Book a demo

GAA Device Reliability (BTI/HCI) Patent Snapshot 2026

GAA Device Reliability (BTI/HCI) Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
GAA Device Reliability (BTI/HCI) Patent Snapshot in 2026

The patent corpus for gate-all-around device reliability — covering bias-temperature instability and hot-carrier injection — is highly concentrated, with TSMC holding more than half of the 28 patent families in scope and the top five filers collectively dominating among the largest filers. The field is in a Growth stage on a multi-year basis, though annual volume peaked in 2023 and remains understated in the most recent years due to publication lag.

28
Patent families in scope
97%
Top visible applicants share
+111%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

TSMC leads a tightly held, early-stage reliability corpus

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company holds 15 patent families, making it the clear leader in GAA BTI/HCI reliability IP. International Business Machines Corporation follows with 6 patent families, and Qualcomm ranks third with 4 patent families — together these three players account for the bulk of meaningful activity.

The top five filers hold 97% of the combined output of the ranked applicants visible in this query, an extraordinary concentration level. The gap between TSMC and the second-ranked IBM is substantial, and the remaining applicants — Intel, IBM Deutschland, and GlobalFoundries US — each hold only 1–2 patent families, confirming a pronounced two-tier structure.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company15
2International Business Machines Corporation6
3Qualcomm Incorporated4
4Intel Corporation2
5IBM Deutschland GmbH1
6GlobalFoundries US Inc.1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

TSMC’s position reflects its role as the primary commercial manufacturer advancing nanosheet and gate-all-around process nodes; IBM’s presence aligns with its long-standing research focus on advanced transistor architectures including nanosheet and CFET structures. Qualcomm’s ranking indicates that fabless design houses are also beginning to protect reliability-related circuit and process knowledge.

The most recent one to two years of filings will appear understated due to the typical 18–24 month gap between filing and publication; the apparent quieting in 20242025 should not be read as a real slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2023 surge anchors multi-year growth; H01L dominates the technology mix

The filing trend and technology composition together show a corpus that is young, technically narrow, and dominated by foundational semiconductor device classification, with a sharp 2023 activity spike driving the three-year growth figure.

Annual filing trend

No families were filed before 2019. Activity began at 5 patent families in 2019, settled near 2 per year through 2020–2022, then surged to 14 patent families in 2023 — the clear peak year. The 2024 tally of 3 and the zero readings for 2025–2026 reflect publication lag rather than a real halt. The three-year recent window sits 111% above the prior three-year window, confirming genuine multi-year expansion even as annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 14 in 2023.020170201852019220202202122022142023320240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (Semiconductor devices) covers all 28 patent families in this corpus and is the visible classification, reflecting the device-physics and process-integration nature of BTI/HCI work. H10D (Semiconductor devices, general) appears in 13 records. H10P, B82Y (Nanotechnology applications), and H10B (Memory device manufacture) each appear in 3 or fewer records, marking them as adjacent, under-represented branches relative to the core device classes.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 28; H10D · Semiconductor devices (general) 13.H01L · Semiconductor dev…28H10D · Semiconductor dev…13H10P3B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…1H10B · Memory device man…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250089229A1Published 2025-03-13

Vertical gate-all-around (GAA) memory cell and met…

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing COMPANY, LTD.

Various embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to a vertical gate-all-around (GAA) memory cell. A middle conductor overlies a lower conductor and decreases in width towards the lower conductor to culminate in a point spaced from the lower conductor. An insulator structure is between the lower conductor and the middle conductor. A semiconductor… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Vertical gate-all-around (GAA) memory cell and met… — patent drawingVertical gate-all-around (GAA) memory cell and met… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Nanosheet transistor having abrupt junctions betwe…35
2Semiconductor Structure Having Both Gate-All-Aroun…35
3Semiconductor Structure Having Both Gate-All-Aroun…5
4Semiconductor structure having both gate-all-aroun…5
5Complementary field effect transistor (CFET) with …4
6Complementary field effect transistor (CFET) with …3
7Gate-all-around field-effect transistor device3
8Nanosheet transistor having abrupt junctions betwe…3

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · TSMC

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company

TSMC holds 15 patent families and is classified as a new entrant in momentum terms — reflecting that this specific reliability niche formed recently. Its technology emphasis spans H01L 29 (device structures), H01L 21 (fabrication processes), and H01L 27 (integrated circuits), indicating broad coverage of the full process-to-circuit reliability chain. This breadth makes its portfolio the most defensible in the corpus.

patent families: 15
Challenger · IBM

International Business Machines Corporation

IBM holds 6 patent families and also enters as a new entrant in this period, with a focus on H01L 29 device structures and a notable reach into B82Y 10 nanotechnology applications — consistent with its published research on nanosheet and CFET transistor reliability. IBM Deutschland filed one family jointly with the parent entity, representing the only documented collaborative filing in this corpus.

patent families: 6
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Qualcomm IncIntel Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.