Book a demo

Gallium & Liquid Metal Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Gallium & Liquid Metal Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gallium-and-liquid-metal-materials-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Metals & Alloys
Gallium and liquid metal materials patents: where filings concentrated and where they stalled
  • Filings peaked in 2017 at 35 and have not returned to that level, with 2022's midpoint at 25 pointing to a flat-to-declining trend rather than a rebound.
  • H01B (conductors and insulators) touches 169 of 243 records, far ahead of C22C alloys at 97 — the core claim activity sits on conductivity, not alloy composition itself.
  • The most-cited prior art dates to the early-to-mid 1990s, with US5170930A alone drawing 179 citations — foundational thermal-paste claims that still shape how later filings are drafted around.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
243
Published Records
29%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-52%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (25 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 243 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape tracks 243 patent families filed against gallium and liquid metal materials — principally gallium-indium alloys and related eutectics — claimed in combination with thermal interface, wetting, flexible electronics, oxide-skin control or electrical conductivity applications, and classified under alloy (C22C28), gallium compound (C01G15) or conductor (H01B1) IPC codes. The search window runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, with the usual caveat that recent-year counts are undercounted because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months.

The filing base is small enough that a handful of foundational patents still dominate the citation graph, and the technology composition skews heavily toward conductor and interconnect applications rather than novel alloy chemistry. That combination — a mature core plus thin recent activity — is the central fact a filing strategy has to reckon with.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1LIQUID WIRE INC21
  2. 2THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE19
  3. 3CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV13
  4. 4BEIJING DREAM INK TECH CO LTD10
  5. 5GEORGIA TECH RES CORP8
  6. 6COMPOSITE MATERIALS TECH INC7
  7. 7NANYANG TECH UNIV6
  8. 8GENERAL ELECTRIC CO6
  9. 9TEVERI LLC6
  10. 10NINGBO SYRNMA METAL MATERIALS CO LTD6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 243-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

A 2017 peak with no return

Filings hit 35 in 2017, fell toward a midpoint of 25 by 2022, and stand at 7 in the most recent (partial) year. Read the tail end cautiously — publication lag means 2025-2026 filings are still arriving — but the multi-year direction from peak to midpoint is already a decline, not a plateau.

A 2017 peak with no return0102030403520172018201920202021202220232024202572026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Conductivity applications outweigh alloy chemistry

H01B (cables, conductors and insulators) appears in 169 of 243 records, nearly double C22C (alloys, 97). H05K (printed circuits), H01L (semiconductor devices) and the coatings classes (C09D, C23C) each sit in the 25-50 range, showing that claim activity is concentrated on how liquid metal is integrated into devices and interconnects rather than on the base alloy composition.

Conductivity applications outweigh alloy chemistryH01B · Cables, conductors & insulators16969.5%C22C · Alloys9739.9%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies5020.6%H01L · Semiconductor devices3916.0%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…3213.2%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks2510.3%C23C · Coating & surface deposition2510.3%C08K · Use of additives in polymers156.2%Other247101.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 243 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gallium and liquid metal materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The prior art that still shapes new claims

Representative Recent Filing
US20230142030A12023-05-11

US20230142030A1 — Liquid metal composites with organic additive as thermal interface materials

INDIUM CORPORATION

Some implementations of the disclosure are directed to liquid metal composites that can be used as thermal interface materials. In one implementation, a liquid metal composite configured to be applied as a thermal interface material between electronic components, includes: 90 wt % to 99.9 wt % of a liquid metal or liquid metal alloy; and 0.1 wt % to 10 wt % of at least one organic additive comprising an organic compound to prevent oxidation of the liquid metal or liquid metal alloy during application of the liquid metal composite on a surface of an electronic component.Filed by Indium Corporation, published 2023-05-11 — a compositional claim built around an oxidation-preventing additive rather than a new base alloy.

US20230142030A1 — patent drawing 1US20230142030A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5170930ALiquid metal paste for thermal and electrical connections179
2US5445308AThermally conductive connection with matrix material and randomly dispersed filler containing liquid metal175
3US5328087AThermally and electrically conductive adhesive material and method of bonding with same166
4US5198189ALiquid metal matrix thermal paste116
5US20170218167A1Polymer Composite with Liquid Phase Metal Inclusions88
6US5053195ABonding amalgam and method of making82
7US5792236ANon-toxic liquid metal composition for use as a mercury substitute65
8US5281364ALiquid metal electrical contact compositions44
9US20180247727A1Deformable Conductors and Related Sensors, Antennas and Multiplexed Systems41
10CN107578838A一种低成本可回收的导电浆料及其制备方法41

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — treat this table as a map of influence on how later claims were drafted, not as a ranking of current importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC mix and the citation graph — each pointing at a different part of a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.

