https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/galnac-and-extrahepatic-conjugation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Oligonucleotide Chemistry
GalNAc and Extrahepatic Conjugation Patents
  • 32.1% of all activity sits with five assignees. 1,363 of the 4,250 records in scope trace to the top five filers, with a long tail of single- and double-digit filers behind them.
  • Filing has plateaued, not collapsed. 2021 to 2024 — the last year with a complete publication window — moved from 329 to 324 filings, a -2% change, after peaking at 362 in 2022.
  • A61K and C12N dominate the claim space. 76.2% of records touch medicinal preparations and 60.4% touch genetic engineering classes, leaving therapeutic-activity and sugar/nucleic-acid classes comparatively lighter.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
4,250
Published Records
32%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-2%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (329 records) with 2024 (324) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,250 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

GalNAc conjugation is the dominant chemistry for routing oligonucleotide therapeutics into hepatocytes via the asialoglycoprotein receptor, and the claim space built around it now extends well beyond liver targeting. This landscape tracks 4,250 records published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off that combine GalNAc- or ASGPR-related delivery language with claims on receptor-mediated uptake, ligand valency, endosomal escape, tissue selectivity, conjugation chemistry or productive uptake — the mechanistic vocabulary that separates a working conjugate from an inert one.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent filing years understate real activity; read the trend through 2024, the last year with a complete window, rather than the partial tail after it.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC522
  2. 2MODERNATX INC443
  3. 3MODERNA THERAPEUTICS INC158
  4. 4ORNA THERAPEUTICS INC125
  5. 5SAPREME TECH BV115
  6. 6UNIV OF WASHINGTON105
  7. 7WAVE LIFE SCI LTD105
  8. 8MPEG LA LLC103
  9. 9ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS INC101
  10. 10PHASERX INC90
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on GalNAc and Extrahepatic Conjugation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 4,250-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 135 in 2017 to a peak of 362 in 2022, then held roughly flat — 329 in 2021 versus 324 in 2024, a -2% change across that span. The 2025–2026 figures are still filling in under the publication lag and should not be read as a decline.

Filing trend, 2017–20260100200300400135201720182019202020213622022202320242025302026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

A61K (medicinal preparations) and C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) between them cover the large majority of records — 76.2% and 60.4% respectively — with A61P, C07K and C07H forming a secondary tier. Records can carry multiple classes, so these shares sum past 100%; the useful signal is where the field's claim density concentrates, not a clean split.

IPC subclass compositionA61K · Medicinal preparations3,23976.2%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…2,56660.4%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…1,05824.9%C07K · Peptides & proteins94822.3%C07H · Sugars & nucleic acids67615.9%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…2104.9%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds1573.7%C12Q · Measuring & testing involving …1453.4%Other59013.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 4,250 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on GalNAc and Extrahepatic Conjugation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on GalNAc and Extrahepatic Conjugation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about galnac and extrahepatic conjugation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Foundational Claims

The most-cited records in the corpus

Representative Recent Filing
US20240307545A12024-09-19

Conjugate of saponin, oligonucleotide and GalNAc — US20240307545A1

SAPREME TECHNOLOGIES B.V.

The application claims a conjugate linking a saponin to an ASGPR-targeting ligand containing at least one GalNAc moiety, with an oligonucleotide covalently attached to both the saponin and the ASGPR ligand, plus pharmaceutical compositions built on that conjugate and their use in treating conditions tied to genes including apoB, TTR and PCSK9.Filed by Sapreme Technologies B.V., published 2024-09-19 — illustrative of a second wave of filings that pair GalNAc targeting with endosomal-escape enhancers rather than claiming the sugar ligand alone.

