Book a demo

Geared Turbofan Combustor Patent Landscape 2026

Geared Turbofan Combustor Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Geared Turbofan Combustor Patent Landscape in 2026

RTX Corp (via its United Technologies lineage) dominates this 178-family corpus with commanding concentration among the top hundred filers, while annual filing volume has eased markedly from its 2019 peak, signalling a maturing, consolidating field. Gas-turbine plant fundamentals (F02C) anchor the technology mix, and meaningful adjacent coverage in gearing, pumping, and airframe integration remains comparatively sparse.

178
Patent families in scope
93%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-77%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

RTX Corp leads a highly concentrated field with limited credible challengers

RTX Corp stands at the top of the applicant ranking with 373 patent records, followed by United Technologies Corp with 159 patent records — both entities representing the same corporate lineage. MTU Aero Engines and Rolls-Royce plc each hold 24 patent records, placing them in a distant but established second tier.

The top five filers collectively account for 93% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, a concentration level that leaves little ambiguity about who controls the foundational IP. The gap between the top entity and the third-ranked filer is roughly 15-fold, indicating a steep hierarchy with no near-term challenger poised to close that distance.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1RTX Corporation373
2United Technologies Corporation159
3MTU Aero Engines GmbH24
4Rolls-Royce plc24
5Florida Turbine Technologies Inc9
6The Boeing Company8
7ROLLS ROYCE DEUT LTD & CO KG7
8GKN Aerospace Sweden AB6
9Rolls-Royce Corporation5
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
10TOPOL DAVID A3
11CLOFT THOMAS G3
12POTTER GLEN E3
13Rolls-Royce North American Technologies Inc3
14GUKEISEN ROBERT L3
15THOMAS FLAVIEN L3
16Raytheon Technologies Corporation1
17PRATT & WHITNEY1
18MTU Aero Engines AG1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

RTX’s dominance means that any new entrant or second-tier player will likely encounter significant freedom-to-operate constraints in core combustor-gearbox integration areas, making licensing or design-around strategies highly relevant for R&D planning.

Patent records from the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and will likely increase as filings are processed; interpret the 20242026 data points with that in mind. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filings peaked in 2019 and have eased; gas-turbine plant fundamentals dominate the IPC mix

The annual filing trend reveals a field that built activity through the mid-to-late 2010s before contracting; the technology composition chart shows where those filings cluster across IPC classes and where relative gaps remain.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings climbed from 25 records in 2017 to a peak of 42 in 2019, then fell steadily to single digits from 2022 onward. The 2023–2026 bars should be read as provisional given publication lag; the underlying trend is nonetheless consistent with a field past its primary build-out phase.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 42 in 2019.25201734201842201927202022202110202222023920246202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

F02C (gas-turbine plants) dominates with 598 records, followed by F02K (jet and reaction propulsion) at 319 and F01D (turbines and non-positive engines) at 315. Gearing (F16H, 73 records), pumping (F04D, 62 records), and airframe integration (B64D, 36 records) are present but occupy comparatively smaller shares, pointing to the areas with relatively less coverage relative to the core propulsion classes.

Technology compositionF02C · Gas-turbine plants leads with 598; F02K · Jet & reaction propulsion 319.F02C · Gas-turbine plants598F02K · Jet & reaction pr…319F01D · Turbines & non-po…315F16H · Gearing & transmi…73F04D · Non-positive-disp…62B64D · Aircraft equipment36B64C · Aeroplanes & heli…16B63H · Marine propulsion…12↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
GB2572783APublished 2019-10-16

A gas turbine engine comprising a fuel purging sys…

ROLLS-ROYCE PLC

A gas turbine engine 10 comprises a compressor 15, a combustion chamber 16, a fuel system 50 and a fuel purging system 60. The fuel system comprises a fuel injector 52, an associated fuel delivery pipe 54 and a fuel manifold 56 which supplies fuel to the fuel injector through the associated fuel delivery pipe. The fuel purging system comprises a compressed… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

A gas turbine engine comprising a fuel purging sys… — patent drawingA gas turbine engine comprising a fuel purging sys… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Geartrain coupling for a turbofan engine484
2Deicing of a geared gas turbine engine246
3Gas turbine engine with geared turbofan and oil th…167
4Turbofan engine comprising an spicyclic transmissi…106
5Geared turbofan gas turbine engine architecture74
6Geared turbofan engine gearbox arrangement74
7Geared turbofan arrangement with core split power …45
8Oil bypass channel deaerator for a geared turbofan…44

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, a post-peak filing curve, and sparse adjacent branches shapes where new R&D effort is likely to find room and where it will face the heaviest IP thicket.

Decline

Field is in decline phase following a 2019 peak

Annual filing volume has eased markedly from the 2019 peak of 42 records, and the multi-year recent-window growth rate is –77%. This lifecycle position suggests that foundational architecture patents are largely established, and incremental improvement or system-integration filings now predominate. New entrants should assess whether remaining white space justifies patent prosecution costs versus licensing existing portfolios.

Post-peak · Decline
Concentration

Top five filers hold 93% of the hundred largest filers’ combined records

The 93% share held by the top five among the hundred largest filers is unusually high even for an aerospace sub-field. The tier gap between RTX/United Technologies and everyone else is steep: MTU Aero Engines and Rolls-Royce plc at 24 records each are the closest credible challengers, yet remain a fraction of the leader’s position. This concentration limits design freedom in core combustor-gear integration and raises freedom-to-operate risk for new development programs.

