Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (31 records) with 2024 (20) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 706 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This review tracks 706 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine gate drive circuitry — active gate drivers, desaturation detection, gate drive circuits — with protection and switching-control techniques such as crosstalk suppression, negative bias, gate loop inductance management and device paralleling. The scope spans discrete gate driver ICs through to module-level protection schemes used in IGBT and SiC/GaN power stages.
Filing activity peaked in 2017 and has since declined through the most recent complete year, 2024, though publication lag means the last one to two years of data will keep filling in. Receiving-office activity is led by the United States, with meaningful volume also filed at the EPO, in Japan, China and Germany, and through the WIPO PCT route.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 706-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Volume ran at 51 records in 2017, its peak so far, and growth from 2021 (31) to 2024 (20) works out to -35% over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 as still-filling-in rather than a genuine drop-off, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
H03K (pulse technique and logic circuits) and H02M (power conversion) each anchor over a third of all 706 records — 41.1% and 36.8% respectively — reflecting how tightly gate-drive timing and power-stage control are bound together in this art. H01L and H10D semiconductor-device classes each cover a meaningful share too, while display-adjacent G09G and digital-processing G06F appear at lower but non-trivial rates, a reminder that some filers approach this problem from the display-driver side rather than the power-module side.
Shares are the percentage of the 706 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gate drive and short circuit protection for modules and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA gate drive circuit for generating asymmetric drive voltages comprises a gate drive transformer with a primary winding responsive to a PWM input that generates a bipolar signal carrying both a positive and a negative bias voltage, and a secondary winding that reconstructs a PWM output signal. A first charge pump level-shifts that output, and a second charge pump readjusts it by decreasing part of the level-shifted signal before it drives the switching device.Abstract text as filed; claim scope may be narrower than the abstract suggests.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5596466A | Intelligent, isolated half-bridge power module | 265 |
| 2 | US20150365003A1 | Power Conversion System | 180 |
| 3 | US20060284801A1 | Driving circuit for organic light emitting diode, display device using the same and driving method of organic… | 177 |
| 4 | US20140225439A1 | High Efficiency High Frequency Resonant Power Conversion | 169 |
| 5 | US7129746B1 | System-on-a-chip integrated circuit including dual-function analog and digital inputs | 157 |
| 6 | US5500616A | Overvoltage clamp and desaturation detection circuit | 148 |
| 7 | US20120025874A1 | Semiconductor device having switching element and free wheel diode and method for controlling the same | 131 |
| 8 | US5929665A | Power converter with voltage drive switching device monitored by device parameters and electric parameters | 123 |
| 9 | US20080252372A1 | Power-MOSFETs with Improved Efficiency for Multi-channel Class-D Audio Amplifiers and Packaging Thereof | 119 |
| 10 | US7170315B2 | Programmable system on a chip | 118 |
Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of influence rather than of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Reading volume and concentration together points to where claim space is genuinely occupied and where it is thin.
The leading assignee holds 58 records against a fifth-place figure of 22 and a tenth-place figure of 17 — a real gap at the top but a shallow drop from there, meaning the ranked leaders do not form an impenetrable bloc.
Activity peaked at 51 records in 2017 and has trended down through 2024, the most recent year treatable as complete. That does not mean the field is closing — module-level gate drive protection remains an active design problem — but the pace of new filing has slowed.
H03K and H02M together anchor most of the dataset, consistent with gate timing and power-conversion control being treated as one design problem rather than two. Semiconductor-device classes H01L and H10D sit well behind, suggesting device-level claims are a secondary layer over circuit-level ones.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gate drive and short circuit protection for modules, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. | Ordos Yuansheng Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. | 18 |
| BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. | Hefei Xinsheng Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. | 10 |
| BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. | Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. | 6 |
| BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. | Beijing BOE Technology Development Co., Ltd. | 5 |
| Toshiba Corporation | TOSHIBA FACTORY AUTOMATION SYST ENG CORP | 5 |
| Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | 1625 Point Street | 3 |
| Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | PORTER ROBERT M | 3 |
| Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | LEDENEV ANATOLI V | 3 |
Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with one cluster of related entities filing jointly at meaningfully higher volume than the others — a sign of a shared internal R&D pipeline rather than arm's-length collaboration.
