Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (342 records) with 2024 (374) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 9,152 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Gas sensor and detection patenting spans electrochemical cells, metal-oxide semiconductor sensors, and optical detection, unified in this dataset by claims that reference selectivity, cross-sensitivity, drift compensation, response time or power consumption — the practical performance parameters that separate a lab sensor from a deployable one. The corpus of 9,152 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 is overwhelmingly classified under G01N, material analysis and testing, with secondary activity in nanotechnology (B82Y), semiconductor devices (H01L) and signalling systems (G08B) where sensors feed alarms.
Filing volume peaked in 2019 and has trended down since, which combined with heavy US, China and EPO filing suggests a field where core sensing mechanisms are well staked out and competitive activity has shifted toward integration, calibration and application-specific tuning rather than new detection chemistries.
Publication counts by year and by IPC subclass, drawn directly from the underlying patent families. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year understates true filing activity.
Annual publications rose to 481 in 2019, held near that level through the early 2020s (369 in 2022), and have fallen toward 86 in the most recent partial year — consistent with a field where core claim territory is largely occupied.
G01N accounts for 9,140 of 9,152 records; every other subclass, including nanotechnology (B82Y, 358) and semiconductor devices (H01L, 253), appears mainly as a secondary classification layered onto a G01N-classified sensor claim.
Shares are the percentage of the 9,152 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gas sensors and detection technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA method for fabricating an ultra-sensitive metal oxide gas sensor is disclosed, which comprises spinning a mixture solution including a metal oxide precursor and a polymer onto a sensor electrode to form a composite fiber, thermally compressing or pressurizing that fiber, and thermally treating it to remove the polymer. The resulting sensor includes a macro pore between nanofibers and a meso pore between nano-rods and nano-grains, which maximizes gas diffusion and surface area for high sensitivity and stability.Filed by Korea Institute of Science and Technology, published 2007-11-15 as US20070261959A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5217595A | Electrochemical gas sensor | 435 |
| 2 | US20180011052A1 | Silicon carbide based field effect gas sensor for high temperature applications | 391 |
| 3 | US6773565B2 | NOx sensor | 308 |
| 4 | US5716506A | Electrochemical sensors for gas detection | 308 |
| 5 | US6370941B2 | Gas sensor and gas sensor system | 304 |
| 6 | US20020026937A1 | Respiratory gas sensors in folw path | 279 |
| 7 | US9360449B2 | Functional monitoring of an electrolytic gas sensor having three electrodes, and hazard alarm and gas measuri… | 246 |
| 8 | US6899684B2 | Method of respiratory gas analysis using a metabolic calorimeter | 244 |
| 9 | US5302274A | Electrochemical gas sensor cells using three dimensional sensing electrodes | 239 |
| 10 | US6469303B1 | Non-dispersive infrared gas sensor | 226 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records; treat this table as a map of foundational influence, not of current filing activity.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three signals stand out once volume, geography and citation age are read together.
Annual publications climbed to 481 in 2019 and have declined steadily since, sitting at 369 by 2022 and falling further toward the most recent year. Declining filing volume alongside a large existing patent base points to occupied claim space rather than a shrinking market — sensors are shipping, but the core mechanisms are patented.
The United States leads with 2,542 records, ahead of China at 1,863, EPO at 1,280 and Japan at 1,138. A relatively even spread across four major offices, plus 601 PCT filings, indicates that leading assignees are pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than concentrating on a single home market.
The most-cited record in the corpus, an electrochemical gas sensor patent cited 435 times, predates the metal-oxide semiconductor sensing approaches that dominate recent filings. High citation counts here mark historical influence on the field's vocabulary and structure, not current commercial relevance.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gas sensors and detection technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum figures show several long-standing sensor specialists filing at or near zero in the latest year, a pattern more consistent with a mature, licensing-driven field than one still being actively claimed.
Honeywell International recorded only 2 filings in the latest year, down 33% year-on-year. Several other established names in the ranking, including NGK Insulators, Figaro Engineering and Denso, show zero filings in the same period, suggesting the largest holders are managing existing portfolios rather than expanding claim coverage.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, and the strongest — Osaka Gas with Toshiba, at 21 joint filings — points to sensor development still being run largely inside single organisations, with occasional supplier-manufacturer pairings such as Denso with its automotive parts research affiliate.
Across 9,152 patent families, the assignee ranking is dominated by a handful of gas-sensor and automotive-electronics specialists, with momentum data showing many of them now filing at low or zero volume — a classic signature of an established field where new entrants face dense prior art rather than open ground.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Honeywell International Inc. | 2 | -33% |
| NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| NGK Insulators, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Figaro Engineering Inc. | 0 | — |
| Denso Corporation | 0 | — |
| Shinkosumos Electric Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| MSA Technology, LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Panasonic Corporation (Japan) | 0 | — |
The trends above describe the field; deciding where to file, or whether a specific claim is blocked, requires drilling into the underlying families.
The most-cited records, especially the electrochemical and silicon-carbide sensor patents, define the claim boundaries most new filings have to route around.
Explore prior art in EurekaDrift compensation and MEMS-integrated arrays show thin coverage relative to their IPC presence; confirm that with a full claim-scope search before committing R&D budget.
Run a white space search in EurekaSeveral top-ranked assignees are filing at zero in the latest year; current competitive risk may come from a different, faster-moving player than the all-time ranking suggests.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaThe assignee ranking in this corpus of 9,152 patent families is led by a mix of dedicated sensor manufacturers and automotive suppliers, including Japanese industrial names such as Denso and its automotive parts research affiliate, alongside global players like Honeywell International. However, several of the largest historical filers show zero or sharply declining filings in the most recent year, so the all-time leader is not necessarily the most active filer today. Anyone assessing competitive risk should weight recent-year momentum alongside total portfolio size.
Annual publications rose to a peak of 481 in 2019 and have fallen steadily since, down to 369 by 2022 and toward 86 in the most recent partial year. This pattern is consistent with a technology area where the core sensing mechanisms — electrochemical cells, metal-oxide semiconductors, optical detection — are already well covered by existing patents, shifting new activity toward incremental calibration, integration and application-specific claims. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year's figure is understated and the true decline is likely less steep.
In this dataset, the most-cited foundational patents, including one cited 435 times, describe electrochemical gas sensing, an older approach still widely referenced in current claims. Metal-oxide sensors, which rely on resistance changes in a semiconducting oxide film exposed to a target gas, appear heavily in more recent filings and in the representative record on ultra-sensitive metal-oxide fabrication using nanofiber composites. Electrochemical sensors tend to dominate citation counts because of their age and foundational role, while metal-oxide approaches dominate more recent filing activity.
The United States leads with 2,542 filings, followed by China at 1,863, the European Patent Office at 1,280, and Japan at 1,138; the WIPO PCT route adds 601 international filings and the United Kingdom a further 335. This spread across four major offices plus a substantial PCT count indicates that leading assignees are pursuing broad multi-jurisdiction protection rather than concentrating filings in a single home market, which is typical for a field tied to global automotive, industrial-safety and consumer-electronics supply chains.
Sub-areas that appear in the IPC composition without matching depth in the core assignee ranking include drift self-compensation algorithms, MEMS-integrated metal-oxide sensor arrays, gas sensing coupled to fuel cells (the H01M overlap, at 171 records against 9,140 in the core G01N class), high-temperature silicon-carbide field-effect sensors, and wearable or diagnostic gas sensing that overlaps A61B. These branches show real filing activity but far less concentration than the core electrochemical and metal-oxide sensing claims, making them more promising starting points for new filings than the heavily cited core.
Go past this page: query the whole gas sensors and detection technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.