Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (64 records) with 2024 (33) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,239 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Gamma alumina is the workhorse transition-alumina phase behind most industrial catalyst supports, valued for the combination of specific surface area and pore volume it retains after calcination of a boehmite precursor. Patent activity in this space clusters around three levers: precursor and calcination-temperature control, pore-size distribution engineering, and the phase-transformation pathway from boehmite through the transition aluminas to alpha alumina. The search underlying this page pulls 2,239 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine alumina-support terminology with these process-parameter terms, filtered to the core catalysis and inorganic-chemistry IPC classes.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts in any trend line understate real filing activity; treat the most recent one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
The dataset spans 2,239 published families across eight IPC subclasses, with receiving-office activity concentrated in the United States, Europe and Japan alongside a meaningful PCT and India presence.
Annual filings rose from 36 in 2017 to a peak of 66 in 2022, then declined toward 7 in the most recent (partial) year. Read against the publication lag, this is best described as flat-to-declining rather than a genuine falloff in R&D interest.
B01J (chemical/physical processes and catalysis) covers 2,143 of the 2,239 records, essentially the whole corpus, confirming that alumina-support claims are almost always framed as catalyst inventions rather than pure materials-science ones. C07C, C10G and B01D each appear in several hundred records, tying the support chemistry to hydrocarbon conversion and separation applications, while C01F and C01B — the more materials-focused inorganic-chemistry classes — appear in a smaller fraction of filings, suggesting the pure synthesis chemistry is comparatively less claimed than its downstream catalytic use.
Shares are the percentage of the 2,239 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gamma alumina synthesis and catalyst supports and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe application discloses an alumina support with a specific surface area of 40 to 160 m2/g and total pore volume of 0.3 to 1.2 cm3/g, defined by a three-band pore-diameter distribution (below 30 nm, 30-60 nm, and above 60 nm) each holding a specified share of total pore volume, plus a hydrogenation catalyst built on that support for selective hydrogenation of pyrolysis gasoline.Filed by China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec); number, assignee and date are rendered from the underlying record.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4448896A | Hydrogenation catalyst for desulfurization and removal of heavy metals | 440 |
| 2 | US5057483A | Catalyst composition containing segregated platinum and rhodium components | 345 |
| 3 | US4171288A | Catalyst compositions and the method of manufacturing them | 300 |
| 4 | US4714694A | Aluminum-stabilized ceria catalyst compositions, and methods of making the same | 291 |
| 5 | US5827421A | Hydroconversion process employing catalyst with specified pore size distribution and no added silica | 261 |
| 6 | US4727052A | Catalyst compositions and methods of making the same | 252 |
| 7 | US4499203A | Supported catalyst of increased resistance to poisons, useful for hydrotreating metal-containing oil fractions | 200 |
| 8 | US4440956A | Selective hydrogenation of acetylenes in the presence of butadiene and catalyst used in the hydrogenation | 194 |
| 9 | US5997829A | Environment purifying material | 183 |
| 10 | US5254519A | Catalyst composition containing platinum and rhodium components | 176 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate references within the searched corpus; treat them as a measure of influence on subsequent filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three structural features of this corpus matter more to a filing or freedom-to-operate decision than the raw count of 2,239 families.
Filing volume rose steadily through the late 2010s and topped out in 2022. The subsequent decline is partly a publication-lag artefact, but the shape of the curve — a clear peak rather than continued growth — points to a technology where the core process-parameter claims (surface area, pore volume, calcination temperature) are already staked out.
Almost every record in the corpus sits in B01J, the catalysis and physical-process class, even though the search terms are materials-science terms like boehmite precursor and phase transformation. Filers are protecting alumina chemistry primarily as an element of a catalyst system, which leaves room to claim the underlying synthesis and characterisation methods on their own terms.
The strongest co-assignee links in the corpus connect a single group's parent entity to its own research institutes, rather than joint ventures between competitors. Genuine cross-company co-filing is rare in this space, which means most of the technical know-how sits inside individual corporate research pipelines rather than shared consortia.
