GaN HEMT Testing Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Small, concentrated field. just 16 patent families sit inside this search, with filings peaking in 2020 at 5 and no clear upward trend since.
- Two documents anchor the citation graph. CN111337807A and CN102721913A each carry 15 citations, far ahead of every other record in the set.
- China and the US are the only receiving offices with volume. each holds 8 of the 16 published records, with no other jurisdiction showing meaningful filing activity.
A narrow, test-and-screening niche inside GaN power electronics
This landscape covers patents at the intersection of gallium nitride HEMT devices and the specific test methods used to qualify them: dynamic on-resistance testing, wafer-level test, and reliability screening. It is not the broader GaN power device field — it is the instrumentation and methodology layer that sits on top of it, which is why the dataset is small at 16 total families.
Filing activity is uneven rather than steadily rising. A peak of 5 families in 2020 was followed by a drop to 1 by the 2022 midpoint, and the most recent years should be read with the usual caveat that publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years understate real activity.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
The underlying dataset spans 16 published records across a decade of activity, concentrated in a handful of IPC subclasses tied to electrical measurement and semiconductor device structure.
Flat-to-declining filing activity since 2020
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 5 in 2020, then eased back toward a single family by 2022. There is no sustained upward trajectory across the window, which for a niche test-methodology field can mean either that the core techniques were claimed early or that activity has simply been intermittent.
Measurement and device structure dominate the IPC mix
G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) leads with 10 records, ahead of H01L (7) and H10D (6) semiconductor device classifications. G01N materials analysis appears twice, and H10P/H10W each appear once — a sign that most inventive effort here is going into the test circuit and measurement apparatus rather than into novel material characterisation methods.
Shares are the percentage of the 16 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Gallium Nitride HEMT Testing and Inspection with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gallium nitride hemt testing and inspection and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records in this dataset
Hetero-Epitaxial Output Device Array (US20190198624A1)
A GaN-on-Si output transistor array comprises a plurality of small monolithic output transistors. The substrate surface has multiple grids, upon which multiple pieces of the small monolithic GaN films are grown epitaxially on the silicon substrate. Each small monolithic output transistor is formed in a respective small monolithic GaN film. By disabling defective transistors, the overall yield/reliability is improved.Filed by Hong Kong Haicun Technology Co., Limited, published 2019-06-27.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN111337807A | 开关器件的高频高压动态导通电阻测试电路及测量方法 | 15 |
| 2 | CN102721913A | 一种GaN HEMT器件可靠性在片筛选的方法 | 15 |
| 3 | CN117310434A | 一种氮化镓高电子迁移率晶体管动态导通电阻测试电路 | 5 |
| 4 | CN119165317A | 一种GaN高电子迁移率晶体管的动态导通电阻测试电路 | 2 |
| 5 | US20190198624A1 | Hetero-Epitaxial Output Device Array | 2 |
| 6 | CN119001529A | 快速监测GaN器件短路前后动态导通电阻的电路及方法 | 1 |
| 7 | US20220199475A1 | PCM metal shielding for wafer testing | 1 |
Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus only and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence within this dataset, not as a current-importance ranking.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (7 of 7 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the citation and filing pattern actually shows
With only 16 families, this dataset rewards reading the citation graph and IPC split closely rather than relying on volume alone.
Two Chinese filings anchor the field
CN111337807A and CN102721913A each sit at 15 citations, well above the next tier of records. Both address dynamic on-resistance test circuitry and on-wafer reliability screening — the two problems this whole search string is built around.
Activity is intermittent, not compounding
The peak of 5 families in 2020 was not sustained; by the 2022 midpoint filings had dropped to 1. This looks more like a field advanced in bursts around specific device generations than one with continuous R&D investment.
Filing activity is evenly split, not globalised
China and the United States each account for 8 of the 16 published records, and no other receiving office shows comparable volume. Anyone filing outside these two jurisdictions is filing into largely open territory as far as this dataset shows.
Co-filing is rare in this niche
Only two co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, the stronger being Zhang Guobiao with Yu Peter Y across 4 families. Most other assignees file independently, consistent with a field still organised around individual inventors and single institutions rather than joint ventures.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gallium nitride hemt testing and inspection, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the recent momentum sits
Assignee activity is spread across individual inventors, Chinese universities and a small number of device manufacturers, with almost no filings recorded in the latest year across the board.
The strongest co-filing link is two named inventors
Zhang Guobiao and Yu Peter Y are linked across 4 families, the largest co-assignee pairing in the dataset, though neither shows filings in the latest year.
