Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (21 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 431 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Gallium nitride HEMT interface engineering covers the claims that determine how the AlGaN/GaN heterojunction behaves once a device leaves the lab bench: the composition and growth of the 2DEG channel interface, the passivation layers that suppress current collapse, and the buffer or interlayer structures that manage strain and mobility. This dataset pulls 431 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine GaN HEMT or GaN transistor language with explicit interface, channel or passivation claims.
The technology composition skews heavily toward core semiconductor device classifications rather than circuit-level or crystal-growth classifications, which tells you where the claims are actually being written: at the device and interface layer, not at the substrate or system level.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Annual filing counts and IPC distribution for the 431 families in this dataset, drawn from publication dates and classification codes on record.
Filings opened the tracked window at 27 in 2017, rose to a peak of 34 in 2019, and sat at 30 by the 2022 midpoint. There is no sustained upward trajectory across the period, and the most recent year is a partial count, so the true 2025-2026 filing level will read higher once publication catches up with the roughly 18-month lag typical of patent data.
H01L (Semiconductor devices) covers 379 of the 431 records and H10D a further 200, confirming that interface and passivation claims are being filed as device-structure patents rather than as circuit patents (H03K, 29 records) or crystal-growth patents (C30B, 16 records). That imbalance is itself a signal: growth-substrate and epitaxy-specific claims are comparatively thin relative to device-structure claims.
Shares are the percentage of the 431 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gallium nitride hemt interface engineering and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaDescribes a liquid crystal device built with Gallium Nitride HEMT electrodes, grown on substrates including sapphire, silicon carbide, silicon, fused silica with a calcium fluoride buffer layer, and spinel, with the GaN HEMT structure including an AlN interlayer to improve mobility. The filing also covers transfer of the GaN HEMT structure from a large-area silicon growth substrate to a second substrate suited to optical phased array devices.Filed by Raytheon Company, published 2010-12-23 — one of the older records still active in citation chains for interlayer and substrate-transfer claims.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6316793B1 | Nitride based transistors on semi-insulating silicon carbide substrates | 889 |
| 2 | US20100025730A1 | Normally-off Semiconductor Devices and Methods of Fabricating the Same | 298 |
| 3 | US20070278518A1 | Enhancement-Mode III-N Devices, Circuits, and Methods | 201 |
| 4 | US6583454B2 | Nitride based transistors on semi-insulating silicon carbide substrates | 177 |
| 5 | US9653642B1 | Manufacturable RGB display based on thin film gallium and nitrogen containing light emitting diodes | 168 |
| 6 | US20030218183A1 | High power-low noise microwave GaN heterojunction field effet transistor | 165 |
| 7 | US6486502B1 | Nitride based transistors on semi-insulating silicon carbide substrates | 163 |
| 8 | US20060255364A1 | Heterojunction transistors including energy barriers and related methods | 145 |
| 9 | US9666677B1 | Manufacturable thin film gallium and nitrogen containing devices | 137 |
| 10 | US7985986B2 | Normally-off semiconductor devices | 124 |
Citation counts are measured within this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of foundational influence rather than current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns in the data matter more than any single ranking: where claim density sits, where citation influence sits, and where the jurisdictional funnel narrows.
The absence of a rising trend after 2019 suggests the core interface architectures — AlGaN/GaN heterojunction composition, standard passivation stacks — are largely claimed. New filings are more likely to be refinements than foundational architecture claims.
Interface engineering is being litigated and filed as a device-structure problem far more than as a crystal-growth problem, leaving epitaxial and substrate-specific claim language comparatively open relative to device architecture.
US6316793B1, covering nitride transistors on semi-insulating silicon carbide substrates, carries far more citations than any other record in the corpus, and a related patent from the same family (US6583454B2) also ranks highly — substrate choice remains a load-bearing citation point.
