Book a demo

Gas Insulated Switchgear Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Gas Insulated Switchgear Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gas-insulated-switchgear-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · High-Voltage Switchgear
Gas Insulated Switchgear Design Patents: Who Leads and Where the Gaps Sit
  • Filings are concentrated but not locked up. The top five assignees hold 33.5% of all 1,814 records in scope, and the top ten hold 44.1% — leaving well over half the field to a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Diagnostics dominate the claim space. 73.0% of records carry an electric & magnetic measurement classification, far ahead of the 17.4% sitting in power switchboard & substation hardware — this field is being fought over sensing and analysis, not the enclosure itself.
  • Momentum has shifted toward Chinese research institutions. Filings grew 22% from 2021 to 2024 (95 to 116), and recent-year assignee momentum shows a university-linked filer up sharply while several established Japanese and Korean names show no recent activity.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,814
Published Records
33%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+22%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (95 records) with 2024 (116) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,814 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Gas insulated switchgear (GIS) design patenting spans the physical enclosure and spacer hardware, gas density and dielectric monitoring, and — increasingly — the sensor and software layer used to detect partial discharge before it causes failure. The search underlying this page pairs GIS and gas insulated substation terms with the specific technical concerns practitioners actually file around: spacer design, gas density monitoring, assembly cleanliness, seismic qualification and footprint saving. That combination pulls in 1,814 published records dated between 2015 and the current data cut-off.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity — 2024 is the last year that can be read as complete, and everything after it is still filling in.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA197
  2. 2MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP126
  3. 3KK TOSHIBA115
  4. 4PRYSMIAN SPA108
  5. 5KOREA ELECTRIC POWER CORP61
  6. 6XI AN JIAOTONG UNIV43
  7. 7HITACHI LTD42
  8. 8CHINA ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE CO LTD41
  9. 9GUANGDONG POWER GRID CO LTD35
  10. 10STATE GRID SHANGHAI MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC POWER CO32
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Insulated Switchgear Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,814-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 73 in 2017 to a peak of 126 in 2023, with 2021-to-2024 volume up 22% (95 to 116). 2026 figures (28 so far) are partial and will revise upward as later publications land.

Filing trend, 2017–20260387511315073201720182019202020212022126202320242025282026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

G01R (electric & magnetic measurement) covers 73.0% of records, well ahead of H02B (power switchboards & substations) at 17.4% and H01H (switches & relays) at 9.9%. G06N (AI-based computing) already reaches 6.7%, signalling that diagnostic modelling is a growing claim surface, not a niche one. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to more than 100% of the 1,814-record total.

Technology composition by IPC subclassG01R · Electric & magnetic measurement1,32573.0%H02B · Power switchboards & substatio…31517.4%H01H · Switches & relays1809.9%G06F · Electric digital data processi…1558.5%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements1266.9%G06N · Computing based on AI models1216.7%G01N · Material analysis & testing1196.6%H02G · Installing power & signal cabl…975.3%Other61934.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,814 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Insulated Switchgear Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gas Insulated Switchgear Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gas insulated switchgear design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited prior art and a representative recent filing

Representative Filing
US10191114B22019-01-29

US10191114B2 — System for analysis of partial discharge defects of gas insulated switchgear

LSIS CO., LTD.

The present invention relates to a system for analysis of partial discharge defects of a gas insulated switchgear capable of allowing a user to precisely analyze a defect of a gas insulated switchgear due to a partial discharge, by providing both partial discharge signal information on a partial discharge signal sensed by a detecting sensor, and detection signal information on a detection signal sensed by one or more neighboring sensors adjacent to the detecting sensor, to a monitor.Filed by LSIS CO., LTD., published 2019-01-29 — illustrates the shift from single-sensor discharge detection toward multi-sensor comparative analysis.

US10191114B2 — patent drawing 1US10191114B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN102435922AGIS局部放电的声电联合检测系统和定位方法117
2US5214595AAbnormality diagnosing system and method for a high voltage power apparatus100
3US5107447AAbnormality diagnosing system and method for a high voltage power apparatus96
4EP0342597A2Abnormality system for a high voltage power supply apparatus80
5US4446420AMethod and device for detecting and locating fault and/or partial discharges in a gas-insulated electrical eq…73
6KR101553005B1A partial discharge monitoring and diagnosis system for power devices63
7KR101574615B1A partial discharge monitoring and diagnosis system for power devices by using signal detection based on stat…59
8CN102809718A一种GIS超高频局部放电信号识别方法59
9US20070221626A1Gas insulated switchgear55
10US5475312AMethod and device for distinguishing between partial discharge and electrical noise54

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus; treat them as evidence of influence on later work, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Insulated Switchgear Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the record set is broken down by class, geography and time.

