Book a demo

Gate-All-Around Transistor Patent Landscape 2026

Gate-All-Around Transistor Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Gate-All-Around Transistor Patent Landscape in 2026

The gate-all-around (GAA) transistor patent field is heavily concentrated, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) alone accounting for a commanding share of 8,258 patent families in scope. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis—with recent three-year filings running 43% above the prior three-year window—though annual volume eased from its 2022 peak and the most recent years are further understated by publication lag.

8,258
Patent families in scope
78%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+43%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

TSMC dominates a highly concentrated field with a widening lead over all challengers

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) ranks first with 4,852 patent families, placing it far ahead of second-ranked IBM at 1,054 patent families. Samsung Electronics ranks third at 548 patent families, followed by Intel at 405 and Qualcomm at 211.

The top five filers account for 78% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, signaling extreme concentration. The gap between TSMC and the next tier is structural: TSMC’s count exceeds the next four ranked applicants combined.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC)4,852
2International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)1,054
3Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.548
4Intel Corporation405
5Qualcomm Incorporated211
6Unisantis Electronics Singapore Pte. Ltd.196
7Tokyo Electron Ltd.162
8Applied Materials, Inc.159
9Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC)98
10ASM IP Holding B.V.98
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11National Taiwan University94
12Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences81
13Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.71
14GlobalFoundries US Inc.66
15Changxin Memory Technologies, Inc.44
16Adeia Semiconductor Solutions LLC37
17IBM United Kingdom Ltd.33
18Tahoe Research Ltd.31
19KLA Corporation30
20Monolithic 3D Inc.30
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

TSMC’s scale implies that any organization seeking freedom-to-operate or a differentiated R&D position in GAA transistors must navigate an extensive and fast-growing portfolio. Challengers IBM and Samsung show accelerating recent momentum, suggesting the second tier is actively contesting ground rather than ceding it.

Filing counts for 2024 and especially 2025–2026 are understated due to standard patent publication lag of 18–24 months; the apparent slowdown in those years should not be read as reduced industry investment. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth remains positive despite a post-2022 easing in annual volume

Two views of the corpus—annual filing trend and technology branch composition—reveal both the pace of industry investment and the concentration of technical focus. Together they help identify where the field is maturing and where adjacent branches remain comparatively sparse.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings grew steadily from 311 families in 2017 to a peak of 1,630 in 2022, then eased to 1,498 in 2023. The apparent drops in 2024 and beyond reflect publication lag rather than a real decline in investment; the three-year recent window is 43% above the prior three-year window. Engineers should treat the post-2022 taper as an artifact of data timing, not a signal of market retreat.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,630 in 2022.31120174122018660201982620201,48920211,63020221,49820231,13220242872025132026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

The dominant branch is H01L (Semiconductor devices), which absorbs the vast majority of filings and reflects the core device-physics and fabrication focus of the field. Secondary branches—H10D (Semiconductor devices, general), H10B (Memory device manufacture), and B82Y (Nanotechnology applications)—show meaningful but substantially lower activity, indicating that memory integration and nanomaterial applications are active but not yet at the same intensity as core device work.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 8,887; H10D · Semiconductor devices (general) 1,312.H01L · Semiconductor dev…8,887H10D · Semiconductor dev…1,312H10B · Memory device man…856B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…376G11C · Static & digital …346H10N · Other electric so…160C23C · Coating & surface…102H10P99↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250212460A1Published 2025-06-26

Nanosheet gate-all-around transistor and method of…

Institute Of MICROELECTRONICS, Chinese Academy Of Sciences

The present disclosure relates to a nanosheet gate-all-around transistor and a method of manufacturing a nanosheet gate-all-around transistor. The nanosheet gate-all-around transistor includes: a substrate having a shallow trench isolation structure on a surface of the substrate; a nanosheet stacking portion provided above the substrate, where the nanosheet… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Nanosheet gate-all-around transistor and method of… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Self-aligned wrapped-around structure822
2Non-planar gate all-around device and method of fa…813
3Stacked silicon-germanium nanowire structure and m…542
4FinFET device having a channel defined in a diamon…540
5Hybrid CMOS Technology With Nanowire Devices and D…491
6Semiconductor nano-rod devices459
7Resistive memory with a plurality of resistive ran…332
8High density nanosheet diodes313

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, strong multi-year growth, active university collaboration, and US-centric filing geography shapes the risk and opportunity profile for any organization entering or expanding in this space.

Growth

Growth stage, past its 2022 annual peak but still expanding on a multi-year basis

The field is classified as Growth: recent three-year filings are 43% above the prior three-year window. Annual volume peaked in 2022 at 1,630 families and has since eased, though publication lag means 2024–2026 figures understate true activity. For R&D planners, this stage implies continued heavy investment by incumbents and narrowing white space in core device architecture, while process and integration sub-fields may still offer entry points.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Extreme top-tier concentration with an accelerating second tier

The top five filers hold 78% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, and TSMC alone commands 4,852 patent families—more than four times IBM’s 1,054. Despite this, Samsung (+116% recent trend), Intel (+91%), and Unisantis Electronics (+92%) are accelerating sharply, indicating the second tier is not static. New entrants face both a large prior-art thicket from TSMC and a rapidly expanding challenger cluster.

High concentration
Collaboration

TSMC–National Taiwan University leads a university-industry co-filing pattern

The most active co-filing pair is TSMC and National Taiwan University with 97 joint families, followed by Unisantis Electronics with individual co-inventors Harada Nozomu (59 families) and Sakui Koji (58 families). IBM co-files across its UK, Chinese, and German subsidiaries (33, 22, and 13 families respectively), reflecting internal portfolio coordination. Tokyo Electron and its US holding subsidiary share 22 families. National Taiwan University and National Taiwan Normal University also collaborate directly with 12 joint families.

