Book a demo

Gas Sensor Durability Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Gas Sensor Durability Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gas-sensor-environmental-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Sensors & MEMS · Patent Landscape
Gas Sensor Environmental Durability Patents: Who Leads and Where the Claim Space Is Still Open
  • Filing has cooled since 2019. the peak year for durability-specific filings was 2019 at 50 records, and by 2022 the annual count had roughly halved to 18 — this is not a growth market on paper, though the 2026 count is partial.
  • G01N dominates the IPC mix. 582 of 967 records sit in material analysis and testing (G01N), versus 113 in semiconductor devices (H01L) — durability claims are being written as measurement-and-materials problems, not device architecture problems.
  • The US is the primary filing venue. 366 records were filed at the USPTO against 149 at the EPO and 101 via WIPO/PCT — a durability claim that only covers Europe or Asia is covering a minority of the disclosed art.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
967
Published Records
19%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-25%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (16 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 967 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review tracks patent families where gas sensors — including chemiresistive and gas-detection variants — are claimed alongside specific environmental durability language: humidity resistance, temperature stability, or poisoning resistance. The search deliberately excludes generic gas-sensing filings that do not address one of these failure modes directly, so the corpus is a durability-specific subset rather than the whole gas-sensor field.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the July 2026 data cut-off. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years in any trend chart will read lower than the true filing rate once the backlog clears.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1MSA TECHNOLOGY LLC76
  2. 2BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST31
  3. 3MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO29
  4. 4ROBERT BOSCH GMBH25
  5. 5KK TOSHIBA25
  6. 6NGK INSULATORS LTD23
  7. 7EPIGAN NV22
  8. 8BRAIN TUNNELGENIX TECHNOLOGIES CORP18
  9. 9BAH HOLDINGS LLC17
  10. 10SMITH ALLAN L15
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 967-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the durability claims.

A market past its filing peak

Annual filings rose to 50 in 2019, then declined toward 18 by the 2022 midpoint and further to 7 by 2026 (partial year). Read the recent years cautiously — publication lag means 2025 and 2026 will both revise upward as later-filed applications publish.

A market past its filing peak013253850392017201850201920202021202220232024202572026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Materials and testing carry the claims

G01N (material analysis and testing) accounts for 582 of 967 records, more than five times the next subclass, H01L (semiconductor devices) at 113. Smaller but consistent clusters sit in A61B (diagnosis and surgery, 74), G01K (temperature measurement, 55), G01J (radiation and light measurement, 52), H01M (batteries and fuel cells, 52), H10K (organic semiconductors, 46) and C23C (coating and surface deposition, 43) — durability engineering is spread across measurement, coating and adjacent device fields rather than concentrated in one.

Materials and testing carry the claimsG01N · Material analysis & testing58260.2%H01L · Semiconductor devices11311.7%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery747.7%G01K · Temperature measurement555.7%G01J · Radiation & light measurement525.4%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells525.4%H10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED e…464.8%C23C · Coating & surface deposition434.4%Other1,011104.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 967 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gas Sensor Environmental Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gas sensor environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
US20060185420A12006-08-24

Gas sensor with humidity-resistant metal-oxide sensing structure (Niterra)

NITERRA CO., LTD.

The present invention provides a gas sensor having excellent humidity resistance even if used in a high temperature and high humidity atmosphere. According to the present invention, a gas sensor is comprised of: a silicon substrate; a metal-oxide semiconductor portion comprised mainly of SnO2 and formed on the substrate; and a catalytic portion comprised of Pd and dispersed on a surface of the metal-oxide semiconductor portion, wherein the metal-oxide semiconductor portion and the catalytic portion constitute a gas sensing portion. Furthermore, an insulating portion comprised mainly of SiO2 is formed dispersedly on a surface of the gas sensing portion.Filed by Niterra Co., Ltd. (formerly NGK Spark Plug), published 2006-08-24 as US20060185420A1.

US20060185420A1 — patent drawing 1US20060185420A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080170982A1Fabrication and Application of Nanofiber Ribbons and Sheets and Twisted and Non-Twisted Nanofiber Yarns1,266
2US6503831B2Method of forming an electronic device680
3US20120187305A1Microchannel plate detector and methods for their fabrication557
4US20090105605A1Apparatus and method for measuring biologic parameters530
5US20180011052A1Silicon carbide based field effect gas sensor for high temperature applications391
6WO2007015710A2The fabrication and application of nanofiber ribbons and sheets and twisted and non-twisted nanofiber yarns383
7US20020105080A1Method of forming an electronic device350
8US20150094914A1Method and apparatus for biological evaluation318
9US20070106172A1Apparatus and method for measuring biologic parameters261
10US6713389B2Method of forming an electronic device255

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat this as a signal of influence on the field, not of which claims are commercially current.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the corpus that matter more than the raw counts.

