Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A patent landscape review of industrial safe motion functions — Safe Torque Off, Safely Limited Speed and related IEC 61800-5-2 techniques — covering assignee concentration, filing growth, IPC composition and the claims
Filing growth = 2021 (5 records) → 2024 (19); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 121 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
Industrial safe motion functions are the drive-level safety behaviours defined in standards such as IEC 61800-5-2 — Safe Torque Off, Safely Limited Speed, Safe Stop 1 and Safe Stop 2 — implemented in servo drives, inverters and robot or machine controllers so that a fault or an operator intervention removes torque or limits speed without a full, unsafe shutdown. The claim space spans the control electronics that generate and verify the safety signal, the wiring and network schemes used to carry it, and the application-specific integrations that put it into elevators, robots and general machine tools. This review draws on 121 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, ranked by patent family so that continuation and multi-jurisdiction filing do not distort the picture.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years in the filing trend understate real activity; treat 2025 and 2026 as still filling in rather than as a slowdown.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 121 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which control disciplines the claims actually sit in.
Annual filings moved from 5 in 2017 to a peak of 19 in 2024, with the 2021-to-2024 span alone showing +280% growth. 2025 and 2026 figures will rise as later publications land; they should not be read as a plateau.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
Control of motors and generators (H02P) appears in 49.6% of the 121 records, roughly three-and-a-half times the next-largest class, lifts and escalators (B66B) at 14.9%. Because a record can carry several IPC classes, these shares sum to more than 100% — the pattern to read is where claim density piles up, not a partition of the field.
Shares are the percentage of the 121 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about functional safety: industrial safe motion functions patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaDescribes systems and methods for carrying Safe Torque Off signals over the same twisted-pair wiring already used for control signalling — either a single DC or AC channel, or a dual DC-plus-AC arrangement for redundancy — removing the need for a separate hardwired safety channel.Filed by Kollmorgen; granted 2013-10-22. Frequently cited within this dataset and structurally close to several of the highest-cited records.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20130327159A1 | Self Contained Sampling and Processing Facility | 45 |
| 2 | US20190068088A1 | Optocoupler-based control circuit and method thereof | 30 |
| 3 | CN104355195A | 安全扭矩关断功能电路和电梯安全控制系统 | 20 |
| 4 | CN108233685A | 一种安全转矩关断控制电路以及传动系统 | 16 |
| 5 | US20130054724A1 | Safe Torque Off Over Network Wiring | 16 |
| 6 | CN105576952A | STO控制电路及系统 | 13 |
| 7 | CN111358660A | 一种下肢康复训练装置、方法计算机设备 | 12 |
| 8 | CN107146432A | 一种高速公路雾区可变限速装置及方法 | 12 |
| 9 | CN104979803A | 安全扭矩关断过程 | 12 |
| 10 | CN205170091U | 安全扭矩关断功能电路和电梯安全控制系统 | 11 |
Citation count favours older filings that have had more time to accumulate forward references — read it as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of present-day importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four read-outs from the concentration, growth and citation figures above, aimed at where to file and who to watch.
The top 5 assignees combined hold 28.9% of the 121 records in scope and the top 10 reach 49.6%. That leaves roughly half the field to a long tail across 57 ranked companies — room for a differentiated filing, but not an empty field.
Annual filings rose from 5 in 2021 to 19 in 2024. High density in H02P claims means occupied ground, not a finished technology — new architectures for signal generation and verification are still being filed at pace.
Nearly half of all 121 records sit in H02P, control of motors and generators, versus 14.9% in lift and escalator applications and 13.2% in general control and regulating systems (G05B). Application-specific integrations are a smaller, more open target than the core control circuitry.
The United States, the EPO and China each account for a similar volume of receiving-office activity, with WIPO PCT filings, Austria and Germany trailing behind. A filing strategy built around a single jurisdiction misses most of the competitive activity here.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to functional safety: industrial safe motion functions patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The dataset points to specific next questions rather than a single verdict.
The most-cited records cluster around how the Safe Torque Off signal is generated, verified and carried over existing wiring. Adjacent branches — diagnostic feedback loops, multi-axis coordination of safe stop states — carry far fewer filings and are worth a closer look before committing claim language.
Explore white space in EurekaThe gap between the top 5 and top 10 combined shares shows several assignees filing at a similar pace just behind the leader. Monitoring filing velocity, not just cumulative rank, will catch a challenger before it shows up in a static ranking.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaSeveral of the most-cited records share close structural similarity to the representative Kollmorgen filing. Any new filing on wiring-based or network-carried safety signalling should be checked against that cluster before drafting.
Run a novelty check in EurekaIn this landscape, a safe motion function is a drive-level or controller-level safety behaviour standardised under frameworks like IEC 61800-5-2 — Safe Torque Off, Safely Limited Speed, Safe Stop 1 and Safe Stop 2 are the named examples in the search scope. Patents in this space typically claim either the electronics that generate and verify the safety signal, the wiring or network scheme used to carry it, or an application-specific integration such as an elevator or robot controller. The dataset behind this page covers 121 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off that match those terms in claims or titles/abstracts.
The ranked list covers 57 companies, with the leading assignee holding 10 of the 121 records in scope; fifth place holds 6 and tenth place holds 4. The top 5 combined account for 28.9% of all records and the top 10 combined for 49.6%, which means roughly half the field is spread across a long tail of companies filing in smaller numbers. That leaves meaningful room for a well-differentiated filing even in a field with an identifiable leader.
It is growing. Annual filings rose from 5 in 2021 to a peak of 19 in 2024, a +280% increase over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend chart will look lower simply because later filings have not all published yet — that should not be read as the field cooling off.
Control of motors and generators (IPC class H02P) is by far the densest, appearing in 49.6% of the 121 records in scope. Lifts and escalators (B66B) follow at 14.9%, and general control and regulating systems (G05B) at 13.2%. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% — they show where claim density concentrates, not a strict split of the market.
US8566415B2, assigned to Kollmorgen and granted in 2013, claims methods for carrying Safe Torque Off signals over existing control-signalling wiring — as a single DC or AC channel across twisted pairs, or a dual DC-plus-AC arrangement for redundancy. A new entrant designing a drive that reuses existing network wiring to carry a safety signal, rather than adding a dedicated hardwired safety channel, should check claim scope here closely, since several of the most-cited records in this dataset sit close to this same approach.
Go past this page: query the whole functional safety: industrial safe motion functions patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.