Book a demo

Fuel Tank Inerting Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Fuel Tank Inerting Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/fuel-tank-inerting-and-flammability-reduction-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Aircraft Fuel Systems
Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction Patents
  • 58.6% concentration. The five leading assignees account for 934 of the 1,593 records in scope, with a long tail of smaller filers behind them.
  • Filings cooled after a 2019 peak. Annual filings hit 189 in 2019 and fell from 45 in 2021 to 28 in 2024, a -38% change, though the newest years are still filling in.
  • One architecture dominates the claims. B64D aircraft-equipment classes cover 65.9% of records and B01D separation-process classes cover 35.5%, confirming bleed-air-to-membrane systems as the settled core.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,593
Published Records
59%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-38%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (45 records) with 2024 (28) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,593 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers 1,593 patent records published between 2015 and mid-2026 that describe onboard inert gas systems, air separation modules and related fuel tank flammability reduction technology, identified through claims and descriptions referencing nitrogen generation, hollow fiber membranes, bleed air and ullage-space oxygen concentration. The field centres on a single core architecture: bleed air is fed through a membrane-based air separation module to produce nitrogen-enriched air for the fuel tank and a separate oxygen-enriched exhaust stream.

Filing is concentrated among a small number of aerospace primes and systems suppliers, with the classification data showing aircraft-equipment and separation-process categories far ahead of fire-suppression or containment categories, and filing volume has cooled from a 2019 peak through the most recent complete filing years.

Records by publication year, 2015-2026
  1. 1HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP540
  2. 2THE BOEING CO233
  3. 3KIDDE TECHNOLOGIES INC56
  4. 4AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD54
  5. 5HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC51
  6. 6EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD44
  7. 7RTX CORP42
  8. 8AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH40
  9. 9PARKER INTANGIBLES LLC34
  10. 10MISSION SYSTEMS DAVENPORT INC33
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data & Trends

Filing trends and technology composition

The 1,593 records in scope span 2015 through mid-2026, with publication lag meaning the most recent one to two years are still filling in as filings clear examination and publish.

Filing activity peaked in 2019 and has since cooled

Annual filings rose from 148 in 2017 to a peak of 189 in 2019, then declined; the clean year-over-year comparison available runs from 45 filings in 2021 to 28 in 2024, a -38% change over that span. 2025 and 2026 figures are not yet representative because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Filing activity peaked in 2019 and has since cooled05010015020014820172018189201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Aircraft equipment and separation processes dominate the classification mix

B64D (aircraft equipment) appears on 65.9% of the 1,593 records and B01D (separation processes) on 35.5%, confirming that most activity centres on how nitrogen-enriched air is generated and ducted rather than on the fire-suppression or containment classes further down the list, each of which sits under 20% of records.

Aircraft equipment and separation processes dominate the classification mixB64D · Aircraft equipment1,05065.9%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…56535.5%A62C · Fire-fighting30719.3%F02C · Gas-turbine plants966.0%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …623.9%A62B · Rescue & life-saving573.6%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…573.6%B65D · Containers & packaging442.8%Other88655.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,593 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fuel tank inerting and flammability reduction and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records other filings build on

Representative Filing
US20160311551A12016-10-27

Engine proximate nitrogen generation system for an aircraft (US20160311551A1)

HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION

A nitrogen generation system includes a bleed air source, an air separation module with an inlet for bleed air, a hollow fiber membrane that removes oxygen to produce nitrogen-enriched and oxygen-enriched streams, and outlets routing nitrogen-enriched air to a fuel tank positioned downstream. The air separation module is located in a defined position within the aircraft relative to the engine.Filed by Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation, published 2016-10-27. Selected here as representative of the engine-proximate placement variant of the standard bleed-air-to-membrane architecture.

US20160311551A1 — patent drawing 1US20160311551A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing in Eureka
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4556180AFuel tank inerting system152
2US6401487B1Hypoxic fire prevention and fire suppression systems with breathable fire extinguishing compositions for huma…138
3US20080128048A1Advanced carbon dioxide fuel tank inerting system126
4US5202023AFlexible hollow fiber fluid separation module124
5US6418752B2Hypoxic fire prevention and fire suppression systems and breathable fire extinguishing compositions for human…115
6US5169415AMethod of generating oxygen from an air stream113
7US20010029750A1Hypoxic fire prevention and fire suppression systems and breathable fire extinguishing compositions for human…110
8US8657227B1Independent power generation in aircraft95
9US20050115404A1Gas generating system and method for inerting aircraft fuel tanks95
10US20120000205A1Adaptive power and thermal management system92

Citation counts are drawn from documents inside this searched corpus and favour older records; use them as a signal of influence within the field, not a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Reading the concentration, trend and classification figures together points to where new claims still have room and where they will collide with dense prior art.

