https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gamma-alumina-synthesis-and-catalyst-supports-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Ceramics & Inorganics
Gamma alumina synthesis and catalyst support patents: who holds the pore-structure claim space
  • Filing has flattened, not grown. Activity peaked at 66 families in 2022 and has since eased back toward 2017 levels, a pattern more consistent with a maturing, well-claimed field than an emerging one.
  • Refining and exhaust applications dominate the IPC mix. C10G (643 records) and F01N (92 records) sit alongside the core B01J catalysis class, showing the support chemistry is claimed mainly through its end-use in hydroprocessing and emissions control.
  • Consolidation is concentrated among a handful of repeat filers. Co-assignee pairs are dominated by a single group's internal research institutes, while several historically active filers now show 0% or -100% year-over-year momentum.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,239
Published Records
20%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-48%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (64 records) with 2024 (33) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,239 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Gamma alumina is the workhorse transition-alumina phase behind most industrial catalyst supports, valued for the combination of specific surface area and pore volume it retains after calcination of a boehmite precursor. Patent activity in this space clusters around three levers: precursor and calcination-temperature control, pore-size distribution engineering, and the phase-transformation pathway from boehmite through the transition aluminas to alpha alumina. The search underlying this page pulls 2,239 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine alumina-support terminology with these process-parameter terms, filtered to the core catalysis and inorganic-chemistry IPC classes.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts in any trend line understate real filing activity; treat the most recent one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES140
  2. 2SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV84
  3. 3ENGELHARD CORP81
  4. 4UOP LLC79
  5. 5JOHNSON MATTHEY PLC58
  6. 6SHELL OIL CO52
  7. 7NIPPON SHOKUBAI CO LTD50
  8. 8EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO49
  9. 9SASOL TECHNOLOGY (UK) LTD47
  10. 10CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP44
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gamma Alumina Synthesis and Catalyst Supports covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

The dataset spans 2,239 published families across eight IPC subclasses, with receiving-office activity concentrated in the United States, Europe and Japan alongside a meaningful PCT and India presence.

A peak in 2022, then a pullback

Annual filings rose from 36 in 2017 to a peak of 66 in 2022, then declined toward 7 in the most recent (partial) year. Read against the publication lag, this is best described as flat-to-declining rather than a genuine falloff in R&D interest.

A peak in 2022, then a pullback020406080362017201820192020202166202220232024202572026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Catalysis and refining dominate the claim mix

B01J (chemical/physical processes and catalysis) covers 2,143 of the 2,239 records, essentially the whole corpus, confirming that alumina-support claims are almost always framed as catalyst inventions rather than pure materials-science ones. C07C, C10G and B01D each appear in several hundred records, tying the support chemistry to hydrocarbon conversion and separation applications, while C01F and C01B — the more materials-focused inorganic-chemistry classes — appear in a smaller fraction of filings, suggesting the pure synthesis chemistry is comparatively less claimed than its downstream catalytic use.

Catalysis and refining dominate the claim mixB01J · Chemical/physical processes & …2,14395.7%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds69931.2%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining64328.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…45220.2%C01F · Alkaline-earth, Al & rare-eart…24210.8%C07B · General organic chemistry meth…24210.8%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…1476.6%F01N · Exhaust silencers & treatment924.1%Other41018.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,239 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gamma Alumina Synthesis and Catalyst Supports covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gamma Alumina Synthesis and Catalyst Supports with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gamma alumina synthesis and catalyst supports and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents shaping this space

Representative Filing
US20100176030A12010-07-15

US20100176030A1 — Alumina having a complex pore structure, and catalyst and process for selective hydrogenation of cracking gasoline

CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION

The application discloses an alumina support with a specific surface area of 40 to 160 m2/g and total pore volume of 0.3 to 1.2 cm3/g, defined by a three-band pore-diameter distribution (below 30 nm, 30-60 nm, and above 60 nm) each holding a specified share of total pore volume, plus a hydrogenation catalyst built on that support for selective hydrogenation of pyrolysis gasoline.Filed by China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec); number, assignee and date are rendered from the underlying record.

View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4448896AHydrogenation catalyst for desulfurization and removal of heavy metals440
2US5057483ACatalyst composition containing segregated platinum and rhodium components345
3US4171288ACatalyst compositions and the method of manufacturing them300
4US4714694AAluminum-stabilized ceria catalyst compositions, and methods of making the same291
5US5827421AHydroconversion process employing catalyst with specified pore size distribution and no added silica261
6US4727052ACatalyst compositions and methods of making the same252
7US4499203ASupported catalyst of increased resistance to poisons, useful for hydrotreating metal-containing oil fractions200
8US4440956ASelective hydrogenation of acetylenes in the presence of butadiene and catalyst used in the hydrogenation194
9US5997829AEnvironment purifying material183
10US5254519ACatalyst composition containing platinum and rhodium components176

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate references within the searched corpus; treat them as a measure of influence on subsequent filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gamma Alumina Synthesis and Catalyst Supports covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the filing pattern signals

Three structural features of this corpus matter more to a filing or freedom-to-operate decision than the raw count of 2,239 families.

