https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gas-separation-membranes-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Filtration & Separation
Gas separation membrane patents: who is filing, where claims cluster, and where the field is thinning out
  • Filing has cooled since its 2017 peak. 31 filings that year against 24 at the 2022 midpoint and just 2 in the most recent partial year — a maturing claim landscape rather than a growing one.
  • The US absorbs more filings than any other office. 125 records route through the USPTO, well ahead of China's 64, EPO's 43 and the PCT route's 40, showing where competitors expect enforcement to matter most.
  • Momentum has gone flat even among the most active filers. Several of the most cited and most collaborative assignees show zero filings in the latest year, including entities with multi-record co-filing histories.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
353
Published Records
33%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+33%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A claim landscape built around the permeability-selectivity tradeoff

Gas separation membrane patenting sits at the intersection of polymer chemistry and process engineering: claims cover the membrane material itself, the mixed matrix fillers used to push past the intrinsic permeability-selectivity tradeoff, and the module and process design needed to manage plasticization and long-term aging under real gas streams. The search set spans 2015 through the 2026 cut-off and draws on 353 patent families classified under B01D53, B01D71 and B01D69, with heavy overlap into polymer condensation chemistry (C08G) and inorganic sorbent material (C01B).

Filing activity peaked in 2017 and has trended down since, with the most recent year understated because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months. The composition of the corpus - a dominant separation-process IPC class layered with polymer and fuel-processing classes - points to a field where membrane material claims and downstream gas-processing claims are being filed together rather than as separate technology tracks.

Filing activity by year, 2015-2026
  1. 1LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE31
  2. 2SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO30
  3. 3FUJIFILM CORP29
  4. 4CENT GLASS CO LTD13
  5. 5BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST13
  6. 6VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC13
  7. 7DALIAN UNIV OF TECH10
  8. 8MG GENERON INC9
  9. 9YESTAR ADVANCED MATERIALS (HK) CO LTD8
  10. 10MITSUBISHI CHEM CORP8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Separation Membranes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 353-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak followed by a decline

Filings ran at 31 in 2017, held near a midpoint of 24 in 2022, and have fallen to 2 in the most recent partial year. Treat the tail end as an undercount rather than a real drop-off, since recent filings are still publishing.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak followed by a decline0102030403120172018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition: separation process claims dominate

Every record in the set touches B01D separation processes by design, but a large secondary cluster sits in C08G condensation polymers (79 records) and C01B inorganic compounds (40), with smaller but consistent activity in polymer compositions, fuel processing and polymer additives - evidence that membrane chemistry and gas-processing application claims are frequently bundled in the same filings.

IPC composition: separation process claims dominateB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…353100.0%C08G · Condensation polymers7922.4%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…4011.3%C08L · Polymer compositions329.1%C10L · Fuels & firelighters308.5%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions277.6%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds113.1%C08K · Use of additives in polymers113.1%Other7220.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 353 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Separation Membranes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gas Separation Membranes with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gas separation membranes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art and a representative recent filing

Representative Filing
US20210245112A12021-08-12

Mixed matrix membranes, and related gas separation membrane apparatuses, gaseous fluid treatment systems, and methods

BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLC

A mixed matrix membrane comprises a support structure. The support structure comprises a glassy polymer matrix, and nanodiamond particles dispersed within the glassy polymer matrix. A gas separation membrane apparatus, a gaseous fluid treatment system, and a method of forming a mixed matrix membrane are also described.Filed by Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC, published 2021-08-12 as US20210245112A1.

US20210245112A1 — patent drawing 1US20210245112A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6508860B1Gas separation membrane with organosilicon-treated molecular sieve226
2US5711882AGas separation membrane module and process88
3US20130098242A1Process for separation of gases80
4US8999038B2Process for separation of gases78
5US20120297976A1Gas separation membrane and method for producing the same, and gas separating method, module and separation a…63
6US20150258505A1Gas separation membrane, gas separation module, gas separation apparatus, and gas separation method49
7US5468283AHollow fiber membrane modules with transverse gas flow tailored for improved gas separation43
8US6592650B2Gas separation using organic-vapor-resistant membranes and PSA40
9US6153097AInternal staged permeator for fluid separation37
10US7604681B2Three-stage membrane gas separation process36

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older records; a high count signals influence on later filings, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Separation Membranes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where this field is headed

Three signals worth weighing before committing search or filing budget to this space.