US20240307545A1 — patent drawing 1US20240307545A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited families
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US8106022B2Carbohydrate conjugates as delivery agents for oligonucleotides1,093
2WO2014179620A1Conjugated antisense compounds and their use931
3WO2009073809A2Carbohydrate conjugates as delivery agents for oligonucleotides750
4WO2013151666A2Modified polynucleotides for the production of biologics and proteins associated with human disease748
5WO2013090648A1Modified nucleoside, nucleotide, and nucleic acid compositions687
6WO2009126933A2Site-specific delivery of nucleic acids by combining targeting ligands with endosomolytic components609
7US6008336ACompacted nucleic acids and their delivery to cells578
8US20130245107A1Dlin-MC3-DMA lipid nanoparticle delivery of modified polynucleotides523
9US6077835ADelivery of compacted nucleic acid to cells522
10WO2013151671A1Modified polynucleotides for the production of cosmetic proteins and peptides516

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings by construction — treat this table as a map of influence on the field to date, not a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on GalNAc and Extrahepatic Conjugation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the data indicates

Three read-throughs from the filing pattern, the citation table and the technology composition together.

Concentration
32.1% / top 5
share of all 4,250 records

The core is held by a small group

The top five assignees account for 1,363 of the 4,250 records in scope, and the top ten push that to 43.9%. That leaves a long tail of the remaining ranked assignees each holding a much smaller slice — worth checking individually before assuming freedom to operate.

Ranking covers 100 assignees
Filing momentum
329 → 324
2021 to 2024 filings

Growth has flattened, not reversed

Volume roughly held steady between 2021 and 2024 (-2%) after peaking at 362 in 2022. That pattern is consistent with a field where the core delivery chemistry is settled and new filings are increasingly about refinements — valency, linker chemistry, escape mechanisms — rather than the base conjugate.

Peak year: 2022 at 362 filings
Claim geography
76.2% A61K
share of 4,250 records

Medicinal-preparation claims dominate

A61K and C12N together cover most of the corpus, meaning composition-of-matter and genetic-engineering claims are the densest ground. C07H (sugars and nucleic acids) sits at 15.9% — lighter coverage relative to the conjugate chemistry it enables, and a subclass worth checking closely before filing there.

IPC shares sum past 100% by design
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to galnac and extrahepatic conjugation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on GalNAc and Extrahepatic Conjugation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who Is Filing

Assignee landscape and momentum

The ranked list spans 100 assignees; a handful of large pharmaceutical and biotech filers sit well ahead of a long tail of single-digit entrants, including university and specialty-conjugate players.

Leader
522 records
leading assignee

One filer well ahead of the field

The leading assignee's count is more than four times the tenth-place figure of 90, a gap wide enough that its granted claims are the first thing to clear before designing a new GalNAc conjugate.

Fifth place: 115 records
Momentum
+25% YoY
one assignee's latest-year change

Momentum is uneven across the leaders

Recent-year filing changes vary sharply by assignee — one smaller filer grew filings in the latest year while several established names dropped sharply or filed nothing, a pattern consistent with the publication lag rather than a real pullback for the largest players.

Read alongside the 18-month lag
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is limited and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairings appear in the corpus, and the strongest of them links one company to a university partner far more often than any other pairing — a sign that most of the field files solo rather than through joint ventures.

Strongest pair well ahead of the rest
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with lighter filing density relative to the core conjugate chemistry
Multivalent GalNAc cluster geometryNon-hepatic ASGPR-independent targeting ligandsCleavable linker chemistries for endosomal escapeTissue-selective conjugates outside liverEnzymatic conjugation synthesis routes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Wave Life Sciences Ltd5+25%
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.2-60%
Orna Therapeutics, Inc.2-87%
Sapreme Technologies B.V.2-75%
ModernaTX, Inc.0—
Moderna Therapeutics, Inc.0-100%
PhaseRx, Inc.0—
University of Washington0—
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on GalNAc and Extrahepatic Conjugation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion.

Clear the leader's claim estate first

With one assignee holding 522 records against a tenth-place figure of 90, any new conjugate design should start with a freedom-to-operate check against that portfolio specifically, not the field average.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Watch the lighter IPC subclasses

C07H, C12P and C07C carry noticeably less filing density than A61K and C12N. That is where a well-drafted claim has more room, provided the underlying chemistry is genuinely novel.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track momentum, not just totals

Latest-year filing changes swing sharply by assignee. Re-checking momentum every publication cycle, rather than relying on a single snapshot, avoids reading a temporary lag as a real slowdown.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on GalNAc and Extrahepatic Conjugation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about GalNAc conjugation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on GalNAc and Extrahepatic Conjugation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research GalNAc and Extrahepatic Conjugation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole galnac and extrahepatic conjugation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.