Gas Turbine Blade Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
A data-backed view of gas turbine blade health monitoring patents: filing trends since 2017, the concentration of filings among leading assignees, dominant IPC classes, and where claim space remains open.
Filing growth = 2021 (7 records) → 2024 (8); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 103 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Gas turbine blade health monitoring sits at the intersection of structural diagnostics and rotating machinery. The search scope combines terms for turbine, compressor and fan blade monitoring with IPC classes covering turbines (F01D) and material or structural testing (G01M, G01N), capturing methods for detecting cracks, strain and damage before a blade fails in service. The 103 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with publication lag meaning the most recent one to two years are still filling in.
The dataset mixes aero-engine, industrial gas turbine and wind turbine blade monitoring under one technical umbrella, since the underlying sensing and diagnostic methods overlap heavily across those machine types. Readers should treat family counts, not raw document counts, as the fairer measure of activity, and should read the 2025-2026 filing years as directional rather than final.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
The chart data below tracks two things separately: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which technical branches (IPC subclasses) carry the claims. Because a single record can carry more than one IPC class, the composition shares add up to more than 100% of the 103 records in scope.
A field still building, not yet plateauing
Filings ran from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 14 in 2025, with 2021-to-2024 growth of 14% (7 to 8) marking the most recent period that can be read as complete. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as partial rather than a slowdown, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
Material testing outweighs turbine-specific claims
G01N (material analysis and testing) appears in 60.2% of the 103 records, and G01M (testing machinery and structural balance) in 35.9%, together outnumbering F01D (turbines proper) at 19.4%. That pattern says the inventive activity is concentrated in sensing and diagnostic method claims that could, in principle, transfer across blade types, rather than in turbine-specific mechanical claims.
Shares are the percentage of the 103 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Gas Turbine Blade Health Monitoring Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gas turbine blade health monitoring patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records and a representative filing
Gas turbine blade damage detection and diagnosis method (LU601096B1)
The filing covers a borescope-based imaging pipeline for gas turbine blades: acquiring images through set apertures, grading them into multi-level regions, and running those regions against a damage sample model built from historical data to generate damage information for the blade.Filed by Huaneng Guilin Gas Distributed Energy Co., Ltd., published 2025-10-14.
View full filing| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN102928472A | 一种用于风力发电机叶片裂纹的监测方法 | 37 |
| 2 | US20130017086A1 | Visual inspection of turbine blades | 27 |
| 3 | US20150240788A1 | Method for detecting damage of wind turbine blade and wind turbine | 26 |
| 4 | CN107946759A | 一种基于微带天线式RFID标签的阵列应变传感器 | 24 |
| 5 | US20180224353A1 | System and method for blade health monitoring | 22 |
| 6 | US20150168352A1 | Laser ultrasonic imaging system for a rotating object and method thereof | 21 |
| 7 | US6786635B2 | Turbine blade (bucket) health monitoring and prognosis using neural network based diagnostic techniques in co… | 18 |
| 8 | CN111398418A | 一种在役叶片损伤检测机器人 | 15 |
| 9 | CN113298134A | 一种基于BPNN的风机叶片远程非接触健康监测系统和方法 | 13 |
| 10 | US20040086024A1 | Turbine blade (bucket) health monitoring and prognosis using neural network based diagnostic techniques in co… | 12 |
Citation counts favour older records that have had more time to accumulate references; read them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend, and the IPC composition are read together: no single assignee has locked up the space, the technical center of gravity sits in diagnostics rather than turbine mechanics, and China's receiving-office volume shapes where prior art actually concentrates.
Leadership is thin, not entrenched
The leading assignee holds only 6 of the 103 records, and the top 5 combined hold 22.3% of all records in scope. That is a fragmented field rather than one guarded by a small set of dominant portfolios, which leaves room for a well-drafted claim to stand on its own merits rather than having to design around a blocking cluster.
China is where the prior art lives
China accounts for 67 of the 103 records, against 12 for the United States and single-digit counts for Europe, South Korea, WIPO and Germany. A freedom-to-operate search that skips Chinese-language prior art in this field is searching a minority of the corpus.
