Fuel Tank Inerting Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
- 58.6% concentration. The five leading assignees account for 934 of the 1,593 records in scope, with a long tail of smaller filers behind them.
- Filings cooled after a 2019 peak. Annual filings hit 189 in 2019 and fell from 45 in 2021 to 28 in 2024, a -38% change, though the newest years are still filling in.
- One architecture dominates the claims. B64D aircraft-equipment classes cover 65.9% of records and B01D separation-process classes cover 35.5%, confirming bleed-air-to-membrane systems as the settled core.
Filing growth compares 2021 (45 records) with 2024 (28) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,593 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape covers 1,593 patent records published between 2015 and mid-2026 that describe onboard inert gas systems, air separation modules and related fuel tank flammability reduction technology, identified through claims and descriptions referencing nitrogen generation, hollow fiber membranes, bleed air and ullage-space oxygen concentration. The field centres on a single core architecture: bleed air is fed through a membrane-based air separation module to produce nitrogen-enriched air for the fuel tank and a separate oxygen-enriched exhaust stream.
Filing is concentrated among a small number of aerospace primes and systems suppliers, with the classification data showing aircraft-equipment and separation-process categories far ahead of fire-suppression or containment categories, and filing volume has cooled from a 2019 peak through the most recent complete filing years.
Filing trends and technology composition
The 1,593 records in scope span 2015 through mid-2026, with publication lag meaning the most recent one to two years are still filling in as filings clear examination and publish.
Filing activity peaked in 2019 and has since cooled
Annual filings rose from 148 in 2017 to a peak of 189 in 2019, then declined; the clean year-over-year comparison available runs from 45 filings in 2021 to 28 in 2024, a -38% change over that span. 2025 and 2026 figures are not yet representative because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
Aircraft equipment and separation processes dominate the classification mix
B64D (aircraft equipment) appears on 65.9% of the 1,593 records and B01D (separation processes) on 35.5%, confirming that most activity centres on how nitrogen-enriched air is generated and ducted rather than on the fire-suppression or containment classes further down the list, each of which sits under 20% of records.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,593 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fuel tank inerting and flammability reduction and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe records other filings build on
Engine proximate nitrogen generation system for an aircraft (US20160311551A1)
A nitrogen generation system includes a bleed air source, an air separation module with an inlet for bleed air, a hollow fiber membrane that removes oxygen to produce nitrogen-enriched and oxygen-enriched streams, and outlets routing nitrogen-enriched air to a fuel tank positioned downstream. The air separation module is located in a defined position within the aircraft relative to the engine.Filed by Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation, published 2016-10-27. Selected here as representative of the engine-proximate placement variant of the standard bleed-air-to-membrane architecture.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4556180A | Fuel tank inerting system | 152 |
| 2 | US6401487B1 | Hypoxic fire prevention and fire suppression systems with breathable fire extinguishing compositions for huma… | 138 |
| 3 | US20080128048A1 | Advanced carbon dioxide fuel tank inerting system | 126 |
| 4 | US5202023A | Flexible hollow fiber fluid separation module | 124 |
| 5 | US6418752B2 | Hypoxic fire prevention and fire suppression systems and breathable fire extinguishing compositions for human… | 115 |
| 6 | US5169415A | Method of generating oxygen from an air stream | 113 |
| 7 | US20010029750A1 | Hypoxic fire prevention and fire suppression systems and breathable fire extinguishing compositions for human… | 110 |
| 8 | US8657227B1 | Independent power generation in aircraft | 95 |
| 9 | US20050115404A1 | Gas generating system and method for inerting aircraft fuel tanks | 95 |
| 10 | US20120000205A1 | Adaptive power and thermal management system | 92 |
Citation counts are drawn from documents inside this searched corpus and favour older records; use them as a signal of influence within the field, not a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Reading the concentration, trend and classification figures together points to where new claims still have room and where they will collide with dense prior art.
The core architecture is locked up by a small group
With the leading assignee alone holding 540 of the 1,593 records and the top five combined reaching 58.6%, new entrants filing on the standard bleed-air-to-membrane architecture will run directly into the deepest prior art.
Filing has cooled since the 2019 peak
Annual filings peaked at 189 in 2019 and the last clean comparison shows a drop from 45 in 2021 to 28 in 2024. Treat 2025-2026 as incomplete rather than as evidence the field is shrinking further, given the roughly 18-month publication lag.
Aircraft-equipment claims dominate the mix
B64D appears on 65.9% of the 1,593 records and B01D separation-process claims on 35.5%, while fire-fighting (A62C) trails at 19.3% — most inventive effort is going into system integration and gas separation, not suppression chemistry.
