Emergency Stop Monitoring Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
A data-backed view of emergency stop monitoring patents: filing trends since 2017, the concentration of the ranked leaders, IPC composition across control systems, lifts, and robotics, and where claim space remains open.
Filing growth = 2021 (121 records) → 2024 (101); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 2,161 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Emergency stop monitoring is the supervisory layer sitting behind the stop button itself: circuits and software that confirm a stop signal was received, latched, and actioned, and that flag a fault if it was not. The claim space spans elevator and lift safety buses, robot and manipulator interlocks, motor drive protective circuits, and increasingly diagnostic software that treats stop-circuit status as a monitored variable rather than a hardwired binary. This dataset pulls 2,161 published records against a claim-level search for emergency-stop circuitry combined with monitoring, diagnostic, or fault-detection language.
The earliest representative filing in this set, GB2003634A from 1979, already describes locating which stop button on a factory line was actuated by reading current through a resistor-divided monitoring line — a problem the field is still solving with digital buses and software diagnostics decades later. That continuity matters for freedom-to-operate work: the underlying supervisory concept is old enough that novelty now sits in implementation detail, not in the idea of monitoring a stop circuit at all.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 2,161-record corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume.
Filings rose to a 2019 peak, then eased
Annual filings climbed from 84 in 2017 to a peak of 130 in 2019, then declined through the 2021-to-2024 window (121 to 101, a 17% drop). Treat the final two years on the chart as undercounts: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 will fill in as later publications post.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
Control systems and lifts dominate the classification mix
G05B (control and regulating systems) covers 14.4% of the 2,161 records and B66B (lifts and escalators) covers 9.6% — the two largest single-class shares in the corpus. B25J (manipulators and robots) at 6.8%, G05D at 5.4%, A61B at 5.0%, G06F at 4.2%, H02H at 3.7% and H02P at 3.6% round out a mix that spans mechanical safety buses, robotic interlocks, and increasingly software-side diagnostics. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares add up to more than the record total — that is expected and not an error in the chart.
Shares are the percentage of the 2,161 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Functional Safety: Emergency Stop Monitoring Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about functional safety: emergency stop monitoring patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaKey patents in the emergency stop monitoring space
GB2003634A — Emergency stop circuit monitoring system
Filed in 1979 by Molins Ltd, this patent describes a system for monitoring an emergency stop circuit across multiple machines on a factory line, so that the location of the actuated stop button can be identified. The circuit uses a self-latching contactor and a monitoring line whose current varies with the position of the actuated button; that current is converted to a voltage and compared against a chain of reference voltages driving indicator LEDs, pinpointing which machine tripped the stop.Priority date 1979-03-14 — establishes the core concept of locating a triggered stop button via circuit-level monitoring, decades ahead of digital bus implementations.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US7894951B2 | Systems and methods for switching between autonomous and manual operation of a vehicle | 385 |
| 2 | US6173814B1 | Electronic safety system for elevators having a dual redundant safety bus | 282 |
| 3 | US5788851A | User interface and method for control of medical instruments, such as dialysis machines | 274 |
| 4 | US6014597A | Distributed electric vehicle battery exchange network | 236 |
| 5 | US20170128769A1 | Pressure chamber and lift for differential air pressure system with medical data collection capabilities | 232 |
| 6 | US6270445B1 | In-bed exercise machine and method of use | 224 |
| 7 | US20190046373A1 | Mobility device | 175 |
| 8 | US20080248926A1 | Training System and Method | 165 |
| 9 | US20150274072A1 | Context-aware collison devices and collison avoidance system comprising the same | 155 |
| 10 | US20150086420A1 | Room sterilization method and system | 148 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read this as a signal of influence on the field, not a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data says about concentration and reach
Four figures worth sitting with before deciding where to file or who to watch.
The top of the field is thin, not dominant
The leading assignee holds 60 families and fifth place holds 33 — the top 5 combined account for 10.2% of all 2,161 records in scope, and the top 10 combined reach 16.1%. That leaves the large majority of filings distributed across a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
A plateau, not a collapse
Filings peaked in 2019 at 130 and eased through the last complete filing years on record. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025–2026 figures on the chart understate real activity and should not be read as a continued decline.