Several assignees with an established filing history in this space show zero filings in the latest tracked year, and at least two show a full year-over-year drop to zero from a prior positive count. That does not necessarily mean withdrawal from the technology — it may reflect a shift to trade-secret protection or a pause between generations of catalyst products — but it does mean their claim position is not currently being extended.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gamma alumina synthesis and catalyst supports, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking is dominated by large integrated refiners and catalyst houses with decades of filing history, alongside their internal research institutes, which appear as separate assignees in the record.
The strongest co-assignee links all sit inside a single large integrated energy and chemicals group, connecting the parent entity to its own research institutes across at least three separate pairings. This internal structure inflates the apparent number of distinct assignees without indicating separate competitive centres.
The United States, Europe and Japan account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, with WIPO PCT filings (164) and India (101) forming a second tier. That pattern tracks the geography of large-scale refining and emissions-control demand rather than raw materials production.
Among the assignees still filing in the most recent tracked year, growth is flat rather than positive — filings held steady rather than increased. Combined with the multiple filers now at zero, this points to a field where existing players are defending established positions rather than racing to expand them.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| IFP Energies Nouvelles (IFPEN) | 3 | 0% |
| Shell International Research Maatschappij B.V. | 1 | 0% |
| Engelhard Corporation | 0 | — |
| UOP LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | 0 | -100% |
| Johnson Matthey PLC | 0 | -100% |
| Shell Oil Company | 0 | — |
This page identifies the pattern; deciding where to file, license or design around requires drilling into the specific claims behind the numbers.
Pull the independent claims from the most-cited records and lay their surface-area and pore-volume ranges side by side to see exactly which numeric bands are already occupied.
Explore claim charts in Eureka →Assignees at 0% or -100% year-over-year momentum may still hold active applications in prosecution; check their pending filings before treating their claim position as static.
Run an assignee watch in Eureka →Draft a first claim around one of the under-claimed sub-areas and check it against the full corpus, not just the most-cited records, before committing to a filing strategy.
Validate novelty in Eureka →The corpus is led by large integrated refiners and catalyst manufacturers with long filing histories in hydroprocessing catalysis, several of which appear multiple times because their internal research institutes are recorded as separate assignees. This inflates headcount at the top without indicating separate competitive centres. When assessing concentration, group institute-level filers together with their parent company rather than counting them independently.
Filing activity rose from 36 records in 2017 to a peak of 66 in 2022, then declined toward the most recent partial year. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years understate true activity, but the overall shape is a clear peak followed by a pullback rather than continued growth. That pattern is more consistent with a maturing field where core process-parameter claims are already staked out than with an emerging one.
This Sinopec filing claims an alumina support defined by a specific surface area of 40 to 160 m2/g, a total pore volume of 0.3 to 1.2 cm3/g, and a three-band pore-diameter distribution across sub-30 nm, 30-60 nm and above-60 nm ranges, plus a hydrogenation catalyst built on that support for selective hydrogenation of pyrolysis gasoline. Anyone designing a support that falls inside all of those numeric bands and pairs it with a hydrogenation catalyst for a similar feedstock risks overlap. Working outside at least one of the claimed ranges, or targeting a different catalytic application, is the more defensible position.
Relative to the dense coverage of pore-volume and calcination-temperature claims, this corpus shows comparatively thin filing around boehmite crystallite-size control, multi-modal pore distribution tailoring, rare-earth-doped stabilisation of the alumina phase, and exhaust-specific washcoat formulations. These sit adjacent to the heavily claimed core rather than outside the field entirely, so a first claim there should be drafted narrowly and checked against the full corpus rather than just the most-cited records.
B01J covers chemical and physical processes including catalysis, and 2,143 of the 2,239 records in this corpus are classified there even though the search terms are materials-science terms like boehmite precursor and specific surface area. That reflects a drafting choice: most applicants frame their alumina-support inventions as catalyst systems rather than standalone materials claims. It means a claim written around the synthesis or characterisation of the alumina itself, decoupled from a named catalytic use, sits in comparatively less-crowded territory.
Go past this page: query the whole gamma alumina synthesis and catalyst supports corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.