Foundational patents still anchor the field
US4556180A, an early fuel tank inerting system patent, carries 152 citations, more than any other record in the set. High citation counts here reflect age and foundational status inside this corpus, not current commercial relevance.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fuel tank inerting and flammability reduction, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the field is moving
The ranking spans 100 companies counted by patent family, with filing heavily concentrated at the top and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants beyond the ranked leaders.
One assignee anchors the field
The leading assignee's 540 records dwarf the fifth-ranked assignee's 51 and the tenth-ranked assignee's 33, showing a steep drop-off rather than a gradual one.
Ten assignees hold most of the field
The ten leading assignees combined account for 70.7% of all records in scope, leaving roughly three in ten records spread across the remaining ranked companies and the unranked tail.
Recent-year filing has gone flat at the top
Several of the largest historical filers, including the leader, show zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with the broader -38% decline from 2021 to 2024 rather than a company-specific pullback.
Cross-filing is rare but concentrated
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest link between two Airbus operating entities and a second notable pairing between Boeing and a membrane specialist supplier.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation | 0 | — |
| The Boeing Company | 0 | -100% |
| Airbus Operations Ltd | 0 | -100% |
| Kidde Technologies Inc | 0 | — |
| Parker Hannifin Corporation | 0 | — |
| Honeywell International Inc | 0 | — |
| EATON LTD | 0 | — |
| Airbus Operations SAS | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The figures above establish concentration, trend and classification structure. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific claims and specific competitors.
Check claim scope before filing on the core architecture
The bleed-air-to-membrane route is densely claimed by the leading assignees; a full claim-chart comparison against the most-cited records is the next step before committing to that path.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaTrack the leaders' recent filings, not just their totals
Several major holders show flat recent-year momentum; monitoring new publications from these assignees will show whether that is a pause or a permanent shift.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaScreen the under-claimed branches for a first-mover position
A62B, B65D and C01B classes show materially lower density than the core; a targeted search inside these branches can confirm how open they really are.
Explore white space in EurekaFrequently asked questions
The dominant approach is bleed-air-fed air separation using a hollow fiber membrane, which strips oxygen from engine bleed air to produce a nitrogen-enriched stream that is ducted into the fuel tank ullage. This architecture underlies the most-cited records in the field, including the earliest foundational patents from the 1980s and 1990s, and it corresponds to the B01D (separation processes) classification that covers 35.5% of the 1,593 records in scope. Most current filing activity, including the B64D aircraft-equipment class covering 65.9% of records, builds on refinements to this same core system rather than replacing it.
Filing is concentrated: the leading assignee alone accounts for 540 of the 1,593 records in scope, and the five leading assignees combined account for 58.6% of all records. The ten leading assignees together reach 70.7% of records, leaving a long tail of smaller filers with only a handful of records each. This concentration reflects the fact that aerospace primes and their systems suppliers, rather than a broad base of independent inventors, have driven most of the filing in this field.
Filings peaked in 2019 at 189 records and have declined since, with the clearest complete-year comparison showing a drop from 45 filings in 2021 to 28 in 2024, a -38% change. That said, 2025 and 2026 figures should not be read as confirming further decline, because patent publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any such dataset are always undercounted at the time of publication. The pattern is best read as core architecture claim space maturing rather than the underlying engineering activity necessarily shrinking.
The classification data shows several branches with much lower filing density than the core B64D/B01D combination: A62B (rescue and life-saving, 3.6% of records), B65D (containers and packaging, 2.8%) and C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds, 3.6%) all trail well behind the dominant classes. These thinner branches suggest claim space around emergency-use applications of nitrogen-enriched air systems, fuel-tank-adjacent container and fitting designs, and chemical inerting agents is comparatively under-claimed relative to the densely occupied membrane-and-ducting core. Anyone evaluating a new filing should check these branches before assuming the whole field is saturated.
US20160311551A1, filed by Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation and published in 2016, describes a nitrogen generation system that uses a bleed air source feeding an air separation module with a hollow fiber membrane, producing separate nitrogen-enriched and oxygen-enriched output streams, with the module positioned in a defined location relative to the engine. It matters because it is a representative example of the engine-proximate placement variant of the standard architecture, and its specific combination of module placement and dual-outlet routing is a detail that later filers and competitors need to check their own designs against. It is one data point among the 1,593 records in scope, not the sole blocking patent in the field, but it illustrates how placement and routing details, not just the separation principle itself, are what gets claimed.
Research Fuel Tank Inerting and Flammability Reduction in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole fuel tank inerting and flammability reduction corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.