The ranked list covers 100 companies scored across all 706 records — it is not a top-50 or top-100 cut, it is the whole ranking the dataset returns.
The top-ranked assignee's 58 records are more than double the fifth-place figure of 22, giving it a real head start without controlling the field outright. Recent-year momentum for several established filers has dropped to zero, including year-over-year declines of -100% for two of the more active historical filers, which points to a pause rather than continuous filing at the top.
The distance from fifth place (22) to tenth place (17) is modest, meaning the next tier of filers is filing at a comparable pace to the leaders rather than trailing far behind. This is where new entrants competing on protection-response-time or negative-bias techniques are most likely to collide with existing claims.
Of ten identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest links a display-technology group with an affiliated optoelectronics entity at 18 joint records, well ahead of the next pairs at 10 and 6. Most of the ranked field files independently, without joint assignees.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Actel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Toshiba Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Raytheon Company | 0 | — |
| Rohm Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or R&D prioritisation.
With 41.1% and 36.8% of all 706 records sitting in these two subclasses, new filings in gate-timing or power-conversion control should map against the most-cited prior art in this space before drafting.
Explore claim scope in EurekaThe shallow gap between fifth and tenth place suggests competitive pressure is building below the top of the ranking. Tracking that tier's filing pace over the next few publication cycles will show whether it overtakes the current leader.
Track assignee momentum in EurekaNegative-bias generation, protection response-time measurement and gate loop inductance compensation show comparatively thin filing density next to the core clusters. Each merits a targeted prior-art pull before committing R&D spend.
Run a white space search in EurekaThe dataset ranks 100 companies across 706 records, with the leading assignee holding 58 records against 22 at fifth place and 17 at tenth place. That gap shows a real leader but a shallow drop into the mid-field, so the next several filers are competitive rather than far behind. Across the ranked leaders as a group, the top 5 account for 29.5% of all 706 records and the top 10 account for 42.4%, leaving a substantial long tail of smaller filers active in the space.
Filing peaked in 2017 at 51 records and declined through 2024, the most recent year that can be treated as complete, with the 2021-to-2024 span showing a -35% change. The 2025 and 2026 figures in any dataset like this are still filling in, since publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so they should not be read as a continuation of the decline. The honest read is a cooling from an earlier peak rather than an active, ongoing collapse.
Two IPC subclasses dominate: H03K, covering pulse technique and logic circuits, appears in 41.1% of all 706 records, and H02M, covering power conversion, appears in 36.8%. Semiconductor-device classes H01L and H10D follow at lower but still meaningful shares. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these percentages add up to more than 100%, which simply reflects that gate-timing and power-conversion claims are frequently bundled into the same filing.
US20180241391A1, assigned to Raytheon and published in 2018, describes a transformer-based gate drive circuit that generates asymmetric drive voltages using a primary winding driven by a PWM signal, a secondary winding, and two charge pumps that level-shift and then readjust the output signal. It is a specific circuit topology built around a gate drive transformer and dual charge pumps, not a generic claim over asymmetric gate drive voltages as a concept. Anyone designing a transformer-isolated gate drive with a similar dual-charge-pump readjustment stage should review its claims closely; designs using different isolation or bias-generation approaches are less likely to be affected.
Relative to the dense H03K and H02M core, branches such as negative-bias generation for paralleled devices, protection response-time measurement circuits, and gate loop inductance compensation networks show comparatively thin filing density in this dataset. That does not guarantee an open field — thin density can also mean the approach is less commercially useful — but it does mean fewer competing claims to design around. A targeted prior-art search in these specific sub-areas is a reasonable first step before committing R&D budget.
Go past this page: query the whole gate drive and short circuit protection for modules corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page