Control systems carry the largest single share
G05B (control and regulating systems) and B66B (lifts and escalators) are the two largest IPC shares in the corpus, at 14.4% and 9.6% of the 2,161 records respectively. Robotics (B25J, 6.8%) and non-electric control (G05D, 5.4%) show the claim space is no longer confined to elevator safety buses.
US and EPO lead filing venues
The United States receives the largest share of filings at 619 records, followed by the EPO at 393, India at 227, WIPO/PCT at 142, Germany at 125, and Austria at 93. That spread points to a technology prosecuted seriously in multiple jurisdictions rather than concentrated in a single home market.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to functional safety: emergency stop monitoring patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Where to take this analysis
The ranking, trend chart and IPC breakdown on this page are a starting point for scoping freedom-to-operate work or a competitive watch list.
Map claim scope against the leaders
Pull full claim sets for the assignees holding the top concentration figures before drafting around elevator or robotics stop-monitoring circuitry.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaTrack the software-diagnostic branch
G06F's 4.2% share signals stop-circuit monitoring is migrating into software; watch this branch for faster growth than the mechanical classes.
Set up a monitoring alert in EurekaCheck the long tail for licensing targets
With 16.1% of records held by the top 10, most of the corpus sits with smaller filers who may be open to licensing rather than litigation.
Search the full assignee list in EurekaCommon questions about emergency stop monitoring patents
The ranked leader in this dataset holds 60 families, with the fifth-place assignee at 33 and tenth place at 22 — a meaningful gap at the top but not a dominant monopoly. Assignees active in this space include elevator manufacturers, industrial robotics companies, and automation control vendors, reflecting how broadly the underlying technology is used. The top 5 combined account for 10.2% of the 2,161 records in scope, and the top 10 combined reach 16.1%, so the majority of filings sit outside the ranked leaders in a long tail of smaller filers.
Filings peaked in 2019 at 130 and eased to 101 by 2024, a 17% decline from the 121 filed in 2021 — a plateau rather than a sharp drop-off. Because publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look lower than the true filing rate turns out to be. Readers should treat 2024 as the most recent year with a reasonably complete picture and be cautious about drawing conclusions from 2025 or 2026 figures.
GB2003634A, filed in 1979 by Molins Ltd, describes a system for identifying which emergency stop button on a factory line was triggered, using current variation through a resistor-divided monitoring line converted to a voltage and compared against reference voltages. As a 1979 priority date, the patent itself is long expired and cannot be asserted, but its disclosure sits in the prior art available to examiners assessing novelty for any new circuit-level stop-monitoring claim. Filers today need to differentiate on implementation — digital bus architecture, software diagnostics, or fault classification — rather than on the basic concept of localising a triggered stop button, since that concept is decades old.
Control and regulating systems (IPC class G05B) carry the largest share at 14.4% of the 2,161 records in scope, followed by lifts and escalators (B66B) at 9.6%. Robotics and manipulators (B25J) account for 6.8%, and non-electric control variables (G05D) for 5.4%, showing the field spans well beyond elevator safety into industrial robotics and general automation. Because a single patent can carry multiple IPC classifications, these percentages add up to more than 100% of the corpus and should be read as overlapping shares, not a strict breakdown.
The smaller IPC shares in this dataset — protective circuit arrangements (H02H at 3.7%) and motor and generator control (H02P at 3.6%) — carry noticeably less filing density than the control-systems and lift classes, suggesting less crowded claim space around fault-specific protective circuitry and motor-drive-integrated stop monitoring. The long tail of the assignee ranking, where the top 10 hold only 16.1% of all records, also points to fragmented ownership outside the largest players, which can mean more room to file without immediately triggering freedom-to-operate conflicts with a dominant holder. Any such assessment should be paired with a direct claims review, since filing density alone does not confirm an open path.
Research Functional Safety: Emergency Stop Monitoring Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole functional safety: emergency stop monitoring patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.