https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/functional-safety-industrial-safe-motion-functions-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Functional Safety
Industrial Safe Motion Function Patents: Who Holds Safe Torque Off Ground

A patent landscape review of industrial safe motion functions — Safe Torque Off, Safely Limited Speed and related IEC 61800-5-2 techniques — covering assignee concentration, filing growth, IPC composition and the claims

121
Published Records
29%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+280%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (5 records) → 2024 (19); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 121 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Industrial safe motion functions are the drive-level safety behaviours defined in standards such as IEC 61800-5-2 — Safe Torque Off, Safely Limited Speed, Safe Stop 1 and Safe Stop 2 — implemented in servo drives, inverters and robot or machine controllers so that a fault or an operator intervention removes torque or limits speed without a full, unsafe shutdown. The claim space spans the control electronics that generate and verify the safety signal, the wiring and network schemes used to carry it, and the application-specific integrations that put it into elevators, robots and general machine tools. This review draws on 121 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, ranked by patent family so that continuation and multi-jurisdiction filing do not distort the picture.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years in the filing trend understate real activity; treat 2025 and 2026 as still filling in rather than as a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1KOLLMORGEN CORP10
  2. 2ABB BEIJING DRIVE SYST CO LTD7
  3. 3RTX CORP6
  4. 4ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG6
  5. 5ABB AG(DE)6
  6. 6GRUNDFOS HLDG6
  7. 7OTIS ELEVATOR CO6
  8. 8LEWIS AUSTRALIA5
  9. 9FOCKE & CO (GMBH & CO KG)4
  10. 10GUANGDONG WINONE ELEVATOR4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Industrial Safe Motion Functions Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 121 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which control disciplines the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend: a fourfold rise since 2021

Annual filings moved from 5 in 2017 to a peak of 19 in 2024, with the 2021-to-2024 span alone showing +280% growth. 2025 and 2026 figures will rise as later publications land; they should not be read as a plateau.

Filing trend: a fourfold rise since 20210510152052017201820192020202120222023192024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

IPC composition: motor control dominates, elevators follow

Control of motors and generators (H02P) appears in 49.6% of the 121 records, roughly three-and-a-half times the next-largest class, lifts and escalators (B66B) at 14.9%. Because a record can carry several IPC classes, these shares sum to more than 100% — the pattern to read is where claim density piles up, not a partition of the field.

IPC composition: motor control dominates, elevators followH02P · Control of motors & generators6049.6%B66B · Lifts & escalators1814.9%G05B · Control & regulating systems1613.2%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)119.1%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…86.6%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…75.8%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements75.8%G06F · Electric digital data processi…65.0%Other6049.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 121 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Industrial Safe Motion Functions Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Functional Safety: Industrial Safe Motion Functions Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about functional safety: industrial safe motion functions patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents anchoring this space

Representative filing
US8566415B22013-10-22

US8566415B2 — Safe torque off over network wiring (Kollmorgen)

KOLLMORGEN CORPORATION

Describes systems and methods for carrying Safe Torque Off signals over the same twisted-pair wiring already used for control signalling — either a single DC or AC channel, or a dual DC-plus-AC arrangement for redundancy — removing the need for a separate hardwired safety channel.Filed by Kollmorgen; granted 2013-10-22. Frequently cited within this dataset and structurally close to several of the highest-cited records.

US8566415B2 — patent drawing 1US8566415B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20130327159A1Self Contained Sampling and Processing Facility45
2US20190068088A1Optocoupler-based control circuit and method thereof30
3CN104355195A安全扭矩关断功能电路和电梯安全控制系统20
4CN108233685A一种安全转矩关断控制电路以及传动系统16
5US20130054724A1Safe Torque Off Over Network Wiring16
6CN105576952ASTO控制电路及系统13
7CN111358660A一种下肢康复训练装置、方法计算机设备12
8CN107146432A一种高速公路雾区可变限速装置及方法12
9CN104979803A安全扭矩关断过程12
10CN205170091U安全扭矩关断功能电路和电梯安全控制系统11

Citation count favours older filings that have had more time to accumulate forward references — read it as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of present-day importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Industrial Safe Motion Functions Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Four read-outs from the concentration, growth and citation figures above, aimed at where to file and who to watch.

Concentration
28.9% / 49.6%
top 5 / top 10 share of 121 records

Leadership is real but not closed

The top 5 assignees combined hold 28.9% of the 121 records in scope and the top 10 reach 49.6%. That leaves roughly half the field to a long tail across 57 ranked companies — room for a differentiated filing, but not an empty field.

Ranking is family-based across the full 57-company list returned by the dataset.
Growth
+280%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Activity is accelerating, not maturing

Annual filings rose from 5 in 2021 to 19 in 2024. High density in H02P claims means occupied ground, not a finished technology — new architectures for signal generation and verification are still being filed at pace.

2025-2026 figures will revise upward as publication catches up with filing.
Technology mix
49.6% H02P
of records touch motor/generator control

Drive electronics carry the claim weight

Nearly half of all 121 records sit in H02P, control of motors and generators, versus 14.9% in lift and escalator applications and 13.2% in general control and regulating systems (G05B). Application-specific integrations are a smaller, more open target than the core control circuitry.

Shares sum above 100% because records can carry multiple IPC classes.
Geography
US 28 · EPO 26 · CN 25
leading receiving offices

Filing is split across three major offices

The United States, the EPO and China each account for a similar volume of receiving-office activity, with WIPO PCT filings, Austria and Germany trailing behind. A filing strategy built around a single jurisdiction misses most of the competitive activity here.

Counts are by receiving office, not by assignee home country.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to functional safety: industrial safe motion functions patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Industrial Safe Motion Functions Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The dataset points to specific next questions rather than a single verdict.

Map the white space around signal-carrying schemes

The most-cited records cluster around how the Safe Torque Off signal is generated, verified and carried over existing wiring. Adjacent branches — diagnostic feedback loops, multi-axis coordination of safe stop states — carry far fewer filings and are worth a closer look before committing claim language.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the fast movers, not just the leader

The gap between the top 5 and top 10 combined shares shows several assignees filing at a similar pace just behind the leader. Monitoring filing velocity, not just cumulative rank, will catch a challenger before it shows up in a static ranking.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka

Test claim novelty against the highest-cited prior art

Several of the most-cited records share close structural similarity to the representative Kollmorgen filing. Any new filing on wiring-based or network-carried safety signalling should be checked against that cluster before drafting.

Run a novelty check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Industrial Safe Motion Functions Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on safe motion function patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety: Industrial Safe Motion Functions Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Functional Safety: Industrial Safe Motion Functions Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole functional safety: industrial safe motion functions patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.