Book a demo

GaN HEMT Wafer Bonding Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

GaN HEMT Wafer Bonding Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gallium-nitride-hemt-wafer-bonding-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Semiconductors & Microelectronics
Gallium Nitride HEMT Wafer Bonding Patents: Filing Trends and Open Claim Space
  • Flat, not rising. Filings peaked at 10 in 2024 after sitting at 4 in 2022 — this is a mature, occupied niche rather than a growth curve.
  • Citation weight sits in 2006-2008. The most-cited records (100 and 81 citations) predate the current filing wave by more than a decade, meaning newer entrants are building on old foundational claims.
  • US-centric filing. Of the tracked receiving offices, the United States accounts for 25 of the filings tracked, roughly triple the next-largest office — Europe at 8.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
52
Published Records
56%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+25%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers patent families indexed under gallium nitride HEMT wafer bonding — filings that combine HEMT device claims with engineered-substrate or layer-transfer bonding techniques, drawn from title/abstract/claim searches across 2015 to 2026. The dataset spans 52 patent families and is concentrated almost entirely in semiconductor device classifications, with H01L capturing 50 of the 52 records.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart understate actual filing activity for those years; treat the most recent two data points as provisional rather than a genuine drop-off.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1MURATA MFG CO LTD9
  2. 2GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC6
  3. 3INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO ELECTRONICS CENT (IMEC VZW)5
  4. 4RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA5
  5. 5INDIAN SPACE RES ORG4
  6. 6INSPUR SUZHOU INTELLIGENT TECH CO LTD4
  7. 7QROMIS INC4
  8. 8MCCARTHY LEE S2
  9. 9INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE2
  10. 10MISHRA UMESH KUMAR2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium Nitride HEMT Wafer Bonding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 52-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.

A flat filing curve since the mid-2010s

Filings moved from 2 in 2017 to a midpoint of 4 in 2022, then peaked at 10 in 2024 before the partial, understated 2025-2026 figures. There is no sustained upward trajectory here — this reads as a technology with a stable population of repeat filers rather than a wave of new entrants.

A flat filing curve since the mid-2010s03581022017201820192020202120222023102024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentration in core device classes

H01L (semiconductor devices generally) covers 50 of 52 records, with H10D and H10W as the next-largest secondary classifications. The presence of H03K (pulse technique and logic circuits) and G09G (display control) at low single-digit counts marks where HEMT bonding work touches circuit-level and display applications, but these remain minor branches relative to the device-fabrication core.

Concentration in core device classesH01L · Semiconductor devices5096.2%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)1732.7%H10W1426.9%H10P713.5%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…611.5%G09G · Display control circuits23.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 52 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium Nitride HEMT Wafer Bonding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gallium Nitride HEMT Wafer Bonding with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gallium nitride hemt wafer bonding and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records shaping this space

Representative Filing
US20230230851A12023-07-20

Transfer of wide and ultrawide bandgap layers to engineered substrate

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Filed by the University of South Carolina, this record describes 193-nm excimer laser-based lift-off of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs built with thick AlN heat-spreading buffer layers grown on sapphire. The approach lowers thermal resistance from roughly 25-50 Kmm/W for standard sapphire-based HEMT structures down to 16 Kmm/W as-fabricated, and to 8 Kmm/W once the lifted-off device is soldered to a copper heat sink — a figure comparable to published results on bulk SiC substrates.Abstract condensed from the original filing.

US20230230851A1 — patent drawing 1US20230230851A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20060284247A1Novel method for integrating silicon CMOS and AlGaN/GaN wideband amplifiers on engineered substrates100
2US20120319169A1CMOS compatible method for manufacturing a HEMT device and the HEMT device thereof81
3US20170309676A1Engineered Substrate Including Light Emitting Diode and Power Circuitry78
4US7420226B2Method for integrating silicon CMOS and AlGaN/GaN wideband amplifiers on engineered substrates28
5US20080296617A1METHOD USING LOW TEMPERATURE WAFER BONDING TO FABRICATE TRANSISTORS WITH HETEROJUNCTIONS OF Si(Ge) TO III-N M…23
6US20210151428A1Integration of heterogeneous transistors on diamond substrate by layer transfer20
7US20180219106A1Lateral gallium nitride jfet with controlled doping profile16
8US10290674B2Engineered substrate including light emitting diode and power circuitry11
9US9070758B2CMOS compatible method for manufacturing a HEMT device and the HEMT device thereof8
10WO2006138378A1Silicon CMOS and algan/GAN wideband amplifiers integrated on engineered substrates and method of manufacturin…8

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus at the time of the search and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium Nitride HEMT Wafer Bonding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Four read-outs from the filing trend, citation pattern and jurisdiction split, aimed at where to file and what to watch.

