Functional Safety Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
Functional Safety Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Heading
43.9% of all 1,935 records sit with just five assignees — a field with a genuine head, not a flat distribution. Filings ran from 119 in 2017 to a peak of 271 in 2018, then declined to 108 by 2024 — a 51% drop from the 219 filed in 2021. 2025 and 2026 counts (14 in 2026 so far) are still filling in under the publication lag and should not be read as a continued fall.
- 1BRIGHT DATA LTD15.7%
- 2MOBILEYE VISION TECH LTD13.9%
- 3STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019 LLC7.9%
- 4INTEL CORP4.0%
- 5VOLVO TRUCK CORP2.4%
See the full functional safety patent landscape analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about functional safety patents
Who holds the most functional safety patents?
The ranking of 100 assignees shows a clear leader with 304 records, well ahead of the fifth-ranked company at 46 and the tenth-ranked company at 30. Together the top five hold 43.9% of the 1,935 records in scope, and the top ten hold 53.1%. That means over half the field’s patenting activity concentrates in just ten organisations, while the remaining ninety ranked companies split the rest, often with single-digit or single-filing counts.
Is functional safety patent filing growing or slowing down?
Filing peaked in 2018 at 271 records and has declined since, with the 2021-to-2024 window showing a 51% drop from 219 to 108 filings. Both those years are past the roughly 18-month publication lag, so the decline is a genuine trend rather than a data artefact. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete and should not be read as a continuation of the decline until later filings publish.
What technology areas dominate functional safety patents?
G06F (electric digital data processing) and H04L (digital information transmission) are the two largest IPC subclasses, covering 27.8% and 23.8% of the 1,935 records respectively. Core control-and-regulating-systems claims under G05B account for 17.6%, and vehicle-control class B60W for 16.3%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100%, and the pattern suggests much of the recent claim-writing sits in data-handling and communications layers rather than in control-loop logic itself.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Functional Safety Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.