https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gas-sensors-and-detection-technology-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Sensors & Instrumentation
Gas Sensor and Detection Patents: Who Is Filing, and Where the Claim Space Is Still Open
  • Filings have cooled since a 2019 peak of 481, with 2022 sitting at 369 and the count still declining toward the most recent full year — a maturing rather than an emerging field.
  • Nearly all activity sits in a single IPC home base, G01N with 9,140 of 9,152 records, while adjacent classes like G08B alarm systems (260) and H01M fuel cells (171) carry a fraction of the volume.
  • The most-cited prior art is decades old, led by an electrochemical gas sensor patent cited 435 times — a sign of foundational influence, not of where current filers are active.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
9,152
Published Records
9%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+9%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (342 records) with 2024 (374) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 9,152 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A mature detection field consolidating around metal-oxide and electrochemical sensing

Gas sensor and detection patenting spans electrochemical cells, metal-oxide semiconductor sensors, and optical detection, unified in this dataset by claims that reference selectivity, cross-sensitivity, drift compensation, response time or power consumption — the practical performance parameters that separate a lab sensor from a deployable one. The corpus of 9,152 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 is overwhelmingly classified under G01N, material analysis and testing, with secondary activity in nanotechnology (B82Y), semiconductor devices (H01L) and signalling systems (G08B) where sensors feed alarms.

Filing volume peaked in 2019 and has trended down since, which combined with heavy US, China and EPO filing suggests a field where core sensing mechanisms are well staked out and competitive activity has shifted toward integration, calibration and application-specific tuning rather than new detection chemistries.

Filing activity by year and IPC subclass
  1. 1NITERRA CO LTD207
  2. 2NGK INSULATORS LTD159
  3. 3MSA TECHNOLOGY LLC158
  4. 4HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC145
  5. 5DRAGER SAFETY AG & CO KAAA142
  6. 6FIGARO ENG INC135
  7. 7DENSO CORP134
  8. 8NEW COSMOS ELECTRIC CO LTD128
  9. 9PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP121
  10. 10FUJI ELECTRIC CO LTD115
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensors and Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Publication counts by year and by IPC subclass, drawn directly from the underlying patent families. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year understates true filing activity.

Filings have declined from a 2019 peak

Annual publications rose to 481 in 2019, held near that level through the early 2020s (369 in 2022), and have fallen toward 86 in the most recent partial year — consistent with a field where core claim territory is largely occupied.

Filings have declined from a 2019 peak0125250375500473201720184812019202020212022202320242025862026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Activity concentrates in one IPC home base

G01N accounts for 9,140 of 9,152 records; every other subclass, including nanotechnology (B82Y, 358) and semiconductor devices (H01L, 253), appears mainly as a secondary classification layered onto a G01N-classified sensor claim.

Activity concentrates in one IPC home baseG01N · Material analysis & testing9,14099.9%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications3583.9%C01G · Compounds of other metals3053.3%G08B · Signalling & alarm systems2602.8%H01L · Semiconductor devices2532.8%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery1721.9%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells1711.9%G01J · Radiation & light measurement1301.4%Other2,98332.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 9,152 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensors and Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gas Sensors and Detection Technology with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gas sensors and detection technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

The patents current filers have to design around

Representative Filing
US20070261959A12007-11-15

Ultra-sensitive metal oxide gas sensor and fabrication method thereof

KOREA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

A method for fabricating an ultra-sensitive metal oxide gas sensor is disclosed, which comprises spinning a mixture solution including a metal oxide precursor and a polymer onto a sensor electrode to form a composite fiber, thermally compressing or pressurizing that fiber, and thermally treating it to remove the polymer. The resulting sensor includes a macro pore between nanofibers and a meso pore between nano-rods and nano-grains, which maximizes gas diffusion and surface area for high sensitivity and stability.Filed by Korea Institute of Science and Technology, published 2007-11-15 as US20070261959A1.

US20070261959A1 — patent drawing 1US20070261959A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5217595AElectrochemical gas sensor435
2US20180011052A1Silicon carbide based field effect gas sensor for high temperature applications391
3US6773565B2NOx sensor308
4US5716506AElectrochemical sensors for gas detection308
5US6370941B2Gas sensor and gas sensor system304
6US20020026937A1Respiratory gas sensors in folw path279
7US9360449B2Functional monitoring of an electrolytic gas sensor having three electrodes, and hazard alarm and gas measuri…246
8US6899684B2Method of respiratory gas analysis using a metabolic calorimeter244
9US5302274AElectrochemical gas sensor cells using three dimensional sensing electrodes239
10US6469303B1Non-dispersive infrared gas sensor226

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records; treat this table as a map of foundational influence, not of current filing activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensors and Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the filing pattern tells a decision-maker

Three signals stand out once volume, geography and citation age are read together.