Filing momentum
4 → 10
2022 to 2024 families

Growth, but not sustained

The rise from 4 families in 2022 to a peak of 10 in 2024 looks like acceleration, but with 2017 already at 2 and the trajectory otherwise flat through the midpoint, this is closer to periodic bursts of filing from a small set of repeat assignees than a structural upswing.

Treat 2025-2026 counts as understated due to publication lag.
Citation base
100 citations
top-cited record, 2006 priority

Foundational art predates the current wave

The two most-cited records in the corpus describe integrating silicon CMOS with AlGaN/GaN amplifiers on engineered substrates, filed years before the 2022-2024 filing peak. Newer filings are operating in claim space already shaped by this earlier CMOS-integration work.

Citation counts favour older filings; read as influence, not current activity.
Jurisdiction split
25 of ~49
US receiving-office filings

Filing is US-weighted

The United States accounts for 25 tracked filings versus 8 for Europe, 6 for India, and 6 filed via WIPO/PCT. China and Japan each show only 2, suggesting protection in those markets is thinner relative to the underlying US-anchored R&D base.

Receiving-office counts, not family counts per country.
Collaboration density
7 pairs
co-assignee pairings

Collaboration is limited and academic-anchored

Only 7 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest links tying a university system to individual named inventors rather than to corporate co-filers. This points to a field still driven by lab-originated IP rather than joint industrial development.

Strongest pairs each recur twice in the dataset.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gallium nitride hemt wafer bonding, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium Nitride HEMT Wafer Bonding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where they are not

Assignee activity in this dataset skews toward research institutions and a small number of corporate filers, with recent-year momentum flat across the tracked organisations.

Academic anchor
0 in latest year
recent-year filings

University of California system

Appears in the co-assignee pairs with named inventors, consistent with a research-lab origin for its claims rather than a product-driven filing programme. No filings are recorded for the latest tracked year.

Co-assignee pairs recur twice with the same named inventors.
Corporate filer
0 in latest year
recent-year filings

GlobalFoundries U.S.

One of the corporate names in the ranking, alongside Murata Manufacturing and the interuniversity microelectronics centre IMEC, none of which show filings in the most recent tracked year — consistent with the overall flat momentum across the dataset.

Recent-year count reflects publication lag, not necessarily reduced activity.
Institutional filer
0 in latest year
recent-year filings

Indian Space Research Organisation

A government research body appearing in the assignee ranking, reflecting the India-specific receiving-office activity (6 filings) seen elsewhere in the dataset. No latest-year filings are recorded for this assignee.

India ranks third among tracked receiving offices at 6 filings.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with thin filing density relative to the core H01L cluster — worth checking before assuming freedom to operate.
thick AlN heat-spreading buffer layersexcimer-laser lift-off from sapphiredisplay-integrated HEMT control circuitryPCT-routed engineered-substrate filings
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.0
GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc.0
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC)0
The Regents of the University of California0
Suzhou Yuannao Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.0
Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)0
Northrop Grumman Corporation0
Gaorui Technology Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium Nitride HEMT Wafer Bonding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or identifying open claim space.

Map the citation network around the 2006-2008 core

The highest-cited records in this corpus set the CMOS-integration foundation that later filings build on. Tracing forward and backward citations from those records clarifies which claim elements are genuinely open.

Explore citation mapping in Eureka

Check freedom-to-operate on thermal-management claims

The featured record's heat-spreading and lift-off approach sits in a thinly populated branch relative to the core device classifications. A targeted claim-chart review would confirm how much room remains there.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing activity post-2024

With 2025-2026 counts still understated by publication lag, the real trajectory since the 2024 peak will not be clear for another 12-18 months.

Set a filing alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium Nitride HEMT Wafer Bonding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gallium Nitride HEMT Wafer Bonding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gallium Nitride HEMT Wafer Bonding in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gallium nitride hemt wafer bonding corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.