Book a demo

Geopolymer Concrete Quality Control Patent Snapshot

Geopolymer Concrete Quality Control Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Geopolymer Concrete Quality Control Patent Snapshot in 2026

Patent activity in geopolymer concrete quality control is nascent, with only 8 patent families in scope and virtually all filings concentrated in 2023–2026. The field is highly fragmented among small firms, individual inventors, and academic institutions, with no single dominant route having yet established a commanding position.

8
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

PROTECTGD LLC leads a fragmented, early-stage field

PROTECTGD LLC holds the top position with 2 patent records, ahead of a group of eight other filers — including Huazhong University of Science and Technology, individual inventors, and several Indian academic institutions — each holding 1 patent record.

The top five filers collectively account for 60% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, a high concentration ratio given the extremely small corpus size; this reflects the field’s immaturity rather than entrenched incumbency.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1PROTECTGD LLC2
2HUAZHONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH1
3Suhail Ahmad Ahanger1
4Rayat Bahra University1
5Asif Hussain Shah1
6Vallurupalli Nageswara Rao Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology1
7Building Armour Industries LLC1
8Bahra University1
9Rayat Bahra Professional University Hoshiarpur1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions are thin: a single new filing by any actor could materially shift relative standing, which means first-mover advantages are not yet locked in and entry costs remain low.

Filings from 2025 onward are likely under-counted due to standard patent publication lag; the true recent activity level is probably higher than the corpus currently reflects. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity ignited after 2022; ceramics and cement IPC dominates the technology mix

The two charts below capture when filings began and which technical branches they cluster in — both are essential context for assessing where the field stands today.

Annual filing trend

No filings were recorded from 2017 through 2022; activity began in 2023 and accelerated through 2025. The 2025–2026 bars are subject to publication lag and almost certainly understate true recent volume.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2025.02017020180201902020020210202212023220244202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C04B (Ceramics, cement and refractories) is overwhelmingly visible with 7 patent records, confirming that quality control innovation is grounded in binder chemistry and mix formulation. Secondary branches — solid waste disposal (B09B), shaping processes (B28B), material analysis and testing (G01N), and AI-based computing (G06N) — each appear with only 1 patent record, signalling that sensing, process control, and data-driven QC remain largely unexplored in the patent literature.

Technology compositionC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories leads with 7; B09B · Solid waste disposal 1.C04B · Ceramics, cement …7B09B · Solid waste dispo…1B28B · Shaping clay & ce…1G01N · Material analysis…1G06N · Computing based o…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20260078055A1Published 2026-03-19

Method for manufacturing geopolymer concrete compo…

Protectgd LLC

This invention relates to a method for producing construction components from Geopolymer materials, primarily using fly ash, which can be partially or fully replaced by other materials such as metakaolin, zeolite, rice husk ash, red mud, or industrial by-products. The method involves preparing a mixture of fly ash or Geopolymer materials (80-99.75% by… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method for manufacturing geopolymer concrete compo… — patent drawingMethod for manufacturing geopolymer concrete compo… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Carbon-absorbing concrete and method of production3

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · PROTECTGD LLC

PROTECTGD LLC

PROTECTGD LLC holds 2 patent records — the highest count in this corpus — focused entirely within C04B (Ceramics, cement and refractories), covering formulation and performance characteristics. It entered as a new entrant with no prior-period filing history, so its current lead is recent and not yet consolidated. Its trajectory is described as a new entrant.

patent records: 2
Challenger · Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Huazhong University of Science and Technology holds 1 patent record, but its technical emphasis sets it apart: it is the only filer focusing on G01N (Material analysis and testing) subclasses, covering electrochemical and compositional sensing methods. This positions it as the sole patent actor approaching quality control from an analytical instrumentation angle. It also entered as a new entrant with no prior-period baseline.

patent records: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
PROTECTGD LLCHuazhong University of Science and Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.