Filing Trend
481 → 86
peak (2019) to latest partial year

A field past its filing peak

Annual publications climbed to 481 in 2019 and have declined steadily since, sitting at 369 by 2022 and falling further toward the most recent year. Declining filing volume alongside a large existing patent base points to occupied claim space rather than a shrinking market — sensors are shipping, but the core mechanisms are patented.

Read against the 18-month publication lag, the true 2025-2026 slope is likely less steep than the raw numbers show.
Geographic Filing
US 2,542 · CN 1,863
top two receiving offices

US and China dominate, Europe and Japan close behind

The United States leads with 2,542 records, ahead of China at 1,863, EPO at 1,280 and Japan at 1,138. A relatively even spread across four major offices, plus 601 PCT filings, indicates that leading assignees are pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than concentrating on a single home market.

The UK, at 335, trails the other five offices but still represents meaningful coverage for a national-only jurisdiction.
Citation Concentration
435 citations
top-cited record

Foundational patents are electrochemical, not metal-oxide

The most-cited record in the corpus, an electrochemical gas sensor patent cited 435 times, predates the metal-oxide semiconductor sensing approaches that dominate recent filings. High citation counts here mark historical influence on the field's vocabulary and structure, not current commercial relevance.

A silicon-carbide field-effect gas sensor for high-temperature use is the most-cited recent-technology entry, cited 391 times.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gas sensors and detection technology, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensors and Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Landscape

Assignee concentration and where activity is thinning

Recent-year momentum figures show several long-standing sensor specialists filing at or near zero in the latest year, a pattern more consistent with a mature, licensing-driven field than one still being actively claimed.

Momentum
-33% YoY
Honeywell International, latest year

Even active filers are pulling back

Honeywell International recorded only 2 filings in the latest year, down 33% year-on-year. Several other established names in the ranking, including NGK Insulators, Figaro Engineering and Denso, show zero filings in the same period, suggesting the largest holders are managing existing portfolios rather than expanding claim coverage.

Zero-filing years for established assignees can also reflect the publication lag rather than a real stop in R&D.
Collaboration
21 co-filings
strongest assignee pair

A small set of co-assignee partnerships anchors joint work

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, and the strongest — Osaka Gas with Toshiba, at 21 joint filings — points to sensor development still being run largely inside single organisations, with occasional supplier-manufacturer pairings such as Denso with its automotive parts research affiliate.

The concentration of joint filings among a handful of Japanese industrial names suggests collaboration is the exception, not the norm, in this field.
Concentration
9,152 families
total ranked assignee base

A long tail beneath a small set of repeat filers

Across 9,152 patent families, the assignee ranking is dominated by a handful of gas-sensor and automotive-electronics specialists, with momentum data showing many of them now filing at low or zero volume — a classic signature of an established field where new entrants face dense prior art rather than open ground.

Automotive-adjacent names (Denso, Mazda, Toyota, Suzuki) appear alongside dedicated sensor makers, reflecting gas sensing's role as embedded automotive and safety infrastructure.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas that show up in the IPC composition without matching filing depth in the core assignee ranking.
Drift self-compensation algorithmsMEMS-integrated metal-oxide arraysFuel-cell-coupled gas sensing (H01M overlap)High-temperature SiC field-effect sensorsWearable/diagnostic gas sensing (A61B overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Honeywell International Inc.2-33%
NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd.0-100%
NGK Insulators, Ltd.0
Figaro Engineering Inc.0
Denso Corporation0
Shinkosumos Electric Co., Ltd.0
MSA Technology, LLC0-100%
Panasonic Corporation (Japan)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensors and Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Turning this landscape into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision

The trends above describe the field; deciding where to file, or whether a specific claim is blocked, requires drilling into the underlying families.

Check freedom-to-operate against the citation leaders

The most-cited records, especially the electrochemical and silicon-carbide sensor patents, define the claim boundaries most new filings have to route around.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Map the white space chips to live claim sets

Drift compensation and MEMS-integrated arrays show thin coverage relative to their IPC presence; confirm that with a full claim-scope search before committing R&D budget.

Run a white space search in Eureka

Track momentum, not just historical volume

Several top-ranked assignees are filing at zero in the latest year; current competitive risk may come from a different, faster-moving player than the all-time ranking suggests.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensors and Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about gas sensor patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Sensors and Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gas Sensors and Detection Technology in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gas sensors and detection technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.