Concentration
58.6%
of 1,593 records held by top 5 assignees

The core architecture is locked up by a small group

With the leading assignee alone holding 540 of the 1,593 records and the top five combined reaching 58.6%, new entrants filing on the standard bleed-air-to-membrane architecture will run directly into the deepest prior art.

Based on the assignee ranking across all 1,593 records.
Trend
-38%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Filing has cooled since the 2019 peak

Annual filings peaked at 189 in 2019 and the last clean comparison shows a drop from 45 in 2021 to 28 in 2024. Treat 2025-2026 as incomplete rather than as evidence the field is shrinking further, given the roughly 18-month publication lag.

Peak year 2019 at 189 filings; complete-year comparison 2021-2024.
Classification
65.9%
of records tagged B64D

Aircraft-equipment claims dominate the mix

B64D appears on 65.9% of the 1,593 records and B01D separation-process claims on 35.5%, while fire-fighting (A62C) trails at 19.3% — most inventive effort is going into system integration and gas separation, not suppression chemistry.

Shares computed against the full 1,593-record set; a record can carry multiple classes.
Citations
152 cites
on the oldest ranked record

Foundational patents still anchor the field

US4556180A, an early fuel tank inerting system patent, carries 152 citations, more than any other record in the set. High citation counts here reflect age and foundational status inside this corpus, not current commercial relevance.

Citation counts drawn from the most-cited records table.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fuel tank inerting and flammability reduction, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is moving

The ranking spans 100 companies counted by patent family, with filing heavily concentrated at the top and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants beyond the ranked leaders.

Leader
540 families
held by the top-ranked assignee

One assignee anchors the field

The leading assignee's 540 records dwarf the fifth-ranked assignee's 51 and the tenth-ranked assignee's 33, showing a steep drop-off rather than a gradual one.

Counted across the 100-company assignee ranking.
Concentration
70.7%
of 1,593 records held by the top 10

Ten assignees hold most of the field

The ten leading assignees combined account for 70.7% of all records in scope, leaving roughly three in ten records spread across the remaining ranked companies and the unranked tail.

Top 10 combined = 1,127 of 1,593 records.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several major holders

Recent-year filing has gone flat at the top

Several of the largest historical filers, including the leader, show zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with the broader -38% decline from 2021 to 2024 rather than a company-specific pullback.

Recent-year momentum figures by assignee.
Collaboration
10 pairs
of co-assignee filings identified

Cross-filing is rare but concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest link between two Airbus operating entities and a second notable pairing between Boeing and a membrane specialist supplier.

Co-assignee pair counts from the collaboration analysis.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth screening before filing
These branches show materially lower classification density than the B64D/B01D core, based on the IPC shares in this dataset.
Emergency hypoxic-air delivery unitsFuel-tank-adjacent container fittingsCatalytic/chemical inerting agentsNon-engine-proximate module placementPortable nitrogen-enriched-air suppression
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation0
The Boeing Company0-100%
Airbus Operations Ltd0-100%
Kidde Technologies Inc0
Parker Hannifin Corporation0
Honeywell International Inc0
EATON LTD0
Airbus Operations SAS0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The figures above establish concentration, trend and classification structure. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific claims and specific competitors.

Check claim scope before filing on the core architecture

The bleed-air-to-membrane route is densely claimed by the leading assignees; a full claim-chart comparison against the most-cited records is the next step before committing to that path.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Track the leaders' recent filings, not just their totals

Several major holders show flat recent-year momentum; monitoring new publications from these assignees will show whether that is a pause or a permanent shift.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Screen the under-claimed branches for a first-mover position

A62B, B65D and C01B classes show materially lower density than the core; a targeted search inside these branches can confirm how open they really are.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole fuel tank inerting and flammability reduction corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.