https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/geological-carbon-storage-reservoir-pressure-management-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Carbon Capture, Utilization & Storage
Geological Carbon Storage: Who Holds the Reservoir Pressure Management Patents
Get a prior-art report on your approach
192
Published Records
23%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-48%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (27 records) with 2024 (14) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 192 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Reservoir pressure management sits at the operational core of geological carbon storage: keeping injected CO2 below the fracture pressure of the storage formation while maintaining injectivity over the life of a project. The 192 records in this dataset span search terms combining reservoir, pressure and management language with carbon capture and storage vocabulary, so the corpus mixes purpose-built CO2 sequestration filings with adjacent oilfield, water-treatment and thermal-cycle patents that share the same pressure-control mechanics.

That breadth matters for reading the numbers below: a filing tagged under earth and rock drilling (E21B) may be a CO2 injection well design, while one under refrigeration (F25B) may be a heat-pump-driven pressure cycle repurposed for storage sites. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit for comparing assignees here because they strip out continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates of the same invention.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2017–2026
  1. 1DEKA PRODUCTS LP22
  2. 2HILLPHOENIX INC6
  3. 3SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO6
  4. 4CARRIER CORP6
  5. 5CARDIAC PACEMAKERS INC5
  6. 6THEMES LLC5
  7. 7M & R CONSULTING SERVICES5
  8. 8SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP5
  9. 9AQUATECH INT LLC5
  10. 10ENERGY DOME SPA4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Reservoir Pressure Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures will keep rising as pending applications publish; treat the most recent two years as incomplete rather than as evidence of a slowdown.

A 2021 peak, then a measured pullback

Annual filings rose from 4 records in 2017 to a peak of 27 in 2021, then eased to 14 by 2024 — a 48% decline over that three-year window. That pattern is consistent with an early wave of exploratory filings around large-scale CO2 storage projects settling into a smaller, steadier stream of incremental improvements once core injection and monitoring approaches were staked out.

A 2021 peak, then a measured pullback0815233042017201820192020272021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Drilling and injection hardware dominate the claim space

E21B (earth and rock drilling, including wellbores) covers 17.2% of the 192 records, the largest single subclass, followed by A01N-classed biocide and treatment chemistry at 12.0% and body-fluid device claims (A61M) at 8.9% — a reminder that pressure-management language recurs in medical and industrial contexts unrelated to storage. Water treatment (C02F), thermal power (F01K), data processing (G06F), fuels (C10L) and refrigeration (F25B) each sit between 5.7% and 7.3%, showing that once wellbore hardware is set aside, no single adjacent technology has pulled ahead of the others.

Drilling and injection hardware dominate the claim spaceE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)3317.2%A01N · Biocides / agrochemicals2312.0%A61M · Devices for body fluids178.9%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment147.3%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants126.3%G06F · Electric digital data processi…126.3%C10L · Fuels & firelighters115.7%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps115.7%Other229119.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 192 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Reservoir Pressure Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Geological Carbon Storage: Reservoir Pressure Management Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about geological carbon storage: reservoir pressure management patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

Key patents and what they signal

Representative Record
US11795784B12023-10-24

System and method for carbon dioxide sequestration in offshore saline aquifers as carbon dioxide hydrate

LOW CARBON ENERGIES, LLC

A CO2 sequestration system sequesters carbon dioxide as carbon dioxide hydrate in offshore saline aquifers. The system includes an offshore aquifer in a tropical region. A plurality of wellbores are positioned inside or around a perimeter of the aquifer. The CO2 may be injected into the aquifer via separate injectors located in the wellbores connected to the aquifer while aquifer water or brine is produced from one or more of the other wellbores and provided to the aquifer. Injection of the CO2 into and production of water from the offshore aquifer at separately timed intervals may maintain the reservoir pressure below the reservoir fracture pressure.Filed by Low Carbon Energies, LLC — one of the more explicit examples in this dataset of pressure management framed specifically around CO2 hydrate formation in offshore saline aquifers.

US11795784B1 — patent drawing 1US11795784B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20050043675A1Method and apparatus for modulating cellular metabolism during post-ischemia or heart failure213
2US20050288721A1Method and apparatus to modulate cellular regeneration post myocardial infarct184
3US20120131918A1Heat engines with cascade cycles133
4US20050251289A1Medicament dispenser130
5US20140220699A1pH BUFFER MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEMS128
6US8869531B2Heat engines with cascade cycles106
7WO2014121169A1pH BUFFER MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEMS94
8US20100132399A1Transcritical refrigerant vapor compression system with charge management94
9WO2012074940A2Heat engines with cascade cycles88
10US8383397B2Method and system for the production of cells and cell products and applications thereof68

Citation counts favour older, broadly-worded filings inside this searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence rather than of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Reservoir Pressure Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Landscape Signals

What the data means for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and jurisdiction filings are read together.

Concentration
23.4% of 192
held by the top 5 assignees

A leader, then a long tail

The single leading assignee holds 22 records, and the top 5 combined account for 23.4% of all 192 records in scope. Beyond that, filings thin out quickly — the tenth-ranked assignee holds just 4 — indicating a field with one identifiable leader but no tightly-held oligopoly beneath it.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Technology mix
17.2%
of records touch E21B drilling claims

Wellbore hardware is the busiest subclass

E21B claims outnumber every other subclass, consistent with pressure management being implemented primarily through injection well design and completion equipment rather than through surface-side monitoring or software.

IPC subclass distribution, 192 records
Geography
53 US filings
vs 34 PCT and 21 India

Filing is US-centred but internationally hedged

The United States receives the largest single share of filings, with WIPO PCT applications close behind and meaningful volumes reaching India, Europe, Canada and Australia — a spread that suggests applicants are hedging storage-site geography rather than filing only where headquarters sit.

Receiving office counts
Growth signal
-48%
2021 peak (27) to 2024 (14)

Post-peak filings, not a dying field

The three-year decline from the 2021 peak to 2024 reflects a maturing first wave rather than abandonment: core injection and pressure-control approaches were staked out early, and later filings narrow into specific mechanisms rather than broad system claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to geological carbon storage: reservoir pressure management patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Reservoir Pressure Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The figures above answer where the field has been. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs a closer read of specific claims and assignees.

Map claim boundaries around a specific mechanism

Pressure-management claims cluster by mechanism — injection timing, brine co-production, hydrate formation — more than by broad system architecture. Narrowing to one mechanism before drafting avoids collision with the densest E21B prior art.

Explore in Eureka

Track the co-filing clusters

A small number of co-assignee pairs recur across multiple records, pointing to established collaborations rather than isolated inventors. Watching those pairs' subsequent filings is a low-cost way to anticipate the next wave.

Run a collaborator search in Eureka

Revisit jurisdiction strategy against storage-site geography

Filing volumes across the US, PCT, India, Europe, Canada and Australia do not map neatly onto known storage basins. Cross-checking jurisdiction choices against project pipelines can surface gaps before a competitor files there first.

Compare jurisdictions in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Reservoir Pressure Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Frequently Asked

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Geological Carbon Storage: Reservoir Pressure Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Geological Carbon Storage: Reservoir Pressure Management Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole geological carbon storage: reservoir pressure management patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.