Book a demo

Emergency Stop Monitoring Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Emergency Stop Monitoring Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/functional-safety-emergency-stop-monitoring-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Industrial Automation & Control
Emergency Stop Monitoring Patents: Who Holds the Circuit-Supervision Claims

A data-backed view of emergency stop monitoring patents: filing trends since 2017, the concentration of the ranked leaders, IPC composition across control systems, lifts, and robotics, and where claim space remains open.

2,161
Published Records
10%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-17%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (121 records) → 2024 (101); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 2,161 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Emergency stop monitoring is the supervisory layer sitting behind the stop button itself: circuits and software that confirm a stop signal was received, latched, and actioned, and that flag a fault if it was not. The claim space spans elevator and lift safety buses, robot and manipulator interlocks, motor drive protective circuits, and increasingly diagnostic software that treats stop-circuit status as a monitored variable rather than a hardwired binary. This dataset pulls 2,161 published records against a claim-level search for emergency-stop circuitry combined with monitoring, diagnostic, or fault-detection language.

The earliest representative filing in this set, GB2003634A from 1979, already describes locating which stop button on a factory line was actuated by reading current through a resistor-divided monitoring line — a problem the field is still solving with digital buses and software diagnostics decades later. That continuity matters for freedom-to-operate work: the underlying supervisory concept is old enough that novelty now sits in implementation detail, not in the idea of monitoring a stop circuit at all.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1INVENTIO AG60
  2. 2OTIS ELEVATOR CO49
  3. 3ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC41
  4. 4MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP37
  5. 5VELTEK ASSOCIATES INC33
  6. 6KONE OYJ32
  7. 7FANUC LTD25
  8. 8HITACHI LTD24
  9. 9SIEMENS AG24
  10. 10DEKA PRODUCTS LP22
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Emergency Stop Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,161-record corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume.

Filings rose to a 2019 peak, then eased

Annual filings climbed from 84 in 2017 to a peak of 130 in 2019, then declined through the 2021-to-2024 window (121 to 101, a 17% drop). Treat the final two years on the chart as undercounts: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 will fill in as later publications post.

Filings rose to a 2019 peak, then eased0387511315084201720181302019202020212022202320242025502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Control systems and lifts dominate the classification mix

G05B (control and regulating systems) covers 14.4% of the 2,161 records and B66B (lifts and escalators) covers 9.6% — the two largest single-class shares in the corpus. B25J (manipulators and robots) at 6.8%, G05D at 5.4%, A61B at 5.0%, G06F at 4.2%, H02H at 3.7% and H02P at 3.6% round out a mix that spans mechanical safety buses, robotic interlocks, and increasingly software-side diagnostics. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares add up to more than the record total — that is expected and not an error in the chart.

Control systems and lifts dominate the classification mixG05B · Control & regulating systems31114.4%B66B · Lifts & escalators2079.6%B25J · Manipulators & robots1486.8%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…1175.4%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery1075.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…904.2%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements793.7%H02P · Control of motors & generators773.6%Other2,237103.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,161 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Emergency Stop Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Functional Safety: Emergency Stop Monitoring Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about functional safety: emergency stop monitoring patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Foundational Filing

Key patents in the emergency stop monitoring space

Representative Early Filing
GB2003634A1979-03-14

GB2003634A — Emergency stop circuit monitoring system

MOLINS LTD

Filed in 1979 by Molins Ltd, this patent describes a system for monitoring an emergency stop circuit across multiple machines on a factory line, so that the location of the actuated stop button can be identified. The circuit uses a self-latching contactor and a monitoring line whose current varies with the position of the actuated button; that current is converted to a voltage and compared against a chain of reference voltages driving indicator LEDs, pinpointing which machine tripped the stop.Priority date 1979-03-14 — establishes the core concept of locating a triggered stop button via circuit-level monitoring, decades ahead of digital bus implementations.

GB2003634A — patent drawing 1
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7894951B2Systems and methods for switching between autonomous and manual operation of a vehicle385
2US6173814B1Electronic safety system for elevators having a dual redundant safety bus282
3US5788851AUser interface and method for control of medical instruments, such as dialysis machines274
4US6014597ADistributed electric vehicle battery exchange network236
5US20170128769A1Pressure chamber and lift for differential air pressure system with medical data collection capabilities232
6US6270445B1In-bed exercise machine and method of use224
7US20190046373A1Mobility device175
8US20080248926A1Training System and Method165
9US20150274072A1Context-aware collison devices and collison avoidance system comprising the same155
10US20150086420A1Room sterilization method and system148

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read this as a signal of influence on the field, not a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Emergency Stop Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the data says about concentration and reach

Four figures worth sitting with before deciding where to file or who to watch.

Concentration
10.2%
of 2,161 records held by the top 5 assignees

The top of the field is thin, not dominant

The leading assignee holds 60 families and fifth place holds 33 — the top 5 combined account for 10.2% of all 2,161 records in scope, and the top 10 combined reach 16.1%. That leaves the large majority of filings distributed across a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.

Ranking covers 100 assignees, the full set the data endpoint returns
Filing trend
-17%
change from 2021 (121) to 2024 (101)

A plateau, not a collapse

Filings peaked in 2019 at 130 and eased through the last complete filing years on record. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025–2026 figures on the chart understate real activity and should not be read as a continued decline.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete
Technology mix
14.4%
of records classified under G05B

Control systems carry the largest single share

G05B (control and regulating systems) and B66B (lifts and escalators) are the two largest IPC shares in the corpus, at 14.4% and 9.6% of the 2,161 records respectively. Robotics (B25J, 6.8%) and non-electric control (G05D, 5.4%) show the claim space is no longer confined to elevator safety buses.

Shares exceed 100% combined because records can carry multiple IPC classes
Filing geography
619
records filed at the US receiving office

US and EPO lead filing venues

The United States receives the largest share of filings at 619 records, followed by the EPO at 393, India at 227, WIPO/PCT at 142, Germany at 125, and Austria at 93. That spread points to a technology prosecuted seriously in multiple jurisdictions rather than concentrated in a single home market.

Counts are by receiving office, not by applicant nationality
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to functional safety: emergency stop monitoring patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Emergency Stop Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The ranking, trend chart and IPC breakdown on this page are a starting point for scoping freedom-to-operate work or a competitive watch list.

Map claim scope against the leaders

Pull full claim sets for the assignees holding the top concentration figures before drafting around elevator or robotics stop-monitoring circuitry.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Track the software-diagnostic branch

G06F's 4.2% share signals stop-circuit monitoring is migrating into software; watch this branch for faster growth than the mechanical classes.

Set up a monitoring alert in Eureka

Check the long tail for licensing targets

With 16.1% of records held by the top 10, most of the corpus sits with smaller filers who may be open to licensing rather than litigation.

Search the full assignee list in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Emergency Stop Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about emergency stop monitoring patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Emergency Stop Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Functional Safety: Emergency Stop Monitoring Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole functional safety: emergency stop monitoring patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.