Book a demo

FDM Feedstock Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

FDM Feedstock Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/fused-deposition-modeling-feedstock-development-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Additive Manufacturing · Patent Landscape
Fused Deposition Modeling Feedstock Patents: Who's Filing and Where the Claims Sit
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 71 records and has eased back since, with the most recent year still undercounted due to publication lag.
  • Composition and structure claims dominate B29C and B33Y account for 360 and 342 of the 387 tracked families, dwarfing fibre-feature and additive-specific classes.
  • No single assignee controls the top-cited art the five most-cited records, each cited up to 25 times, span different filer groups rather than one dominant holder.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
387
Published Records
53%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-62%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (53 records) with 2024 (20) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 387 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families around fused deposition modeling (FDM) feedstock — the filament materials, composite formulations, and core-shell or embedded-functional-material architectures fed into fused deposition modeling and fused filament fabrication printers. The scope spans filament material, composite filament, high-performance polymer filament and feedstock formulation claim language, filtered to the additive-manufacturing and plastics-shaping IPC classes where this work is actually classified.

Filing runs from 2015 through the current data cut-off, covering 387 patent families. Composition and structural claims sit heavily inside two IPC subclasses, while several adjacent classes carry far fewer filings — a gap worth checking before assuming a formulation idea is already claimed.

Filing volume and IPC composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1SIGNIFY HOLDING BV165
  2. 2BAE SYSTEMS PLC11
  3. 3JABIL INC11
  4. 4ULTIMAKER BV11
  5. 5ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL(COMPAGNIE GENERALE D OPTIQUE)9
  6. 6XEROX CORP9
  7. 7ADEKA CORP8
  8. 8SLICE ENGINEERING LLC7
  9. 9G6 MATERIALS CORP6
  10. 10STRATASYS INC6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fused Deposition Modeling Feedstock Development covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The filing curve and the IPC spread together show where feedstock formulation work has concentrated and where it has thinned out.

Filing activity, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 34 in 2017 to a peak of 71 in 2020, then eased to 30 by the 2022 midpoint and continued declining toward the most recent, still-partial year. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last one to two years understate actual filing activity.

Filing activity, 2017–2026020406080342017201820197120202021202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

B29C (shaping of plastics) and B33Y (additive manufacturing) anchor the corpus at 360 and 342 records respectively. Polymer composition (C08L, 47), moulding-material indices (B29K, 45) and fibre-feature classifications (D01F, 30) trail well behind, marking the thinner, less-claimed branches of the same field.

IPC subclass distributionB29C · Shaping of plastics36093.0%B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D pri…34288.4%C08L · Polymer compositions4712.1%B29K · Plastics moulding materials (i…4511.6%D01F · Chemical filament & fibre feat…307.8%B29L · Plastic products (index)297.5%F21V · Lighting device components287.2%C08K · Use of additives in polymers277.0%Other19650.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 387 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fused Deposition Modeling Feedstock Development covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Fused Deposition Modeling Feedstock Development with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about fused deposition modeling feedstock development and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative claim to anchor the landscape

Representative Patent
US10744695B22020-08-18

Polymer composites for fused filament fabrication and methods of making the same

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE

Disclosed are compositions of a fused filament fabrication (FFF) composite filament having embedded functional materials in a thermoplastic matrix. Methods of making the composite filaments are also disclosed. In one example, a FFF composite filament incorporates a MOF, in an amount greater than 10% by mass, dispersed in a matrix polymer. One example of a method of synthesizing FFF composite filaments involves mixing a suspension that has a MOF with a matrix polymer solution to yield a polymer-MOF mixture. The mixture is cast and dried into a solid composite material, which is formed a FFF composite filament having the MOF in an amount greater than 10% by mass.Granted to Battelle Memorial Institute, 2020-08-18.

US10744695B2 — patent drawing 1US10744695B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20210231301A1Heat conducting composite printed by FDM and strategies for effective heat sinking25
2WO2017207514A1Filaments for fused deposition modeling including an electronic component25
3US20170341301A1Composite Continuous Filament for Additive Manufacturing25
4US20190217517A1Polymer composites for fused filament fabrication and methods of making the same24
5WO2018162268A1Core-shell filament for printing smooth FDM 3D items21
6WO2020048889A1Printing method for FDM printing smooth surfaces of items20
7WO2019025472A1A process for producing a three-dimensional green body by a fused filament fabrication (FFF) process20
8US20210101330A1Method for 3D printing a 3D item19
9EP3403806A1Hierarchical porous structure19
10WO2021104920A1FDM printed luminaires with enhanced shiny appearance18

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older filings are structurally favoured, so treat this as influence rather than a current leaderboard.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fused Deposition Modeling Feedstock Development covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the data signals for feedstock strategy

Reading filing volume, citation weight and IPC spread together separates staked-out claim territory from areas still open to a first filer.