Concentration
33.5% / 44.1%
top 5 / top 10 share of 1,814 records

A leader with real breathing room below it

The top assignee holds 197 records against a fifth-place figure of 61 and a tenth-place figure of 32 — a steep drop-off rather than a plateau. That gap is where a well-targeted filing strategy can still establish a defensible position without displacing the leader.

Based on the 100-company ranking returned by the dataset.
Geography
833 CN filings
vs. 220 JP, 163 EP, 136 US

Filing activity is centred on China

China's receiving office accounts for the largest single share of filings, ahead of Japan, Europe, the US and South Korea combined receiving offices individually. Clearing freedom-to-operate in China first is the practical implication for any new entrant.

Receiving office counts, not family-adjusted.
Technology mix
73.0% G01R
share of 1,814 records

Sensing and measurement, not hardware, is the crowded zone

Nearly three-quarters of records touch electric and magnetic measurement classifications, compared with under a fifth touching switchboard and substation hardware directly. New enclosure or spacer geometry claims face a thinner prior art field than new discharge-detection claims do.

Class shares sum past 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Momentum
+22% (2021→2024)
complete-year filing growth

Growth is real but unevenly distributed

Aggregate filing volume grew 22% across the last fully-observable three-year window, yet assignee-level momentum diverges sharply — one university-linked filer is up 200% year over year while several long-established filers show no activity in the latest year.

2025–2026 figures are still filling in due to publication lag.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gas insulated switchgear design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Insulated Switchgear Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

Filing leadership sits with grid operators, diversified electronics majors and power-focused research institutes, but co-filing patterns and recent momentum tell a more granular story than the headline ranking alone.

State-owned grid operators
27 co-filings
strongest assignee pair in the dataset

Grid operator plus national research institute is the dominant collaboration

The strongest co-assignee pair in this dataset links a state grid operator with a national electric power research institute, and a second strong pair links the same grid operator with a university. This pattern suggests joint filings are a common route to combine field deployment access with lab-side diagnostic development.

10 co-assignee pairs identified across the dataset.
Diversified electronics majors
20 co-filings
second-strongest pair

Japanese equipment makers pair with utility partners

A leading Japanese electronics major and a major Japanese utility form the second-strongest co-filing pair in the dataset, consistent with equipment vendors developing diagnostic hardware in tandem with the operators who will deploy it.

Momentum for this pairing has slowed in the most recent year on both sides.
University and institute filers
+200% YoY
one university-linked filer's latest-year momentum

Academic filers are the fastest-moving group right now

While several established corporate filers show flat or declining activity in the latest year, one university-linked filer's output tripled year over year, a signal that some of the newest diagnostic and AI-assisted detection work is originating outside the traditional equipment vendors.

Recent-year counts are small in absolute terms and should be read as directional, not definitive.
🔍
Sub-areas with comparatively thin claim density
Based on IPC class shares and filing patterns, these branches carry fewer claims relative to the core measurement and switchboard classes.
Seismic qualification of GIS enclosuresAssembly cleanliness verification protocolsGas density monitoring sensor fusionFootprint-saving modular bay layoutsAI-assisted spacer defect classification
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Xi'an Jiaotong University3+200%
State Grid Corporation of China2-75%
Toshiba Corporation1
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation0-100%
Prysmian S.p.A.0
Korea Electric Power Corporation0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
China Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Insulated Switchgear Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or competitive tracking.

Map claim scope on the top assignees' families

With 33.5% of records held by five assignees, a claim-by-claim review of their granted families is the fastest way to identify where new filings would actually collide with existing scope versus where they would sit clear of it.

Explore assignee families in Eureka

Test draft claims against the under-claimed sub-areas

Seismic qualification, assembly cleanliness and gas density sensor fusion show thinner claim density than core measurement classes — running a draft claim through prior-art search in these areas can confirm whether the white space is real or simply under-indexed.

Run a claim check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Insulated Switchgear Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about GIS design patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Insulated Switchgear Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gas Insulated Switchgear Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gas insulated switchgear design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.