Book a demo

Geared Turbofan Fan Drive Gear Patent Landscape 2026

Geared Turbofan Fan Drive Gear Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Geared Turbofan (Fan Drive Gear) Patent Landscape in 2026

The geared turbofan fan drive gear patent space is dominated by RTX Corp and its legacy United Technologies entity, which together account for the overwhelming majority of filings among the hundred largest filers. Annual filing volume has eased markedly from its 2017 peak, signaling a field that has moved past its primary accumulation phase while core gas-turbine and transmission branches remain the focal points of activity.

219
Patent families in scope
95%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-79%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

RTX Corp leads a heavily concentrated field with a wide gap to all challengers

RTX Corp holds the top position with 483 patent records, more than double the 213 patent records attributed to United Technologies Corp — the same corporate lineage under an earlier entity name. MTU Aero Engines GmbH ranks third with 46 patent records, followed closely by Rolls-Royce plc at 39 and Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG at 37.

The top five filers collectively account for 95% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, indicating an exceptionally concentrated competitive structure. The gap between the top two entities and the next tier is substantial, and the gap between the third-ranked firm and those below it is similarly pronounced.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1RTX Corporation483
2United Technologies Corporation213
3MTU Aero Engines GmbH46
4Rolls-Royce plc39
5ROLLS ROYCE DEUT LTD & CO KG37
6Rolls-Royce Corporation7
7General Electric Company4
8PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP4
9TOPOL DAVID A3
10Florida Turbine Technologies Inc3
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11CLOFT THOMAS G3
12POTTER GLEN E3
13Rolls-Royce North American Technologies Inc3
14GUKEISEN ROBERT L3
15THOMAS FLAVIEN L3
16PRATT & WHITNEY2
17GKN Aerospace Sweden AB2
18Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation1
19Raytheon Technologies Corporation1
20MCCUNE MICHAEL E1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Such concentration signals that the core fan drive gear architecture has been locked up by a single corporate family over multiple patent cycles. Challengers seeking freedom-to-operate or differentiated positions face a dense claim landscape in the primary gas-turbine and jet-propulsion branches.

Filing counts for 2024 through 2026 are subject to publication lag and should be treated as undercounts; the apparent low volume in those years does not necessarily reflect a further structural retreat. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filings peaked in 2017 and have eased; gas-turbine classes dominate but transmission and pump branches remain underweight

Two views of the corpus — annual filing volume and IPC class composition — together reveal both the maturity of core design patents and the relative sparsity of ancillary engineering branches.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings reached their highest recorded level of 54 patent records in 2017, then declined to 44 in 2018 before a partial recovery to 53 in 2019. From 2020 onward volume fell sharply — 28 records in 2020, 13 in 2021, 11 in 2022 — and has remained in single digits from 2023 through 2026. The years 2024–2026 are subject to publication lag and should be read as floors, not final counts.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 54 in 2017.54201744201853201928202013202111202242023520246202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

F02C (Gas-turbine plants) leads with 644 patent records, followed by F02K (Jet and reaction propulsion) at 477 and F01D (Turbines and non-positive engines) at 465. F16H (Gearing and transmissions), the branch most directly linked to the gear system itself, accounts for only 93 patent records, and F04D (Non-positive-displacement pumps) adds 73. Aircraft-integration branches B64D and B64C together contribute 65 patent records, confirming that system-level integration has received considerably less coverage than core thermodynamic and mechanical design.

Technology compositionF02C · Gas-turbine plants leads with 644; F02K · Jet & reaction propulsion 477.F02C · Gas-turbine plants644F02K · Jet & reaction pr…477F01D · Turbines & non-po…465F16H · Gearing & transmi…93F04D · Non-positive-disp…73B64D · Aircraft equipment46B64C · Aeroplanes & heli…19B63H · Marine propulsion…17↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20140216003A1Published 2014-08-07

Gas turbine engine with geared turbofan and oil th…

Rtx Corporation

A gas turbine engine includes a fan, a compressor section, a combustion section, and a turbine section. A fan drive gear system is configured for driving the fan at a speed different than the turbine section. A lubricant system includes a lubricant pump delivering lubricant to an outlet line. The outlet line splits into at least a hot line and into a cool… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Gas turbine engine with geared turbofan and oil th… — patent drawingGas turbine engine with geared turbofan and oil th… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Geartrain coupling for a turbofan engine484
2Deicing of a geared gas turbine engine246
3High bypass turbofan engine having a partially gea…223
4Turbofan engine having a counterrotating partially…155
5Low noise turbine for geared turbofan engine126
6Geared turbofan engine with integral gear and bear…118
7Geared turbofan114
8Turbofan engine comprising an spicyclic transmissi…106

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The field’s maturity, extreme concentration, and cross-entity collaboration patterns collectively define a challenging entry environment; understanding each dimension helps engineers prioritize differentiated work.

Decline

Decline stage: peak accumulation is behind the field

Annual filing volume has eased markedly from the 2017 peak, and the lifecycle evidence classifies the field as Decline. The core architectural claims around gas-turbine plants, jet propulsion, and turbine components were accumulated primarily between 2017 and 2019. New entrants should focus on adjacent or next-generation configurations rather than replicating filed ground.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

One corporate family holds most of the terrain

The top five filers hold 95% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, with the RTX/United Technologies lineage alone representing the dominant position. The drop from the top tier to MTU Aero Engines at rank three is steep. Any new entrant or challenger must either carve out non-overlapping claims in underserved branches or accept a high freedom-to-operate burden.

