Gallium & Liquid Metal Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
- Filings peaked in 2017 at 35 and have not returned to that level, with 2022's midpoint at 25 pointing to a flat-to-declining trend rather than a rebound.
- H01B (conductors and insulators) touches 169 of 243 records, far ahead of C22C alloys at 97 — the core claim activity sits on conductivity, not alloy composition itself.
- The most-cited prior art dates to the early-to-mid 1990s, with US5170930A alone drawing 179 citations — foundational thermal-paste claims that still shape how later filings are drafted around.
Filing growth compares 2021 (25 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 243 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this patent set covers
This landscape tracks 243 patent families filed against gallium and liquid metal materials — principally gallium-indium alloys and related eutectics — claimed in combination with thermal interface, wetting, flexible electronics, oxide-skin control or electrical conductivity applications, and classified under alloy (C22C28), gallium compound (C01G15) or conductor (H01B1) IPC codes. The search window runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, with the usual caveat that recent-year counts are undercounted because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months.
The filing base is small enough that a handful of foundational patents still dominate the citation graph, and the technology composition skews heavily toward conductor and interconnect applications rather than novel alloy chemistry. That combination — a mature core plus thin recent activity — is the central fact a filing strategy has to reckon with.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 243-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
A 2017 peak with no return
Filings hit 35 in 2017, fell toward a midpoint of 25 by 2022, and stand at 7 in the most recent (partial) year. Read the tail end cautiously — publication lag means 2025-2026 filings are still arriving — but the multi-year direction from peak to midpoint is already a decline, not a plateau.
Conductivity applications outweigh alloy chemistry
H01B (cables, conductors and insulators) appears in 169 of 243 records, nearly double C22C (alloys, 97). H05K (printed circuits), H01L (semiconductor devices) and the coatings classes (C09D, C23C) each sit in the 25-50 range, showing that claim activity is concentrated on how liquid metal is integrated into devices and interconnects rather than on the base alloy composition.
Shares are the percentage of the 243 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gallium and liquid metal materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe prior art that still shapes new claims
US20230142030A1 — Liquid metal composites with organic additive as thermal interface materials
Some implementations of the disclosure are directed to liquid metal composites that can be used as thermal interface materials. In one implementation, a liquid metal composite configured to be applied as a thermal interface material between electronic components, includes: 90 wt % to 99.9 wt % of a liquid metal or liquid metal alloy; and 0.1 wt % to 10 wt % of at least one organic additive comprising an organic compound to prevent oxidation of the liquid metal or liquid metal alloy during application of the liquid metal composite on a surface of an electronic component.Filed by Indium Corporation, published 2023-05-11 — a compositional claim built around an oxidation-preventing additive rather than a new base alloy.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5170930A | Liquid metal paste for thermal and electrical connections | 179 |
| 2 | US5445308A | Thermally conductive connection with matrix material and randomly dispersed filler containing liquid metal | 175 |
| 3 | US5328087A | Thermally and electrically conductive adhesive material and method of bonding with same | 166 |
| 4 | US5198189A | Liquid metal matrix thermal paste | 116 |
| 5 | US20170218167A1 | Polymer Composite with Liquid Phase Metal Inclusions | 88 |
| 6 | US5053195A | Bonding amalgam and method of making | 82 |
| 7 | US5792236A | Non-toxic liquid metal composition for use as a mercury substitute | 65 |
| 8 | US5281364A | Liquid metal electrical contact compositions | 44 |
| 9 | US20180247727A1 | Deformable Conductors and Related Sensors, Antennas and Multiplexed Systems | 41 |
| 10 | CN107578838A | 一种低成本可回收的导电浆料及其制备方法 | 41 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — treat this table as a map of influence on how later claims were drafted, not as a ranking of current importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC mix and the citation graph — each pointing at a different part of a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.
The core wave has passed, not arrived
A 2017 peak followed by a decline through the 2022 midpoint to single digits in the latest year suggests the initial burst of interest in liquid metal thermal and conductive applications has already been claimed. New entrants are filing into a space with an established citation backbone rather than a greenfield one.
Integration claims outnumber material claims
Conductor and interconnect classifications (H01B) nearly double alloy classifications (C22C), meaning most claim scope has already been drawn around device-level use of liquid metal rather than around the alloy itself. Alloy composition — particularly outside the dominant gallium-indium system — remains comparatively less crowded.
Foundational thermal-paste patents still anchor the field
The five most-cited records all predate 2018 and cluster around thermally/electrically conductive paste and adhesive claims. Their continued citation weight means new filings in thermal interface materials are almost certainly drafted with these documents in the prior-art search.
