Book a demo

GaN-on-Silicon Cost Reduction Patent Snapshot

GaN-on-Silicon Cost Reduction Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
GaN-on-Silicon Cost Reduction Patent Snapshot in 2026

The GaN-on-Silicon cost reduction patent corpus is extremely small and highly concentrated, with only three identified applicants and activity peaking in 2017 before dropping away. Lumileds Holding BV and Korrus Inc share the top ranking, while the United States is the sole active filing jurisdiction with supplementary coverage in South Korea.

3
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

A tightly held, post-peak niche dominated by Lumileds and Korrus

The corpus is narrow: three applicants account for all activity, with Lumileds Holding BV and Korrus Inc each holding two patent records and the Regents of the University of California holding one.

Concentration is absolute — the top five filers account for the entire pool of the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating no meaningful second tier exists. There is no observable gap between leader and challenger because the two top-ranked applicants are tied.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Lumileds Holding BV2
2Korrus Inc2
3Regents of the University of California1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Lumileds and Korrus together define the frontier of this sub-topic; any new entrant would be entering a space where existing coverage is thin but where these two players hold all registered ground.

Activity peaked in 2017; subsequent years show no recorded filings. Given the standard 18-to-24-month publication lag, very recent work may not yet be visible, but the long gap since 2017 is consistent with the lifecycle signal.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A single filing burst in 2017, then sustained dormancy across all IPC branches

The trend chart reveals a sharp spike in 2017 followed by a single filing in 2021 and no recorded activity in any other year. The technology composition chart shows that semiconductor device patents (H01L) are visible in, with smaller representations in lasers, sterilisation, and materials.

Annual filing trend

Two filings appear in 2017 and one in 2021; all other years from 2018 through 2026 record zero. The standard publication lag means filings from late 2024 onward may not yet be reflected, but the pattern over the prior several years is clear.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2017.22017020180201902020120210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (semiconductor devices) is the visible branch, followed by H01S (lasers and stimulated emission) and H10P. A61L (sterilisation and disinfecting) and C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications) appear at the margins, reflecting the University of California’s UV-application work.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 5; H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission 2.H01L · Semiconductor dev…5H01S · Lasers & stimulat…2H10P2A61L · Sterilising & dis…1C09K · Materials for mis…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20230187573A1Published 2023-06-15

Iii-nitride LED with UV emission by auger carrier …

The Regents Of The University Of California

A III-nitride LED with simultaneous visible and ultraviolet (UV) emission, in which the visible emission is due to conventional InGaN active region mechanisms and the UV emission occurs due to Auger carrier injection into a UV light emitting region, such as impurity-doped AlGaN. The primary application for the III-nitride LED is general airborne pathogen… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Iii-nitride LED with UV emission by auger carrier … — patent drawingIii-nitride LED with UV emission by auger carrier … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Iii-nitride LED with tunnel junction27
2INxALyGAzN OPTICAL EMITTERS FABRICATED VIA SUBSTRA…8
3Iii-nitride LED with UV emission by auger carrier …7
4III-nitride LED with tunnel junction4
5INxALyGAzN OPTICAL EMITTERS FABRICATED VIA SUBSTRA…2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Lumileds Holding BV

Lumileds Holding BV

Lumileds holds 2 patent records, concentrated in H01L (semiconductor devices), H01S (lasers and stimulated emission), and H10P. No momentum data is available for the recent period, consistent with the overall dormancy of the corpus since 2017. Their technical emphasis spans device architecture and stimulated emission, suggesting integration of GaN cost-reduction approaches into broader LED and laser platforms.

patent records: 2
Challenger · Korrus Inc

Korrus Inc

Korrus Inc also holds 2 patent records, matching Lumileds at the top of the ranking. Specific technology focus by IPC class is not separately listed for Korrus in the applicant-technology breakdown, and no momentum trend data is available. Their presence alongside Lumileds — both formerly linked to the Soraa lineage — makes them the most directly comparable peer in this sub-topic.

patent records: 2
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Lumileds Holding BVKorrus Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own GaN-on-Silicon cost reduction Snapshot?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.