Book a demo

GAA DTCO / ML Patent Snapshot 2026

GAA DTCO / ML Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
GAA DTCO / ML Patent Snapshot in 2026

The intersection of Gate-All-Around transistor design, design-technology co-optimization (DTCO), and machine learning is an early-stage but rapidly expanding field, with Intel Corporation and Samsung Electronics jointly leading a highly concentrated corpus. Activity surged to a peak in 2023 and the field continues to expand on a multi-year basis, with the most recent years understated by publication lag.

8
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Intel and Samsung share the lead in a tightly concentrated emerging field

Intel Corporation and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. each hold 3 patent families, placing them joint-first in the applicant ranking, with Synopsys Inc. third at 2 patent families. The top five filers collectively account for the entire output of the ranked applicants visible in this query in this corpus.

With only three identifiable applicants, the field exhibits extreme concentration — a hallmark of a nascent technology domain where foundational positions are still being staked. The gap between the top tier and any fourth-place entrant is, by definition, total: no other applicant has yet appeared in the ranked corpus.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Intel Corporation3
2Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.3
3Synopsys Inc.2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Intel’s and Samsung’s parallel leadership signals that both integrated device manufacturers are treating GAA DTCO combined with ML-driven optimization as a strategic priority for sub-3 nm node development, while Synopsys’s presence confirms that EDA toolchain providers are also active in securing IP in this intersection.

The most recent filing years are further understated by standard patent publication lag; the true activity level in 2024 and beyond is likely higher than current counts suggest. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2023 surge anchors multi-year growth; semiconductor device IP dominates the technology mix

Two charts together reveal when activity accelerated and which technical branches attracted the most filings, giving a read on both the pace of innovation and its current focus.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible before 2019, rose modestly to 2022, then spiked sharply in 2023 — the peak year — before falling back in 2024. The 2024 and later years are understated by publication lag and should not be read as a real decline. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, with recent three-year filings well above the prior three-year window.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2023.02017020182201902020020211202242023120240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (Semiconductor devices) is the overwhelmingly visible IPC branch, reflecting the device-level focus of GAA and DTCO work. H10P and B82Y (Nanotechnology applications) appear as secondary branches, consistent with nanosheet transistor and nanowire architectures central to GAA structures.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 8; H10P 2.H01L · Semiconductor dev…8H10P2B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20260090100A1Published 2026-03-26

Integrated gate-all-around (GAA)/finfet transistor…

Intel Corporation

In embodiments of the present disclosure, an integrated transistor device includes a gate-all-around (GAA) transistor and a FinFET transistor device on the same substrate. The FinFET transistor includes a dielectric region between the channel of the FinFET transistor and the substrate. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Integrated gate-all-around (GAA)/finfet transistor… — patent drawingIntegrated gate-all-around (GAA)/finfet transistor… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Crystal orientation engineering to achieve consist…5
2Semiconductor device including nanosheet transistor3
3N-type transistor fabrication in complementary FET…3

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Intel Corporation

Intel Corporation

Intel Corporation holds 3 patent families and is classified as a new entrant in the recent filing window, reflecting early but committed IP-building in GAA DTCO / ML. Its technology focus spans semiconductor device processing (H01L 21), device structure (H01L 29), and integrated circuit arrangements (H01L 27), indicating a broad-based approach covering fabrication process and device design together.

families: 3
Challenger · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. also holds 3 patent families and similarly enters as a new entrant in the recent window, matching Intel’s count and trajectory. Its IPC focus mirrors Intel’s — H01L 29, H01L 21, and H01L 27 — suggesting both companies are competing on closely overlapping technical ground within GAA device architecture and DTCO-informed design.

families: 3
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Synopsys Inc.Additional entrants tracked by Eureka+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.