Book a demo

Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026

Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/functional-foods-and-nutraceuticals-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals
Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Heading
  • Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees together hold 853 of 1,719 records in scope (49.6%), with a long tail behind them.
  • Filing has cooled from its peak. Activity peaked at 153 records in 2020; from 2021 to 2024, the last complete filing year, counts fell 56%, from 102 to 45.
  • Medicinal and food classes overlap heavily. A61K and A23L each cover about 44% of records, showing most filings straddle the food-drug boundary rather than sitting in one lane.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,719
Published Records
50%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-56%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (102 records) with 2024 (45) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,719 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the functional foods and nutraceuticals patent record shows

Functional foods and nutraceuticals sit at the intersection of food science, microbiology and pharmaceutical formulation, and the patent record reflects that mix directly. Filings in this dataset span ingredient mixtures, microbial cultures, processing temperature controls, product stability and flavor compound work, meaning claims can originate from a food processor, a probiotics house or a pharmaceutical formulator depending on the specific mechanism being protected. That breadth is why the leading IPC classes split almost evenly between medicinal preparations and conventional food categories rather than clustering in one.

The scope covers 1,719 published records from 2015 through the 2026-08-31 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional rather than a genuine decline.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1INT N&H DENMARK APS494
  2. 2NICOVENTURES TRADING LTD171
  3. 3UNIV GENT67
  4. 4MICROBIAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT HEALTH NV66
  5. 5GENECOR INC55
  6. 6PHARMALINK INTERNATIONAL LTD50
  7. 7METANOMICS GMBH31
  8. 8SECOND GENOME INC20
  9. 9APIVITA SA19
  10. 10AJINOMOTO CO INC18
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,719 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A 2020 peak followed by a documented pullback

Filings rose from 81 in 2017 to a peak of 153 in 2020, then fell across the 2021-2024 window that can be treated as complete, dropping 56% from 102 to 45. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are still filling in under normal publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline.

A 2020 peak followed by a documented pullback05010015020081201720182019153202020212022202320242025382026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Medicinal and food classes dominate, microbiology close behind

A61K (medicinal preparations) and A23L (foods and non-alcoholic beverages) each sit near 44% of the 1,719 records, with C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) close behind at 36.8%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add to well over 100% and should each be read against the full record count, not against each other.

Medicinal and food classes dominate, microbiology close behindA61K · Medicinal preparations76744.6%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages76444.4%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…63336.8%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…37621.9%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…28316.5%A23K · Animal feed18010.5%A23C · Dairy products17610.2%C12Q · Measuring & testing involving …1699.8%Other1,19869.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,719 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about functional foods & nutraceuticals patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a recent representative filing

Representative recent filing
US20250333805A12025-10-30

Hericium erinaceus strain HE015, molecular markers and uses thereof (US20250333805A1)

INFINITUS (CHINA) COMPANY LTD.

Filed by Infinitus (China) Company Ltd. and published 2025-10-30, this filing discloses a newly bred Hericium erinaceus (lion's mane) fungal strain, HE015, obtained through systematic breeding from wild-collected material and deposited at the Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center. The claims center on the strain's distinct genetic markers and its use, positioning it within the microbial-culture and functional-ingredient overlap that runs through much of this dataset.Abstract trimmed for length; see the full record for complete claim language.

US20250333805A1 — patent drawing 1US20250333805A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2007025097A2use616
2WO2008108989A2Cultures with improved phage resistance405
3US20100093617A1Use355
4US20070118916A1Process for the production of fine chemicals350
5US20140199767A1use344
6US20130011828A1Use216
7WO2008004900A1Production of ultrapure EPA and polar lipids from largely heterotrophic culture209
8US20060093720A1Pumpable, semi-solid low calorie sugar substitute compositions209
9US20110002889A1Cultures with Improved Phage Resistance204
10US20100069492A1Production of ultrapure EPA and polar lipids from largely heterotrophic culture168

Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records are structurally favoured; treat this as a signal of past influence rather than current commercial weight.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once concentration, timing and class overlap are read together.

Concentration
49.6%
of 1,719 records held by top 5 assignees

The leader board is short and heavy

The top five assignees combined account for 853 of the 1,719 records in scope, 49.6% of the field, while the leader alone holds 494. That leaves a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants competing for the remaining claim space.

Read the ranking as concentrated, not evenly distributed.
Momentum
-56%
filing change, 2021 to 2024

Post-peak activity has genuinely declined

After peaking at 153 records in 2020, filings fell from 102 in 2021 to 45 in 2024, the last year that can be treated as complete. That is a real pullback in a window unaffected by publication lag, distinct from the incomplete 2025-2026 data.

Do not extend this trend using 2025 or 2026 counts.
Class overlap
44.6% / 44.4%
A61K vs A23L share of 1,719 records

Food and medicinal claims sit on top of each other

A61K and A23L cover almost identical shares of the dataset, and C12N follows at 36.8%. Filings frequently claim across the food-drug boundary and into microbial-culture mechanics rather than staying inside a single classification.

Multi-class filings signal where design-around options are constrained.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to functional foods & nutraceuticals patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where it thins out

A short list of assignees anchors more than half the ranked field, while several of the most active names show no recent-year filings, suggesting the position has already been staked out rather than actively expanding.

Leader
494
records held by the top assignee

One assignee dominates the ranking

The leading assignee holds 494 of the 1,719 records in scope, well ahead of fifth place at 55 and tenth place at 18. That gap suggests an early, sustained filing programme rather than a recent surge.

New entrants compete against an established base, not a level field.
Top 10
57.6%
of 1,719 records held by top 10 assignees

Concentration extends past the top five

The top ten assignees combined hold 991 records, 57.6% of all records in scope. The step down from fifth (55) to tenth (18) is steep, meaning most of that concentration sits in the first few positions.

The remaining 90 ranked assignees split the balance thinly.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several top assignees, several -100% YoY

Leading filers have gone quiet recently

Several of the most active historical assignees show zero filings in the latest year, with year-over-year change of -100% for some. Given publication lag, this may reflect filings still working through the pipeline rather than an actual exit from the space.

Confirm recent activity before assuming a competitor has stepped back.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sit adjacent to the dense classes above but carry lighter documented coverage in this dataset.
Flavor-masking compound stabilizationProcessing-temperature control for live culturesAnimal-feed nutraceutical carriers (A23K)Dairy-matrix probiotic delivery (A23C)Enzyme-based quality preservation assays
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
International Flavors & Fragrances (Denmark) ApS0-100%
Nicoventures Trading Ltd0-100%
Ghent University0-100%
Genecor International Inc.0
Microbial Resource Management Health NV0-100%
Pharmalink International Ltd0
Second Genome Inc.0
Metanomics GmbH0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking or identifying open claim space.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top holders

With the leading assignee alone holding 494 records, any new filing touching microbial-culture or stability claims should be checked against that portfolio first.

Run a freedom-to-operate search in Eureka

Track dormant leaders for renewed activity

Several top assignees show zero filings in the latest year; publication lag means that could reverse. Set up monitoring rather than assuming the position is settled.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Scope claims in the under-claimed branches

Animal-feed carriers, dairy-matrix delivery and processing-temperature control for live cultures show lighter coverage relative to the dominant classes.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on the functional foods and nutraceuticals patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Functional Foods & Nutraceuticals Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole functional foods & nutraceuticals patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.