Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (401 records) with 2024 (279) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 16,145 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Solid oxide cells sit at the intersection of ceramics processing, electrochemistry and fuel cell system design, and the patent record reflects that breadth. Of the 16,145 records in scope, filings from receiving offices in the United States, Europe and South Korea dominate, with Canada and Germany also carrying meaningful volume — a signature of a technology being prosecuted across the jurisdictions where stationary power and transport fuel cell programmes are commercially active. The composition data shows nearly every record classified under H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells), which is expected given the search scope, but the secondary classes are where the differentiation shows up: electrolytic production, non-metallic inorganic compounds, and ceramics each account for a modest single-digit share of records, pointing to where materials and manufacturing claims cluster outside the core electrochemical cell design.
Assignee concentration is moderate rather than extreme. The leader holds 812 records, and the top five combined account for 17.4% of all records in scope — a meaningful lead but not a monopoly. Below that, filing spreads across a ranked list of 100 companies, consistent with a field where established fuel cell developers, ceramics specialists and automotive R&D units all hold active claim positions.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 16,145-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses.
Annual filings rose to a peak of 524 in 2017. The last three-year span that can be read as complete, 2021 to 2024, shows volume falling from 401 to 279 records — a 30% decline. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as a continuation of that decline.
99.5% of the 16,145 records carry an H01M classification, confirming the search scope. Below that, electrolytic production (C25B, 9.1%), inorganic compounds (C01B, 6.4%) and ceramics (C04B, 6.0%) are the next most common classes, each present in a modest single-digit share of records — these are the branches where materials and process claims sit alongside the core cell design.
Shares are the percentage of the 16,145 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fuel cells: solid oxide cell patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing describes a solid oxide cell built by depositing a fuel electrode layer on a fuel electrode support, then an electrolyte layer of stabilised zirconia, optionally pre-sintering that assembly into a half-cell, and finally depositing one or more oxygen electrode layers — at least one being a composite of lanthanum-strontium-manganite and stabilised zirconia — onto the pre-sintered half-cell.Filed by Topsoe Fuel Cell A/S; published 2010-06-03. The layered fabrication sequence and the LSM-zirconia composite oxygen electrode are the two elements most likely to intersect with later filings in this space.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6187465B1 | Process and system for converting carbonaceous feedstocks into energy without greenhouse gas emissions | 514 |
| 2 | US5955039A | Coal gasification and hydrogen production system and method | 466 |
| 3 | US5273837A | Solid electrolyte fuel cells | 413 |
| 4 | US20030082427A1 | Fuel supply for a fuel cell | 353 |
| 5 | US5741605A | Solid oxide fuel cell generator with removable modular fuel cell stack configurations | 341 |
| 6 | US5573867A | Purge gas protected transportable pressurized fuel cell modules and their operation in a power plant | 330 |
| 7 | US20050164051A1 | High temperature fuel cell system and method of operating same | 327 |
| 8 | US20040202914A1 | Co-production of hydrogen and electricity in a high temperature electrochemical system | 310 |
| 9 | US6045933A | Method of supplying fuel gas to a fuel cell | 277 |
| 10 | US20030143448A1 | High temperature fuel cell power plant | 267 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of being in the corpus longer — read them as a signal of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings that matter more to a filing strategy than the raw counts alone.
A single assignee holds 812 records, well ahead of fifth place at 389, but the top five together still only account for 17.4% of all records in scope. With 100 companies appearing in the ranked list, freedom-to-operate work has to look well past the household names.
Filings peaked at 524 in 2017. The most recent complete window, 2021 to 2024, shows a 30% drop in annual volume, consistent with a technology moving from an initial claims rush into a steadier prosecution phase rather than a technology being abandoned.
Every secondary IPC subclass behind H01M sits under 10% of the 16,145 records — electrolytic production, inorganic compounds, ceramics, catalysis, separation, coatings and alloys. None is crowded, which is where new claim positions are easiest to establish.
The United States and the European Patent Office are the two largest receiving offices, with South Korea, Canada and Germany also carrying four-figure volumes — a filing footprint that tracks the countries with active stationary and transport fuel cell programmes.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fuel cells: solid oxide cell patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The counts above establish where claim density sits. The next step is testing a specific claim or design against that density directly.
The most-cited records in this dataset, including the layered fabrication approach in US20100136380A1, define the boundaries most new filings will bump against. Run a candidate claim past them before drafting further.
Explore in EurekaCoating, alloy and separation-process classes each sit under 4% of records. That is where a first claim has the most room to stand without stacking against dense prior art.
Explore in EurekaWith 100 companies in the ranked list and the top five holding only 17.4% of records, competitive movement is as likely to come from mid-ranked filers as from the leader.
Explore in EurekaThe leading assignee in this dataset holds 812 of the 16,145 records in scope, with the fifth-ranked company at 389 and the tenth at 265. That said, the top five together account for only 17.4% of all records, and the ranked list runs to 100 distinct companies, so no single filer controls the field. A freedom-to-operate review needs to look well beyond the top few names.
Filings peaked in 2017 at 524 and have declined since; the most recent complete three-year window, 2021 to 2024, shows annual volume falling from 401 to 279, a 30% drop. However, publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in any dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as evidence the field is dying. The pattern reads more like a maturing core claim space than an abandoned one.
Nearly all records — 99.5% of the 16,145 in scope — carry an H01M battery and fuel cell classification, which is expected given the search scope. Beyond that, electrolytic production of compounds (9.1%), inorganic compound chemistry (6.4%) and ceramics processing (6.0%) are the next largest overlaps, followed by smaller shares in catalysis, separation processes, coatings and alloys. Each of these secondary areas sits in single digits, meaning materials and process claims are more distributed than concentrated.
The United States receiving office carries the largest volume at 4,997 records, followed by the European Patent Office at 3,509 and the WIPO PCT route at 1,579. South Korea, Canada and Germany each carry four-figure counts as well, reflecting the jurisdictions where stationary power generation and fuel cell vehicle programmes are most active. Filers targeting global protection typically combine a US or EPO first filing with a PCT route into these secondary markets.
US20100136380A1, filed by Topsoe Fuel Cell A/S and published in 2010, describes a solid oxide cell built by depositing a fuel electrode on a support layer, adding a stabilised-zirconia electrolyte, optionally pre-sintering that half-cell, then depositing an oxygen electrode layer that includes a lanthanum-strontium-manganite and stabilised-zirconia composite. It matters as a representative filing because the layered fabrication sequence and the specific oxygen electrode composite are exactly the kind of construction detail that later filings in this space have to design around or license.
Go past this page: query the whole fuel cells: solid oxide cell patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.