https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gas-sensor-reliability-and-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Sensors & MEMS · Patent Landscape
Gas Sensor Reliability and Durability Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Slowing
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown. Volume peaked at 109 families in 2025 after sitting near 92 at the 2022 midpoint — this is a mature filing pattern, not an emerging one.
  • G01N dominates the claim space. 1,211 of 1,611 records sit in material analysis and testing (G01N), leaving adjacent subclasses like B01D and B01J comparatively thin.
  • Momentum has thinned to single-digit filers. The most active assignees in the latest year each show just one filing, signalling a long tail rather than a concentrated race.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,611
Published Records
12%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+2%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (63 records) with 2024 (64) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,611 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families that combine gas sensor, gas detection sensor or chemiresistive gas sensor language with claims around long-term stability, baseline drift suppression or poisoning resistance — the durability problems that separate a lab sensor from a field-deployable one. It spans 1,611 published families filed between 2015 and mid-2026.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2026 figure in any trend line understates actual filing activity for that year. Family counts, not raw document counts, are used throughout so that multi-jurisdiction filing strategy does not distort the picture of who is actually active.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1SENSIRION AG46
  2. 2DRAGER SAFETY AG & CO KAAA45
  3. 3NGK INSULATORS LTD39
  4. 4NITERRA CO LTD37
  5. 5ROBERT BOSCH GMBH33
  6. 6DRAGERWERK AG32
  7. 7HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC31
  8. 8RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA26
  9. 9GENERAL ELECTRIC CO24
  10. 10INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG24
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,611 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which technical subclasses carry the claim density.

A plateau after a 2025 peak

Filings rose from 44 in 2017 to a peak of 109 in 2025, but the path was not steady growth — the 2022 midpoint of 92 sat close to the eventual peak, meaning the last several years have been flat-to-declining rather than accelerating. The partial 2026 count of 20 is an artefact of publication lag, not a real drop-off.

A plateau after a 2025 peak030609012044201720182019202020212022202320241092025202026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

G01N carries the field

Material analysis and testing (G01N) accounts for 1,211 of 1,611 records — nearly three-quarters of the dataset. Semiconductor devices (H01L, 90), nanotechnology applications (B82Y, 82), batteries and cells (H01M, 79), other metal compounds (C01G, 74), diagnosis and surgery (A61B, 61), separation processes (B01D, 54) and catalysis (B01J, 50) each hold a small fraction, suggesting durability innovation is still framed primarily as a sensing-element problem rather than a systems or materials-supply one.

G01N carries the fieldG01N · Material analysis & testing1,21175.2%H01L · Semiconductor devices905.6%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications825.1%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells794.9%C01G · Compounds of other metals744.6%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery613.8%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…543.4%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …503.1%Other99061.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,611 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gas Sensor Reliability and Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gas sensor reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative filing
US20090101502A12009-04-23

US20090101502A1 — Thermal Shock Resistant Gas Sensor Element

ROBERT BOSCH LLC

A thermal shock resistant sensor element built around a gamma alumina (or alumina) coating applied to the sensor element, made by plasma spraying the coating onto the element. The filing claims thermal shock resistance at temperatures above roughly 500-600 degrees Celsius, targeting the mechanical failure mode that shortens sensor life in hot exhaust and industrial gas streams.Filed by Robert Bosch LLC, published 2009-04-23.

US20090101502A1 — patent drawing 1US20090101502A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5957854AWireless medical diagnosis and monitoring equipment1,612
2US5862803AWireless medical diagnosis and monitoring equipment1,111
3US7215991B2Wireless medical diagnosis and monitoring equipment660
4US6577893B1Wireless medical diagnosis and monitoring equipment608
5US6289238B1Wireless medical diagnosis and monitoring equipment590
6US20040135684A1Non-specific sensor array detectors585
7US20180011052A1Silicon carbide based field effect gas sensor for high temperature applications391
8US6773565B2NOx sensor308
9US5716506AElectrochemical sensors for gas detection308
10US7034677B2Non-specific sensor array detectors282

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the state of the field

Three patterns stand out once filing volume, technology mix and receiving offices are read together.

Filing momentum
109 in 2025
peak year

Growth has already happened

Filings climbed from 44 in 2017 to a 2025 peak of 109, but the 2022 midpoint of 92 shows most of that climb was done years ago. A new entrant today is filing into a plateaued space, not a rising one.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology concentration
1,211 of 1,611
records in G01N

Durability claims cluster in one subclass

Material analysis and testing (G01N) holds nearly three-quarters of all records. The remaining subclasses — semiconductor devices, nanotechnology, batteries, catalysis — each carry a small slice, which is where less-contested claim language is likely to sit.

IPC composition
Geographic filing
594 US filings
leading office

US and Europe lead, China and India rising

The United States (594) and EPO (242) remain the largest receiving offices, but China (146), WIPO/PCT (124) and India (113) show this is not a US-only conversation — durability claims are being filed for multiple regional markets in parallel.

Receiving offices
Assignee activity
1 filing
top latest-year count

No single assignee is pulling ahead

In the most recent year, the most active named assignees — including General Electric, Bosch and Honeywell — each show just one filing. That is a long tail of maintenance-level activity, not a concentrated race for position.

Recent-year momentum
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gas sensor reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has gone quiet

Robert Bosch, Honeywell, General Electric, Sensirion, NGK Insulators and Draeger Safety all appear in the historical ranking, but recent-year momentum has thinned across the board — most now show zero or one filing in the latest year rather than sustained runs.

Incumbents
1 in latest year
Bosch, GE, Honeywell

Established filers are maintaining, not expanding

Robert Bosch, General Electric and Honeywell each recorded a single filing in the most recent year, with Honeywell flat at 0% year-over-year. This looks like portfolio maintenance around existing coatings and drift-correction claims rather than a push into new territory.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Gone quiet
0 in latest year
Sensirion, NGK, Draeger

Several historical leaders show no recent activity

Sensirion, NGK Insulators and Draeger Safety each show zero filings in the latest year despite appearing in the broader ranking, which may reflect either a shift to trade secret protection or a genuine pause in new durability claims from these firms.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
across the dataset

Co-filing is rare and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across 1,611 families, and the strongest link — Robert Bosch with its own German and Japanese corporate entities — is largely internal rather than a cross-company partnership.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Subclasses with low record counts relative to G01N's density, where claim language is less crowded.
Catalyst poisoning-resistant coatings (B01J)Membrane-based selective filtration (B01D)Nanomaterial drift-stable sensing layers (B82Y)Battery-integrated gas sensing (H01M)Semiconductor-substrate thermal shock design (H01L)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
General Electric Company1
Robert Bosch GmbH (Germany)1
Honeywell International Inc.10%
Sensirion AG0
NGK Insulators, Ltd.0
Draeger Safety AG & Co. KGaA0
NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd.0
Draegerwerk AG & Co. KGaA0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, plateaued filing space with concentration in one IPC subclass and thin recent-year activity even among named leaders.

Map claim boundaries in G01N before filing

With nearly three-quarters of records in a single subclass, a freedom-to-operate review of specific G01N claim language is more useful here than a broad novelty search.

Explore G01N claims in Eureka

Track the quiet incumbents

Sensirion, NGK Insulators and Draeger Safety show no recent filings — worth confirming whether that reflects trade secret strategy or a genuine pause before assuming the space is open.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

B01D, B01J and H01M each carry a fraction of G01N's volume; a first claim drafted around catalyst poisoning resistance or battery-integrated sensing may face less prior art.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on gas sensor reliability patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gas Sensor Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gas sensor reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.