Filing Momentum
31 → 2
2017 peak vs. most recent year

Volume has receded from its high point

The corpus peaked at 31 filings in 2017 and sat at 24 by the 2022 midpoint before tapering sharply. Some of the most recent decline is a publication-lag artefact, but the multi-year downward trend from the peak is real and predates the final undercounted years.

Filing trend, 2015-2026
Jurisdiction
125 US filings
vs. 64 China, 43 EPO, 40 PCT

The US is the primary enforcement venue

United States filings outnumber the next largest office, China, by roughly two to one, and outnumber the EPO and PCT routes combined. Companies planning freedom-to-operate work should treat US prosecution history as the first stop, not a secondary check.

Receiving office distribution
Citation Concentration
226 citations
top-cited record, US6508860B1

Influence concentrates in a small set of older patents

One organosilicon-treated molecular sieve membrane patent from the pre-2015 art carries 226 citations, more than double the next most-cited record. New entrants drafting around molecular sieve incorporation should expect this filing to sit upstream of much of the later mixed matrix membrane literature.

Most-cited records
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 13 shared filings

Co-filing is concentrated among a handful of academic pairs

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, and the strongest of them accounts for 13 shared filings between two university-affiliated entities. Corporate-academic tie-ups in this space are the exception rather than the norm.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gas separation membranes, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Separation Membranes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has gone quiet

Recent-year momentum tells a different story than cumulative filing counts: several historically active assignees, including ones with strong co-filing histories, show no filings in the latest year.

Academic Anchor
13 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair in the corpus

University pairs drive the densest collaboration

The strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset links two US university-affiliated entities across 13 shared filings, well ahead of the next pairs. This kind of tie-up typically reflects a sustained joint research programme rather than a one-off license arrangement.

Co-assignee pairs
Momentum Check
0 in latest year
across several top assignees

Even leading filers have gone quiet recently

Multiple assignees with meaningful filing histories, including large industrial and academic names, show zero filings in the most recent year. Dalian University of Technology is the exception with one filing, though down 50% year over year.

Recent-year momentum
Industrial Filers
5 filings
Saudi Aramco pair, combined

Energy majors file jointly rather than solo

Saudi Arabian Oil Company and its affiliated services entity appear as a co-filing pair rather than as independent single-assignee programmes, suggesting internal IP is centralised through a shared filing structure rather than split by business unit.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas sit adjacent to the dense core claim space but do not show the same filing density in this corpus.
Anti-plasticization crosslinking chemistriesThin-film composite module scale-upNanodiamond and carbon-filler mixed matrix loadingLong-term aging/conditioning protocolsHollow-fiber module packing density
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Dalian University of Technology1-50%
FUJIFILM Corporation0
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)0
L'Air Liquide, Societe Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procedes Georges Claude0
Board of Regents, The University of Texas System0
Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc.0
Central Glass Co., Ltd.0
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Separation Membranes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and ranking data point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or R&D scoping.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited art

The molecular sieve and module-design patents carrying the highest citation counts are the most likely upstream blockers for new mixed matrix membrane work. Run a claim chart against those before committing to a specific filler chemistry.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing from quiet assignees

Several previously active filers show zero activity in the latest year. A pause is not the same as an exit, and re-emergence often accompanies a licensing shift or a new co-filing partner.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Scope the under-claimed module and aging branches

Filing density sits heavily on membrane material composition; module-level engineering and long-term conditioning protocols show comparatively less claim coverage in this corpus.

Map white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Separation Membranes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about gas separation membrane patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Separation Membranes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gas Separation Membranes in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gas separation membranes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.