Filing momentum
50 → 18 → 7
records, 2019 → 2022 → 2026

Durability filing has been declining since the 2019 peak

The corpus peaked at 50 records in 2019, was already down to 18 by the 2022 midpoint, and sits at 7 for the partial 2026 year. Publication lag means the true 2025–2026 numbers will revise up somewhat, but the multi-year direction from 2019 onward is a decline, not a plateau.

Trend basis: annual family counts, 2017–2026
Claim concentration
582 of 967
records in G01N

Material-analysis claims dominate the IPC mix

Six in ten records classify under G01N, material analysis and testing — the durability problem is being solved and claimed primarily as a materials and measurement question, with H01L semiconductor-device claims a distant second at 113.

IPC basis: subclass counts across 967 records
Filing geography
366 US filings
vs. 149 EPO, 101 WIPO/PCT

The US is the dominant receiving office by a wide margin

USPTO filings outnumber EPO filings by more than two to one, and WIPO/PCT filings by more than three to one. A durability portfolio strategy built only around European or PCT coverage is missing the majority of disclosed prior art in this space.

Office basis: United States, EPO, WIPO, Japan, Canada, Australia
Citation influence
1,266 citations
on the top-cited record

Influence is concentrated in a handful of older filings

The most-cited record in the corpus carries 1,266 citations, several times the count of the next most-cited filings — a pattern typical of foundational, older art that newer filings must still work around or cite past.

Citation basis: most-cited records in corpus
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gas sensor environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

Assignee activity in this corpus shows established sensor and materials organisations holding position, but recent-year momentum is flat across the named assignees below — none show fresh filings in the latest year, consistent with the overall filing decline.

Momentum check
0
latest-year filings across leading assignees

Named leaders show no latest-year activity

Across the assignees with the strongest historical presence in this corpus — including MSA Technology, Mine Safety Appliances, University of Texas System, Toshiba, NGK Insulators and Robert Bosch — recent-year momentum recorded is zero. That is consistent with the broader decline in annual filings, not necessarily an exit from the field.

Momentum basis: latest recorded filing year per assignee
Collaboration pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings identified

Co-filing is limited and mostly bilateral

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus. The strongest pairing, Smith Allan L with Wadso Ingemar, recurs across 9 records; institutional pairings such as University of Texas System with CSIRO appear at lower frequency (4 and 2 records).

Pairing basis: co-assignee frequency across corpus
Filing venue
6 offices tracked
US, EPO, WIPO, JP, CA, AU

Coverage decisions concentrate on three offices

The bulk of filing activity clusters in the United States, Europe and the WIPO/PCT route, with Japan, Canada and Australia trailing well behind. A freedom-to-operate check limited to those three primary offices will catch most of the disclosed art.

Office basis: 366 US / 149 EPO / 101 WIPO
🔍
Sub-areas with thinner claim coverage
Branches inside this corpus that carry fewer dedicated filings relative to the G01N core — worth checking before assuming the space is closed.
Poisoning-resistance coatings for chemiresistive sensorsHigh-temperature SiC field-effect gas sensingOrganic-semiconductor (H10K) durability claimsCoating/deposition methods for sensor longevity (C23C)Combined humidity-and-temperature stability claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
MSA Technology0
Mine Safety Appliances0
Board of Regents, The University of Texas System0
Toshiba Corporation0
NGK Insulators, Ltd.0
Robert Bosch GmbH0
ABREU MARCIO MARC0
SMITH ALLAN L0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to a mature, materials-heavy claim space with declining filing volume — the practical next step is checking specific claim language against the sub-areas that remain thinner.

Map claims against the under-claimed branches

Run the specific sub-areas identified above — poisoning-resistant coatings, SiC high-temperature sensing, organic-semiconductor durability — against your own technical roadmap to see which are genuinely open versus merely low-volume.

Explore with Patsnap Eureka

Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited filings

The most-cited records in this corpus are older, foundational filings with outsized citation counts. Confirm whether any core claims from those filings still cover the specific durability mechanism you plan to file around.

Run a claim comparison in Patsnap Eureka

Verify assignee momentum before assuming exit

Zero latest-year filings across the named leading assignees may reflect the overall market decline rather than withdrawal. Pull each assignee's full filing history to distinguish a paused portfolio from an abandoned one.

Track assignee activity in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on gas sensor durability patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gas Sensor Environmental Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gas sensor environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.