Geopolymer Concrete Structural System Patent Landscape
Geopolymer Concrete Structural System Patent Landscape in 2026
The geopolymer concrete structural system patent space is in an early growth stage with 15 patent families in scope, dominated by Chinese academic and construction institutions alongside a small set of international entrants. The field is highly fragmented — no single applicant holds more than one patent record — and filing momentum has accelerated markedly in the most recent window, with China and India as the primary filing jurisdictions.
A fragmented, emerging field with no clear dominant player
Every applicant in the top-ranked cohort holds exactly one patent record, placing Zhengzhou University at the top of the ranking solely by virtue of alphabetical or index ordering among equals. The top five filers account for 25% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, reflecting extreme dispersion rather than concentration.
With no applicant holding more than a single patent record, there is no incumbent fortress to defend and no clear tier gap between leaders and challengers. The competitive structure is essentially flat — an unusual condition that signals the field is still being defined rather than consolidated.
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zhengzhou University | 1 | |
| 2 | Sunconomy LLC | 1 | |
| 3 | Jiangsu Shenghiheng Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. | 1 | |
| 4 | HALOK | 1 | |
| 5 | China Construction Fifth Engineering Division Corp., Ltd. | 1 | |
| 6 | Zicon Ltd. | 1 | |
| 7 | Dr. G. Kumaran | 1 | |
| 8 | Nanjing Metro Group Co., Ltd. | 1 | |
| 9 | Dr. R. Sivagamasundari | 1 | |
| 10 | Shanghai Yangtze River Delta Baoye Urban Construction Development Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Anhui University of Architecture | 1 | |
| 12 | Er. A. Sai Kumar | 1 | |
| 13 | Tongji University | 1 | |
| 14 | State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd. | 1 | |
| 15 | North China University of Science and Technology | 1 | |
| 16 | Easwari Engineering College | 1 | |
| 17 | Hunan CSCEC Fifth Bureau Green Municipal Engineering Research Center Co., Ltd. | 1 | |
| 18 | Guangdong Construction Vocational Technology Institute | 1 | |
| 19 | State Grid Fujian Electric Power Economic and Technology Research Institute | 1 | |
| 20 | SRM INST OF SCI & TECH (RAMAPURAM CAMPUS) | 1 |
For R&D teams, the flat structure implies that a focused filing program of even modest scale could establish measurable leadership. The absence of entrenched portfolios also reduces freedom-to-operate risk relative to more mature construction materials domains.
Patent counts for 2024 and 2025 are understated due to publication lag; the apparent plateau in those years should not be read as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
Accelerating filings and a building-structure-dominated technology mix
Two dimensions define the current state of the field: a filing curve that has moved sharply upward since 2020, and a technology composition where structural building applications dominate while adjacent branches remain sparsely covered.
Annual filing trend
Activity was negligible through 2018, began forming with isolated filings in 2019–2021, and then surged to six patent records in 2024 — the single largest annual cohort on record. The 60% recent-window growth rate confirms the upward trajectory. The 2025 and 2026 counts are substantially understated due to publication lag and should be treated as lower bounds.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
E04B (Building structures and elements) is the dominant IPC class, followed by C04B (Ceramics, cement and refractories) and E04C (Structural building components). More specialized branches — including B33Y (additive manufacturing / 3D printing), E01D (bridges), E02D (foundations), and F16L (pipes) — each carry only a single patent record, indicating that structural system integration at the building scale has attracted the most attention while application-specific and process-oriented branches remain underdeveloped.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Building panel
The present invention relates to a building panel. The building panel includes a core including first geopolymer concrete. One or more protective layers are located adjacent the core. Each protective layer includes second geopolymer concrete of greater density than the first geopolymer concrete. In one embodiment, passages are defined along which air can… (excerpt from the patent abstract)


| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Method and system for 3D printing a concrete struc… | 16 |
| 2 | 钢管混凝土柱及其施工方法 | 3 |
| 3 | 一种混杂纤维增强超高性能地聚物混凝土及其制备方法和应用 | 2 |
| 4 | Building panel | 2 |
| 5 | 一种地聚物泡沫混凝土结构的保温板 | 1 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the structure means for R&D investment decisions
The combination of early growth stage, flat competitive hierarchy, and sparse adjacent branches creates both opportunity and uncertainty. The cards below distil the key strategic signals.
Early Growth — filings rising from a near-zero base
The lifecycle stage is confirmed as Growth, with annual filings still rising and the most recent years understated by publication lag. The field moved from zero activity before 2019 to its highest annual count in 2024. This early positioning means that core claims on structural configurations, mix-design integration, and connection detailing are still largely available for capture.
Growth stageMaximum fragmentation — every ranked applicant holds one patent record
The top five filers hold 25% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, but given that all applicants in the visible ranking are tied at one patent record each, this reflects the ceiling on individual share at this corpus size rather than a genuine concentration signal. No applicant has yet assembled a blocking portfolio. A team filing three to five related patents would immediately become a statistical leader.
Fragmented fieldThree co-filing pairs active, all within China
Three collaboration pairs are evidenced: Hunan CSCEC Fifth Bureau Green Municipal Engineering Research Center with China Construction Fifth Engineering Division Corp; Jiangsu Shenghiheng Environmental Technology with Nanjing Metro Group; and State Grid Fujian Electric Power Economic Research Institute with State Grid Fujian Electric Power. Each pairing links a research or engineering subsidiary to an operational parent or infrastructure operator, suggesting that practical deployment testing is driving joint filings rather than pure research interest.
