Book a demo

Geopolymer Concrete Modeling Patent Landscape 2026

Geopolymer Concrete Modeling Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Geopolymer Concrete Modeling Patent Landscape in 2026

The geopolymer concrete modeling space is a small, maturing field dominated by a handful of research institutions, with Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) holding a clear lead. Annual filings have plateaued near their peak, and India is the primary filing jurisdiction, reflecting the concentration of academic activity in the region.

65
Patent families in scope
38%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
0%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

CSIRO leads a research-institution-dominated field

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) ranks first among all filers, followed by Catholic University of America and a cluster of European and Asian institutions including Ecole Centrale de Lille and Storengy.

The top five filers account for 38% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating a moderately concentrated field where a small group of institutions shapes the research agenda but no single player holds overwhelming control.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG16
2Catholic University of America8
3Ecole Centrale de Lille6
4Storengy6
5ITT Italia Srl5
6Carbon Craft Design Pte Ltd4
7IHI Construction Materials Co., Ltd.3
8Indian Institute of Science3
9Indian Institute of Technology Bombay3
10IHI Corporation3
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Andhra University2
12Changsha University of Science and Technology2
13Easwari Engineering College2
14Manipal Academy of Higher Education2
15King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals2
16Hyssil Private Limited2
17University of British Columbia2
18Miss Akanksha Santoshburase1
19Zhengzhou University1
20Mr. Sushant Vishwaskadam1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leadership positions of CSIRO and Catholic University of America suggest that fundamental geopolymer formulation and performance modeling remain primarily academic pursuits, with limited private-sector dominance at the filing frontier.

Activity in the most recent 18–24 months is likely under-counted due to standard patent publication lag and should not be interpreted as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity plateaued; ceramics and cement IPC class dominates

The two charts below show how annual filing volume has evolved over time and how the technology mix is distributed across IPC classes. Together they reveal a field that peaked in the late 2010s and is now sustaining at a steady level with a clear materials-science center of gravity.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose sharply from 2018 to a 2019 peak, dipped through 2021–2022, then recovered to sustained activity from 2023 onward. The most recent periods (2024–2026) should be read as partial counts given publication lag, so the apparent plateau may understate true current activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 15 in 2025.0201782018122019320202202112022820238202415202582026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C04B (Ceramics, cement and refractories) accounts for the large majority of classified records, confirming that geopolymer binder chemistry is the core technical domain. Secondary classes G06F (digital data processing) and C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications) reflect computational modeling and well-cementing use cases respectively, while classes such as B28B, E21B, and G16C represent meaningful but smaller adjacent activity.

Technology compositionC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories leads with 77; C09K · Materials for misc. applications 12.C04B · Ceramics, cement …77C09K · Materials for mis…12G06F · Electric digital …10B28B · Shaping clay & ce…6E21B · Earth & rock dril…6F16D · Clutches & brakes5G16C · Computational che…5B33Y · Additive manufact…4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
NZ622477BPublished 2016-11-29

Cellular geopolymer product and manufacture thereof

Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Researc

A method for manufacturing a cellular geopolymer product, which method comprises the steps: (a) forming an activated geopolymer premix by addition to a geopolymer premix of an activator compound that initiates a condensation reaction in the geopolymer premix; (b) incorporating a gas generating agent in the activated geopolymer premix, such as aluminium… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Geopolymer concretes for energy storage applications26
2Friction material, in particular for the manufactu…20
3Nanozeolite-modified green concrete14
4一种玄武岩筋碱激发混凝土粘结性能的验证方法12
5Geopolymer concretes for energy storage applications10
6Geopolymer product10
7一种地聚合物砂浆与混凝土界面粘结性能的评估方法9
8一种基于分子动力学模拟的<sup>137</sup>Cs废水处理用地聚物吸附剂的构建方法7

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The competitive structure, lifecycle stage, and geographic distribution of this corpus point to specific leverage points and risk factors for organizations evaluating entry or expansion in geopolymer concrete modeling.

Maturity

Field is at plateau maturity following a 2019 peak

Annual filing volume has plateaued near the 2019 peak level, placing the field in a mature stage where incremental formulation refinements dominate over breakthrough filings. New entrants should expect to navigate a body of established prior art concentrated in C04B binder chemistry. Opportunities for differentiation are more likely to emerge in computational and simulation sub-classes than in core material composition claims.

Lifecycle: Mature
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a clear institutional leader

CSIRO holds the top position with 16 patent records, more than double the next-ranked filer (Catholic University of America at 8). The top five filers collectively represent 38% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output. This tier gap means that challenging the leader on breadth of coverage would require a sustained multi-year program, while niche differentiation in under-claimed IPC classes remains more accessible.