US and China dominate, Europe and WIPO trail
The United States (98) and China (72) together account for the large majority of receiving-office activity, with the EPO (27) and WIPO/PCT (18) well behind. A filing strategy aimed at Europe or broader PCT coverage is competing for far less crowded office-level territory.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gallium and liquid metal materials, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee landscape and where activity has gone quiet
The named assignees in this dataset span government research, corporate R&D and specialist liquid-metal firms — but the recent-year momentum figures tell a consistent story: activity has cooled across the board.
No assignee shows recent-year filing activity
Every one of the assignees with recent-year momentum data — spanning a US government research arm, a university, a specialist liquid-metal company and several Chinese materials firms — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the broader decline from the 2017 peak, not an anomaly specific to any one filer.
Co-filing is rare and thin
Only four co-assignee pairings appear across the dataset, the strongest linking a composite-materials company with a named individual inventor on two families. This is a field of largely solo-assignee filing rather than joint-venture or consortium patenting.
Early filers set the citation baseline
The most-cited records in the corpus were filed well before the 2017 peak, meaning the assignees behind the foundational thermal-paste and conductive-adhesive patents still frame how later work in the space is evaluated for novelty and freedom to operate.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force | 0 | — |
| Liquid Wire Inc. | 0 | — |
| Carnegie Mellon University | 0 | — |
| Xerox Corporation | 0 | — |
| Beijing Dream Ink Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Ningbo Xinruiqingke Metal Materials Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Georgia Tech Research Corporation | 0 | — |
| Cao Shuai | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature core and a thin, uneven tail. These next steps narrow that into decisions specific to a given filing or freedom-to-operate question.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on the H01B core
With 169 of 243 records classified under conductors and interconnects, any new thermal-interface or conductive-adhesive filing should be checked against this subclass first, not against the alloy classifications.
Explore claim scope in EurekaTest the under-claimed branches for viability
Oxide-skin suppression, wetting-control surface treatments and polymer-composite blends show thinner IPC density than the conductor core — worth a targeted prior-art pull before drafting.
Search white space in EurekaTrack whether the decline reverses
The fall from a 2017 peak to single digits in the latest year could reflect real disinterest or simply publication lag; re-running the trend in twelve months will clarify which.
Set up trend monitoring in EurekaCommon questions on gallium and liquid metal materials patents
The dominant application in this patent set is thermal interface materials — liquid metal or gallium-indium alloy pastes used to conduct heat between electronic components, a use case that traces back to foundational patents from the early 1990s. Beyond thermal management, the same materials appear in flexible electronics, conductive coatings and wetting-control applications, reflected in the spread across H05K, H01L, C09D and C23C classifications. The IPC composition shows conductor and interconnect uses (H01B) far outweigh alloy-composition claims (C22C), meaning most patented value sits in how the material is integrated into a device rather than in the base alloy itself.
This corpus includes a mix of specialist liquid-metal firms, university and government research groups, and materials companies filing across both the US and China, which together account for the large majority of receiving-office activity in this dataset. No single assignee shows filing activity in the most recent tracked year, so leadership in this field is better read historically — through citation weight and family count — than through current filing momentum. Indium Corporation's 2023 filing on liquid metal composites with organic additives is a useful recent reference point for where active development has continued.
Based on this dataset, filings peaked in 2017 at 35 and had fallen to a midpoint of 25 by 2022, with the latest tracked year showing only 7 — a flat-to-declining trajectory rather than growth. Some of that recent drop is a publication-lag artefact, since patent applications typically take around eighteen months to publish, so the very latest year is always undercounted. Even allowing for that lag, the multi-year direction from 2017 through 2022 already points downward, which is the more reliable signal than the last one or two data points alone.
US20230142030A1, assigned to Indium Corporation and published in 2023, claims a liquid metal composite in a specific compositional range — 90 to 99.9 weight percent liquid metal or liquid metal alloy combined with 0.1 to 10 weight percent of an organic additive that prevents oxidation during application. That claim structure targets a narrow but commercially relevant problem: oxide-skin formation during thermal interface application, which degrades conductivity and reliability. Companies developing similar thermal interface products should check their own additive chemistry and weight-percent ranges against this filing specifically, since the claim is compositional rather than tied to a particular device or end use, which can make it broader in effect than its title suggests.
The clearest gap sits outside the dominant H01B conductor classification: alloy-composition claims (C22C) are less than two-thirds as numerous, and sub-areas like oxide-skin suppression additives, wetting-control surface treatments and polymer-composite blends under C08K carry comparatively thin IPC counts. Co-assignee collaboration is also rare, with only four identified pairs across the entire 243-family set, suggesting joint-development filing has not been a common strategy here. Given the flat-to-declining overall trend, a new entrant is more likely to find open claim space by targeting these thinner branches than by competing directly in the crowded thermal-paste and conductive-adhesive core.
Research Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole gallium and liquid metal materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.