Book a demo

Gas Turbine Hot Section Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Gas Turbine Hot Section Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gas-turbine-hot-section-components-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Aerospace Propulsion
Gas Turbine Hot Section Components Patents: Who Holds the Cooling and Coating Claims
  • Filing has cooled since a 2017 peak of 10 families a year, with the 2022 midpoint back at that same level — the claim space around combustor liner cooling and coatings looks saturated rather than growing.
  • F23R combustion-chamber and F02C gas-turbine-plant codes cover the large majority of records, while alloy-composition filings under C22C sit at a fraction of that volume — a narrower, less crowded lane for new claims.
  • The most-cited prior art dates back to the 2000s, including combustor liner cooling and CMC-on-insulation composite structure patents that still anchor freedom-to-operate analysis today.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
212
Published Records
77%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Gas turbine hot section components sit at the intersection of thermal management, materials science and mechanical design: combustor liners, transition pieces, cooling hole geometries, thermal barrier coatings and the single crystal alloys that carry creep loads at combustion temperatures. This landscape draws on 212 patent families filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, indexed against IPC classes covering combustion chambers, gas turbine plants, turbines, metalworking, furnace linings, welding and alloys. Publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, so the most recent filing years understate real activity.

The dataset is built around claim language on thermal barrier coatings, creep life, oxidation resistance, single crystal alloys and cooling holes — the specific technical levers used to keep hot section metal below its melting point while running combustion gas past it at ever-higher inlet temperatures.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1GENERAL ELECTRIC CO128
  2. 2KK TOSHIBA11
  3. 3GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC9
  4. 4UNITED TECH CORP8
  5. 5RTX CORP7
  6. 6TOSHIBA ENERGY SYST & SOLUTIONS CORP7
  7. 7IHI CORP7
  8. 8GENERAL ELECTRIC TECH GMBH6
  9. 9PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP5
  10. 10HITACHI LTD4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Hot Section Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 212-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how that volume splits across the IPC subclasses that define the hot section claim space.

A flat-to-declining filing curve

Filings peaked at 10 families in 2017 and the 2022 midpoint sits at the same level of 10, with no sustained climb in between. That pattern reads as a mature, well-occupied claim space rather than an emerging one — new entrants are more likely to compete for narrow improvements than open ground.

A flat-to-declining filing curve035810102017201820192020202110202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Combustion and plant codes dominate

F23R (combustion chambers) and F02C (gas-turbine plants) appear in 185 and 175 of the 212 records respectively, meaning most filings touch both codes at once — liner and cooling-hole claims tied directly to the surrounding plant architecture. F01D (turbines), B23P (metalworking) and the coating-and-alloy codes (C23C, C22C) trail well behind, marking where claim density thins out.

Combustion and plant codes dominateF23R · Combustion chambers18587.3%F02C · Gas-turbine plants17582.5%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines5325.0%B23P · Metal working (general)2310.8%F23M · Furnace casings & linings167.5%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing157.1%F02K · Jet & reaction propulsion125.7%C22C · Alloys104.7%Other178.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 212 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Hot Section Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gas Turbine Hot Section Components with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gas turbine hot section components and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The prior art anchoring this space

Representative Filing
US20050050896A12005-03-10

Thick coated combustor liner

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

A combustor liner built from panels joined at a cooling nugget with a bridge and lip forming a slot outlet. Thermal barrier coating covers the inboard panel and lip surfaces at a nominal thickness, with the lip's distal end at the slot outlet positioned close to the coating aft of the slot — a geometry aimed at controlling coating thickness precisely where cooling air exits.Filed by General Electric Company, published 2005-03-10 as US20050050896A1.

US20050050896A1 — patent drawing 1US20050050896A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7010921B2Method and apparatus for cooling combustor liner and transition piece of a gas turbine230
2US6098397ACombustor for a low-emissions gas turbine engine160
3US20050076504A1Composite structure formed by CMC-on-insulation process128
4US7093359B2Composite structure formed by CMC-on-insulation process121
5US6513331B1Preferential multihole combustor liner97
6US6655149B2Preferential multihole combustor liner91
7US7493767B2Method and apparatus for cooling combustor liner and transition piece of a gas turbine75
8US6205789B1Multi-hole film cooled combuster liner75
9US6761031B2Double wall combustor liner segment with enhanced cooling74
10US5737922AConvectively cooled liner for a combustor64

Citation counts accumulate over time inside this corpus, so older combustor liner and coating patents lead the table — treat the ranking as a signal of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Hot Section Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing strategy

Read together, the trend line, the IPC split and the citation table point to a technology that has already been heavily claimed at the system level, with narrower room left in materials and process detail.