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
This university appears both independently and paired once with its Guangdong electronic information research institute affiliate, reflecting an academic rather than commercial filing pattern typical of early-stage test-method research.
Manufacturer activity has stalled
Runic Semiconductor (Dalian) shows a -100% year-over-year change with zero filings in the latest year, a pattern shared by every named assignee in this dataset — none show current-year momentum.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| ZHANG GUOBIAO | 0 | — |
| YU PETER Y | 0 | — |
| University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | 0 | — |
| Runic Semiconductor (Dalian) Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Pai Semi Inc. | 0 | — |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) | 0 | — |
| The 55th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation | 0 | — |
| Guangdong Electronic Information Engineering Research Institute of UESTC | 0 | — |
Where to take this
The dataset points to a narrow but active claim space around test circuitry rather than device fabrication itself.
Map the two anchor patents' claim scope
Before drafting around dynamic on-resistance testing, work out precisely what CN111337807A and CN102721913A claim — they carry the most citations in this set and likely define the boundaries other filers are designing around.
Explore claim scope in EurekaCheck the under-claimed branches
Trap-state characterisation and automated screening thresholds show thin direct coverage in this dataset. A freedom-to-operate check on these specific sub-areas is cheaper than a full-field search.
Run a white space check in EurekaWatch for renewed filing activity
Momentum has been flat across every named assignee in the latest year, but publication lag means recent filings may not yet be visible. Set a monitor rather than assuming the field has gone quiet.
Set up monitoring in EurekaCommon questions about GaN HEMT test and screening patents
Dynamic on-resistance testing measures how a GaN HEMT's conduction resistance changes under switching conditions compared to its static, DC-measured value — a phenomenon often called current collapse. Because GaN devices can show a significantly higher on-resistance immediately after a high-voltage switching event than a static test would predict, dedicated dynamic test circuits are needed to characterise real-world efficiency and reliability. In this dataset, dynamic on-resistance test circuits are the single most cited category, with two Chinese filings, CN111337807A and CN102721913A, each carrying 15 citations. Anyone qualifying GaN devices for power applications typically needs this kind of test alongside standard static measurement.
This dataset contains 16 published patent families matching the combined search for GaN HEMT devices and dynamic on-resistance, wafer-level test, or reliability screening methods. That is a small, specialised pool compared to the broader GaN power device literature, reflecting that this search targets the test-methodology layer specifically rather than device fabrication as a whole. Filing activity peaked at 5 families in 2020 and has not shown a sustained increase since. Given an 18-month typical publication lag, the most recent one to two years in this count should be treated as incomplete rather than as evidence of a slowdown.
Filing in this space is spread across individual inventors, Chinese universities and a handful of semiconductor manufacturers, with no single dominant assignee across the 16 families. The strongest documented collaboration is between the named inventors Zhang Guobiao and Yu Peter Y, linked across 4 families. Academic filers such as the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China also appear, sometimes co-filing with affiliated research institutes. None of the named assignees show filings in the most recent year, which is consistent with the field's generally intermittent filing pattern rather than pointing to any one company withdrawing.
US20190198624A1, assigned to Hong Kong Haicun Technology, claims a GaN-on-Si output transistor array built from small monolithic transistor cells grown in individual grid segments, where defective cells are disabled to improve overall yield and reliability. This is a specific architectural approach to yield improvement through cell segmentation and selective disabling, not a claim over dynamic on-resistance testing or wafer-level screening methods generally. Work that improves yield through different means, such as process control, material quality improvements or post-fabrication trimming without a segmented-array structure, sits outside what this filing describes. Anyone considering a segmented small-cell GaN array architecture should review this filing's claims closely before proceeding.
Based on the IPC composition, most inventive activity concentrates in electrical measurement circuitry (G01R, 10 records) and semiconductor device structure (H01L and H10D, 7 and 6 records respectively), while materials analysis methods (G01N) appear in only 2 records. This suggests thinner direct coverage around areas like in-situ trap-state characterisation during dynamic testing, correlation of wafer-level burn-in data to field failure rates, and automated pass/fail thresholding for production screening lines. These are not confirmed gaps — they are areas where this dataset shows less density relative to the core test-circuit claims, and a proper freedom-to-operate search would be needed before relying on them as open space.
Research Gallium Nitride HEMT Testing and Inspection in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole gallium nitride hemt testing and inspection corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.