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across 431 families. The strongest pairing links a large foundry with a fabless design house, not a university partnership, indicating that interface IP here is mostly built and held inside single organisations.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gallium nitride hemt interface engineering, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year filing counts across the tracked assignees show almost no fresh activity: most listed organisations filed zero families in the latest year, and the one exception filed a single family with flat year-on-year momentum. That is consistent with a space where the founding architecture claims are already staked out and current work is incremental.
The only tracked assignee with any latest-year activity in this dataset, though the single filing and flat year-on-year figure indicate steady rather than expanding output.
Associated with the most-cited record in the corpus and with co-assignee pairings tied to individual named inventors, suggesting long-standing internal patent families built around specific engineers.
The strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset links a major foundry to a fabless semiconductor design house, pointing to joint device-process claims rather than joint research claims.
Despite holding the strongest co-filing relationship in the dataset, TSMC's own latest-year filing count in this interface-specific search dropped to zero, a pattern shared by most other tracked assignees.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Cambridge GaN Devices Ltd. | 1 | 0% |
| Wolfspeed, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) | 0 | -100% |
| Raytheon Company | 0 | — |
| Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC) | 0 | — |
| HRL Laboratories, LLC | 0 | — |
| The Regents of the University of California | 0 | — |
| HUANG CHIH SHU | 0 | — |
The filing and citation data point to specific next questions for an R&D or IP team rather than a single conclusion.
US6316793B1 and its related family US6583454B2 still anchor substrate-choice claims. Any new silicon-carbide or silicon substrate work should be checked against this family's claim scope before drafting.
Explore prior art in EurekaEpitaxial buffer engineering and non-standard substrate transfer show thinner filing density than core device-structure claims. A freedom-to-operate check focused on C30B-classified filings would clarify how open this really is.
Run a white space search in EurekaThe TSMC-NXP co-assignee pairing is the strongest in the dataset despite both organisations showing flat or declining solo momentum. A joint filing resurgence would be an early signal worth tracking.
Track assignee activity in EurekaIt refers to claims covering the physical and chemical structure at and around the AlGaN/GaN heterojunction: the composition and thickness of layers that form the two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) channel, passivation layers applied over the access regions to suppress current collapse, and interlayers such as AlN used to improve carrier mobility. These are distinct from claims on bulk crystal growth or from circuit-level claims covering how the transistor is wired into a larger device. In this dataset, interface-related claims are filed predominantly under semiconductor device classifications (H01L, H10D) rather than crystal-growth or circuit classifications.
Not by filing volume alone. The tracked filings peaked at 34 in 2019 and had settled to 30 by 2022, with no sustained upward trend across the period. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any such trend will always look artificially low, so this is not evidence of a shrinking field, but it is evidence that filing activity is no longer accelerating the way it was earlier in the window.
The dataset's recent-year momentum figures show most tracked assignees filed zero new families in the latest year, with only one showing any latest-year activity at a single filing and flat year-on-year change. Historically, the most cited foundational patents in this space trace to Wolfspeed's silicon-carbide substrate work, while the strongest co-assignee collaboration links a major foundry (TSMC) with a fabless design house (NXP). This pattern suggests the field's core architecture is held by a small number of long-established players rather than being actively contested by new entrants.
The IPC composition shows a strong skew toward device-structure classifications (H01L at 379 of 431 records, H10D at 200) relative to crystal-growth classifications (C30B at only 16). That gap suggests epitaxial buffer-layer strain management and substrate-transfer techniques are comparatively under-claimed relative to device architecture itself. Circuit-level integration of HEMT interface structures (H03K, 29 records) is also thin, indicating room for claims that connect interface design choices to circuit-level performance outcomes.
US6316793B1 covers nitride-based transistors on semi-insulating silicon carbide substrates and carries 889 citations within this corpus, far more than any other record, with a related patent, US6583454B2, also ranking highly. High citation counts inside a searched corpus tend to favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations, so this should be read as a marker of foundational influence on substrate-choice claims rather than a claim that the patent still controls current commercial designs. Anyone drafting new substrate or interface claims should still map their language against this family's scope early in the process.
Go past this page: query the whole gallium nitride hemt interface engineering corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.