University-industry links
Geography

US filing office dominates; Taiwan and China are the key secondary jurisdictions

The United States leads with 5,779 patent records, nearly five times the next jurisdiction. Taiwan is second at 1,114 records and China third at 926, reflecting the geographic concentration of both design and fabrication activity. WIPO PCT filings stand at 350 and Europe (EPO) at 313, indicating that top filers do seek international coverage but at a substantially lower rate than US-first filings. South Korea at 37 records appears underweight relative to Samsung’s ranking, suggesting selective jurisdiction strategy.

US-led, Asia secondary
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC)National Taiwan University97
Unisantis Electronics Singapore Pte. Ltd.Harada Nozomu59
Unisantis Electronics Singapore Pte. Ltd.Sakui Koji58
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)IBM United Kingdom Ltd.33
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)IBM China Co., Ltd.22
Tokyo Electron Ltd.Tokyo Electron US Holdings Inc.22
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC)National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University20
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)IBM Deutschland GmbH13
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC)National Taiwan Normal University12
National Taiwan UniversityNational Taiwan Normal University12

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards draw on lifecycle classification, applicant momentum, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction distribution from the same corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

TSMC and IBM anchor the field; Samsung and Intel are the fastest-accelerating challengers

The top eight applicants by recent filing momentum illustrate two distinct competitive postures: TSMC and IBM hold large, broad portfolios concentrated in core semiconductor device classes, while Samsung, Intel, and Unisantis are growing their positions at a markedly faster rate from smaller bases.

Leader · TSMC

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC)

TSMC leads with 4,852 patent families and a recent-period momentum of +33%, with 2,431 families filed in the most recent three-year window. Its technical focus spans H01L21 (semiconductor processing), H01L29 (discrete semiconductor devices), and H01L27 (integrated circuits), covering the full stack from process to device to circuit. The breadth and volume of this portfolio make TSMC the defining prior-art reference for the entire field.

patent families: 4,852
Challenger · IBM

International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)

IBM ranks second with 1,054 patent families and recent momentum of +23% (458 families in the recent window). Its focus mirrors TSMC’s across H01L29, H01L21, and H01L27, reflecting a similarly device-physics-oriented portfolio. IBM coordinates filings across its UK, Chinese, and German entities, and co-files with those subsidiaries at scale. Samsung Electronics is the fastest-growing challenger at +116% recent trend (268 recent families), followed closely by Intel at +91% (166 recent families), signaling that the second tier is intensifying its GAA position.

patent families: 1,054
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, technology focus maps, and momentum scores for all top-100 filers in the GAA transistor space.
Qualcomm Inc.Unisantis Electronics Singapore+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC)2,431▲ +33%
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)458▲ +23%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.268▲ +116%
Intel Corporation166▲ +91%
Qualcomm Incorporated105▲ +35%
Unisantis Electronics Singapore Pte. Ltd.127▲ +92%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.37▼ -48%
Applied Materials, Inc.80▲ +67%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking and trajectory figures from recent-vs-prior three-year filing comparisons.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the core device space

Several IPC branches appear in the corpus at substantially lower share than the dominant H01L class, indicating that certain technically adjacent areas have received comparatively little dedicated GAA-specific attention. These are observations of relative sparsity; their value as entry points depends on technical fit and a realistic development path.

H10B · Memory Device Manufacture

H10B accounts for 856 patent records at a 7% share of the branch composition, making it the largest of the sparser adjacent branches. GAA nanosheet architectures offer geometric advantages for high-density memory cell design, and Unisantis Electronics’ existing focus on H01L27 and G11C11 (static and digital memories) demonstrates a plausible technical path. Organizations with memory-design expertise—particularly in DRAM or embedded NVM—could explore GAA-specific process integration for memory arrays as a differentiated entry route.

Search this in Eureka →

B82Y · Nanotechnology Applications

B82Y appears at 376 patent records and a 3% share, reflecting that nanomaterial-level characterization and application of GAA structures—such as quantum confinement effects, novel channel materials, or nanowire bio-sensing—remain a comparatively sparse area. Academic filers such as National Taiwan University and IMEC already bridge this territory. For organizations with nanomaterials or compound-semiconductor expertise, this branch represents an adjacent observation worth monitoring, though commercial paths are less defined than in memory integration.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See detailed branch-level filing gaps, representative patents, and suggested search strategies across all adjacent IPC classes in the GAA transistor landscape.
G11C · Static & digital memoriesC23C · Coating & surface deposition+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch analysis is based on IPC branch share within the 8,258-family GAA transistor corpus; lower share indicates relative sparsity, not absence of activity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How the leading filers differ by technology route across IPC sub-classes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01L 21 · Semiconductor devicesH01L 29 · Semiconductor devicesH01L 27 · Semiconductor devicesH01L 23 · Semiconductor devicesH10D 30 · Semiconductor devices (general)
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC)Strong · 3,987Strong · 3,152Moderate · 1,928Emerging · 683Emerging · 670
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)Strong · 758Strong · 962Strong · 555Emerging · 191Emerging · 89
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 314Strong · 360Strong · 313Moderate · 125Emerging · 37
Intel CorporationStrong · 298Strong · 311Strong · 166Moderate · 83Emerging · 39
Qualcomm IncorporatedStrong · 165Strong · 160Strong · 137Moderate · 45Emerging · 22
Unisantis Electronics Singapore Pte. Ltd.Strong · 110Moderate · 61Strong · 183AbsentAbsent
Tokyo Electron Ltd.Strong · 119Strong · 104Strong · 72AbsentModerate · 26
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own GAA transistor patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.