Domestic co-filingChina leads; India is the only other meaningful jurisdiction
China accounts for nine patent records and India for five, with a single filing each in the United States and via WIPO PCT. The near-absence of PCT filings indicates that most applicants are not yet seeking international protection, leaving non-Chinese and non-Indian markets largely uncontested. For teams seeking global freedom-to-operate or first-mover protection in Europe, Southeast Asia, or the Gulf region, the window to file without encountering prior art is still open.
China + India dominantGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
| Applicant | Collaborator | Co-filings |
|---|---|---|
| Hunan CSCEC Fifth Bureau Green Municipal Engineering Research Center Co., Ltd. | China Construction Fifth Engineering Division Corp., Ltd. | 1 |
| Jiangsu Shenghiheng Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. | Nanjing Metro Group Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| State Grid Fujian Electric Power Economic and Technology Research Institute | State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd. | 1 |
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
A flat field — universities and state-owned enterprises share the front rank
All ranked applicants hold exactly one patent record. The following two profiles represent the diversity of player types: an academic institution focused on building structures, and a construction conglomerate subsidiary bridging research and site deployment.
Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou University holds one patent record focused on E04B 1 (building structures and elements), placing it at the top of the applicant index. Its momentum trend is marked as a new entrant, indicating its filing activity falls entirely within the recent window. As a Chinese research university with civil engineering capabilities, it is positioned to expand claims into mix-design and structural detailing as the field matures.
patent records: 1CSCEC Fifth Bureau Green Municipal Research Center
This subsidiary of China Construction Fifth Engineering Division Corp holds one patent record spanning C04B 28 (cement and refractories), E04B 1 (building structures), and E04H 1 (specialized buildings), and files jointly with its parent company. Its trend is also new entrant. The cross-disciplinary coverage — materials, structures, and specialized construction — and the parent-subsidiary co-filing model suggest an intent to protect integrated system solutions rather than isolated components.
patent records: 1| Applicant | Recent (3 yrs) | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Zhengzhou University | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| Hunan CSCEC Fifth Bureau Green Municipal Engineering Research Center Co., Ltd. | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| Jiangsu Shenghiheng Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| Anhui University of Architecture | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| State Grid Fujian Electric Power Economic and Technology Research Institute | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd. | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| Nanjing Metro Group Co., Ltd. | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant structural core
Several IPC branches appear in the corpus but carry very low patent-record counts relative to the dominant E04B cluster. Two stand out as worth monitoring for teams considering lateral moves.
B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing) for geopolymer structures
B33Y holds only one patent record in this corpus — a 2% share among the branches observed — despite the most-cited document in the dataset being a method and system for 3D printing a concrete structure, which carries 16 forward citations. This citation weight on a single document suggests that 3D-printed geopolymer structural elements are technically viable and of interest to the broader community, yet dedicated patent coverage is nearly absent. Teams with expertise in extrusion-based concrete printing or robotic placement could enter this branch with minimal prior-art friction and claim core process-structure combinations.
Search this in Eureka →E01D · Bridges using geopolymer concrete systems
Bridge applications (E01D) carry only one patent record in scope, a 2% share, even though geopolymer concrete’s durability and lower embodied carbon relative to Portland cement concrete are frequently cited as reasons for infrastructure adoption. The branch has clear technical value — bridge decks, girders, and abutments are high-load structural elements where alkali-activated binders offer measurable lifecycle advantages — and no incumbent appears to hold blocking claims. A realistic entry path involves filing on specific connection details, reinforcement integration, or accelerated curing protocols adapted for bridge geometry.
Search this in Eureka →How applicants differ by technology route
Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.
| Player | E04B 1 · Building structures & elements | C04B 28 · Ceramics, cement & refractories | C04B 14 · Ceramics, cement & refractories | C04B 18 · Ceramics, cement & refractories | E04C 2 · Structural building components |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tongji University | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Absent |
| Easwari Engineering College | Absent | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Absent |
| SRM Institute of Science and Technology (Ramapuram Campus) | Absent | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Absent |
| State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd. | Absent | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Absent |
| State Grid Fujian Electric Power Economic and Technology Research Institute | Absent | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Absent |
| Dr. G. Kumaran | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| Dr. R. Sivagamasundari | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Absent | Absent | Absent |
Frequently asked questions
The current evidence covers 15 patent families in scope. This is a small corpus consistent with an early-growth field where systematic patenting has only recently begun, with the first filings appearing in 2019.
Zhengzhou University appears at the top of the applicant ranking, but every applicant in the ranked cohort holds exactly one patent record. There is no meaningful gap between any two players at this stage of the field’s development.
China accounts for nine patent records and India for five. The United States and WIPO (PCT) each have one filing. European and Southeast Asian jurisdictions are not yet represented in the evidence, leaving those markets without incumbent prior art.
The lifecycle stage is Growth. Annual filings rose from zero before 2019 to a peak of six patent records in 2024, representing 60% growth in the recent window. The 2025 and 2026 counts are understated due to publication lag and should be treated as lower bounds rather than evidence of a slowdown.
The most-cited document in the dataset is a method and system for 3D printing a concrete structure, which has accumulated 16 forward citations — by far the highest citation weight in the corpus. The next most-cited documents each carry three or fewer citations, indicating that 3D printing integration is the primary reference point for subsequent inventors in this field.
The sparsest branches in the corpus are B33Y (additive manufacturing / 3D printing) and E01D (bridges), each with one patent record. G01M (structural testing) and G01N (material analysis and testing) each have two patent records. Given the high citation count on the existing 3D-printing document, the B33Y branch appears to have both technical relevance and minimal incumbent coverage, making it a plausible focus for new filings.
Ready to map your own geopolymer concrete patent landscape?
Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.