Filing Momentum
10 → 10
2017 peak vs. 2022 midpoint

Growth has stalled, not accelerated

The peak year for filings was 2017, and the 2022 midpoint returned to that same volume rather than exceeding it. Combined with the eighteen-month publication lag, this points to a claim space where the core architecture is settled and incremental refinement is the more realistic path for new filings.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology Concentration
185 / 212
records touching F23R combustion chambers

Combustion-chamber claims dominate the corpus

Nearly the entire dataset sits inside F23R and F02C, the codes covering combustion chambers and gas-turbine plants. Turbines (F01D), metalworking (B23P) and alloy composition (C22C) are present but far thinner, which is where a narrower, better-defined claim is more likely to clear prior art.

IPC subclass distribution
Citation Anchors
230 citations
on the leading combustor liner cooling patent

2000s-era cooling and CMC patents still set the baseline

The most-cited records in this corpus, including combustor liner cooling and CMC-on-insulation composite structure patents, were published in the 2000s. Any new filing on liner cooling geometry or ceramic matrix composite integration should expect examiners to cite this earlier art directly.

Most-cited records table
Filing Geography
81 US filings
vs. 55 at the EPO, 24 in Japan

US and European offices carry the bulk of activity

The United States leads receiving offices with 81 filings, followed by the EPO at 55 and Japan at 24, with Canada, Singapore and South Korea trailing. A freedom-to-operate check for hot section components should prioritise US and European searches first.

Receiving office counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gas turbine hot section components, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Hot Section Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees has flattened to zero across the board in the latest year, consistent with the overall filing slowdown rather than any single company pulling back. That makes the co-assignee record and the sub-areas still open to a first mover more informative than a simple leaderboard.

Collaboration Pattern
2 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Filing here is mostly solo, not joint

Only two co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, both centred on Toshiba entities filing jointly with Toshiba Energy Systems and Toshiba Engineering. Most other activity in this space is filed by a single assignee rather than through joint ventures or cross-licensed development programmes.

Co-assignee pairs
Recent Momentum
0 in latest year
across every tracked assignee

No assignee is currently accelerating

General Electric, United Technologies, Toshiba, IHI, Toshiba Energy Systems and Hitachi all show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the publication lag, this likely reflects reporting delay rather than a genuine stop, but it means recent competitive positioning cannot yet be read from this data.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Citation Legacy
5 records > 90 citations
each tied to combustor liner or CMC design

Legacy assignees still anchor the prior art

The most-cited patents in the corpus concentrate on combustor liner cooling and CMC-on-insulation composite structures, filed well before the 2015-2026 window opens. Any competitive analysis needs to trace forward from these anchor patents to see which later filings design around them versus build directly on them.

Most-cited records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to the core combustor liner and cooling-hole claims
Single crystal alloy creep-life claimsCooling hole geometry for CMC linersOxidation-resistant bond coat processesFurnace lining thermal barrier integrationBraze joint design for hot section repair
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
General Electric Company0
United Technologies Corporation0
Toshiba Corporation0
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (IHI)0
Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp.0
Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Hot Section Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature core and a thinner set of adjacent branches. The next steps depend on whether the goal is defensive clearance or an offensive filing position.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on liner cooling geometry

Given how heavily cited the earlier combustor liner cooling patents remain, any new cooling hole or panel design should be checked against that lineage before drafting claims.

Explore prior art with Eureka

Scope alloy and coating claims separately from plant-level claims

C22C alloy and C23C coating codes carry far fewer filings than the combustion-chamber codes, suggesting materials-level claims face a less crowded field than system-level architecture claims.

Map the white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Hot Section Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gas Turbine Hot Section Components covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gas Turbine Hot Section Components in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gas turbine hot section components corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.