Top-5 share: 95%
Collaboration

United Technologies–MTU axis is the most active co-filing partnership

The strongest co-filing relationship in the corpus is between United Technologies Corp and MTU Aero Engines GmbH with 36 co-filed records, reflecting their established joint-venture program on geared turbofan platforms. Rolls-Royce plc and Rolls-Royce Corp form a secondary intra-group axis with 5 co-filed records. Raytheon Technologies Corp and MTU Aero Engines GmbH show 4 co-filed records, carrying forward the partnership under the renamed entity.

Co-filing: UTA–MTU (36)
Geography

US and EPO filings are nearly equal; coverage thins rapidly outside those two offices

The United States leads with 328 patent records and the European Patent Office follows closely with 325, together accounting for the bulk of jurisdictional coverage. WIPO PCT filings stand at 59 and Canada at 44, providing a secondary ring of protection. Presence in Singapore, Germany, the UK, Brazil, France, India, and Russia is sparse, suggesting that protection strategies have not prioritized emerging manufacturing markets.

Lead office: United States
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
United Technologies CorporationMTU Aero Engines AG36
Rolls-Royce plcRolls-Royce Corporation5
Raytheon Technologies CorporationMTU Aero Engines AG4
United Technologies CorporationMTU Aero Engines AG1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights derived from lifecycle classification, applicant concentration, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction distribution in the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

RTX Corp and its United Technologies legacy entity dominate; MTU Aero Engines is the notable new-entrant challenger

The ranking is shaped by a single corporate lineage that has filed consistently across all core gas-turbine, jet-propulsion, and turbine-component branches. MTU Aero Engines GmbH, though smaller in absolute count, has recently re-entered the corpus as a new entrant in the momentum data.

Leader · RTX Corp

RTX Corp

RTX Corp leads with 483 patent records, concentrated in F02C Gas-turbine plants, F02K Jet and reaction propulsion, and F02C Gas-turbine plants sub-classes — the same thermodynamic core that defines the geared turbofan architecture. Its predecessor entity United Technologies Corp adds a further 213 patent records, meaning the combined corporate lineage is the decisive force in this space. Momentum data show Raytheon Technologies Corp (a related renamed entity) at a recent trend of down 31%, consistent with the field-wide deceleration from the 2017 peak.

patent records: 483
Challenger · MTU Aero Engines GmbH

MTU Aero Engines GmbH

MTU Aero Engines GmbH holds 46 patent records and is classified as a new entrant in the recent momentum window, indicating activity in the most recent filing period from a low prior base. Its technology focus spans F02C Gas-turbine plants, F02K Jet and reaction propulsion, and F01D Turbines — the same core classes as the leader, but with a more balanced split and additional weight on turbine-component sub-classes. The long-standing co-filing relationship with the United Technologies / RTX lineage (36 co-filed records) means some of MTU’s positions are built on joint architecture.

patent records: 46
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked data for all applicants in the geared turbofan fan drive gear corpus, including individual and institutional filers.
Rolls-Royce plcRolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Raytheon Technologies Corporation20▼ -31%
MTU Aero Engines AG4▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards are based on patent record counts from the applicant ranking and technology emphasis from IPC sub-class data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Gearing, pump integration, and aircraft-system branches are sparse relative to core thermodynamic classes

Against a corpus where gas-turbine and propulsion classes dominate, several directly relevant engineering branches hold notably lower patent-record counts, making them worth examining for under-served technical problems.

F16H · Gearing & Transmissions

Despite being the IPC class most directly aligned with the fan drive gear mechanism itself, F16H accounts for only 93 patent records — roughly 5% of the IPC distribution. Given that gear geometry, load-sharing in epicyclic stages, and lubrication-induced thermal management are open engineering problems in high-bypass platforms, this branch is sparsely covered relative to its technical centrality. Entrants with expertise in precision gearing or tribology could file in F16H without immediately running into the dense RTX/United Technologies claim walls that characterize F02C and F02K.

Search this in Eureka →

B64D · Aircraft Equipment Integration

B64D holds 46 patent records and B64C a further 19, together representing roughly 3% of the IPC distribution. Aircraft-level integration topics — nacelle acoustics, installation loads, power-extraction interfaces, and health-monitoring architectures — sit in these classes and are underrepresented relative to the size of the core propulsion corpus. As geared turbofan platforms mature and operators focus on maintenance economics and noise certification, system-integration filings in B64D could offer differentiated positions with lower overlap against existing RTX claims.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches ranked by filing density and technical overlap with the geared turbofan fan drive gear corpus.
F04D · Non-positive-displacement pumpsB63H · Marine propulsion & steering+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches identified by comparing IPC class patent-record counts against the dominant classes in the corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across core and adjacent IPC branches

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerF02C 7 · Gas-turbine plantsF02K 3 · Jet & reaction propulsionF02C 3 · Gas-turbine plantsF01D 25 · Turbines & non-positive enginesF01D 5 · Turbines & non-positive engines
United Technologies CorporationStrong · 418Strong · 344Strong · 303Moderate · 184Moderate · 121
Raytheon Technologies CorporationStrong · 77Strong · 75Strong · 60Moderate · 20Moderate · 21
MTU Aero Engines AGStrong · 21Strong · 21Strong · 20Moderate · 6Strong · 20
Rolls-Royce plcStrong · 28Moderate · 10Emerging · 2Moderate · 14Moderate · 9
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KGStrong · 25Strong · 25Moderate · 9Emerging · 4Absent
Rolls-Royce CorporationStrong · 5AbsentAbsentStrong · 7Absent
CLOFT THOMAS GStrong · 3AbsentStrong · 2Strong · 3Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own geared turbofan patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.