Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (27 records) with 2024 (14) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 192 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Reservoir pressure management sits at the operational core of geological carbon storage: keeping injected CO2 below the fracture pressure of the storage formation while maintaining injectivity over the life of a project. The 192 records in this dataset span search terms combining reservoir, pressure and management language with carbon capture and storage vocabulary, so the corpus mixes purpose-built CO2 sequestration filings with adjacent oilfield, water-treatment and thermal-cycle patents that share the same pressure-control mechanics.
That breadth matters for reading the numbers below: a filing tagged under earth and rock drilling (E21B) may be a CO2 injection well design, while one under refrigeration (F25B) may be a heat-pump-driven pressure cycle repurposed for storage sites. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit for comparing assignees here because they strip out continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates of the same invention.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures will keep rising as pending applications publish; treat the most recent two years as incomplete rather than as evidence of a slowdown.
Annual filings rose from 4 records in 2017 to a peak of 27 in 2021, then eased to 14 by 2024 — a 48% decline over that three-year window. That pattern is consistent with an early wave of exploratory filings around large-scale CO2 storage projects settling into a smaller, steadier stream of incremental improvements once core injection and monitoring approaches were staked out.
E21B (earth and rock drilling, including wellbores) covers 17.2% of the 192 records, the largest single subclass, followed by A01N-classed biocide and treatment chemistry at 12.0% and body-fluid device claims (A61M) at 8.9% — a reminder that pressure-management language recurs in medical and industrial contexts unrelated to storage. Water treatment (C02F), thermal power (F01K), data processing (G06F), fuels (C10L) and refrigeration (F25B) each sit between 5.7% and 7.3%, showing that once wellbore hardware is set aside, no single adjacent technology has pulled ahead of the others.
Shares are the percentage of the 192 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about geological carbon storage: reservoir pressure management patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA CO2 sequestration system sequesters carbon dioxide as carbon dioxide hydrate in offshore saline aquifers. The system includes an offshore aquifer in a tropical region. A plurality of wellbores are positioned inside or around a perimeter of the aquifer. The CO2 may be injected into the aquifer via separate injectors located in the wellbores connected to the aquifer while aquifer water or brine is produced from one or more of the other wellbores and provided to the aquifer. Injection of the CO2 into and production of water from the offshore aquifer at separately timed intervals may maintain the reservoir pressure below the reservoir fracture pressure.Filed by Low Carbon Energies, LLC — one of the more explicit examples in this dataset of pressure management framed specifically around CO2 hydrate formation in offshore saline aquifers.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20050043675A1 | Method and apparatus for modulating cellular metabolism during post-ischemia or heart failure | 213 |
| 2 | US20050288721A1 | Method and apparatus to modulate cellular regeneration post myocardial infarct | 184 |
| 3 | US20120131918A1 | Heat engines with cascade cycles | 133 |
| 4 | US20050251289A1 | Medicament dispenser | 130 |
| 5 | US20140220699A1 | pH BUFFER MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEMS | 128 |
| 6 | US8869531B2 | Heat engines with cascade cycles | 106 |
| 7 | WO2014121169A1 | pH BUFFER MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEMS | 94 |
| 8 | US20100132399A1 | Transcritical refrigerant vapor compression system with charge management | 94 |
| 9 | WO2012074940A2 | Heat engines with cascade cycles | 88 |
| 10 | US8383397B2 | Method and system for the production of cells and cell products and applications thereof | 68 |
Citation counts favour older, broadly-worded filings inside this searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence rather than of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and jurisdiction filings are read together.
The single leading assignee holds 22 records, and the top 5 combined account for 23.4% of all 192 records in scope. Beyond that, filings thin out quickly — the tenth-ranked assignee holds just 4 — indicating a field with one identifiable leader but no tightly-held oligopoly beneath it.
E21B claims outnumber every other subclass, consistent with pressure management being implemented primarily through injection well design and completion equipment rather than through surface-side monitoring or software.
The United States receives the largest single share of filings, with WIPO PCT applications close behind and meaningful volumes reaching India, Europe, Canada and Australia — a spread that suggests applicants are hedging storage-site geography rather than filing only where headquarters sit.
The three-year decline from the 2021 peak to 2024 reflects a maturing first wave rather than abandonment: core injection and pressure-control approaches were staked out early, and later filings narrow into specific mechanisms rather than broad system claims.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to geological carbon storage: reservoir pressure management patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The figures above answer where the field has been. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs a closer read of specific claims and assignees.
Pressure-management claims cluster by mechanism — injection timing, brine co-production, hydrate formation — more than by broad system architecture. Narrowing to one mechanism before drafting avoids collision with the densest E21B prior art.
Explore in EurekaA small number of co-assignee pairs recur across multiple records, pointing to established collaborations rather than isolated inventors. Watching those pairs' subsequent filings is a low-cost way to anticipate the next wave.
Run a collaborator search in EurekaFiling volumes across the US, PCT, India, Europe, Canada and Australia do not map neatly onto known storage basins. Cross-checking jurisdiction choices against project pipelines can surface gaps before a competitor files there first.
Compare jurisdictions in EurekaIn this landscape it covers any claimed method or system for keeping injected CO2 below the fracture pressure of a storage formation while sustaining injectivity, including injection timing, brine or water co-production, monitoring instrumentation and well completion design. Because the search terms also catch general reservoir and pressure language, the 192-record corpus includes adjacent filings from oilfield operations, water treatment and thermal cycles that use the same pressure-control mechanics outside a storage context. Readers doing freedom-to-operate work should expect to filter by the specific mechanism they care about rather than treat the whole set as CO2-specific.
The ranking is led by a single assignee with 22 records, with the top 5 assignees combined holding 23.4% of all 192 records in scope and the top 10 holding 35.9%. Beyond the leader, holdings drop off quickly, with the fifth-ranked assignee at 5 records and the tenth at 4 — a pattern of one clear leader followed by a long tail of smaller filers rather than a concentrated oligopoly. Anyone assessing competitive risk should look at the leader's claim scope specifically, since the rest of the field is fragmented.
Filings rose from 4 records in 2017 to a peak of 27 in 2021, then declined to 14 by 2024, a 48% drop over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and should not be read as continued decline. The honest reading is a first wave of broad filings around 2020-2021 followed by a smaller, more targeted second wave rather than a field losing interest.
Earth and rock drilling claims (IPC class E21B), covering wellbore and injection equipment, are the largest single category at 17.2% of the 192 records. Biocide and agrochemical-classed filings (A01N) and body-fluid device claims (A61M) also appear at meaningful shares, reflecting the breadth of the underlying search terms rather than CO2-specific activity. Water treatment, thermal power, data processing, fuels and refrigeration each sit in a similar band between roughly 6% and 7%, suggesting no single adjacent technology has pulled decisively ahead once wellbore hardware is set aside.
The technology composition shows wellbore and injection hardware (E21B) as the most heavily claimed area, so novel mechanism-level claims there face the densest prior art. Areas represented at lower, roughly even shares — data processing, refrigeration cycles, thermal power integration — carry fewer records each and are worth a closer look for underclaimed combinations, particularly where a claim ties a monitoring or control method specifically to storage-site pressure limits rather than to general oilfield use.
Go past this page: query the whole geological carbon storage: reservoir pressure management patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.