Filing Trend
35 → 7
2017 peak to latest year

The core wave has passed, not arrived

A 2017 peak followed by a decline through the 2022 midpoint to single digits in the latest year suggests the initial burst of interest in liquid metal thermal and conductive applications has already been claimed. New entrants are filing into a space with an established citation backbone rather than a greenfield one.

Trend data, 2017-2026
IPC Composition
169 vs 97
H01B records vs C22C records

Integration claims outnumber material claims

Conductor and interconnect classifications (H01B) nearly double alloy classifications (C22C), meaning most claim scope has already been drawn around device-level use of liquid metal rather than around the alloy itself. Alloy composition — particularly outside the dominant gallium-indium system — remains comparatively less crowded.

IPC subclass counts, 243 families
Citation Graph
179 citations
US5170930A, the top-cited record

Foundational thermal-paste patents still anchor the field

The five most-cited records all predate 2018 and cluster around thermally/electrically conductive paste and adhesive claims. Their continued citation weight means new filings in thermal interface materials are almost certainly drafted with these documents in the prior-art search.

Top five cited records
Filing Geography
98 US / 72 CN
Leading receiving offices

US and China dominate, Europe and WIPO trail

The United States (98) and China (72) together account for the large majority of receiving-office activity, with the EPO (27) and WIPO/PCT (18) well behind. A filing strategy aimed at Europe or broader PCT coverage is competing for far less crowded office-level territory.

Receiving office counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gallium and liquid metal materials, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape and where activity has gone quiet

The named assignees in this dataset span government research, corporate R&D and specialist liquid-metal firms — but the recent-year momentum figures tell a consistent story: activity has cooled across the board.

Momentum
0 in latest year
Across all tracked top assignees

No assignee shows recent-year filing activity

Every one of the assignees with recent-year momentum data — spanning a US government research arm, a university, a specialist liquid-metal company and several Chinese materials firms — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the broader decline from the 2017 peak, not an anomaly specific to any one filer.

Recent-year momentum tracking
Collaboration
4 co-assignee pairs
Total identified in the corpus

Co-filing is rare and thin

Only four co-assignee pairings appear across the dataset, the strongest linking a composite-materials company with a named individual inventor on two families. This is a field of largely solo-assignee filing rather than joint-venture or consortium patenting.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Citation Legacy
5 records > 100 citations
All filed before 2018

Early filers set the citation baseline

The most-cited records in the corpus were filed well before the 2017 peak, meaning the assignees behind the foundational thermal-paste and conductive-adhesive patents still frame how later work in the space is evaluated for novelty and freedom to operate.

Citation ranking, top five records
🔍
Sub-areas with thinner claim density
Based on IPC counts relative to the H01B/C22C core, these branches carry comparatively less filing weight and merit a closer freedom-to-operate look before assuming they are occupied.
Oxide-skin suppression additivesGallium alloy polymer composite blends (C08K)Wetting-control surface treatmentsLiquid metal coatings and deposition (C23C)Flexible-electronics interconnect encapsulation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force0
Liquid Wire Inc.0
Carnegie Mellon University0
Xerox Corporation0
Beijing Dream Ink Technology Co., Ltd.0
Ningbo Xinruiqingke Metal Materials Co., Ltd.0
Georgia Tech Research Corporation0
Cao Shuai0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature core and a thin, uneven tail. These next steps narrow that into decisions specific to a given filing or freedom-to-operate question.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the H01B core

With 169 of 243 records classified under conductors and interconnects, any new thermal-interface or conductive-adhesive filing should be checked against this subclass first, not against the alloy classifications.

Explore claim scope in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches for viability

Oxide-skin suppression, wetting-control surface treatments and polymer-composite blends show thinner IPC density than the conductor core — worth a targeted prior-art pull before drafting.

Search white space in Eureka

Track whether the decline reverses

The fall from a 2017 peak to single digits in the latest year could reflect real disinterest or simply publication lag; re-running the trend in twelve months will clarify which.

Set up trend monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on gallium and liquid metal materials patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gallium and Liquid Metal Materials in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gallium and liquid metal materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.