Injection Well Control Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
Filing growth compares 2021 (82 records) with 2024 (78) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,051 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape covers 2,051 published patent records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that describe methods and systems for controlling injection wells used in geological carbon storage — valve and slipstream architectures, materials for managing injection profile, and the wellbore hardware that ties them together. The scope combines direct injection-well-control filings with records tied to carbon dioxide storage, geological storage and carbon capture more broadly, so the corpus reflects both dedicated CO2 storage hardware and adjacent oilfield-control techniques being repurposed for it.
Coverage runs through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, though the most recent one to two years are understated because publication typically lags the original filing date by around 18 months. Patent families, not raw document counts, give the fairer read on how many distinct inventions sit behind the numbers, since a single invention can generate several published documents across jurisdictions.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
The dataset spans 2,051 published records covering injection well control methods and systems tied to geological carbon storage, filed between 2015 and the mid-2026 data cut-off.
Filing activity peaked in 2022 and has since plateaued
Annual filings rose from 56 in 2017 to a peak of 117 in 2022. Complete-year data shows 82 filings in 2021 against 78 in 2024, a -5% change over that span — a plateau rather than a decline. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent years will rise as records catch up.
Drilling-well hardware dominates the classification mix
E21B (earth and rock drilling for wells) appears on 48.9% of the 2,051 records, far ahead of any other class. C09K materials claims sit second at 15.8%, followed by a spread of medicinal, separation and water-treatment classes each under 9% — a signature of a field anchored in wellbore hardware with materials and water-management claims layered around it. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 2,051 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Geological Carbon Storage: Injection Well Control Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about geological carbon storage: injection well control patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative claim in the current wave
US12228022B1 — Carbon dioxide control system for well control and production
The patent claims a method of diverting part of a carbon dioxide stream flowing through a main supply line into a slipstream line, then directing that slipstream to control modules at the well site. Equipment tied to the injection operation, including the injection tree, is operated by flowing a portion of the diverted CO2 slipstream through those control modules — effectively using the process gas itself as the actuation medium for wellsite control.Filed by FMC Technologies, published 2025-02-18 — one of the more recent entrants in the E21B drilling-control cluster that covers 48.9% of records in this dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20160045841A1 | New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials | 861 |
| 2 | US5152757A | System for diagnosis and treatment of wounds | 445 |
| 3 | US4706751A | Heavy oil recovery process | 433 |
| 4 | US4026357A | In situ gasification of solid hydrocarbon materials in a subterranean formation | 335 |
| 5 | US20030220204A1 | Use of surface-modified nanoparticles for oil recovery | 325 |
| 6 | US20030201098A1 | In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation using one or more simulations | 310 |
| 7 | US20040020642A1 | In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation using conductor-in-conduit heat sources with an elec… | 305 |
| 8 | US20030196789A1 | In situ thermal processing of a hydrocarbon containing formation and upgrading of produced fluids prior to fu… | 297 |
| 9 | US20030079877A1 | In situ thermal processing of a relatively impermeable formation in a reducing environment | 297 |
| 10 | US20030146002A1 | Removable heat sources for in situ thermal processing of an oil shale formation | 278 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older filings accumulate citations naturally, so treat this as an influence signal rather than a currency ranking.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals for strategy
Reading the concentration, technology mix and citation data together points to where claim space is occupied and where it is not.
Ownership is spread, not locked up
The five most active filers together account for 18.6% of all 2,051 records, and the tenth-ranked filer holds only 25 records against the leader's 156. That gap between the leader and the rest signals one company with a durable filing programme, surrounded by a genuinely open field rather than a tight oligopoly.
Hardware claims dominate the corpus
Nearly half of all records touch earth and rock drilling for wells, meaning most of the contested claim space is mechanical — valves, control lines and injection-tree architecture — rather than chemical formulation. Materials claims (C09K, 15.8%) form the next most active layer, but at less than a third the density of E21B.
A plateau after the 2022 peak, not a decline
Filing peaked at 117 records in 2022 and has since settled near 78 by 2024, a -5% move from 2021's 82. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures will rise as they fill in — the current data should not be read as a cooling field.