Trend
66 in 2022 → 7 latest year
peak to trough, unadjusted for lag

The field has stopped accelerating

Filing volume rose steadily through the late 2010s and topped out in 2022. The subsequent decline is partly a publication-lag artefact, but the shape of the curve — a clear peak rather than continued growth — points to a technology where the core process-parameter claims (surface area, pore volume, calcination temperature) are already staked out.

Plan new filings around narrower, application-specific claims rather than broad pore-structure ranges.
Composition
2,143 of 2,239 in B01J
share of corpus in the core catalysis subclass

Claims are framed through catalytic use, not raw materials science

Almost every record in the corpus sits in B01J, the catalysis and physical-process class, even though the search terms are materials-science terms like boehmite precursor and phase transformation. Filers are protecting alumina chemistry primarily as an element of a catalyst system, which leaves room to claim the underlying synthesis and characterisation methods on their own terms.

A pure-synthesis claim, decoupled from a named catalytic application, is a plausible under-claimed angle.
Ownership
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 17 shared families

Collaboration is mostly internal, not cross-company

The strongest co-assignee links in the corpus connect a single group's parent entity to its own research institutes, rather than joint ventures between competitors. Genuine cross-company co-filing is rare in this space, which means most of the technical know-how sits inside individual corporate research pipelines rather than shared consortia.

Licensing-in from a named institute inside a large group is likelier than a joint-venture deal.
Momentum
0% or -100% YoY for several historic filers
recent-year momentum across tracked assignees

Some long-standing filers have gone quiet

Several assignees with an established filing history in this space show zero filings in the latest tracked year, and at least two show a full year-over-year drop to zero from a prior positive count. That does not necessarily mean withdrawal from the technology — it may reflect a shift to trade-secret protection or a pause between generations of catalyst products — but it does mean their claim position is not currently being extended.

Check assignment and continuation activity before assuming a quiet filer has exited the space.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gamma alumina synthesis and catalyst supports, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gamma Alumina Synthesis and Catalyst Supports covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who holds the claim space

The ranking is dominated by large integrated refiners and catalyst houses with decades of filing history, alongside their internal research institutes, which appear as separate assignees in the record.

Concentration
17 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

One group's internal structure shows up as its own cluster

The strongest co-assignee links all sit inside a single large integrated energy and chemicals group, connecting the parent entity to its own research institutes across at least three separate pairings. This internal structure inflates the apparent number of distinct assignees without indicating separate competitive centres.

Treat institute-level assignees from the same group as one competitive actor when assessing concentration.
Geography
US 594 · EPO 360 · Japan 283
leading receiving offices

Filing follows the major refining and automotive markets

The United States, Europe and Japan account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, with WIPO PCT filings (164) and India (101) forming a second tier. That pattern tracks the geography of large-scale refining and emissions-control demand rather than raw materials production.

India's filing volume is worth watching given its refining capacity build-out.
Momentum
0% YoY for two tracked assignees
no growth among recently active filers

Even the active filers are not accelerating

Among the assignees still filing in the most recent tracked year, growth is flat rather than positive — filings held steady rather than increased. Combined with the multiple filers now at zero, this points to a field where existing players are defending established positions rather than racing to expand them.

A flat leader is still a leader — do not read flat momentum as an opening.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These sit adjacent to the dense pore-structure and calcination claims but show comparatively thin coverage in this corpus.
Boehmite crystallite size controlMulti-modal pore distribution tailoringRare-earth-doped alumina stabilisationLow-temperature phase-transformation pathwaysExhaust-specific alumina washcoat formulations
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
IFP Energies Nouvelles (IFPEN)30%
Shell International Research Maatschappij B.V.10%
Engelhard Corporation0
UOP LLC0-100%
Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.0
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company0-100%
Johnson Matthey PLC0-100%
Shell Oil Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gamma Alumina Synthesis and Catalyst Supports covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

This page identifies the pattern; deciding where to file, license or design around requires drilling into the specific claims behind the numbers.

Map claims against the pore-structure landscape

Pull the independent claims from the most-cited records and lay their surface-area and pore-volume ranges side by side to see exactly which numeric bands are already occupied.

Explore claim charts in Eureka →

Track the quiet filers

Assignees at 0% or -100% year-over-year momentum may still hold active applications in prosecution; check their pending filings before treating their claim position as static.

Run an assignee watch in Eureka →

Test a white-space claim draft

Draft a first claim around one of the under-claimed sub-areas and check it against the full corpus, not just the most-cited records, before committing to a filing strategy.

Validate novelty in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gamma Alumina Synthesis and Catalyst Supports covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gamma Alumina Synthesis and Catalyst Supports covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gamma Alumina Synthesis and Catalyst Supports in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gamma alumina synthesis and catalyst supports corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.