Book a demo

Gas Sensor Packaging Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Gas Sensor Packaging Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gas-sensor-packaging-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Sensors & MEMS · Patent Landscape
Gas Sensor Packaging Patents: Filing Trends, Leaders and Open Claim Space
  • Filing has cooled since a 2020 peak of 17. the 2022 midpoint sits at 12 and the trend line is flat-to-declining, not a growth story.
  • One assignee anchors the field but isn't expanding. Honeywell shows the strongest co-assignee network yet filed just 1 family in the latest year, flat year-on-year.
  • A 20-year-old patent still dominates citations. US6140144A on microsensor packaging carries 430 citations, more than four times the next most-cited record.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
149
Published Records
34%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-7%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (14 records) with 2024 (13) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 149 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the gas sensor packaging patent set covers

Gas sensor packaging sits at the intersection of material analysis, MEMS fabrication and mechanical protection: how a sensing element is sealed, filtered and mounted so it survives field conditions without losing sensitivity. The dataset behind this page spans 149 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from filings that combine gas or chemiresistive sensor claims with packaging-specific language such as hermetic sealing or gas-permeable filter caps. G01N material analysis dominates the classification mix, but meaningful overlap with MEMS manufacturing (B81B/B81C) and printed circuit assembly (H05K) shows packaging claims are rarely filed in isolation from the sensing element itself.

Filing offices skew heavily toward the United States and China, with PCT and European filings a smaller but consistent share — a pattern consistent with a mature, globally distributed supply chain rather than a single regional cluster. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 tail in any trend chart understates real filing activity.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1ONE MILLION METRICS CORP15
  2. 2HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC15
  3. 3GENERAL ELECTRIC CO7
  4. 4ALTERED CARBON LTD7
  5. 5AGENCY FOR SCI TECH & RES6
  6. 6SHOUCHUAN LASER TECH (SHANGHAI) CO LTD5
  7. 7THE OHIO STATES UNIV5
  8. 8LUMILEDS SINGAPORE PTE LTD4
  9. 9APPLE INC4
  10. 10HARCOSEMCO LLC3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Annual filing counts and IPC distribution for the 149 families in this dataset, drawn directly from the underlying search.

A peak in 2020, not a ramp

Filings rose from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 17 in 2020, then eased to 12 by the 2022 midpoint. That shape — rise, peak, plateau — points to a technology whose core packaging approaches were largely staked out by the early 2020s, with newer filings refining rather than opening territory.

A peak in 2020, not a ramp0510152092017201820191720202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Packaging claims cluster around G01N, with MEMS and circuit overlap

G01N material analysis accounts for 95 of the classified records, by far the largest share. The next largest groups — A61B diagnostic applications, B81B/B81C MEMS structures and manufacture, and H05K circuit assembly — show that packaging innovation is usually claimed alongside a specific end application or fabrication method rather than as a standalone mechanical invention.

Packaging claims cluster around G01N, with MEMS and circuit overlapG01N · Material analysis & testing9563.8%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery1711.4%B81B · Microstructural devices (MEMS)106.7%B81C · MEMS manufacturing85.4%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…85.4%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies74.7%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…64.0%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks64.0%Other10268.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 149 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gas Sensor Packaging with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gas sensor packaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records shaping this landscape

Representative filing
US20080206107A12008-08-28

US20080206107A1 — Gas sensor apparatus for automotive exhaust gas applications

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

A gas sensor apparatus and method of forming the same generally includes a gas sensor element comprising a heater and a plurality of electrodes. A ceramic substrate can be provided for supporting the electrodes on one side of the ceramic substrate and the heater on the opposite side of the ceramic substrate. The gas sensor element is preferably embedded in the ceramic substrate. The ceramic substrate also possesses a substantially circular shape in order to prevent a breakage of the gas sensor element, avoid thermal loss, and permit the gas sensor apparatus to withstand mechanical shock and high vibrations while occupying a minimal package space.Filed by Honeywell International Inc., published 2008-08-28 — the circular embedded-substrate geometry recurs across later filings in this set.