Highly concentrated
Collaboration

United Technologies–MTU Aero Engines is the dominant co-filing pair

The most active co-applicant relationship is between United Technologies Corp and MTU Aero Engines, with 18 jointly filed records — reflecting the PW1000G engine partnership. Rolls-Royce plc and Rolls-Royce Corp co-filed 5 records, while Raytheon Technologies and MTU Aero Engines jointly filed 4. The United Technologies–MTU Aero Engines AG pairing adds one further record. These dyads suggest that technology transfer and joint development within established engine programs, rather than broad open collaboration, characterise the ecosystem.

Partnership-driven
Geography

United States and EPO filings account for the majority of jurisdictional coverage

The United States leads jurisdictional filings with 256 records, closely followed by the EPO at 238. WIPO PCT filings stand at 42 and Canada at 40, reflecting the North American and European manufacturing bases of the principal assignees. Coverage in Asia is minimal — Japan holds just 1 record — which may indicate a deliberate strategic choice or an area where regional competitors could emerge without immediately confronting the RTX portfolio.

US + Europe dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
United Technologies CorporationMTU Aero Engines AG18
Rolls-Royce plcRolls-Royce Corporation5
Raytheon Technologies CorporationMTU Aero Engines AG4
United Technologies CorporationMTU Aero Engines AG1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards synthesise applicant momentum, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence from the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

RTX Corp anchors the field; MTU Aero Engines and Boeing emerge as new entrants in recent filings

Two corporate entities — RTX Corp and its predecessor United Technologies Corp — together account for the overwhelming majority of the corpus. Second-tier players show divergent momentum, with some declining and others entering the space for the first time.

Leader · RTX Corp

RTX Corp

RTX Corp holds 373 patent records, the largest position in the corpus by a wide margin. Its technology emphasis is anchored in F02C 7 (gas-turbine plant accessories and combustors), F02C 3 (continuous-combustion gas-turbine cycles), and F02K 3 (turbofan and turboprop propulsion). Raytheon Technologies (the intermediate corporate identity) shows a recent-period trend of –27% versus the prior three years, consistent with the overall post-peak field dynamic.

patent records: 373
Challenger · MTU Aero Engines GmbH

MTU Aero Engines GmbH

MTU Aero Engines holds 24 patent records, placing it joint-third in the ranking alongside Rolls-Royce plc. Its focus spans F02C 7, F02K 3, and F02C 3 — closely mirroring the dominant players’ core propulsion classes. Notably, MTU Aero Engines is flagged as a new entrant in the most recent filing window, suggesting renewed activity that may reflect ongoing geared-turbofan development partnerships.

patent records: 24
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Unlock rankings for all 18 identified filers, including individual inventors and smaller specialist firms.
Florida Turbine Technologies IncGKN Aerospace Sweden AB+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Raytheon Technologies Corporation19▼ -27%
MTU Aero Engines AG4▲ new entrant
The Boeing Company2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards use applicant ranking, momentum, and technology focus data from the corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Gearing integration and airframe installation are under-served relative to core propulsion classes

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant F02C/F02K/F01D core carry meaningfully fewer records relative to their technical relevance, suggesting areas where incremental filing could differentiate a portfolio without immediately confronting the densest part of the RTX thicket.

F16H · Gearing & transmissions

With 73 patent records and a 5% share of the corpus, gearing and transmission technology is the largest adjacent branch but remains sparse relative to the propulsion core. The epicyclic gearbox is a defining feature of the geared turbofan architecture, and detailed gear-system patents — covering load sharing, lubrication paths, and torque-split optimisation — appear underrepresented. A team with gear-system expertise could pursue differentiated IP in this space, particularly around high-power-density planetary arrangements suited to next-generation thrust levels, provided freedom-to-operate analysis confirms adequate room around existing RTX and MTU filings.

Search this in Eureka →

B63H · Marine propulsion & steering

Twelve patent records appear under B63H, a surprising adjacency that may reflect cross-filing of gas-turbine technology adapted for marine drive applications. This branch is sparse (12 records, roughly 1% of records) and sits at the periphery of the corpus, but for organisations exploring gas-turbine propulsion in naval or offshore power contexts, it represents an area with low existing patent density. Entry would require establishing genuine technical differentiation from the aero-derivative configurations already covered, and the small record count means the competitive picture here is still developing.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access detailed branch-level analysis for all 23 IPC classes identified in the corpus, including filing velocity and applicant overlap scores.
F04D · Non-positive-displacement pumpsB64D · Aircraft equipment integration+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified from IPC classes with comparatively low record counts relative to the dominant F02C/F02K/F01D core.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across propulsion, gearing, and airframe classes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerF02C 7 · Gas-turbine plantsF02K 3 · Jet & reaction propulsionF02C 3 · Gas-turbine plantsF01D 25 · Turbines & non-positive enginesF01D 5 · Turbines & non-positive engines
United Technologies CorporationStrong · 445Strong · 244Strong · 244Moderate · 157Emerging · 77
Raytheon Technologies CorporationStrong · 84Strong · 45Strong · 50Moderate · 21Emerging · 14
MTU Aero Engines AGStrong · 21Strong · 17Strong · 14Moderate · 5Strong · 13
Rolls-Royce plcStrong · 24Emerging · 4Emerging · 2Moderate · 11Absent
Florida Turbine Technologies IncStrong · 9Strong · 6Strong · 5Moderate · 2Absent
The Boeing CompanyStrong · 8Moderate · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KGStrong · 7Moderate · 3Moderate · 2AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own geared turbofan patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.