Book a demo

Injection Well Control Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Injection Well Control Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/geological-carbon-storage-injection-well-control-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Carbon Capture, Utilisation & Storage
Geological Carbon Storage Injection Well Control: Patent Trends and Leaders
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,051
Published Records
19%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-5%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (82 records) with 2024 (78) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,051 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers 2,051 published patent records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that describe methods and systems for controlling injection wells used in geological carbon storage — valve and slipstream architectures, materials for managing injection profile, and the wellbore hardware that ties them together. The scope combines direct injection-well-control filings with records tied to carbon dioxide storage, geological storage and carbon capture more broadly, so the corpus reflects both dedicated CO2 storage hardware and adjacent oilfield-control techniques being repurposed for it.

Coverage runs through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, though the most recent one to two years are understated because publication typically lags the original filing date by around 18 months. Patent families, not raw document counts, give the fairer read on how many distinct inventions sit behind the numbers, since a single invention can generate several published documents across jurisdictions.

Records by filing year and receiving office
  1. 1SHELL OIL CO156
  2. 2SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV68
  3. 3HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC63
  4. 4EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY(US)56
  5. 5SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO38
  6. 6LINDE AG31
  7. 7HORISONT ENERGI AS29
  8. 8CONOCOPHILLIPS CO27
  9. 9SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP26
  10. 10INST MEXICANO DEL GASOLINEEO25
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Injection Well Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The dataset spans 2,051 published records covering injection well control methods and systems tied to geological carbon storage, filed between 2015 and the mid-2026 data cut-off.

Filing activity peaked in 2022 and has since plateaued

Annual filings rose from 56 in 2017 to a peak of 117 in 2022. Complete-year data shows 82 filings in 2021 against 78 in 2024, a -5% change over that span — a plateau rather than a decline. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent years will rise as records catch up.

Filing activity peaked in 2022 and has since plateaued030609012056201720182019202020211172022202320242025152026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Drilling-well hardware dominates the classification mix

E21B (earth and rock drilling for wells) appears on 48.9% of the 2,051 records, far ahead of any other class. C09K materials claims sit second at 15.8%, followed by a spread of medicinal, separation and water-treatment classes each under 9% — a signature of a field anchored in wellbore hardware with materials and water-management claims layered around it. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100%.

Drilling-well hardware dominates the classification mixE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)1,00248.9%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…32515.8%A61K · Medicinal preparations1788.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1276.2%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…894.3%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment824.0%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds773.8%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds753.7%Other1,82589.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,051 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Injection Well Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Geological Carbon Storage: Injection Well Control Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about geological carbon storage: injection well control patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative claim in the current wave

Representative Patent · 2025
US12228022B12025-02-18

US12228022B1 — Carbon dioxide control system for well control and production

FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

The patent claims a method of diverting part of a carbon dioxide stream flowing through a main supply line into a slipstream line, then directing that slipstream to control modules at the well site. Equipment tied to the injection operation, including the injection tree, is operated by flowing a portion of the diverted CO2 slipstream through those control modules — effectively using the process gas itself as the actuation medium for wellsite control.Filed by FMC Technologies, published 2025-02-18 — one of the more recent entrants in the E21B drilling-control cluster that covers 48.9% of records in this dataset.

US12228022B1 — patent drawing 1US12228022B1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing details
Most-cited records in the injection well control corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160045841A1New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials861
2US5152757ASystem for diagnosis and treatment of wounds445
3US4706751AHeavy oil recovery process433
4US4026357AIn situ gasification of solid hydrocarbon materials in a subterranean formation335
5US20030220204A1Use of surface-modified nanoparticles for oil recovery325
6US20030201098A1In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation using one or more simulations310
7US20040020642A1In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation using conductor-in-conduit heat sources with an elec…305
8US20030196789A1In situ thermal processing of a hydrocarbon containing formation and upgrading of produced fluids prior to fu…297
9US20030079877A1In situ thermal processing of a relatively impermeable formation in a reducing environment297
10US20030146002A1Removable heat sources for in situ thermal processing of an oil shale formation278

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older filings accumulate citations naturally, so treat this as an influence signal rather than a currency ranking.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Injection Well Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing pattern signals for strategy

Reading the concentration, technology mix and citation data together points to where claim space is occupied and where it is not.

Concentration
18.6%
of 2,051 records held by top 5 assignees

Ownership is spread, not locked up

The five most active filers together account for 18.6% of all 2,051 records, and the tenth-ranked filer holds only 25 records against the leader's 156. That gap between the leader and the rest signals one company with a durable filing programme, surrounded by a genuinely open field rather than a tight oligopoly.

Ranked across 100 assignees in the dataset
Technology mix
48.9%
of records carry an E21B drilling-control class

Hardware claims dominate the corpus

Nearly half of all records touch earth and rock drilling for wells, meaning most of the contested claim space is mechanical — valves, control lines and injection-tree architecture — rather than chemical formulation. Materials claims (C09K, 15.8%) form the next most active layer, but at less than a third the density of E21B.

Classes overlap; shares are of the 2,051-record total
Filing momentum
-5%
change 2021 to 2024 (complete years)

A plateau after the 2022 peak, not a decline

Filing peaked at 117 records in 2022 and has since settled near 78 by 2024, a -5% move from 2021's 82. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures will rise as they fill in — the current data should not be read as a cooling field.

2025-2026 counts are still incomplete
Citation signal
861 citations
on the most-cited record in the corpus

A handful of older records anchor the prior-art map

The most-cited record in this dataset carries 861 citations, far ahead of the rest of the most-cited group. High citation counts concentrate in older, foundational filings by nature of how citation searches work, so treat this as a signal of influence on later filings rather than a marker of current commercial relevance.

Citation counts favour earlier-filed records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to geological carbon storage: injection well control patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Collaboration is limited
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Linde AGBABCOCK JOHN A23
VINEGAR HAROLD JZHANG ETUAN20
VINEGAR HAROLD JWELLINGTON SCOTT LEE20
VINEGAR HAROLD JKARANIKAS JOHN MICHAEL18
Schlumberger Technology CorporationSchlumberger Limited18
VINEGAR HAROLD JRYAN ROBERT CHARLES16
VINEGAR HAROLD JHARRIS CHRISTOPHER KELVIN14
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.VINEGAR HAROLD J13

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the entire dataset, with the strongest pairs linked to Linde and to inventors named Vinegar, Zhang and Wellington — a sign that most filers in this field patent independently rather than through joint programmes.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Injection Well Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The trends above point to where the field is dense and where it is not. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs claim-level detail.

Check freedom-to-operate against the dense E21B cluster

Nearly half of all records sit inside earth and rock drilling for wells. Before drafting a wellbore control claim, compare it against this cluster clause by clause rather than by keyword alone.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Track the long tail beyond the ranked leaders

With the top five holding only 18.6% of records, most competitive activity sits outside the familiar names. Monitoring new entrants in the ranked list catches shifts early.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka

Test claim language in the thinner IPC branches

Water treatment and organic-compound classes each sit under 5% of records. Drafting a claim that bridges one of these with the control-loop architecture is worth testing against prior art before filing.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Injection Well Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on injection well control patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Injection Well Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Geological Carbon Storage: Injection Well Control Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole geological carbon storage: injection well control patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.