

H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) covers 99.9% of records, confirming the search is anchored correctly on fuel cell technology. C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) reaches 16.0%, showing meaningful overlap with electrolyser and hydrogen production chemistry. B01J (catalysis processes, 11.5%) and C08J (polymer processing, 6.7%) mark the two next-largest adjacent branches, followed by coating (B05D, 5.3%) and laminate structure (B32B, 3.1%) classes.

H01M dominates; C25B and B01J mark the adjacent chemistryH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells1,20199.9%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…19216.0%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …13811.5%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions806.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…726.0%B05D · Coating processes645.3%C08G · Condensation polymers393.2%B32B · Layered products & laminates373.1%Other19716.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,202 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Cells: Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Fuel Cells: Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fuel cells: catalyst layer ionomer patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
WO2024115878A12024-06-06

WO2024115878A1 — Recycling of catalyst coated membrane components

JOHNSON MATTHEY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY

A method of recycling a waste catalyst coated membrane, wherein the waste catalyst coated membrane comprises a membrane including a membrane ionomer, a first catalyst layer disposed on one side of the membrane, the first catalyst layer comprising a first catalyst and a first catalyst layer ionomer, and a second catalyst layer disposed on an opposite side of the membrane, the second catalyst layer comprising a second catalyst and a second catalyst layer ionomer. The method is configured to recover the first and second catalyst layer ionomers in addition to the catalyst materials and membrane ionomer.Filed by Johnson Matthey, published 2024-06-06 — one of the few filings in this set aimed at end-of-life recovery rather than initial catalyst layer performance.

WO2024115878A1 — patent drawing 1WO2024115878A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the catalyst layer ionomer corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6403245B1Materials and processes for providing fuel cells and active membranes230
2WO2007061945A2Nanowire structures comprising carbon204
3US5561000AGas diffusion electrode with catalyst for an electrochemical cell with solid electrolyte and method for makin…163
4US20080280169A1Nanowire structures comprising carbon143
5US20080206616A1Catalyst coated membranes and sprayable inks and processes for forming same131
6WO1992015121A1Membrane catalyst layer for fuel cells113
7US6309772B1Membrane-electrode unit for polymer electrolyte fuel cells and processes for their preparation107
8US6641862B1Preparation of fuel cell electrode assemblies98
9US6156449ACatalyst layer for polymer electrolyte fuel cells96
10WO1997013287A2Flow field structures for membrane electrode assemblies of fuel cells82

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Cells: Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Landscape Insights

What the concentration and citation data mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, trend and citation data are read together: a concentrated top tier, a cooling but not collapsing filing pace, and prior art that still points to membrane and electrode fundamentals rather than catalyst layer ionomer specifics.

Concentration
27.4%
of 1,202 records held by top 5 assignees

The top of the field is narrow

Five assignees account for 329 of the 1,202 records in scope, and the top ten reach 43.6% (524 records). Beyond the leader at 87 records, the count falls off quickly — fifth place sits at 52, tenth place at 31 — pointing to a small set of heavy filers surrounded by a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.

Ranking covers 100 assignees, the full set returned by the data endpoint.
Filing Pace
-25%
change in filings, 2021 to 2024

Activity has eased from its 2018 peak

Filings peaked at 83 records in 2018 and the 2021-to-2024 window shows a 25% decline, from 68 down to 51 records. That is a real cooling in the most recent complete years, not a signal that the underlying chemistry is settled — later years in the trend will revise upward as publication catches up with filing.

2025 and 2026 counts are still incomplete due to publication lag.
Prior Art
230 citations
on the most-cited record, US6403245B1

Foundational membrane patents still anchor the field

The most-cited records in this corpus are membrane and electrode patents from the late 1990s and 2000s, including US6403245B1 and US5561000A, rather than catalyst layer ionomer-specific filings. New entrants should expect any catalyst layer ionomer claim to be read against this older membrane and electrode prior art, not just against recent competitors.

Citation counts reflect corpus-internal citing behaviour, which favours older records.
Adjacent Chemistry
16.0%
of records also classed under C25B

Electrolyser overlap is now material

C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) appears on 16.0% of the 1,202 records, the largest overlap outside the core H01M fuel cell class. Ionomer chemistry developed for catalyst layers is migrating into electrolyser and green hydrogen production claims, which widens the set of assignees worth watching beyond traditional automotive fuel cell filers.

IPC shares are measured against the full 1,202-record set and can sum above 100%.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fuel cells: catalyst layer ionomer patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare and clustered around a small number of pairs
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Kia CorporationHyundai Motor Company37
Toyota Motor CorporationToyota Central R&D Labs, Inc.12
Toyota Motor CorporationCataler Corporation7
Ballard Power Systems Inc.Johnson Matthey PLC (UK)5
Ballard Power Systems Inc.WILKINSON DAVID P4
Ballard Power Systems Inc.TAYLOR JARED L4
Ballard Power Systems Inc.KNIGHTS SHANNA D4
Kolon Industries, Inc.Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)3

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest pairing links two automotive groups at 37 shared records; most filings in this field are made by a single assignee acting alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Cells: Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The landscape above frames where filing has concentrated. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper into specific claim sets and adjacent branches.

Map the white space in adjacent IPC branches

C08G, B32B and B01D each sit under 7% of records — thin enough that a well-drafted claim in polymer condensation chemistry or laminate structure may face a shorter prior art chain than a core H01M filing.

Explore white space in Eureka

Trace citation chains from the oldest anchor patents

US6403245B1 and US5561000A sit at the root of many later claims; understanding what they actually cover narrows the search for genuinely open catalyst layer ionomer claim territory.

Run a citation trace in Eureka

Watch the electrolyser overlap for new entrants

The 16.0% overlap with C25B means hydrogen production companies without a fuel cell filing history may start appearing in this space; tracking new assignees early avoids surprises later.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Cells: Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about catalyst layer ionomer patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Cells: Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Fuel Cells: Catalyst Layer Ionomer Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole fuel cells: catalyst layer ionomer patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.