US20080206107A1 — patent drawing 1US20080206107A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the gas sensor packaging set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6140144AMethod for packaging microsensors430
2WO2001026708A1Reactive polymeric valve, dispensing devices and methods using same135
3WO1998005935A1Method for packaging microsensors94
4EP0351516A2Precalibrated, disposable, electrochemical sensors94
5US20170245806A1System and method for monitoring safety and productivity of physical tasks89
6US20190343429A1System and method for monitoring safety and productivity of physical tasks66
7US20040112764A1Sensor device for detection of dissolved hydrocarbon gases in oil filled high-voltage electrical equipment59
8US20080016946A1Gas sensor packaging for elevated temperature and harsh environment and related methods30
9US5492612ALean shift correction of potentiometric oxygen sensors30
10US20080229831A1Design and deposition of sensing layers for surface acoustic wave chemical sensors based on supra-molecular c…27

Citation counts are measured within this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once family counts, citation weight and office distribution are read together.

Filing momentum
17 → 12
peak (2020) vs. 2022 midpoint

The growth phase has passed

Filings peaked in 2020 and have since eased toward the 2022 midpoint of 12. Combined with a 2026 count of just 2 (a partial, lagging year), the trajectory reads as flat-to-declining rather than an emerging area still attracting new entrants.

Read alongside the 18-month publication lag before treating any single recent year as a real drop.
Citation concentration
430 citations
US6140144A vs. next-best 135

One foundational packaging patent still anchors the field

US6140144A, "Method for packaging microsensors," carries more than three times the citations of any other record in the set, with WO1998005935A1 — a related microsensor packaging method — also appearing high in the ranking. New filers are building claims in the shadow of packaging methods staked out decades ago.

High citation counts inside a searched corpus reward age; use them to trace lineage, not to judge current relevance.
Assignee network
9 co-assignee pairs
strongest pairs all involve Honeywell

Collaboration is thin and concentrated around one firm

Only 9 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the three strongest all pair Honeywell with individual named inventors rather than with other corporate assignees. That suggests packaging IP here is built largely in-house rather than through joint filings.

A thin collaboration graph often means licensing-in is more realistic than co-development.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gas sensor packaging, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the packaging claims, and where they are not filing

Honeywell's network is the densest in the dataset, but recent-year momentum across every tracked assignee is flat or zero — a sign the leading names are defending existing positions rather than expanding them.

Incumbent
1 filing
latest year, 0% YoY

Honeywell International

Honeywell anchors both the citation table (via its historic microsensor packaging patents) and the co-assignee network, pairing repeatedly with the same named inventors. Its latest-year filing count of 1 and flat year-on-year change suggest a mature, maintained portfolio rather than active expansion.

Strongest co-assignee pairs in the dataset all involve Honeywell.
Industrial incumbent
0 in latest year
General Electric

General Electric

General Electric appears among the ranked assignees but shows no filings in the most recent tracked year, consistent with a portfolio built earlier in the window rather than one still being actively added to.

Watch for reactivation tied to new sensing applications rather than packaging alone.
Research institution
0 in latest year
Ohio State University

Ohio State University

Academic assignees such as Ohio State University appear in the ranking but without recent-year activity, typical of research-driven filings that cluster around specific funded projects rather than sustained commercial programmes.

Institutional filings are worth checking for licensing availability rather than competitive threat.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show thinner overlap with the dominant G01N cluster and warrant a freedom-to-operate check before assuming open space.
Gas-permeable filter cap materialsHermetic seal degradation testingMEMS-integrated heater substratesCoating-based selectivity layersWafer-level sensor packaging
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Honeywell International Inc.10%
ONE MILLION METRICS CORP0
General Electric Company0
Ohio State University0
Lumileds0
ALTERED CARBON LTD0
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)0
Shouchuan Laser Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing and citation data point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or new claim drafting.

Check freedom-to-operate against Honeywell's core claims

Given the concentration of citations and co-assignee activity around Honeywell's microsensor packaging methods, any new hermetic or embedded-substrate design should be checked against that lineage before drafting.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Map the under-claimed packaging branches in detail

Filter cap materials, seal degradation testing and wafer-level packaging show thinner filing density than the core G01N cluster — worth a deeper claim-chart pass before assuming the space is open.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track dormant assignees for licensing opportunities

Several ranked assignees, including General Electric and Ohio State University, show no recent-year filings — a pattern worth revisiting if licensing-in is more attractive than building around active claims.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about gas sensor packaging patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gas Sensor Packaging in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gas sensor packaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.