Filing Momentum
71 → 4
peak (2020) vs latest partial year

Growth has flattened, not accelerated

Filings rose from 34 in 2017 to a 2020 peak of 71, then fell back to roughly 30 by 2022 and continued easing. That trajectory says the core composition space filled up early rather than that demand for FDM feedstock innovation dried up.

Publication lag means the last one to two years will revise upward.
Claim Concentration
360 / 342
B29C and B33Y record counts

Two IPC subclasses carry most of the corpus

B29C (shaping of plastics) and B33Y (additive manufacturing) together anchor the vast majority of the 387 families. Anything filed inside those subclasses now competes with a dense, mature prior-art base.

Adjacent subclasses like D01F and C08K sit far thinner.
Citation Weight
25 citations
top shared citation count

Influence is spread, not cornered

The most-cited records top out at 25 citations apiece and cover distinct approaches — heat-conducting composites, embedded electronics, continuous composite filament. No one family or assignee dominates the influential core.

Citation counts favour older filings; treat as influence, not current relevance.
Jurisdictional Spread
137 / 84 / 54
US / EPO / WIPO record counts

US-first filing with PCT as the fallback

The United States draws more than a third of tracked records, with EPO and PCT/WIPO filings well behind. A freedom-to-operate review limited to one office will miss a meaningful share of relevant claims.

India's 45 records outpace Germany and China combined.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to fused deposition modeling feedstock development, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fused Deposition Modeling Feedstock Development covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignees

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

Filing activity spreads across materials companies, printer makers and research institutes rather than concentrating in one holder, and recent-year momentum has cooled across several previously active filers.

Filing Base
387 families
total tracked patent families

A broad but not deeply concentrated base

With 387 families and no single assignee dominating the most-cited records, the field looks more like a wide field of specialists than a market with one or two gatekeepers.

Family counts neutralise multi-jurisdiction refiling.
Recent Momentum
0 in latest year
across multiple tracked assignees

Several previously active filers have gone quiet

A number of assignees that filed in prior years show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, including declines as steep as -100% YoY for at least one filer. That is consistent with a field where the initial composition-claim land grab has already happened.

Latest-year counts are the most affected by publication lag.
Jurisdiction Mix
US 137 · EPO 84
leading receiving offices

US and European filing lead, PCT close behind

The United States and EPO together draw the largest share of filings, with PCT/WIPO applications close behind — a pattern typical of applicants keeping international options open before committing to national phase.

India's 45 filings signal growing regional interest.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches carry materially fewer filings than the B29C/B33Y core, based on the IPC composition breakdown.
Fibre-feature filament engineering (D01F)Polymer-additive loading combinations (C08K)Embedded optical/lighting components (F21V)Multi-lobed non-core-shell cross-sectionsPost-print functional coating routes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Signify Holding B.V.0-100%
Ultimaker B.V.0
Xerox Corporation0
Jabil Inc.0
BAE Systems plc0
Essilor International0
Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC0
Adeka Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fused Deposition Modeling Feedstock Development covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The filing and citation patterns above point to specific follow-up checks before committing to a filing or freedom-to-operate position.

Check freedom to operate on a specific formulation

Run your matrix polymer, filler class and loading range against the top-cited composite and core-shell families before filing or launching, since these carry the densest claim overlap.

Search this space in Eureka →

Track assignee momentum before it shifts again

Several assignees have gone quiet in the latest tracked year; watch for renewed filing activity that could signal a shift back into composition claims.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka →

Explore the under-claimed fibre-feature and additive branches

D01F and C08K filings trail well behind the B29C/B33Y core, leaving room for a first-mover claim on fibre-feature or additive-loading combinations.

Explore white space in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fused Deposition Modeling Feedstock Development covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Fused Deposition Modeling Feedstock Development covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Fused Deposition Modeling Feedstock Development in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole fused deposition modeling feedstock development corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.