HHI: Moderate
Collaboration

Three active co-filing pairs anchor the collaboration network

The most active co-filing relationship is between Ecole Centrale de Lille and Storengy, with 6 joint patent records, reflecting a focused industrial-academic partnership in geopolymer well-cementing applications. IHI Corporation and IHI Construction Materials co-filed 3 records, indicating a vertically integrated Japanese manufacturer’s approach to shaping and product development. Carbon Craft Design and Indian Institute of Science collaborated on 2 records, connecting a Singapore-based material innovation firm with Indian academic expertise.

3 active pairs
Geography

India leads filings; China and the US are secondary markets

India accounts for the largest share of patent records at the jurisdiction level, followed by China and the United States. Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT) filings provide international coverage for select assets. The India-heavy distribution reflects active academic filing from institutions such as Indian Institute of Science, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, and numerous regional engineering colleges, rather than primarily commercial protection strategies.

Lead office: India
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Ecole Centrale de LilleStorengy6
IHI CorporationIHI Construction Materials Co., Ltd.3
Carbon Craft Design Pte LtdIndian Institute of Science2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards are grounded in lifecycle, collaboration, applicant ranking, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

CSIRO leads on breadth; Ecole Centrale de Lille and Storengy dominate the well-cementing route

The top two player cards represent the broadest coverage holder and the most active industrial-academic partnership, respectively. Both have distinct technology emphases that suggest limited direct overlap in claim territory.

Leader · COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG

COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG

CSIRO holds 16 patent records, the largest portfolio in the corpus, concentrated in C04B ceramics and cement subclasses covering geopolymer binder formulation and energy storage applications. The organization’s breadth across formulation, product definition, and application performance positions it as the foundational prior-art reference for any new entrant in this field. No recent momentum trend data is available for CSIRO in the evidence, so trajectory cannot be characterized.

patent records: 16
Challenger · ECOLE CENTRALE DE LILLE

ECOLE CENTRALE DE LILLE

Ecole Centrale de Lille holds 6 patent records and files jointly with Storengy (also 6 records), making the partnership effectively the second-largest combined force in the corpus. Their technology focus spans C04B28 binder chemistry, C09K8 oilfield materials, and E21B43 well completions, indicating a tightly scoped industrial application in subsurface cementing rather than broad geopolymer coverage. This specialization creates a defensible niche but limits exposure to broader construction modeling markets.

patent records: 6
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all filers including momentum trends and technology emphasis maps.
Catholic University of AmericaITT Italia Srl+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
IHI Corporation2▲ new entrant
IHI Construction Materials Co., Ltd.2▲ new entrant
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards draw on applicant ranking, technology focus, and collaboration evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring

Several IPC classes appear in the corpus at low record counts relative to the dominant C04B class. These observations indicate relative sparsity and should be assessed for technical relevance and entry feasibility before treating them as investment targets.

G06F · Electric digital data processing

With 10 patent records, G06F is the third-largest IPC class in the corpus but remains sparse relative to the core C04B domain. This class covers the computational and simulation methods — machine learning models, finite element analysis, and predictive performance tools — that sit at the heart of ‘modeling’ in geopolymer concrete modeling. Given the field’s stated focus on digital modeling, the low filing density here suggests that proprietary computational methods are either being kept as trade secrets, published openly, or simply not yet being aggressively patented. Organizations with simulation or AI capabilities targeting concrete performance prediction could find this a relatively open area to establish early positions.

Search this in Eureka →

B28B · Shaping clay and cement products

B28B appears at 6 patent records, largely associated with IHI Corporation and IHI Construction Materials’ recent new-entrant filings in shaping and product manufacturing. The adjacency between geopolymer formulation and additive manufacturing (B33Y also appears at 4 records, with Indian Institute of Technology Bombay active there) suggests that 3D-printed geopolymer concrete elements represent an emerging combination that remains thinly covered. An organization bridging geopolymer mix design models with additive manufacturing process parameters could occupy a currently sparse intersection of B28B and B33Y claims.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all sparse branches, filing-density heat maps, and claim-level gap analysis across the geopolymer concrete modeling corpus.
E21B · Earth and rock drilling (wells)G16C · Computational chemistry+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch cards are based on relative IPC record counts; sparsity does not confirm commercial opportunity without further freedom-to-operate analysis.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerC04B 28 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 14 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 111 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 18 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 12 · Ceramics, cement & refractories
Catholic University of AmericaStrong · 8Strong · 8Strong · 6Strong · 8Strong · 6
Hyssil Private LimitedStrong · 18Moderate · 7Emerging · 3AbsentAbsent
Carbon Craft Design Pte LtdStrong · 4Moderate · 1Moderate · 2Strong · 3Absent
ITT Italia SrlStrong · 5AbsentStrong · 4AbsentAbsent
IHI Construction Materials Co., Ltd.Strong · 3Strong · 2AbsentStrong · 3Moderate · 1
StorengyStrong · 6Moderate · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
Ecole Centrale de LilleStrong · 6Moderate · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own geopolymer concrete modeling landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.