Book a demo

Gas Turbine Blade Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Gas Turbine Blade Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gas-turbine-blade-health-monitoring-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Aerospace & Propulsion · Patent Landscape
Gas turbine blade health monitoring patents: who leads and where the claim space is still open

A data-backed view of gas turbine blade health monitoring patents: filing trends since 2017, the concentration of filings among leading assignees, dominant IPC classes, and where claim space remains open.

103
Published Records
22%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+14%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (7 records) → 2024 (8); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 103 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Gas turbine blade health monitoring sits at the intersection of structural diagnostics and rotating machinery. The search scope combines terms for turbine, compressor and fan blade monitoring with IPC classes covering turbines (F01D) and material or structural testing (G01M, G01N), capturing methods for detecting cracks, strain and damage before a blade fails in service. The 103 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with publication lag meaning the most recent one to two years are still filling in.

The dataset mixes aero-engine, industrial gas turbine and wind turbine blade monitoring under one technical umbrella, since the underlying sensing and diagnostic methods overlap heavily across those machine types. Readers should treat family counts, not raw document counts, as the fairer measure of activity, and should read the 2025-2026 filing years as directional rather than final.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS6
  2. 2GENERAL ELECTRIC CO5
  3. 3SIEMENS ENERGY INC5
  4. 4INNER MONGOLIA UNIV OF TECH4
  5. 5RTX CORP3
  6. 6KOREA ADVANCED INST OF SCI & TECH3
  7. 7XIAN THERMAL POWER RES INST CO LTD3
  8. 8SOUTHEAST UNIV3
  9. 9UNITED TECH CORP3
  10. 10Anhui Zhongke Haoyin Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Blade Health Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data & Trends

Filing trends and technology composition

The chart data below tracks two things separately: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which technical branches (IPC subclasses) carry the claims. Because a single record can carry more than one IPC class, the composition shares add up to more than 100% of the 103 records in scope.

A field still building, not yet plateauing

Filings ran from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 14 in 2025, with 2021-to-2024 growth of 14% (7 to 8) marking the most recent period that can be read as complete. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as partial rather than a slowdown, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

A field still building, not yet plateauing048111562017201820192020202120222023202414202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Material testing outweighs turbine-specific claims

G01N (material analysis and testing) appears in 60.2% of the 103 records, and G01M (testing machinery and structural balance) in 35.9%, together outnumbering F01D (turbines proper) at 19.4%. That pattern says the inventive activity is concentrated in sensing and diagnostic method claims that could, in principle, transfer across blade types, rather than in turbine-specific mechanical claims.

Material testing outweighs turbine-specific claimsG01N · Material analysis & testing6260.2%G01M · Testing machine & structure ba…3735.9%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines2019.4%F03D · Wind motors (wind turbines)1918.4%G06N · Computing based on AI models1615.5%G06F · Electric digital data processi…109.7%G01H · Measuring vibrations & sound87.8%G01L · Force & pressure measurement76.8%Other6664.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 103 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Blade Health Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gas Turbine Blade Health Monitoring Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gas turbine blade health monitoring patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
LU601096B12025-10-14

Gas turbine blade damage detection and diagnosis method (LU601096B1)

HUANENG GUILIN GAS DISTRIBUTED ENERGY CO., LTD.

The filing covers a borescope-based imaging pipeline for gas turbine blades: acquiring images through set apertures, grading them into multi-level regions, and running those regions against a damage sample model built from historical data to generate damage information for the blade.Filed by Huaneng Guilin Gas Distributed Energy Co., Ltd., published 2025-10-14.

View full filing
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN102928472A一种用于风力发电机叶片裂纹的监测方法37
2US20130017086A1Visual inspection of turbine blades27
3US20150240788A1Method for detecting damage of wind turbine blade and wind turbine26
4CN107946759A一种基于微带天线式RFID标签的阵列应变传感器24
5US20180224353A1System and method for blade health monitoring22
6US20150168352A1Laser ultrasonic imaging system for a rotating object and method thereof21
7US6786635B2Turbine blade (bucket) health monitoring and prognosis using neural network based diagnostic techniques in co…18
8CN111398418A一种在役叶片损伤检测机器人15
9CN113298134A一种基于BPNN的风机叶片远程非接触健康监测系统和方法13
10US20040086024A1Turbine blade (bucket) health monitoring and prognosis using neural network based diagnostic techniques in co…12

Citation counts favour older records that have had more time to accumulate references; read them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Blade Health Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend, and the IPC composition are read together: no single assignee has locked up the space, the technical center of gravity sits in diagnostics rather than turbine mechanics, and China's receiving-office volume shapes where prior art actually concentrates.

Concentration
22.3%
share of records held by top 5 assignees

Leadership is thin, not entrenched

The leading assignee holds only 6 of the 103 records, and the top 5 combined hold 22.3% of all records in scope. That is a fragmented field rather than one guarded by a small set of dominant portfolios, which leaves room for a well-drafted claim to stand on its own merits rather than having to design around a blocking cluster.

Based on the ranked assignee list of 75 companies.
Filing geography
67 of 103
records filed via the Chinese receiving office

China is where the prior art lives

China accounts for 67 of the 103 records, against 12 for the United States and single-digit counts for Europe, South Korea, WIPO and Germany. A freedom-to-operate search that skips Chinese-language prior art in this field is searching a minority of the corpus.

Receiving office counts, all 103 records.
Technology mix
60.2% vs 19.4%
G01N share vs F01D share of records

Sensing and diagnostics carry the claims, not blade mechanics

G01N (material analysis and testing) touches 60.2% of records while F01D (turbines specifically) touches 19.4%. The imbalance suggests most inventive effort is going into how damage is sensed and classified, leaving mechanical blade-design claims comparatively less crowded.

IPC subclass shares, all 103 records; a record may carry multiple classes.
Filing pace
+14%
growth from 2021 (7) to 2024 (8)

Steady growth on the complete years

Filings grew 14% from 2021 to 2024, the most recent span that publication lag lets us call complete. 2025's count of 14 and the 2026 partial-year figure should be read as still-arriving data, not as evidence the field has peaked or reversed.

Filing-year counts, 2017-2026 cut-off.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gas turbine blade health monitoring patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Two documented co-filing pairs
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Xi'an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.Huaneng Tongchuan Zhaojin Coal-Electricity Co., Ltd.1
Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityDongfang Electric Group Dongfang Turbine Co., Ltd.1

The dataset surfaces only two co-assignee pairs, each appearing once, pointing to research-institute and operator collaborations (a thermal power research institute with a coal-fired power partner, and a university with a turbine manufacturer) rather than any broader alliance pattern.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Blade Health Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

A landscape snapshot tells you where claim density sits today. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going record by record on the branches that matter to your product.

Map your own claim against the IPC clusters

Pull the full claim text behind the G01N and G01M clusters rather than relying on subclass labels alone, since diagnostic method claims often extend beyond what the classification suggests.

Explore the IPC breakdown in Eureka

Track the fragmented leaderboard for shifts

With no assignee holding more than 6 records, watch for a new entrant consolidating filings quickly, which would be a much stronger signal than any single filing.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka

Verify citation leaders are still enforceable

The most-cited records in this corpus skew older; check current legal status before treating any of them as a blocking reference.

Check legal status in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Blade Health Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Blade Health Monitoring Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gas Turbine Blade Health Monitoring Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gas turbine blade health monitoring patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.