A handful of older records anchor the prior-art map
The most-cited record in this dataset carries 861 citations, far ahead of the rest of the most-cited group. High citation counts concentrate in older, foundational filings by nature of how citation searches work, so treat this as a signal of influence on later filings rather than a marker of current commercial relevance.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to geological carbon storage: injection well control patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Linde AG | BABCOCK JOHN A | 23 |
| VINEGAR HAROLD J | ZHANG ETUAN | 20 |
| VINEGAR HAROLD J | WELLINGTON SCOTT LEE | 20 |
| VINEGAR HAROLD J | KARANIKAS JOHN MICHAEL | 18 |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Schlumberger Limited | 18 |
| VINEGAR HAROLD J | RYAN ROBERT CHARLES | 16 |
| VINEGAR HAROLD J | HARRIS CHRISTOPHER KELVIN | 14 |
| Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. | VINEGAR HAROLD J | 13 |
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the entire dataset, with the strongest pairs linked to Linde and to inventors named Vinegar, Zhang and Wellington — a sign that most filers in this field patent independently rather than through joint programmes.
Where to take this analysis next
The trends above point to where the field is dense and where it is not. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs claim-level detail.
Check freedom-to-operate against the dense E21B cluster
Nearly half of all records sit inside earth and rock drilling for wells. Before drafting a wellbore control claim, compare it against this cluster clause by clause rather than by keyword alone.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaTrack the long tail beyond the ranked leaders
With the top five holding only 18.6% of records, most competitive activity sits outside the familiar names. Monitoring new entrants in the ranked list catches shifts early.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaTest claim language in the thinner IPC branches
Water treatment and organic-compound classes each sit under 5% of records. Drafting a claim that bridges one of these with the control-loop architecture is worth testing against prior art before filing.
Explore white space in EurekaCommon questions on injection well control patents
Filings in this dataset are moderately concentrated: the five most active assignees together hold 18.6% of the 2,051 records in scope, and the ranked leader alone accounts for 156 records. That leaves the large majority of records spread across a long tail of filers, including oilfield-service companies, national oil companies and specialist storage developers. No single company controls the field outright, so freedom-to-operate analysis needs to look beyond the top names to this longer tail.
Filing rose steadily from 56 records in 2017 to a peak of 117 in 2022, then eased slightly to 78 by 2024 — a -5% change from the 82 filed in 2021, which reads as a plateau rather than a downturn. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because grants and publications typically trail the original filing date by about 18 months. Treat any apparent drop in the most recent one to two years as a data-lag artefact, not a real slowdown.
Earth and rock drilling for wells (IPC class E21B) dominates, appearing on 48.9% of the 2,051 records, reflecting how much of the field is about wellbore hardware, valves and control-line architecture rather than chemistry alone. Materials for miscellaneous applications (C09K) is the next largest at 15.8%, covering additives and conformance agents used to manage injection profiles. Smaller clusters in water treatment, separation and organic chemistry classes each sit under 9%, marking narrower but still active sub-fields.
US12228022B1, assigned to FMC Technologies and published 2025-02-18, claims a method of diverting part of a carbon dioxide stream into a slipstream line and using that slipstream to operate control modules at a well site. It specifically covers using CO2 itself as the actuation medium for wellsite equipment tied to an injection tree. It does not automatically block control architectures that use a different actuation medium, such as hydraulic or electric control lines, or that route the diverted CO2 for purposes other than equipment control — a clause-by-clause comparison against the granted claims is still needed for any specific design.
The thinnest documented branches by IPC share are water and wastewater treatment tied to injection operations (C02F, 4.0% of records), and organic-compound classes C07C (3.8%) and C07D (3.7%), all well below the dominant drilling-control and materials clusters. Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the whole dataset, indicating limited cross-company collaboration even in these narrower areas. Combining a specific treatment or compound step with a wellhead control-loop trigger, rather than claiming either element alone, is one plausible way to stake out unclaimed ground in these branches.
Research Geological Carbon Storage: Injection Well Control Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole geological carbon storage: injection well control patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.