Sensing and diagnostics carry the claims, not blade mechanics
G01N (material analysis and testing) touches 60.2% of records while F01D (turbines specifically) touches 19.4%. The imbalance suggests most inventive effort is going into how damage is sensed and classified, leaving mechanical blade-design claims comparatively less crowded.
Steady growth on the complete years
Filings grew 14% from 2021 to 2024, the most recent span that publication lag lets us call complete. 2025's count of 14 and the 2026 partial-year figure should be read as still-arriving data, not as evidence the field has peaked or reversed.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gas turbine blade health monitoring patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Xi'an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd. | Huaneng Tongchuan Zhaojin Coal-Electricity Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| Xi'an Jiaotong University | Dongfang Electric Group Dongfang Turbine Co., Ltd. | 1 |
The dataset surfaces only two co-assignee pairs, each appearing once, pointing to research-institute and operator collaborations (a thermal power research institute with a coal-fired power partner, and a university with a turbine manufacturer) rather than any broader alliance pattern.
Where to take this analysis
A landscape snapshot tells you where claim density sits today. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going record by record on the branches that matter to your product.
Map your own claim against the IPC clusters
Pull the full claim text behind the G01N and G01M clusters rather than relying on subclass labels alone, since diagnostic method claims often extend beyond what the classification suggests.
Explore the IPC breakdown in EurekaTrack the fragmented leaderboard for shifts
With no assignee holding more than 6 records, watch for a new entrant consolidating filings quickly, which would be a much stronger signal than any single filing.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaVerify citation leaders are still enforceable
The most-cited records in this corpus skew older; check current legal status before treating any of them as a blocking reference.
Check legal status in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
The ranked list covers 75 companies, and it is a fragmented field rather than one dominated by a handful of names. The single leading assignee holds only 6 of the 103 records in scope, and the top 5 assignees combined account for 22.3% of all records. That means a competitive intelligence search should look across a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants, not just the largest portfolios, since most of the activity sits outside the top ranks.
The search scope combines both because the underlying sensing and diagnostic methods overlap: strain sensors, crack detection algorithms and vibration analysis apply to blades regardless of whether they sit in an aero-engine, an industrial gas turbine or a wind turbine rotor. The IPC composition shows F03D (wind motors) present in 18.4% of records alongside F01D (turbines generally) at 19.4%, confirming both machine types are well represented. Readers focused narrowly on aviation or power-generation turbines should filter by IPC class and machine type in the underlying records rather than assume the whole corpus is aero-specific.
China is the receiving office for 67 of the 103 records in scope, well ahead of the United States at 12 and single-digit counts for Europe, South Korea, WIPO and Germany. This reflects both the volume of Chinese wind and thermal power operators filing domestically and the strong presence of Chinese research institutes and universities in the assignee list. Anyone running a freedom-to-operate check in this space needs to include Chinese-language prior art, since it represents the majority of the documented filings.
Filings grew 14% from 2021 (7 records) to 2024 (8 records), which is the most recent period that publication lag allows to be read as complete. The peak year on record so far is 2025 at 14 filings, but because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still arriving and should not be read as a slowdown or a peak. The honest read is steady growth through 2024, with the true trajectory of 2025-2026 not yet visible.
LU601096B1 describes a borescope-based imaging pipeline for gas turbine blades that grades captured images into multi-level regions and runs them through a damage sample model built from historical data to generate damage information. It is a specific method combining image acquisition, region grading and a trained damage-classification model, filed by Huaneng Guilin Gas Distributed Energy Co., Ltd. and published 2025-10-14. Whether it blocks a given design depends on whether that design also combines borescope imaging with region-based grading and a historical-data model in the same sequence; a system using different sensing modalities, such as strain gauges or acoustic emission instead of imaging, would sit outside its literal claim scope.
Research Gas Turbine Blade Health Monitoring Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole gas turbine blade health monitoring patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.